of how we implemented this design methodin our junior level electrical and optical properties of materials course is presented alongwith an assessment of our student’s confidence in being able to apply the design methodto the types of unstructured problems they faced in their PBL activities.Equipping the Global EngineerOne of the primary objectives as an educator is to equip engineering students with thetools necessary to become successful global engineers, ready to face the challenges of the21st century. Students need to develop self-directed learning skills, systems-levelthinking, the ability to integrate principles of sustainability into design solutions andrecognize that they serve a global community. Project-based learning (PBL) has
teaching, and a similar outcome was shown in the design report evaluationtest which evaluates critical thinking. The design report evaluation test reported positive resultsfor MEA online courses [24].Study 2Another study by Chatterjee et al. (2016) [21] investigates the design of an asynchronous onlineengineering classroom, focusing specifically on cognitive radio networks. A prominent feature ofthe course design is the emphasis on various assessment methods, including asynchronous onlinediscussions, virtual labs, open-ended module assignments, and a final project. Central to thisapproach is the integration of feedback mechanisms within these assessment methods [21]. Theeducational strategies in this study stray away from the traditional
. Part ofthis increase is probably because the faculty members have become more adept at teaching thealternative design. For instance, the faculty members incorporate more examples from previousmechanical engineering students in their instruction. Another part of this increase is probablybecause the students have seen older students use the design in senior design presentations andhave interpreted the alternative design as an integral part of this engineering community. What is also interesting is an examination of the slide designs that these undergraduatesuse after they leave the laboratory course sequence. Our examinations of senior designpresentations over the past three years have found that in these presentations, only about half
) and workplace behaviors. Other research interests include the use of political skill and interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace. Joshua’s post-graduation plans include pursuing a career as a Researcher and Professor in the College of Business at a research- oriented university.Mr. Kenneth D. Birchler, Southern Illinois UniversityMr. Joseph David Narusis, Southern Illinois UniversityDr. Rhonda K Kowalchuk, Southern Illinois University - Carbondale Rhonda K. Kowalchuk is an Associate Professor of Quantitative Methods at Southern Illinois University Carbondale (SIUC). She also serves as the Director of Applied Research Consultants in the Department of Psychology at SIUC. She received her B.A. (Hons., 1990), M.A
students at UNC Char- lotte and 2) seperately enhancing a core Geotechnical Engineering course by implementing interactive curriculum tools and creating an interactive learning environment in the classroom.Peter Thomas Tkacik, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Dr. Peter Thomas Tkacik is an Assistant Professor at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte with a Motorsports focus. His areas of research are teaching, visual based experimental methods and fluid dynamics. He has advised 6 Graduate Students, 38 under-graduate (UG) seniors, 8 UG summer research experiences, 48 high school summer program kids, and has been the advisor for three UNC Charlotte student race teams
theireffects to professionals in the field. Twenty-one responses were received from participants in theSouthern California area. The analysis results indicate that in a general consensus, theconstruction industry is not only dependent on the changing information technologies, but alsothat construction companies have discovered the efficiency developed through theimplementation of such technology allows them to increase profitability and ultimately lower thepotential for construction delays and undocumented issues that contractors wish to avoid at anycost. The findings will help academia develop the construction curriculum when integratingadvanced information technologies.IntroductionAdvanced information technology, such as Building Information
University - Purdue University Indianapolis Andrew McNeely was a lecturer in the Electrical Engineering Technology department of the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at IUPUI. He teaches courses in circuit analysis and instrumen- tation + controls. His research interest lies in the areas of methods to better incorporate technology into curriculum and improving first year programs. He has a B.S. in Technology with an emphasis in Electrical Engineering Technology and a M.S. in Technology with an emphasis in technical communications , both from IUPUI. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Assessing Level of Laboratory
anything, the pace of this change is accelerating. Although there are exceptions, in general, engineering education has not kept up with this changing environment. I think it is only a slight exaggeration to say that our students are being prepared to practice engineering in a world that existed when we were trained a generation or two ago. They are not being prepared for the 21st century.”□ “So, what needs to change? A lot, I think! Most obviously, we need to focus on curriculum, pedagogy, and diversity. … But the need for change goes deeper … We need to scrutinize the current system of faculty rewards … Recall that my definition of engineering is design under constraint. I believe the process of design is a synthetic, highly
instance, cultural, economic, and governance factors are typically included in this dimension[18]. Ecological dimensions can consist of a variety of features and processes related to theenvironment, such as characteristics of the soil, hydrological processes, aspects of the localvegetation, and the weather and climate of a site location [17, 18]. Technical dimensions caninclude any factors related to the built environment, such as building materials and resources [17,18]. These three dimensions interact with one another, creating an integrated system [18].We conceptualize sustainability around the social-ecological-technological systems framework.This approach is similar to other researchers’ approaches in the field of urban policy andecosystems
Evaluation of High School Pre-Engineering Curricula through Missouri University of Science and Technology Student Survey Responses R. Joe Stanley, Ph.D. and Stuart W. Baur, Ph.D., A.I.A.AbstractProject Lead The Way (PLTW) is an example of a STEM education program that providesstructured curriculum to promote college preparation in these areas. There have been severalstudies that show the benefits of PLTW courses for K-12 students in the preparation for highschool students on statewide and national exams, high school academic performance, collegelevel academic performance in particular areas of study, high school student engagement, andother areas. This study examines the impact of PLTW courses on Missouri S&T
TMS320C6000 DigitalSignal Processor (DSP) series is Texas Instrument’s most powerful DSP processor. The C6713 is thelatest in this series. A number of wide bandwidth analog expansion daughter boards are also beinginstalled as part of this laboratory upgrade. During the 1980’s, with the continuous increasingspeed of digital computers, it became apparent that digital signal processing would become aviable alternative to analog signal processing. In recognizing this trend, digital signal processinglecture and laboratory courses were introduced into the Electrical Engineering curriculum atSouthern University during the early 1990’s. Both Motorola and Texas Instruments digital signalprocessors have been used in the laboratory. The DSP boards have included
Oklahoma offers aRobotics Lab course, which fulfills the requirement for experimental elective in both the AE andME degree programs. The course is typically taken by junior or senior undergrads, though theoccasional graduate student may also enroll. Many colleges and universities now include one ormore robotics courses in their curriculum. Many are being used in CS departments to promotethe CS curricula and increase the otherwise declining number of CS majors.10, 6, 4 Our class hasalmost the opposite motivation. The fields of ME and AE are both becoming more softwaredependent -- yet many of the undergrad majors say that they selected one of these fields becausethey do not like working with computers. This robotics course forces them to face
teach any of the basics about it. One may have noticed that twopossible courses listed in the certificate curriculum include a course on Programmable LogicControllers (PLCs) and its associated lab and a course on Biomedical Wireless Networks and itsassociated lab. These courses give IoT certificate students the ability to pick up some basic skillsabout these topic areas without taking the entire two-year programs that those courses areassociated with. This is an exciting and rapidly growing area with the additional promise of built-in machine learning (ML) driving the artificial intelligence (AI) aspects of these IoT enabledcontrol systems. The inter-disciplinary nature of the IoT area will most likely drive othersolutions to provide the skill
rateamong engineering graduates in western countries is almost 13% [4], and a staggering62.3% and 42.8% among Fine art and Design graduates respectively [5]. These numbersdo not just disincentivise students from pursuing their desired majors and their passionsbut also suggest a need for an immediate change to improve disciplinary education, ifnot completely returning to an integrative multidisciplinary approach.The vitality of multidisciplinary education is therefore evident. However, the approachtowards this collaborative education is just as important. The way a topic is introducedto a student and the way that topic is applied varies highly with respect to the type ofeducational model being followed. Project based learning, for example gives
. Rentsch has been with AIA for 15 years and has over 10-years of experience in both commercial and defense aerospace sectors. He held Technical Support Engineering and Commercial Support positions with Tex- tron Lycoming, Messier-Services Inc., and Messier-Dowty. Additionally, Rentsch has several years of experience in product development and management in the telecommunications and logistics industries. Rentsch is a member of the American National Standards Institutes (ANSI) Board of Directors and has chaired the ANSI ISO Forum and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Technical Committee 20 for Aircraft and Space Vehicles. Currently, Rentsch is leading AIA’s efforts to establish an A & D
are used as tools for generating ideas and visual communication, especially when it involves the skill to generate quick and realistic sketches of an object or idea. He has also conducted research on the impact involvement in academic makerspaces has on students in engineering programs.Dr. Kimberly Grau Talley P.E., Texas State University Dr. Kimberly G. Talley is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Technology, Maker Space Co-Director and Senior Research Fellow for the LBJ Institute for STEM Education and Research at Texas State University, and a licensed Professional Engineer. She received her Ph.D. and M.S.E. from the University of Texas at Austin in Structural Engineering. Her undergraduate
Partnering Across Cultures: Bridging the Divide between Universities and Minority High Schools Marion Usselman1, Donna Llewellyn2, Dara O’Neil3, Gordon Kingsley3, 1 Center for Education Integrating Science, Math, and Computing (CEISMC) 2 Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) 3 School of Public Policy Georgia Institute of TechnologyAbstractThe historical mission of most engineering-dominated Research-1 universities is to create newknowledge and to train students in technological fields. In the
isensuring that the task would still be a learning experience for the design team.Design ProcessThe design process is where the design learning facilitator provides the most guidance to theteam. Even though within the curriculum students are taught a design process (first E4 and thenemphasized throughout their other courses), students still deviated from an organized process. Asa coach, the faculty advisor guides the team towards the process they have learned. As oneprofessor says: “So they get to try [the design process] out early on, and then what we do as advisors in clinic is remind them about the process. Because I think a lot of times when they are given a real world project in clinic, the inclination is just to run out
-April 2006), and the Associate Dean of Undergraduate Studies (April 2006-September 2013). Dr. Karimi is a Fellow of ASEE, a Fellow of ASME, senior member of AIAA, and holds membership in ASHRAE, and Sigma Xi. He has served as the ASEE Campus Representative at UTSA, ASEE-GSW Section Campus Representative, and served as the Chair of ASEE Zone III (2005-07). He chaired the ASEE-GSW section during the 1996-97 academic year.Dr. Randall D. Manteufel, The University of Texas at San Antonio Dr. Randall Manteufel is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA). He has won several teaching awards, including the 2012 University of Texas Sys- tem Regent’s Outstanding
. curriculum. M.S. Indiana State University, B.S. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Undergraduate Engineering Laboratories During COVID-19 Pandemic Maria Javaid, David Malooley, Edith Wittenmyer, William Clyburn, Oscar Henriquez, Larry Pritchett, Robert English, and Xiaolong Li Indiana State UniversityAbstractLaboratories have always been considered an integral part of undergraduate engineeringeducation.The recent COVID-19 pandemic has globally affected higher education and educators aredevising innovative ways to minimize the impact
the local community on the opioid crisis facing rural America.Interdisciplinary communication methods used by student teams to engage various communitystakeholders and the project sponsors are discussed. The challenges and lessons learnedassociated with connecting a large community project across three semesters in two differentdepartments with different learning objectives are discussed.IntroductionA senior design project course is designed to satisfy Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) engineering design criteria. ABET Criterion 5 on Curriculum describes theintegration of content as follows: “ The Integration of Content: Baccalaureate degree curriculamust provide a capstone or integrating experience that develops
- Black ○ 23 - Two or more races ○ 13 - Not specified ○ 7 - Hispanic/Latino ○ 2 - Did Not Disclose The program’s mission is to stimulate skills, talents and behaviors in first- andsecond-year engineering students that lead to success. The program’s vision seeks to establishthe Engineering Village as an integral part of every first-year engineering students’ purposefuland successful transition to the university, the College of Engineering, their chosen disciplineand the global community. The program offers diverse high-impact experiential learningactivities to help students determine the best path to the profession. The program integratesThe Career Identity Programhousing’s residential curriculum “Experience
Paper ID #39121A Self-Study of the IRE 5-Point Grading Scale for Promoting Growth Mind-setDr. Lauren Singelmann, Minnesota State University, Mankato Lauren Singelmann is an Assistant Professor at Minnesota State University, Mankato with the Iron Range Engineering program. She has a Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering and STEM Education through North Dakota State University. Her research interests include learning analytics and alternative assessment.Dr. Yuezhou Wang, Minnesota State University, Mankato Dr. Yuezhou Wang is an associate professor in both Iron Range Engineering and Twin Cities Engineering programs
materials at a predominately undergraduate institution as hewas climbing the ladder toward tenure, promotion, and reputation. It should provide "savvy" forthe new engineering educator establishing research in such an environment.I. IntroductionResearch has historically been a component of the mission of universities and most colleges1.Emphasis on research has been heaviest at graduate degree - granting land grant or flagship Page 4.238.1institutions but mission statements; public relations material; promotion, tenure, and merit paycriteria; and even classroom objectives often loftily address the noble role of research even atpredominately
lecture with a one-sentence explanation of the “big picture” for the day. This practice will keep you on track byensuring that whatever you plan to discuss has some purpose, and it will help the students tomaintain an awareness of the goals and purposes of the course.During the lecture, use visual aids whenever you can. For example, in an electronics class, showstudents an integrated chip and the manufacturer’s sheet that accompanies it. In an imageprocessing class, show students a plastic phantom and images of it taken in various modalities andfrom varying perspectives. Bring the real world into the students’ hands, and allow them toglimpse the excitement of an actual product that results from the equations and theories beingdiscussed. Not only
workshops held at WPI’s Makerspace and Prototyping Lab, while collaborating with clubs and organizations on campus to bring new workshops into the space.Cameron Wian, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Robotics Engineering and Computer Science Student Makerspace Workshop CoordinatorSydney Kerivan, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Sydney Kerivan is an Environmental Engineering student at the Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI) in Worcester MA. Her position as Workshop Coordinator at the WPI Innovation Studio focuses on leading a team of facilitators to develop and teach educational workshops for the WPI community. She is currently focusing on the training systems for the workshop team and is responsible for weekly events and
list of design materials which were provided for the teams to selectfrom for the construction of their design. The results of this project (fall 2020) will be comparedto (fall 2021 – under a less restrictive COVID protocol) and pre-COVID (2002, 2008 and 2011)semesters – when this project was used in a first-year introduction to engineering design course.Introduction At our institution, first-year engineering students (~700 students) have a common first year,which includes chemistry I & II, physics I & II, calculus I and II, ENGCMP I and II (which arefocused on writing for engineers – taught by the English department specifically for ourengineering students), an introduction to engineering analysis and a computing class. The
Paper ID #21908Measuring Student Learning of Crystal Structures Using Computer-basedVisualizationsDr. Susan P. Gentry, University of California, Davis Dr. Susan P. Gentry is a Lecturer with Potential Security of Employment in the Materials Science and Engineering department at the University of California, Davis. In her current position at UC Davis, she is integrating computational modules into the undergraduate and graduate materials curriculum. She is specifically interested in students’ computational literacy and life-long learning of computational materi- als science tools.Dr. Tanya Faltens, Purdue University, West
once per week for three hours. The time is generally broken into a lectureperiod of 45 minutes and a 2-hour-long lab period (except for the first class meeting, which isdescribed in the next section).We presume that the entering students have been exposed tomechanics in their high-school physics classes and have a passing familiarity with the notions ofdifferentiation and integration from calculus (this is typical for our entering classes). To date, thesubject has been offered twice, with eight students enrolled each time.The goals of the subject are: • To build excitement for engineering among first-year students by engaging them in an interesting hands-on project. • To introduce a few fundamental concepts from electronics to the
researched by Becker (2010).4A summary of his surveys indicates that the greatest disparity is found in four categories:1) hands-on know how; 2) methods, systems know how; 3) ability to work in teams; and4) communication skills. The ETIC was created to address these gaps while responding tothe regional economy’s requirements for well-qualified workers. By having direct accessto industry, students benefit from real-life experiential activities while gaining thefoundational skills necessary to their integration into the workforce.Progress to-dateSince the launch of the Entrepreneurship and Technology Innovation Center (ETIC) inMarch 2015, the School has put into action a strategic plan to nurture an entrepreneurialecosystem at the new facility. All