validation, ultimately influencing their progress towardgraduation and career choices (Bryson & Housh, 2023; Santa-Ramirez, 2022; Wilkins-Yel et al.,2022). Altogether, the vast and lasting effect of faculty advising on their graduate students'overall educational experience and success suggests that it is an area where servingness might beboth cultivated and prioritized at HSIs.While the focus on measurable performance outcomes such as persistence and graduation ratesare both relevant and informative, other non-academic dimensions of the graduate studentexperience also deserve attention. Master’s and Doctoral students’ non-academic outcomes, suchas their sense of belonging in their institution or discipline, have also been shown to beresponsive
support, mentoring, and resources, studentscan excel in STEM fields regardless of their pre-college preparation or background [5].Summer Bridge Program: Among the interventions, Summer Bridge Programs (SBPs) haveproven especially impactful in enhancing STEM career aspirations across diverse studentdemographics, including race, gender, and first-generation status [6, 7]. Traditional SBPs primarilyfocus on pre-college preparation, exposing students to the academic rigor of college-level mathand science while improving their preparedness [8, 9]. In contrast, the CURE project’s SBPspecifically targets Statics and Mechanics of Materials—two foundational courses in engineeringeducation that heavily influence retention and long-term success [10].These
students would beblock scheduled typically by an administrative assistant based on test scores and placement tests,and then the faculty advisor would meet with the student once a semester for the rest of thestudent’s academic career to advisee the student on the next semesters courses. This is a fairlystandard model that is used at many different institutions and is one that allows for one on onepersonal interactions with the student and minimizes the workload on the faculty advisor.However, in order to address the issues of mechanical engineering student retention, recruitment,and the initial math placement of these students the new active and structured advising modelwas created as seen in Fig. 1. The structured advising model integrates
members, and introduced the NSFADVANCE award initiatives and determined main concerns raised by faculty which determinedtopics that were discussed in Facilitated Peer Mentor Circles. The Facilitated Peer MentorCircles program was an adaptation from other universities (Gilfoyle et al., 2011; Thomas et al.,2015; Li et al., 2023). A novel adaptation was the hiring of a Faculty Development Coordinator(FDC) to facilitate all circles to: (1) Top-down support and commitment for continuity; (2)Creating psychological safety through respect for everyone and confidentiality; (3)Responsiveness to individual career needs/paths; (4) Seeking input to tailor offerings for success;and (5) Collecting feedback/offering aggregated, bottoms-up input to
program that delivers high qualityeducation at an affordable price, and some students suggested shorter, topic-focused videos, moreproject-based learning, and fewer exams. They would like the program to be customizable to theircareer needs, with some expressing a preference for self-paced programs.Flexibility in scheduling, such as the ability to pause classes when they are busy and resume themlater, was noted as important. Additionally, students wanted timely support from professors andclarity about breaks between sessions. Some students are already satisfied with the existingcustomization and accessibility of the program and indicate that personal factors, like career goalsand financial support, will influence their decisions more than the
Paper ID #45968Engagement in Practice: A Case Study in Construction Engineering PracticumCourse at University ”X”Dr. Ronald W. Welch, The Citadel Ron Welch (P.E.) received his B.S. degree in Engineering Mechanics from the United States Military Academy in 1982. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana in 1990 and 1999, respectively. He taught at The United States Military Academy during his 25 year military career. After retiring form the military he has taught at the University of Texas at Tyler and The Citadel, where he was the Dean of Engineering for
combining the information they have to form perceptions of each major.Using these perceptions and their own desires for their future career, students then select anengineering major.Universities use different types of matriculation processes for students to enter a major, such asdirect matriculation into a major or a common first-year program with an application to a major.Additionally, not all universities use the same type of engineering major application process,where students may be automatically accepted by meeting certain criteria, applying to individualmajors separately, or even applying through a common application across all engineering majors.Because these processes differ, students traversing them may need supported in different ways
to teaching, someheld administrative or curricular leadership roles within their departments. All professors showeda strong commitment to addressing systemic challenges related to the research-over-teachingculture of their institution and to participating in CoPs to address critical problems they identifiedin the courses they taught. Their varied yet overlapping identities and career paths provided anuanced view of how CoPs can foster innovation, mentorship, and professional development inresearch-intensive contexts.We collected data from multiple sources for this study: semi-structured interviews via an onlinevideo (8–10 pages transcripts) used as the primary data source and artifacts related to their TIPparticipation. Semi-structured
experiences.Dr. Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University Dr. Elif Miskioglu is an early-career engineering education scholar and educator. She holds a B.S. ˘ in Chemical Engineering (with Genetics minor) from Iowa State University, and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Ohio State University. Her early Ph.D. work focused on the development of bacterial biosensors capable of screening pesticides for specifically targeting the malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles gambiae. As a result, her diverse background also includes experience in infectious disease and epidemiology, providing crucial exposure to the broader context of engineering problems and their subsequent solutions. These diverse experiences and a growing passion
students reported, both through surveys and verbally, the importance ofinviting alumni speakers. In one-on-one meetings with mentors and group interviews, scholarsemphasized the value of academic advisement, mentorship, and role models. This papersummarizes, utilizing quantitative and qualitative data, various aspects of the program and keyfindings of the project that have proven effective for student retention and academic success.A qualitative study conducted through semi-structured interviews and focus groups with scholarsrevealed the program’s multidimensional support. Scholars appreciated the financial assistance,academic guidance, and supportive STEM community. The program gave scholars opportunitiesto apprentice for future STEM careers
to support initiatives in STEM and changes to policies and practices of global engineering organizations. Dr. Pearson is an HBCU alumna, earning both her B.S. and M.S. degrees from Southern University A&M College and serving on the Civil and Environmental Engineering faculty there for the first 12 years of her career. Since 2019, she has collaborated on ˜$8M in research projects with HBCU partners. Part of her research portfolio includes studies of partnerships, specifically the effectiveness of multi-sector, multi-team systems (MTS). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Paper ID
Paper ID #47862BOARD # 402: NSF EDA-Eng Diversity Activities: *** Asset Driven EquitablePartnerships (ADEP) Workshops – Sharing What Works (WIP)Dr. Kenneth A Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Kenneth Connor is Program Officer at the Inclusive Engineering Consortium (IEC), whose mission is to enable MSI ECE programs to produce more and better prepared graduates from groups that have been historically underrepresented in ECE careers. He is also an emeritus professor in the Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering (ECSE) at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) where he taught courses on
committed to becoming an engineer, as seen in her interview response;elsewhere in her interviews, she expresses strong engineering identity in terms of interest andcompetence, which seems to create a very positive global affect towards engineering. Thispositive engineering affect outweighs her less positive affect towards mathematics in herdecision to remain in the major. Noelle’s case shows a more moderate case of a student persistingin the major: after switching into engineering later in her college career rather than beginning asa first-year student, her global affect towards engineering is not as positive as Hope’s. Still, herpositive affective pathway through an engineering design project gives us indications of why shepersists: elsewhere in
, an extra Friday session in theirEngineering classes, and weekly lunches each to build community within the students. Thesupplemental instruction in the first year was targeted towards the engineering and math coursesthat all students were taking. Although the program continues career development, socialsupport, and financial assistance into the sophomore year, the supplemental instruction and extraFriday engineering sessions were phased out as students segregated among seven engineeringdisciplines.The SSP program has resulted in a statistically significant increase in exam performance in first-year engineering and mathematics classes and a much higher success rate of completing the finalfirst-year engineering and math course by the end of
2024, Dr. McCall received a National Science Foundation CAREER grant to identify systemic opportunities for increasing the participation of people with disabilities in engineering. Her award-winning publications have been recognized by leading engineering education research journals at both national and international levels. Dr. McCall has led several workshops promoting the inclusion of people with disabilities and other minoritized groups in STEM. She holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in civil engineering with a structural engineering emphasis.Dr. Stephen Secules, Florida International University Dr. Stephen Secules is an Assistant Professor in the School of Universal Computing, Construction, and Engineering Education
positions. After two yearsof working as engineers and completing technical, design, and professionalism credits, studentsgraduate with a B.S. in Engineering. Participants in this study are a part of the IRE STEMScholars program, which helps financially support low-income, high achieving students for theirBell Academy semester, and provides additional mentorship and career development supportresources through to graduation. This program supports a diverse population of individuals ontheir pathway to graduation, with a range of backgrounds and experiences [1].This work will notfocus solely on low-income experiences, but rather the more nuanced identities and experiencesof the students [2].Engineering Identity and BelongingEngineering identity is
advanced technology in Engineering Education Research (EER).Dr. Medha Dalal, Arizona State University Dr. Medha Dalal is an assistant research professor and associate director of scholarly initiatives in the Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Her career as an engineering education researcher focuses on addressing complex engineering education challenges by building capacity for stakeholders at the grassroots, while also informing policy. Her research seeks to transform and democratize engineering education by exploring ways of thinking, identifying effective professional development approaches, and uncovering pedagogical techniques to enhance students’ engineering curiosity, engagement, and
students to use design thinking to advance their research,translation, and career goals, and (iv) demonstrate that an innovation mindset can fuel basicresearch as well as translation and innovation activities. This Work in Progress paper describesour novel implementation approaches and early indicators of trainee engagement and success.Our approach to delivering the Impact Training revolves around central tenets of early andcontinuous engagement applied using a “just-in-time” model. In this just in time approach,trainees learn concepts immediately before they must be deployed to accomplish authentic,meaningful tasks [1], [2]. Examples include workshops on scientific talks and poster design justbefore a key regional or national conference, or
andpracticality. The HVAC/Energy sector is experiencing rapid growth due to increasing climateawareness and the drive for decarbonization. This trend, combined with a nationwide shortageof HVAC/Energy technicians, has brought increased attention to the program. The program'sability to adapt and serve students with diverse backgrounds has contributed to improvedenrollment. However, maintaining student engagement and ensuring the comprehensivedelivery of all SLOs remain ongoing challenges. Future initiatives under consideration by STCC faculty and staff include a comprehensivementoring program. Each student would be assigned a dedicated mentor throughout theiracademic journey and beyond graduation for career guidance. Mentoring has been
Purdue University and is currently pursuing her Master’s degree in Aeronautics and Astronautics, for which her research focuses on fracture mechanics models for composite materials. She hopes to pursue a career in developing cutting-edge composite materials for aerospace applications. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Understanding Participant Engagement in a Large-Scale Mentoring Program for Women Undergraduate Engineering StudentsAbstractThere is a lack of representation of women in engineering throughout all academic levels, with lessthan 30% of women earning bachelor’s degrees, and in the workforce, where less than 20% ofworking
Arboleda, University of Miami Diana Arboleda, PhD, is a structural engineering Lecturer at the University of Miami, Florida. She re- ceived her B.S. in Computer Engineering from the University of Miami in 1988 and after a full career as a software engineer in corporate America she returDr. Aaron Heller, University of Miami Aaron Heller is a clinical psychologist and an Associate Professor of Psychology at the University of Miami having received a B.A. in Psychology from UC Berkeley and a Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology from the University of Wisconsin – Madison. His work focuses on understanding the relevance of real-world, naturalistic mood dynamics to psychiatric disease and psychological wellbeing.Ali Ghahremaninezhad
contribute to the change in their career path or them droppingout before earning their degree; and (2) identify the actions that can be taken by educationalinstitutions to increase undergraduate STEM student’s enrollment and retention while decreasingattrition. To achieve these objectives, this study: (1) identified the main factors contributing tothese problems of utmost importance to academia from previous literature; (2) collected andanalyzed enrollment and retention data from Florida International University (FIU), one of thelargest minority serving institutions in the United States; and (3) identified strategies and bestpractices aimed at addressing these paramount difficulties within undergraduate educationthrough literature review. The data
such, participating in researchexperiences provides hands-on training that can help students in their later careers. Despite thebenefits of participating in research, not all students have the time or opportunity to experienceworking in a research lab during their undergraduate careers. In comparison, all students willparticipate in classes as part of their engineering majors, and thus it is important to alsounderstand how class experiences may impact student curiosity and learning. In the current study, we utilized a qualitative interview and survey to investigateundergraduate engineering students’ experiences with curiosity in class and research settings. Wealso interviewed faculty who work with undergraduates in both settings to
, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education focuses oneducating future generations to be successful in their professions. A decline in STEMproficiency has been reported in America, leading to significant regression from its position asa global leader in math and science. Debbie Myers, general manager of DiscoveryCommunications in STEM Diversity Symposium concluded: "International comparisons placethe U.S. in the middle of the pack globally." For the United States to achieve a competitiveadvantage, there is a need to encourage young people to develop a passion for learning andspecifically encourage minorities and females to pursue STEM careers [1]. Another report named "Rising above the Gathering Storm" indicated that the U.S. is
pursuing faculty teaching careers Provide faculty with resources to support Faculty development and diversity inclusive learning environmentIn recognition of these efforts, GVSU was one of only three universities to receive both the Sealof Excelencia and ASEE Deans Program Award. In addition, GVSU is a Higher EducationExcellence in Diversity (HEED) recipient, Michigan Minority Supplier Development Council’sCorporate ONE award recipient, and was also named as a Role Model Institution by MinorityAccess Inc.College EffortsThe Padnos College of Engineering and Computing (PCEC) has about 2,200 undergraduate andgraduate students, of which
servant leader, equity advocate, and researcher with experience across the non-profit, public, and private sectors. Upon completion of her Bachelor of Arts degree in International Development Studies at UCLA, she began a successful career in banking and finance at Bank of America, Merrill Lynch. Driven to pursue a career in public service, she completed her MPA at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, and MBA at Cornell Tech. She was a leadership fellow in the Southern California Leadership Network’s Leadership LA program and recently completed her Diversity and Inclusion Certificate from eCornell. Currently, she is completing her doctoral studies at the USC Price School of Public Policy where she is a
, Directorate for STEM Education, National Science Foundation.John Skvoretz Jr., University of Florida John Skvoretz is Distinguished University Professor in the Department of Sociology & Interdisciplinary Social Sciences and, by courtesy, Distinguished University Professor in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at the University of South Florida. A Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and a recipient of the James Coleman Distinguished Career Award from the Mathematical Sociology Section of the American Sociological Association, his current research projects analyze social network data from various sources.Dr. Rebecca Campbell-Montalvo, University of Connecticut Dr. Rebecca
of their findings and describe how their conclusions may be applied to real-world engineering challenges with bioadhesives. Team-based discussions were included in theactivity as an equitable and inclusive way to promote student learning [37,38]. After thesesummaries, instructors prompted the entire group with questions relating directly to the results oftheir activity (e.g., Which adhesive was stronger? Why?) and more open-ended questions thatchallenged students to think about real-world applications of bioadhesives. After the guideddiscussion, students were encouraged to ask any questions they had about the activity,bioadhesives, and careers in STEM. To conclude the module, students were given a post-test andpost-survey to assess learning
. She primarily teaches thermal-fluid sciences as well as introductory and advanced design courses.Amelia Elizabeth Cook, Lipscomb University Amelia Cook is an undergraduate student in the Raymond B. Jones College of Engineering at Lipscomb University. Amelia is studying mechanical engineering and, following her graduation, will be starting her career in engineering consulting as an EIT. She is currently researching the connections of humanitarian engineering projects affecting views of diversity, inclusion, equity, and professional development.Lewis Ngwenya, Lipscomb University Lewis Ngwenya is an undergraduate student at Lipscomb University. He is studying electrical and com- puter engineering and plans to get some
representationof women in science (62%) while Argentina has 52%, Chile trails with 30% [2].STEM disciplines mirrors this underrepresentation, with areas such as computer science, physics andmathematics the least represented by women [1]. Factors that influence career selection in STEMdisciplines are deep-rooted gender stereotypes in Latin America, reflected both at family and societallevel [4], [5], [6]. Many countries and / or universities have yet to incorporategender equality as policy.Various initiatives are being developed that focus on promoting equality and empowerment of women(UN and UNESCO) [1] [2] The European W-STEM project coordinated by a research group operatingout of a university in Barranquilla, Colombia, has focused on three relevant