Engineering Technology, and a Bachelor of Science in EngineeringTechnology with a Concentration in Applied Systems Technology[1]. Given the relationship ofthese programs, their faculty frequently collaborate, providing a better educational experience tothe students enrolled in their programs. The work presented in this paper was a collaborationbetween the BSE Mechanical Concentration Faculty, Dr. Joseph Tang, and the BS EngineeringTechnology Faculty, Dr. Nelson Granda Marulanda, and Mr. Tom Spendlove.In summer 2021, two units of the MF102D-H Double-Station Hydraulic Training Simulator(figure 1) were acquired from the Fluid Power Trainer Institute (FPTI) in Salt Lake City,Utah[2]. The targeted student population for this equipment are the students in
Paper ID #37998Work in Progress: How Women Develop Their Leadershipwithout Men: Women Engineering Students’ LeadershipDevelopment in Homogeneous Women GroupsJohn Jongho Park (Assistant research professor) (Pennsylvania StateUniversity)Dena Lang (Associate Director of Engineering Leadership Research)(Pennsylvania State University) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comASEE 2022 1 Work in Progress: How Women Develop Their Leadership without Men: Women Engineering Students’ Leadership
ConductingResearch with University IndigenousCommunities FEBRUARY 2023 1 A d v e r tis in g c o m p any LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I want to acknowledge and thank the Tutelo/Monacan people, who are the traditional custodians of the land on which I work and live, and recognize their continuing
following practices employees use in job crafting,(1) changing task boundaries, (2) changing cognitive task boundaries, and (3) changing relationalboundaries. Changing task boundaries is a job crafting technique where employees alter eitherthe type of task or the number of tasks at work. Employees alter their perspectives, thoughts, orbeliefs about their job when they change the cognitive task boundaries of their job. Further,employees change the relational boundaries of their jobs when they alter the nature of theirrelationships with others in a helpful way. The job crafting model has connections with jobdesign, meaning of work and social identity theories [10]. Recently, [15] leveraged the jobcrafting model conceptualized by Wrzesniewski and
and grow capable and self-sufficient engineering professionals [1, 2]. Engineering educators have been reported to even gobeyond known techniques of experiential learning where they continue to seek pioneering andcaptivating experiential learning experiences to implement and to help students understandengineering concepts, simultaneously, while mastering related skills [1, 3, 4, 5]. In MechanicalEngineering, thermal-fluid courses are excellent candidates for the incorporation of experientiallearning to facilitate understanding of complex concepts through real tangible activities which canbe experienced by normal human senses like feeling heat from temperature increases or seeing fluidmotion and effects. Some commercial entities have emerged
leadership studies field. Third, the methods of the research were categorized as qualitative(12), quantitative (12), and theoretical (3). Finally, the ways in which the literature used identityto address the research was organized into three categories: 1. Grounded in Identity, research that is based on an identity framework (11 sources); 2. Identity as Lens, research that interpreted results using identity theory, even if the overall research approach was not based on identity (12 sources); and 3. Identity Tangential, research that is not explicitly identity-based but meaningfully contributes to this research, nonetheless (4 sources). 8 6 4 2 0
andmeetings. In addition to providing a road map for instructors to form a similar working group attheir institution, we will share knowledge gained, commonalities across course types, and asummary of answers to the questions that inspired the formation of this CoP.IntroductionLaboratory experiences are a form of experiential learning and a common component ofundergraduate STEM education. These courses have the potential to provide valuableexperiences for students, who benefit by connecting the theories learned in lectures to practice inthe laboratory [1], [2]. In the laboratory, students also have opportunities to develop skills andgain experience with design, problem solving, and exposure to real-world issues that are notusually present in
Engineering Launch aims to improvestudents’ math preparation in Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II, and Trigonometry, and bridge theperceived gaps in math preparation to get students ready for Calculus I.Many universities around the country have implemented similar remedial programs. There aretwo common approaches. One is a workshop-style course, which typically requires weekly classtime in addition to regular lectures [1]. The other one, which is a more common approach, is tooffer a bridge course before the semester starts, with duration from one-week long [2] to severalweeks [3-5]. For example, Cancado, Reisel, and Walker [3] examined the impact of a 4-weeksummer residential bridge program on engineering student retention. Students with low
mathematics). In addition to encouraging retention and academic success inrigorous disciplines, summer bridge programs have a variety of goals related to academics, socialengagement, culture, and identity formation. A review spanning 25 years of literature on summerbridge programs identified 14 different types of goals and classified them into 3 broadcategories: 1) academic goals success such as enhancement of student knowledge of material andincreased graduation rate, 2) psychosocial goals such as improved sense of belonging and self-efficacy, and 3) department-level goals such as increasing recruitment into a specific disciplineand enhancing diversity [1]. The review also drew attention to the importance of starting withprogrammatic goals and
in small universities that mightbe thought to have less need for the community development an LLC provides.IntroductionLiving-Learning Communities (LLCs), in which students live together in a dormitory or otherresidence while participating in common courses and/or co-curricular activities, have been toutedas a high-impact educational practice [1]. LLCs can be organized around particular majors suchas engineering, identity characteristics such as gender or ethnicity, or interdisciplinary themessuch as sustainability. Over one hundred universities have established Engineering-based LLCsover the past four decades [2], [3], and studies have shown that they can improve short-termmeasures of student success such as engagement, first-year academic
engineering students to enhance their academic success and transition them into a career in STEM. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com STEMpathy as Key to Inclusivity in Engineering EducationEngineering education has a problem. At a time when greater numbers of increasingly diverseengineers are needed [1] and are indeed successfully being recruited into STEM (science,technology, engineering and mathematics) career pathways [2], [3], [4], too many students arestill being lost at startlingly high rates, especially those from groups traditionallyunderrepresented in engineering. In their national multimethod Talking About Leaving study
launch speed is 6.1 km/s, how fast is it moving at the peak of its trajectory? - Problem from one of the authors’ first year engineering student’s Physics homework [1]If your background is engineering, you are also likely to have seen problems like the one abovein classes that you have taken.If you are unsettled by problems that engineering studentsencounter that lack any reflection on the inherent moral implications, such as the one above, weencourage you to read on as we relate our efforts to contribute to the struggle for social justice inengineering. If you are not troubled with problems like the one above, then you may not findvalue in reading any further. Then again, perhaps you could benefit from learning aboutSolidarity
social justice and equity.Students also demonstrated high levels of understanding of the ubiquity of coding skills andapplications. Taken together, program evaluation results show that this integration of themes iseffective in engaging students in difficult conversations about race while building interest incomputing.Keywords: Computing, education, equity, EarSketch, student engagement, STEAM, hip hoppedagogy, K-12Introduction:Computational thinking has become ubiquitous across many technical and creative disciplines [1].According to a 2021 report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, employment in computer andinformation technology occupations is projected to grow 13 percent from 2020 to 2030, addingabout 667,600 new jobs [2]. Diversity within
expertise. Invention Education and Youth Impacts Invention Education refers to the “deliberate efforts to teach people how to approachproblem finding and problem-solving in ways that reflect the process and practices employed byaccomplished inventors” (Couch et al., 2019, p. 1). The Lemelson Foundation (2020) notescommon traits of inventors to include empathy, creativity, curiosity, resilience, calculated risk-taking, passion, resourcefulness, and a tolerance for ambiguity and complexity. To broadly tiethese traits to IvE programs, A Framework for Invention Education (Lemelson, 2020) wascreated with adoption of six key tenets: 1. Context: Invention is the result of an ongoing creative process. 2. Empathy
identity has been variously explored within engineeringeducation research. The literature has examined the influence of identity on student retention [1],[2], interrogated the gendered nature of engineering identity formation [3], [4], andconceptualized leadership identity development within engineering education [5]. In recent years,we have seen increasing attention on the need to incorporate leadership development as part ofengineering education and to recognize engineering as a leadership profession [6]–[8].Accordingly, engineering leadership identity, for its assumed relationship with the practice anddevelopment of leadership, has been a recent focus within engineering education research [9]–[11].Through this study, we contribute to the
of culture in communication. Then, during the training, studentswere introduced to topics such as: (1) key concepts of race, culture, and ethnicity; (2) identifydifferences between diversity, inclusion, and equity; (3) concepts of unconscious biases and theirimpact on people; and (4) concepts of microaggression. After the training, all the students whoparticipated in the training completed the post-course survey as well. The pre-survey resultsindicated that more than 50 percent of students are not familiar with the concepts of unconsciousbiases. The results of the McNemar test indicated that guided training related to unconsciousbiases significantly improves students' understanding of systemic racism and ways to addresssocial sustainability
variation of natural frequency with stiffness; andto familiarize students with advanced applications in structural health monitoring.The experiment is tied to one important application in the structural health monitoring of bridges.The theoretical natural frequency of a bridge is of the form of equation 1 kω= (1) mwhere k is the stiffness and m is mass. As the structural condition of the bridge deteriorates withtime, its stiffness decreases while mass remains constant. Even if mass were to change, forexample due to an overlay, it can easily be quantified. Therefore, it follows that if the naturalfrequency is measured annually, the
ten years, leadership has gained attention as a necessary skill for graduatingengineering students. This is exemplified by the increasing numbers of engineering leadershipdevelopment programs [1], the addition of a leadership development division within theAmerican Society for Engineering Education in 2014 [2], and the inclusion of leadership in therevised ABET Criterion 3 outcomes [3]. Rationale for this influx of engineering leadershipdevelopment educational opportunities includes calls from industry, the National ResearchCouncil [4] and professional engineering societies such as the American Society of MechanicalEngineers [5] and the National Society of Professional Engineers [6]. These organizationsacknowledge the increasing complexity of
of the post-COVID hybridclasses compared to pre-COVID face-to-face classes. Generic student evaluations showed a markedimprovement, likely indicating that students enjoyed the new structure, including labs. Also, studentshad to write free form lab reports and their communication skills improved markedly as the semesterprogressed. I. IntroductionExperiential learning, that is, laboratories, internships, service learning, etc., are valuable experiencesthat improve student learning, motivation, and success, including engineering students [1], [2], [6], [5].Due to the recognized value of labs, major science teaching societies publish position statementssupporting labs in instruction [8], [9]. However, the valuable lab learning experience is
Engineers in Leadership Participation in engineering for Black students has been stagnantly low for several yearsnow [1], despite the heightened attention towards diversity and inclusion in the field. One areawhere this trend is especially prevalent is within engineering leadership. When you think ofBlack leaders, do any Black engineering leaders come to mind? There has been a recent uptick inCEOs with engineering backgrounds, such as Amazon's Jeff Bezos, Apple's Tim Cook, andAlphabet's Larry Page. In 2009, Ursula Burns became the first Black woman engineer CEO of aFortune 500 company when she took on the role with IBM. However, when she left her positionin 2016, she left a void of Black engineers occupying the C-suite of major companies
Opportunities to Orient Students in their Transition) onboarding bootcamp forincoming and transfer students in the College of Engineering and Computer Science (CECS) atThe University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (UTRGV), a predominantly Hispanic ServingInstitution (HSI) and one of the newest universities in the state of Texas and the United States.I.1 UTRGV BackgroundUTRGV consolidates the former University of Texas-Pan American (UTPA) with the Universityof Texas at Brownsville (UTB) and is now the second largest federally certified HSI of highereducation in the United States, with a student population of more than 32,000, almost of 90% ofwhom are Hispanic, mainly Mexican American due to the region’s proximity to Mexico. Statisticaldata defines UTRGV as
. Finally, recommendations for other institutionsseeking to launch or refine similar programming are shared.Background: The Urban STEM CollaboratoryThe Summer Bridge programs described take place at three public urban research universitiesparticipating in an NSF S-STEM project called the Urban STEM Collaboratory [1]. The purposeof the Urban STEM Collaboratory is to award scholarships of up to $10,000 per year toacademically talented students majoring in engineering or mathematics who have financialneed. Students receiving this S-STEM scholarship are referred to as Urban STEM Scholars(Scholars). These three institutions share some commonalities in how they execute the UrbanSTEM Collaboratory at their individual campuses, while also engaging in some
., assumptions, lessons, values, beliefs, attitudes, and perspectives) thatare not openly acknowledged in a given environment [1]. HC often consists of positive(inclusive) or negative (exclusionary) systemic messages that are structurally supported andsustained [2]. HC affects everyone but people with limited access to social and institutionalcapital are the most prone to be affected negatively by HC (e.g., first-generation) [1],[2]. The U.S. Department of Education classifies first-generation (FG) college students asthose who came from families where neither parent obtained a four-year college degree [3]. FGstudents are disproportionally people of color (POC) [4], therefore their disenfranchised andmarginal identities are intersectional [5]. The
NDSU Advocatesthrough their “Men allies for gender equity workshop”, which allowed the formation of an initialrelationship between several Advocates at these institutions. This relationship represents also thebasis on which we are announcing the launch of a national emailing list, ADVOCATES-GLOBE, and invite members of advocates groups to join. The list is intended to serve as aplatform to discuss and disseminate best practices and resources in support of gender equity.1. IntroductionPrevious studies [1], [2], [3] showed that engaging men in helping lead departmental effortsaimed at gender equity issues is crucial, particularly in units, such as chemistry, physics, andengineering departments, where there are so few women. For example, among
(Kell, 2022). With a growing number of Hispanic immigrants in Virginia,institutions are recognizing the need to create more organizations and programs that celebrateand support Latin X cultures (VT Cultural and Community Centers, n.d.). Considering ourpositionality as engineering and computing education researchers, we are specifically interestedin how the engineering and computing communities within the institutions (micro level) aredoing their part to engage and serve the communities they were intended to support as defined inFigure 1. In the context of engineering and computing education, we draw out the presence ofservingness at three different types of top universities in Virginia: Hampton University, VirginiaPolytechnic University, and
for Engineering Education, 2023 Intersectionality: Professional identity formation and the success of women of color in higher education STEM disciplinesWelcome to our presentation titled:Intersectionality: Professional identity formation and the success of women of color inhigher education STEM disciplinesToday, we will present:(1) a counter narrative to how ‘success’ is defined by women of color faculty in STEM(2) the role of professional identity and how it interpolates with social identities to shapetheir experience of success, and(3) the sources of stress and support affecting the success among women of color in STEMdisciplines. 1
administrators to further realize how to support students.Keywords: community cultural wealth, ecological systems theory, asset frameworkIntroductionDeficit narratives hold historically marginalized students solely accountable for educationaloutcomes as a result of inequities and challenges they encounter in life [1]. These narratives failto recognize how systemic issues within institutions perpetuate unjust structures. Researchersagree there are several negative impacts of deficit narratives including: reinforcing a blame-the-victim orientation, ignoring systemic oppression, and reinforcing inequitable systems. [1] – [4].However, researchers can choose to view historically marginalized students from an assets-basedlens as opposed to a deficit lens
, and Native Pacific Islanderface challenges in graduate study in engineering and computer science not only due to the rigorof the academic work, but also because they may face a hostile climate, racial microaggressions,and racial trauma [1, 2]. This means that the advisor-advisee relationship can be a particularlypowerful determinant of students’ success and degree completion [3-5]. The North CarolinaAlliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP-NC) was created to improve 1)the departmental climate and 2) advising and mentoring practices that can impede students’success, particularly the success of US citizen students who are underrepresented in STEM. Inthis paper, we examine the advising practices that are known to positively
WebLabs can be generalized by theSingle Output) and can be accessed and controlled directly block diagram at Fig. 1, and presents the following elements:through mobile devices. The interface includes dashboards andgraphics, real-time monitoring of the equipment image and • the system or equipment which is controlled remotely;adjustment of reference values for the control, which iscomputationally implemented through discrete PID • monitoring system by sensors, that acquire process(Proportional, Integral and Derivative) controllers. The work variables in real time; may include electronic signalapproaches the accomplishment of the following experiments:determination of the characteristic
the students’ work in the context of ABET Outcomes 1, 5, and 6, relating toworking in teams to design experiments, analyzing and interpreting data and drawing appropriateconclusions. This paper presents sample experiments that were designed by the studentsinvolving the use of basic concepts in vibrations, mechanics of material, and heat transfer.IntroductionFor engineering students, laboratory experiments constitute an essential part of their curriculum.The engineering theories become observable and a few times palpable during these experiments.In general laboratory experiments are designed to have a single path to reach the desired results.Although this approach is effective in connecting the theories and the results, it does not offer