Department. He has done has done institutional research work at UPR Mayaguez and also has worked in the ABET accreditation process for the School of Engineering . c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 WIP: Incorporating the engineering design process to solve real-life programming problems in an introductory engineering courseAbstractFor many students, the concepts involved in courses about algorithm and programming are verydifficult to understand. Many professors pay more attention to the programming skills and rulesthat are not as critical for students in their academic career in engineering. As a result, studentshave high proficiencies for coding but are presenting
graduate student at Stanford University. She is currently working on her Ph.D. in mechanical engineering with a focus in engineering education. Brunhaver completed a B.S. in mechanical engineering from Northeastern University in 2008 and a M.S. in mechanical engineering with a focus in design for manufacturing from Stanford in 2010.Dr. Shannon Katherine GilmartinDr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of mechanical engineering at Stanford University. Besides teach- ing both undergraduate and graduate design and education-related classes at Stanford University, she con- ducts research on weld and solder-connect fatigue and impact failures, fracture mechanics, applied finite
their projects, actions that had not previously beennecessary of instructors but further exercised their cross-cultural and communication skills.LimitationsWhile this paper highlights the expanded impacts to all those associated with the course throughan objective comparison between what has been done with the course in the past and what isbeing practiced now, a significant limitation is the lack of a systematic survey or evaluation ofthe course’s effectiveness. As such, the 2014-2015 offering has prompted the course instructorsto begin work that quantitatively and qualitatively evaluates the course’s impact to studentsthrough an assessment of their learning. This parallel research study (Improving the GlobalCompetency of Graduate Engineers
want graduate students for their research program and which graduate students„need‟ funding, irrespective of whether they are qualified or prepared to be GTAs, teachingquality among beginning GTAs can be extremely uneven. GTAs often receive no or littlesystematic training[10-13], and are unprepared to take on their teaching responsibilities due to lack Proceedings of the 2010 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 3of exposure to the best practices in teaching and classroom management[14-15]. At the institutionunder study, international GTAs must pass an exam and receive some training on culture
Paper ID #14485Scaling-up a MOOC at a State University in a Cost-effective MannerDr. Paul Morrow Nissenson, California State Polytechnic University - Pomona Paul Nissenson (Ph.D. Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Irvine, 2009) is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. He teaches courses in fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, and numerical methods. Paul’s research interests are studying the impact of technology in engineering education and computer modeling of atmospheric systems.Dr. Todd Dale Coburn P.E., California
-accredited engineering or computing programs, but two teams constructingaugmented-reality historical simulations include students majoring in History and GeospatialInformation Science. Most projects have external sponsors - typically a government agency thatappoints a senior engineer to serve as the customer. These customers provide project ideas, inputon scope and requirements, and financial support for equipment and travel.We have formulated an iterative “agile-waterfall” design process combining the traditional“waterfall” design practice found in engineering with agile methodology common to softwaredesign [8], [9]. This process encourages rapid prototyping and short term goal-setting (through aseries of “sprints”) and requires our students to
Paper ID #16049Impacts of a University-wide Service Learning Program on a Senior Under-graduate Capstone CourseDr. Jennifer Queen Retherford, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Dr. Retherford is an alumna of the University of Nebraska, Omaha, and received her graduate degrees from Vanderbilt University. She currently teaches a variety of courses supporting the department of Civil & Environmental Engineering at the University of Tennessee. Among many structural engineer- ing courses, Dr. Retherford manages the Senior Design Project course for all undergraduate seniors.Kelly Summerford Ellenburg, The University of Tennessee
in place at Rowan, ̇ providing sufficient laboratory space to attract the level of external funding necessary to sustain graduate level research, ̇ leveraging the strengths of the Rowan Industrial Affiliates program, ̇ attracting small high tech incubator tenants, ̇ providing administrative office space for the SJTP staff and incubation services, ̇ providing professional meeting space (including teleconferencing) for incubator tenants, and ̇ providing a common design, brainstorming and prototyping space that promotes creativity and innovation among students, faculty, staff and incubator tenants.Capital costs for the Innovation Center are projected at $12 million and ground breaking isanticipated for
participating in teaching, scholarship and service to the department. Dr. Stiner-Jones recently won funding for the College’s first National Science Foundation (NSF) Research Experience for Undergraduates SITE program. She and her co-investigators aim to pro- vide students from traditionally underrepresented backgrounds with a 10-week research immersion and prepare them for graduate school. She is the recipient of the 2018 College of Engineering Faculty Diver- sity Excellence Award for achievements that support the College’s goal of excellence through diversity and inclusion. She and her co-author are the recipients of the 2019 Best Paper and Best Diversity Paper Awards from the American Society for Engineering Education for
questionnaire. Except for profiles of old or deceased engineers, all participants wereasked similar questions. These questions sought information on various topics, including: whatfemale engineers do; why these women had selected the engineering profession; what thesewomen considered the best parts of the profession; what challenges female engineers face; andhow being an engineer impacts a female’s family, dreams, goals, inspiration, hobbies and Page 15.367.6schooldays. The website also offers advice to girls wanting to be an engineer.Questions posed to the 123 participants became sub-questions related to the research questions ofthis study. Each major
. Mark is also researches empathy and mindfulness and its impact on gender participation in engineering education. He is a Lecturer in the School of Engineering at Stanford University and teaches the course ME310x Product Management and ME305 Statistics for Design Researchers. Mark has extensive background in consumer products management, having managed more than 50 con- sumer driven businesses over a 25-year career with The Procter & Gamble Company. In 2005, he joined Intuit, Inc. as Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer and initiated a number of consumer package goods marketing best practices, introduced the use of competitive response modeling and ”on- the-fly” A|B testing program to qualify
AC 2012-5247: A NEW VISION FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN INSTRUC-TION: ON THE INNOVATIVE SIX COURSE DESIGN SEQUENCE OFJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITYDr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University Olga Pierrakos is an Associate Professor and founding faculty member in the School of Engineering, which is graduating its inaugural class May 2012, at James Madison University. Pierrakos holds a B.S. in engineering science and mechanics, an M.S. in engineering mechanics, and a Ph.D. in biomedical en- gineering from Virginia Tech. Her interests in engineering education research center around recruitment and retention, engineering design instruction and methodology, learning through service (NSF EFELTS project), understanding engineering
from aserious epistemological weakness: The standard model of undergraduate research is the apprenticeship model in which students are transported across this divide with little cognitive or practical preparation. Sinking or swimming, the student is then presented with a problem or project, shown the basics of how to solve the problem, and allowed to give it his/her best shot. This effort frequently takes place under the guidance of graduate students and/or research associates who themselves have little cognitive or practical preparation for this role. This research experience most often takes place late in the student's course of study and is usually pedagogically and epistemologically
universities. Pasadena, CA: California Institute of Technology.65. Zydney, A. L., Bennett, J. S., Shahid, A., & Bauer, K. W. (2002). Impact of undergraduate research experience in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(2), 151-157.66. Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The qualitative report, 13(4), 544-559.67. Brophy, J. E. (2013). Motivating students to learn. Routledge.68. Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), 299-323.69. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of educational psychology, 84(3), 261.70. Dörnyei, Z. (2000). Motivation in
in Mechanical Engineering from University of New Hampshire, USA and B.Tech [Hons.] in Ocean Engineering & Naval Architecture from Indian Insti- tute of Technology, Kharagpur, India. Her research interests include Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), Numerical Analysis and Applied Mathematics, Heat Transfer Applications, Mechanical Design, Nanotechnology, HP/HT Rheology. She also has strong industrial experience as a Senior Technical Pro- fessional at Halliburton [Oil-well Cementing Research & Development]. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Full Paper: Provision of the practical learning environment via application-based
Page 20.20.5 4 The cultural differences and the expectations in Indian classrooms are very different from thosein the U.S. For example, the first time the co-author (Maillacheruvu) walked into a classroom ofan upper-level graduate course consisting of M.S. and Ph.D. students, students got up andremained standing until they were asked to sit; this is in stark contrast to expected behavior atmost U.S. universities where students would not be expected to get up (or remain standing) whena faculty enters the room. Most graduate students worked on funded projects, includingconsulting-type projects, which prepared them to deal with the practical problems in engineeringand science. Communication skills
Paper ID #17240Towards a Framework for Educational University-Industry Cooperation: In-dustry PerspectiveProf. Victor Taratukhin, Stanford University Victor Taratukhin received his Ph.D. in Engineering Design in 1998 and Ph.D. in Computing Sciences and Engineering in 2002. Victor was a Lecturer in Decision Engineering and Module Leader (IT for Product Realization) at Cranfield University, UK (2001-2004), SAP University Alliances Program Director (2004- 2012). He is Managing Director, Competence Center ERP at European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS), University of Muenster, Germany (2012-present) and Visiting
Without Borders and Engineers for a SustainableWorld, as well as university-specific opportunities. Student interest and involvement in theseprograms has been explosive. Yet, partly due to the grassroots development of many of theseprograms and to their rapid rise, there are scant findings on the impacts of these programs onengineering education. Preliminary findings suggest that students participating in PBSL early incollege are retained in engineering at higher levels, women participate in voluntary PBSLopportunities at higher levels than their representation in engineering overall, PBSL fulfills avariety of ABET learning outcomes, and PBSL enhances student preparation to practiceengineering design. The community impacts of these projects are
AC 2008-2629: DESIGN AND INTEGRATION OF A CAPSTONE COURSE TOACHIEVE PROGRAM OUTCOMESMohamed El-Sayed, Kettering University Professor of Mechanical Engineering and director of the Hybrid Vehicles Integration Laboratory. He has been teaching at the undergraduate and graduate level for over 30 years. He teaches Machine Design, Automotive Design, Machine Design Capstone, Automotive Design Capstone, Design Optimization, Advanced Mechanics of Materials, linear and Nonlinear Finite Element analysis, and Design for manufacturability. He has been a PI and Co-PI on several research grants and a consultant to several engineering corporations. He has over seventy research papers in addition to several
matter knowledge of student participants is also discussed. The paper further highlightsbest practices that have been developed at the STEM Institute host college to assist otherinstitutions in developing a similar program to increase subject matter knowledge as well asinterest and self-efficacy in STEM.1. IntroductionIncreasingly publications describe our nation’s compelling need for “home-grown” STEMprofessionals while at the same time condemn the lack of preparedness of most graduates forthese jobs. Experts are also concerned that that the aging workforce and a reduced labor poolwill impact professionals available for the federal STEM workforce.1 Moreover, despite high
classes, though the practice is not widespread. For example, Huff [4] andJohnson, Leydens, and Moskal [9] have augmented engineering classes with social justiceconcepts, and Riley [10] and Leydens and Lucena [6] have published books that can be used as aguide for doing so in many disciplines. A consideration of “sociotechnical” from a humanorganizations perspective is described by Subrahmanian for a design engineering class [11].Engineering has been introduced as a sociotechnical process in a new introductory classdescribed in [12]. Hoople and Choi-Fitzpatrick have recently published a new text designed tofoster sociotechnical integration into engineering classes [13]. Other examples exist, but suchcases do not represent the bulk of engineering
asset of the Program developed for this phase is its simplified single contract. Inresearching impediments to investment in University IP, VA surveyed venture capital firms andtheir counsel. The results of this research showed that professional investors are very leery aboutentering into discussions with companies that have licensed IP from a University with whichthey are unfamiliar. The concern is that the work and expense of understanding and, in manycases restructuring, contracts issued by Universities outweighs the commercial opportunitiesavailable.To overcome this perception, the program has spent considerable time and effort creating asingle contract with the newly formed company that conforms to investment best practices in theareas of
equation in their projects is an importantpreparation for industrial careers.Program OutcomesAfter several revisions made in consultation with the program’s stakeholders, the Texas StateUniversity Manufacturing Engineering Program Outcomes (PO) were created. The PO as theyexisted prior to the initial ABET accreditation evaluation are:Each graduate is expected to have:1. An ability to apply the principles of math, science, and engineering to the solution of practical problems.2. An ability to plan and conduct experiments and interpret the results of the experiment.3. An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs.4. An ability to function effectively on a multi-disciplinary team.5. An understanding of professional and
Laboratory on campus where she works with lithium ion coin cells. She has completed two co-ops, where she has worked on grid-scale energy storage technologies and electrochemically medi- ated CO2 capture devices. She is an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship recipient and will begin pursuing a PhD in Materials Science and Engineering at Brown University this Fall.Ms. Hannah Boyce, Northeastern University Hannah Boyce is a fourth year undergraduate student pursuing a B.S. in Chemical Engineering at North- eastern University. She has been involved in the Connections Chemistry Review program for a three years, is a peer mentor, President of AIChE and Conference Chair for the 2021 AIChE Northeast Regional Con- ference. She
- wide Undergraduate Teaching Award at the University of South Florida St. Petersburg (2003-2004). For his research, he received the North Carolina Association for Research in Education’s Distinguished Paper Award (2000) and the Best Paper Award from the American Society for Engineering Education, K-12 Engineering Division (2010). His current research focuses on applying motivation and cognitive theories to instruction. He developed the MUSIC Model of Academic Motivation with the hopes that novice, as well as experienced, instructors would find it useful as a tool for improving their instruction (see http://www.MotivatingStudents.info/).Mr. Philip R. Brown, Virginia Tech Philip R. Brown is a graduate student in the
(Davis, 1999; Gorman and Mehalik, 1997; Kline, 2001; Nichols, 1999; Soudek, 1999;Stephan, 1999).The American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) has gone so far as to say that, “to survivein the work world of the 21st century and to carry out responsibly their roles as agents oftechnological change, new engineering graduates need substantial training in recognizing andsolving ethical problems”(http://www.asee.org). All of these emerging issues of engineering ethicshave prompted the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) to specificallyidentify “an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility” and “the broad educationnecessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context
AC 2011-187: MULTI-DISCIPLINARY CAPSTONE DESIGN PROJECT:AN UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS) FOR VEHICLE TRACK-INGGeorge York, U.S. Air Force Academy George York, PhD, PE, became an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the United States Air Force Academy, CO, in 2005. He received his PhD in Electrical Engineering from the University of Washington in 1999. His research interests include the cooperative control of intelligent systems, digital signal processing, and embedded computer systems. He is a Senior Member IEEE.Daniel J. Pack, U.S. Air Force Academy Director of Academy Cetner for Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Professor of Electrical and Computer En- gineering
, and degree completion. This understanding is key to the successful design and implementation of higher education adjacent program- ming at industry partners. Ashleigh completed a BS in Biological Engineering at Kansas State University where she worked in the Women in Engineering and Science program. In this role, she witnessed the in- credible impact targeted support and guidance can have for STEM students. She then completed an MEd in Higher Education Administration and a Graduate Certificate in Institutional Research at Pennsylvania State University.Dr. Kimberly D. Douglas, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc. Dr. Kimberly D. Douglas is SHPE’s Chief Research & Innovation Officer. She has over 25
themselves, as African American, Latino, Asian American or Native American. o 83% received financial aid – full scholarship. o Financial sponsors included: NSF, MESA, industry, individuals, JHU and Foundations.The following is a synopsis of the recommendations of the Carnegie Mellon University retreat:• We should think more broadly about the faculty and inclusion of teachers of who will teach the class – team teaching to provide professional development for both faculty and high school teachers.• Design the AP® assessment process to address what is known about best practices in engineering education – take into consideration ABET criteria and aligning to the AP® curriculum.• Perhaps an AP® in STEM should be considered as
evidence suggests that practicing engineers are increasingly expected to actas boundary spanners who can participate in and manage diverse local and global teams,translate competing stakeholder demands into effective design solutions, and leverage expertknowledge from multiple fields and specialties. The larger project represented by this paperresponds to this reality by proposing boundary spanning as a core meta-attribute for engineeringstudents and early career professionals. This paper more specifically offers a detailed descriptionof the study design for a major phase of this research project that involves conducting in-depth,semi-structured interviews about boundary spanning experiences with more than two dozen earlycareer engineers in the