Paper ID #24997Exploring Faculty Perceptions of Students Characteristics at Hispanic Serv-ing InstitutionsDr. Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas, El Paso An Assistant Professor at The University of Texas at El Paso, Dr. Meagan R. Kendall is helping develop a new Engineering Leadership Program to enable students to bridge the gap between traditional engineer- ing education and what they will really experience in industry. With a background in both engineering education and design thinking, her research focuses on how Latinx students develop an identity as an engineer, methods for enhancing student motivation, and
displacement of Bedouins. Ari’s international community service to Palestinian rights align with international law and the Geneva Convention.Christine Reiser Robbins, Texas A&M University, KingsvilleDr. Hua Li, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Dr. Hua Li, a Professor in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville, is interested in sustainable manufacturing, renewable energy, sustainability assessment, and engineering education. Dr. Li has served as P.I. and Co-P.I. in various grants funded by NSF, NASA, DoEd, DHS, etc.Jianhong Ren, Texas A&M University, KingsvilleDr. David Ramirez, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Dr. David Ramirez is a tenured Associate Professor of the Department
Paper ID #37248Exploring Transformative Learning from a Summer Bridge ProgramMs. Sukeerti Shandliya, University of Cincinnati Sukeerti Shandliya is a doctoral student in Engineering and Computing Education and a GRA in the De- partment of Engineering and Computing Education at the University of Cincinnati. Her research interests include engineering workforce development, DEI in STEM, experiential learning, development of global competencies and cultural competencies in higher education and the workforce. She has completed her bachelor’s in Electronics and Communications Engineering from Banasthali University, India
Ambassadors alongside three other undergraduate STEM students. In addition to working as a DEI Ambassador, they served on several boards for social change and integrated their perspectives on abolitionism, anti-racism, trans-inclusivity and accessibility into their work as a Ban- nan Scholar, Resident Assistant in the Kolvenbach Living Community, Ignatian Leader and Intellectual Traditions Honors Program Graduate. Brooke is a passionate advocate for both scientific literacy and deconstructing institutionalized racism and transphobia on college campuses and beyond.Dr. Agnieszka Miguel, Seattle University Agnieszka Miguel received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering in 2001 from the University of Washing- ton, and MSEE and
Journal of Mixed Method Research. Dr. Headley is devoted to designing effective research studies with the potential to generate well-justified answers to complex questions about how students learn given variations in their health, homes, classrooms, and schools.Dr. Amy Trauth, University of Delaware Amy Trauth, Ph.D., is Affiliate Faculty in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Delaware and Science Instructional Specialist at New Castle County Vo-Tech School District in Wilm- ington, DE. In her role, Amy works collaboratively with high school science teachers to develop and implement standards-based curricula and assessments. She also provides mentoring, coaching and co- teaching support to
Paper ID #28522Comparing Effectiveness of Peer Mentoring for Direct Admit andCollege-Ready FreshmenDr. Teresa J. Cutright, The University of Akron Dr. Cutright is a Professor of Civil Engineering at The University of Akron. She has a B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering with emphasis on environmental remediation techniques with over 20 years of experience conducting site assessments, soil characterizations and treatability studies for a variety of environmental contaminants. In addition she also conducts education research via an EPA education grant and a NSF Scholarships for STEM education. Most recently she
Paper ID #40679The Pink Paradox: Tensions in How STEM Toys are Marketed Toward GirlsDr. Theresa Green, Purdue University Dr. Theresa Green is a postdoctoral researcher at Purdue University with a Ph.D. in Engineering Edu- cation. Her research interests include K-12 STEM integration, curriculum development, and improving diversity and inclusion in engineering.Mr. Artre Reginald Turner, Purdue University at West Lafayette Artre Turner is a dedicated graduate student deeply invested in advancing the field of engineering edu- cation. With a methodical and inquisitive approach to his studies, he’s pioneering research that
Paper ID #40689Safe Space Warm Embrace: Building Blocks to Support Black & BrownSTEMScholarsDr. DeAnna Katey, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Bio for Outside Virginia Tech Dr. DeAnna Katey current serves as the Director of Undergraduate Student Programs for the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity (CEED) within the College of En- gineering at Virginia Tech. In her role, she is charged with increasing the diversity of the undergraduate student population and creating spaces for student’s academic, professional, and personal development. This includes a wide range of programs
effectiveness of STEM-focusedprogramming on increasing motivational factors that have downstream impacts on intentions andpersistence in STEM fields, particularly for women and underrepresented minorities [10], [11].However, many of these programs, while important, focus broadly on STEM. With thesemotivational factors in mind and a goal to specifically support broadening participation inengineering and agrisciences, we see the ANGELS program as a unique opportunity to addresseducation equity in STEM and promote the development of a confident and qualified femaleworkforce in engineering and agricultural sciences.The programs exposed fifteen (15) female, middle school girls per year to accomplished femalesand minorities in STEM-related fields through
in engineering and learning technology to develop future generations of entrepreneurially-minded engineers. This is achieved by partnering and invest- ing in educational initiatives and programs between industry and institutions of higher learning. Under Michael’s leadership, The Boeing Company has won the multiple Awards for Excellence and Innova- tion for their industry academic partnerships and joint programs Michael has served on various advisory groups including, the editorial board of the Journal of Engineering Education, Boeing Higher Education Integration Board, American Society for Engineering Education Project Board and the National Science Foundation I-UCRC Industry University Collaborative Research
alistening ear to anyone experiencing them.Perhaps the most important aspect of Sophie’s narrative is the insight it provides into the phenomenonthat some gendered microaggressions will happen but remain hidden to faculty. Sophie highlights reasonswhy for her and other students experiencing similar microaggressions, they may choose to stay silent:definitively gendered and problematic, they may fear retaliation from or worsening relations with fellowteammates. She also notes that gendered microaggressions are “a society thing, not like a school thing.” Ifwe consider how engineering professors might typically relate to gendered microaggressions – to assumethey are not happening (out of sight out of mind), to worry whether they themselves are
Paper ID #26080Board 59: Work in Progress: Industry-based Team Program Reviews forCapstone Design teamsDr. Rachana Ashok Gupta, North Carolina State University Dr. Rachana A Gupta is currently a Teaching Associate professor and Associate Director of ECE Se- nior Design Program. She teaches and mentors several senior design students on industry-sponsored projects (On average 12 / semester) to successful completion of an end product. These projects include all aspects of System Engineering: concept design, product design and design trade-offs, prototyping and testing (circuit design, PCB, mechanical fabrication, algorithm
participants’experiences, thereby providing tangible justifications for the project’s merit. Note that theseresults, due to the small sample size (n = 4), are preliminary in nature and may differ from asimilar project conducted with a larger number of students.The study was carried out with the following exploratory research questions in mind: 1. How does the project experience complement the knowledge and skills learned in traditional engineering education? 2. How does the project experience influence students’ perspectives of the relationship between engineering and social responsibility?Perceived Value“Just working with an actual client, I’ve never done that before. So that’s kind of insight into theengineering world, meeting with that client
Paper ID #39398Board 209: Adaptive Expertise: A Potential Tool for Supporting S-STEMStudent Retention and GraduationDr. Alexander John De Rosa, University of Delaware Alex De Rosa is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Delaware. His research focuses on improving the educational experience through the creation and promotion of new teaching tools and techniques. Alex is particularly interested in the areas of deeper learning and knowledge transfer, where he is working to help students better apply their knowledge and skills in new contexts, including in their future
Education: International Perspectives on Curriculum Change, Sense Publishers, Springer, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 2017.[12] J. E. Mills and D. F. Treagust, “Engineering Education – Is Problem-Based or Project-Based Learning the Answer,” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, The Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Inc., pp. 2 – 16, 2003.[13] L.S. Vigotsky, Thought and language, Cambridge, MA: M.I.T Press, 1962.[14] L.S. Vigotsky, Mind in society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.[15] A. Kozulin, “Vygotsky’s theory in the classroom: Introduction,” European Journal of Psychology Education, Vol. XIX, No.1, pp. 3 – 7, 2004.[16] W. Damon, “Peer Education: The Untapped Potential
teaching and learning.Don Pair, University of Dayton ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Use of a multi-level self-study to engage campus stakeholders and improve STEM student learning outcomes Jennifer Speed, Texas State University Donald L. Pair, University of DaytonAbstractSpurred by longstanding concerns about inequities in STEM learning outcomes, includingamong students in a university’s growing engineering and computer science programs, a smallteam of faculty and staff at a midsized university undertook an institution-wide initiative tounderstand its entire STEM learning environment, i.e., the conditions that inform
Paper ID #28938Modifications to a graduate pedagogy course to promote active learningand inclusive teachingMs. Kara Danielle Fong, University of California, Berkeley Kara Fong is a PhD student in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the Uni- versity of California, Berkeley. She earned a bachelor’s degree in Chemical Engineering from Stanford University as well as a Master of Philosophy in Materials Science and Metallurgy from the University of Cambridge.Dr. Shannon Ciston, Molecular Foundry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Shannon Ciston is the User Program Director at the Molecular Foundry at
. Theseenhancements would ensure the activity continues to evolve, preparing students for the complexchallenges of sustainable engineering. Finally, inviting decision-making practicing engineerand/or building owner’s representatives to provide context for the assignment can also increasethe students’ appreciation for communication with stakeholders.AcknowledgmentThe author wishes to thank Dr. Andrew Gerhardt, Lawrence Technological University, and Dr.Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, Merrimack College, for hosting the “2024 LTU EML KIT FacultyDevelopment Workshop” motivating faculty to create entrepreneurially minded learning modules.References[1] Y. Zhong, F. Y. Y. Ling, and Peng Wu, “Using Multiple Attribute Value Technique for the Selection of Structural
Paper ID #43808Faculty Transformation: a Study of Professional TransitionDr. Lori Houghtalen, University of Texas at El Paso Lori Houghtalen is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education and Leadership at The University of Texas at El Paso. Dr. Houghtalen’s research interests include the professional formation of engineering students and faculty. Her teaching experience has been focused on designing industry-based senior capstone courses and leadership and professional development for undergraduate engineering students.Dr. Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas at El Paso An Associate Professor at
semester that integrated social context into a technically focused course. Thiscourse, a third-year Engineering Materials Science course taught by the second author, is arequired course for Integrated Engineering and an elective for Mechanical and Industrial andSystems Engineering students. This course was designed to introduce engineering students to thefundamentals of materials science engineering. Modules were accompanied by homework andexam questions to reinforce the relevance of these topics to the overall class. Incorporating socialcontent into engineering courses requires an intentional, sustained, and consistent approach thatbears in mind student’s limited time, conflicting priorities, and level of maturity.Of the four modules, two have
Paper ID #41492Addressing Issues of Justice in Design Through System-Map RepresentationsDr. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University Alan Cheville studied optoelectronics and ultrafast optics at Rice University before joining Oklahoma State University working on terahertz frequencies and engineering education. While at Oklahoma State he developed courses in photonics and engineering design. After serving for two and a half years as a program director in engineering education at the National Science Foundation, he served as chair of the ECE Department at Bucknell University. He is currently interested in engineering design
college of engineering. Theobjectives of research in the college do not mirror the strategic goals of the university as a wholenor the college of engineering. It is true that most R1 PWIs value their research as means forfinancial gain and professional distinction. If research is highly revered at the graduate andinstitutional level, the strategic goals should also be implemented into the efforts made. Thisincludes engineering departments as well as centers and institutes that support departmentalresearch. Bearing this disconnect in mind, we classify Virginia Tech’s identity as communitymember-enhancing. We acknowledge that the university has developed an organizationalidentity that caters to and reflects the members of the local and state
ability.In the second year of the program (2018), the project team introduced a second measure, theRevised Minnesota Paper Form Board Test (RMPFBT) [12]. First published in the 1930’s, thetest measures an individual's ability to manipulate two-dimensional objects in their mind and isoften used to assess spatial visualization skills in engineering students. Unlike the PSVT:R, theRMPFBT has two equivalent forms, which should reduce practice effects. In 2018 and 2021,form AA was given as the pre-test, and BB was given as the post-test. In 2019 and 2022, theforms were reversed (BB as the pre-test). As a paper-and-pencil test, the RMPFBT could not beadministered in 2020.Reliability refers to the stability of test scores over time and the internal
Paper ID #25128Push and Pull: Integrating Industry Across the Student ExperienceKatherine McConnell, University of Colorado, Boulder/Denver Katherine McConnell is a Senior Professional Development Advisor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder. She is currently a student at the University of Col- orado Denver pursuing an EdD in Leadership for Educational Equity with a concentration in Professional Learning and Technology.Julie Elizabeth Steinbrenner, University of Colorado, Boulder Julie Steinbrenner earned her PhD in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University in 2011. She is
Paper ID #22042Development of Students’ Intercultural Knowledge and CompetenceDr. James Warnock, University of Georgia James Warnock is a Professor and founding Chair for the School of Chemical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering at the University of Georgia. He has been a big proponent of self-directed learning and active learning in his classes. James is also the Adjunct Director for training and instruction in the professional services department at ABET. In this role, he oversees the development, planning, production and imple- mentation of the ABET Program Assessment Workshops, IDEAL and the assessment webinar
information passes from the notes of the instructor to the notes of thestudents - without passing through the mind of either one - continues as “the norm”.The purpose of this paper is to renew the call for deployment of better and more effectiveinstructional strategies in the classrooms of the Arab Gulf States, stressing on cooperativelearning practices as a viable alternative to the traditional (low-interaction lecture-based)environment that has gripped the engineering education of Region’s institution for decades.The paper sheds light on: theoretical roots, research support, current practices, andsuggestions for redesigning classes-if need be- to stimulate interaction and help break thetraditional lecture dominant pattern, when cooperative learning
Paper ID #11111Domestic Internationalization Developed Through Collegiate ActivitiesDr. Saeed D. Foroudastan, Middle Tennessee State University Dr. Saeed Foroudastan is the Associate Dean for the College of Basic and Applied Sciences (CBAS). The CBAS oversees 10 departments at Middle Tennessee State University. He is also the current Director for the Master’s of Science in Professional Science program and a professor of engineering technology at MTSU. Foroudastan received his B.S. in civil engineering, his M.S. in civil engineering, and his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Tennessee Technological University
included, verbatim, in the appendix to this paper. Onethird of these comments are requests that future versions of the course devote more time to learning. Onecomment reads: “I really enjoyed this class and love how it ties engineering in with LGBTQIA+ topics. I alsothink it’s a great idea to advertise the course in the email because that’s how I found out about it.” Anotherreads: “This was a great course. I really wouldn’t mind meeting more during the week so we can have moretime discussing LGBTQIA+ topics and so we have more time to pursue larger projects.” 6
STEM. A novel conceptual framework wasdeveloped by Engineering Education Researchers at RPI for this purpose and is described in thesections that follow.Conceptual Framework The origins of modern NSE theory can be traced back to Ancient Greece. Leucippus ofMiletus claimed the world was made from a combination of imperceptible matter and a voidseparating them. Plato argued that reality existed in the human mind in the form of experienceand therefore any effort to quantify imperceptible matter was futile [11]. These same basicclaims are still inherent in modern NSE theory. Nuclear Science tends to deal with the abstracttheoretical quantification of imperceptible matter while Nuclear Engineering tends to deal withthe more practical
Paper ID #31125Continuing to Promote Metacognitive Awareness in a First-Year LearningStrategies CourseDr. Elizabeth Anne Stephan, Clemson University Dr. Elizabeth Stephan is the Director of Academics for the General Engineering Program at Clemson University. She holds a B.S. and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Akron. Since 2002, she has taught, developed, and and now coordinates the first-year curriculum. As the lead author of the ”Thinking Like an Engineer” textbook, currently in its 4th edition, she has been the primary author team–member in charge of the development of the MyEngineeringLab