: Comparing Difficulty and Problem-Solving Skills between Two Cohorts in Chemical Engineering,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 2190–2196, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c01062.[11] M. Liberatore and U. Asogwa, “Videos for Project Dissemination: Adopting Student- Written YouTube Problems in any Course,” presented at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Aug. 2022. Accessed: Jan. 07, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/videos-for-project-dissemination-adopting-student-written-youtube- problems-in-any-course[12] S. M. Kavale, A. M. Jackson, C. A. Bodnar, S. R. Brunhaver, A. R. Carberry, and P. Shekhar, “Work in Progress: Examining the KEEN 3Cs Framework Using Content
. Stories have long been used in K-12 and college education. In particular,stories have been used in college education for students to learn about pioneers in STEM 18 ,practice decision-making 19 , etc. Furthermore, stories from traditional culture contain culturalcontexts that are often missing in case studies used for engineering ethics currently.2 DESIGN OF TEACHING MODULESFor this project, we used stories as a vehicle to help students connect virtues to engineering ethics.The main teaching modules we developed are Virtue-of-the-Week modules. To give studentsmore practice on connecting virtues to engineering ethics, we also developed an in-class activityand a student writing assignment.2.1 Selecting StoriesWe started by selecting stories
perception of their advisor's/s' work-life balance(s), research groupclimate, department climate, and culture of academia, as presented in our prior work [4]. All ofthese themes except for “culture of academia” were directly asked about in the interviewprotocol. During the second round of coding, we identified codes and sub-codes for the first fourthemes, including “advisor career advice”, which is the focus of this paper. The first authorcompleted the two rounds of coding and met weekly with the second author to discuss theresults. The first author and a graduate student also met weekly to discuss the larger project. Weall examined codes across the three authors and ultimately achieved a consensus for final codes.Results have been grouped by
Paper ID #47311Considering the Whole Learner: A Theoretical Examination of Learning andIndividual Identity using Cognitive Load TheoryGabriel Van Dyke, Utah State University Gabriel Van Dyke is a Graduate Student and Research Assistant in the Engineering Education Department at Utah State University. His current research interests are engineering culture and applying cognitive load theory in the engineering classroom. He is currently working on an NSF project attempting to improve dissemination of student narratives using innovative audio approaches. Gabe has a bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Utah State
mental habits that foster curiosity, the ability to make connections, and the ability to createvalue when engaging with engineering problems. To best support the growth of an EM inengineering students, researchers have begun to design and implement teaching practices gearedtowards instilling this mindset in their students. However, there is still a dearth of research onassessing teaching practices that provide support for integrating EM into engineering courses.Thus, this work in progress reports the initial efforts to design an engineering-specific teachingpractices assessment tool to serve in a larger project that addresses engineering teachingpractices that infused EM mindset EM development. We conducted a literature review of STEMteaching
InSiDE were developed in the game engine/middleware Unity2. Unity provides functionalityto create 3D scenes with custom logic to animate and move objects. It is primarily used for thedevelopment of video games, but has also found applications in engineering, simulation and2 https://unity.com/education. For our project one particularly appealing feature of Unity is its built-in capability toexport the simulations to WebGL, making them playable directly in a standard web browserwithout the need for any additional plugins.We created a total of 16 web applications, split into two categories: Simulations and PracticeProblems. The simulations provide an animated view of a problem or collection of problems,where students are tasked with calculating
at Allan Hancock College (AHC), a California community college between UC Santa Barbara and Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. At AHC, he is Department Chair of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty Advisor of MESA (the Mathematics, Engineering, Science Achievement Program), has served as Principal/Co-Principal Investigator of several National Science Foundation projects (S-STEM, LSAMP, IUSE). In ASEE, he is chair of the Two-Year College Division, and Vice-Chair/Community Colleges of the Pacific Southwest Section. He received the Outstanding Teaching Award for the ASEE/PSW Section in 2022.Dr. Jean Carlos Batista Abreu, Elizabethtown College Jean Batista Abreu earned his Ph.D. and M.S.E. at the Johns Hopkins University, M.S. at
Paper ID #46029Piloting the EMPOWERS Program: Inaugurating Student-Centered HolisticMentorship for STEM Practitioners in AcademiaMs. Randi Sims, Clemson University Randi is a current Ph.D. student in the department of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. Her research interests center around undergraduate research experiences using both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Her career goals are to work as an evaluator or consultant on educationally based research projects with an emphasis on statistical analyses and big data.Sofia Brewer, Clemson UniversityLily Fender, Clemson UniversityKassidy
Paper ID #48060Pollution Prevention Through Popcorn: An Introduction to Life Cycle AnalysisEmma Marie Padros, Rowan University Chemical engineering student at Rowan University set to graduate in May 2025. Upon graduation I am to work for CECO Environmental as a Project Engineer I, under their Peerless Emissions Control Brand. On campus I am a part of the D3 women’s swim team, social media manager of the American institute of chemical engineering (AIChE) club, a member of the society of women in engineering (SWE), and the national college athlete honor society (Chi Alpha Sigma).Marcella McMahon, Rowan UniversityMr. Barnabas
2020. Related research and data collection began in 2020with focus group interviews with small groups of first-year engineering students. For this study,focus group participants from 2020 were invited for follow-up interviews three years later intheir academic careers, with 16 responding positively. The 60-90-minute semi-structuredretrospective interviews for this study were conducted in spring 2023.Methodology for the study in this paper involved qualitative thematic analysis of retrospectiveinterview transcripts. These interviews were retrospective because students were asked to reflectand characterize their 3-year experiences in the engineering program. A project researcher andgraduate assistant from the university’s school of education
is often linked to critical thinking, collaboration across disciplines, problem solving, teamwork, professional development and career interest, and other criteria that are described as valuable 21st centurys kills[7]. Previous studies that examined student agency in undergraduate engineering education have focused on student agency in relation to career choice[8]; collaborative problem solving and project based learning[9]; and supporting historically marginalized students experiences in engineering programs[10]. vital aspect of student agency is relational agency, which is understood as the ability to offerAsupport and ask for support from others[11]. Relational agency exists between students
groups of students, faculty, and industry professionals?ParticipantsThis study involved participants from three groups: students, faculty, and industry professionals.The student participants (n = 23) were enrolled in the Department of Integrated Engineering,which emphasizes project-based and cooperative learning. The program allows students tocustomize their education across disciplines such as mechanical, electrical, biomedical, andcomputer engineering. At the time of the study, all student participants were taking a 1-creditcourse titled Machine Learning for Engineers, offered in April 2024. The faculty participants(n=18) were faculty from a variety of disciplines who were enrolled in a professionaldevelopment course about the use of
], alumni and graduating seniors [27]. For these reasons, we looked atstudent ratings for NFO participants each semester for five semesters after participating in theprogram.We examined student feedback, obtained from the Academy-wide end of course (EOC) survey todetermine if there was a correlation between instructor self-efficacy and student perceptions ofinstructor effectiveness. We did not have access to the development of these survey questions,so a best-fit approach was taken using the existing EOC survey instrument.The EOC survey contains the following questions: 1. The course activities (e.g., assigned readings, lectures, discussions, labs, projects, etc.) were effective in helping me accomplish the learning goals of this course. 2
FIRST Robotics (available to ~10% of U.S. highschools) and Project Lead the Way provide opportunities, though access remains uneven [3]. APComputer Science courses illustrate a similar trend, with increasing enrollment demonstratinginterest in programming, though access disparities still persist, particularly in underservedcommunities [6].The NGSS emphasizes hands-on learning and integrating engineering practices to engagestudents and make STEM subjects more career-relevant [1]. However, the availability of specificcourses, such as those in CAD or programming, varies widely across states and school types.Early exposure to engineering activities correlates with higher rates of pursuing engineeringmajors in college. Yet, many students rely on
more contextualized approachis needed to fully attend to the unique needs and contexts of its faculty population. Finally, the data sources of the survey responses are currently being analyzed and thisadded response may provide additional insights and context to the findings presented here. Assuch, readers are cautioned that the findings may not fully encapsulate the full context of the quotesshared. Future work will expand upon the added data results.Author Contributions: We used NISSO’s Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) [56] to delineate the roles of eachauthor: IVA (funding acquisition, conceptualization, methodology, project administration,supervision, validation, visualization, data curation, formal analysis, writing
Foundation (NSF) funded projects, a League of American Bicyclists Cycling Instructor (LCI), community educator, volunteer, and activist. Dr. Waight’s research, which engages formal/informal learning in the context of precollege science education focuses on the understandings of the nature of technology, enactment of technology-supported inquiry-based science teaching and learning; transparent, equitable and critical technologies; and community-based teaching and learning, and urban ethnic, racial and linguistically diverse youth science and engineering learning with the bicycle.Shakhnoza Kayumova, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Dr. Kayumova holds a PhD in Educational Theory and Practice from University of Georgia
and studentsmay be limited in their access due to a variety of factors including GPA, social networks, andother factors beyond the instructor's control. Instructors can strive to bring industry members intothe classroom by including them as project mentors or working to include industry clientprojects. Faculty can also encourage students to access practicing engineers outside theclassroom by attending career fairs and career panels or joining project-based teams with anindustry sponsor or industry conference (e.g. design competitions for ASME or ASCE). Whilethese experiences may not be as impactful as internships as being recognized at an engineeringinternship, they begin to promote access to a hard-to-access group. Engineering programs
toward becoming interdisciplinary scholars, (b) desire to be them, and(c) perceptions of their possibilities for becoming interdisciplinary scholars evolve during theirenrollment in an interdisciplinary certificate program?MethodsStudy Site and Project BackgroundThis study examines students enrolled in an Interdisciplinary Disaster Resilience (IDR) graduatecertificate program, formerly funded by an NSF Research Traineeship (NRT) grant at a largepublic research university in the United States. The IDR program provided supplementalinterdisciplinary training to graduate students while they maintained primary affiliations in theirdisciplinary departments. The program requires 12 credit hours of coursework, including corecourses in interdisciplinary
acrosssections and continue the pedagogical training started at the semester kickoff. Lessons covered inweekly meetings include collaborative learning facilitation, academic coaching, process-orientedteaching, and team conflict resolution. The online, asynchronous training modules often arerecordings of meetings for PTAs that cannot attend in-person. Other modules also include topicssuch as FERPA and information security basics, bystander intervention, and public speaking.When there are special programs for the PTAs to facilitate, such as project demonstrations orexam grading, their training comes in a one-hour intensive orientation on cases of studentexperiences that they will expect to encounter. Overall, a PTA can be expected to spendapproximately 30
learning techniques, computer-based instruction, andvirtual lab – a web-based student learning tool for thermodynamic concepts related to multi-stagingin compressors and turbines. TESTTM software used in design projects and laboratory was alsobriefly discussed. The authors used the characteristics of the learning systems, their effectivenessbased on students’ performance, student skills developed using the learning systems, and studentfeedback as their comparison criteria. Most of the methods reviewed used computer technologyand multimedia to provide interactivity and visualization. Most of these methods were found toimprove student performance and help develop their skills. Overall, student feedback andcomments were positive and
development projects. The ability for students to learn and perform an end-to-end data science workflow without writing a single line of code, all within the context ofmaterials design, has the potential to enhance their educational experience and improve theiremployability in a rapidly advancing field.The Citrine Platform has been used to help expose second- and third-year undergraduateMS&E students to AI and ML through an iterative activity that involves development andcuration of a material and process property dataset of 3D printed plastics [25]. The process isshown in Figure 8. Students began by collecting and organizing plastic filament data frompublished literature and from an existing dataset provided by the instructor. The output ofthis
and Me: Collaborative Creativity in a Group Brainstorming with Generative AI," in American Society of Engineering Education Conference, Portland, 2024.[24] E. Aref, "Team Dynamics And Conflict Resolution: Integrating Generative AI in Project- Based Learning to Support Student Performance Team Dynamics And Conflict Resolution: Integrating Gen AI in Project Based Learning to Support Students' Performance," in American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Portland, 2024.[25] R. Rottner, "Iterative Learning: Using AI-Bots in Negotiation Training," in American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Portland, 2024.
engineering students andthe factors that influence those intentions (Park et al, 2022; Patrick et al, 2021; Abe & Chikoko,2020). Knowing and understanding how both intrinsic and extrinsic factors contribute tostudents’ attitudes, perceptions, and self-efficacy, and how these ultimately impact their post-graduation intentions and outcomes can help educators and administrators shape programs andexperiences to foster student success. Further, understanding whether students from low-incomebackgrounds experience differences in beliefs, influences, and outcomes can help identify,mitigate, and strive to eradicate systemic barriers to their success.This study was part of a larger project designed to understand the impacts of the EducatingEngineering
experience, ultimatelyleading to improved academic and emotional outcomes for students.Peer SupportBuilding strong, positive relationships among students can significantly enhance their sense ofbelonging and overall academic performance. STEM institutions can implement peer mentorshipprograms, where more experienced students guide first-year students through their academicjourney. Additionally, encouraging collaborative learning through group projects, study groups,and peer-led workshops can help students develop a sense of community and mutual support.Faculty SupportFaculty support is equally crucial for student success. The active involvement of facultymembers in students' academic lives can greatly enrich their learning experiences. Faculty
project intended to assist two-year college faculty andadministrators to prepare proposals for the National Science Foundation Scholarships in Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (S-STEM) Program. S-STEM proposals are expectedto be built on a foundation of deep needs analyses specific to the targeted population of studentsin STEM disciplines. Based on needs assessment, programs can then focus on implementingappropriate interventions and supports that will be most effective in improving the retention andcompletion of their students. Guidelines for streamlining the acquisition and organization ofcritical elements of student needs analyses can be useful for two-year college faculty andadministrators to develop NSF S-STEM proposals and
their identified themes in small subgroups and identify 3-5 main themes Selection All participants share themes from the previous steps to full group, and all themes are combined into “major themes” Action Participant subgroups develop plans to address an assigned major themeWhile GLA is traditionally done fully in person, multiple projects have used GLA in a virtualenvironment [11], [12]. For these virtual GLAs, the Generating and Appreciating steps aretypically moved to take place before the focus group to cut down on the time for the focus groupitself. The remainder of the focus group is then conducted through a virtual meeting platform.For the purpose of this project, we aimed to utilize the GLA focus group to better
, statics and dynamics, thermodynamics, and linear algebra). Outside of his coursework, Eli was on the university’s baseball team, and playing baseball was a significantdriver in his decision to attend college instead of trying to enter the workforce in an engineering capacity right outof high school. The team welcomed him and made him feel very much a part of a group, and even though he had tosit out much of the first year because he was recovering from an injury, the team camaraderie was something henotably relished and enjoyed. Outside of baseball, his favorite parts of his first year of school were “the hands-on projects [he] got to dofor engineering because that’s how [he] learns the best and gets the most out of it.” When
greater transparency and customization opportu- Recent initiatives highlight attempts to create privacy- nities. Universities can deploy these models within controlledpreserving AI frameworks tailored to education. For in- environments, ensuring compliance with regulatory policies.stance, projects focusing on federated learning aim to de- However, maintaining and securing open-source implemen-centralize AI model training, keeping sensitive student data tations requires significant technical expertise and resources,on local devices rather than sending it to external servers [5]. which may pose adoption challenges. Table II provides aAdditionally, open-source AI initiatives are gaining traction as
anadvanced course in steel or reinforced concrete design.Discussion It was beyond the scope of this study to endeavor why these programs made theirrespective curricular decisions regarding steel and reinforced concrete design courses. Thiswould require contacting program/department chairs and structural engineering faculty fromeach institution. Such program level decisions might have been made by faculty who are nolonger at those institutions and it could be difficult to track down the reasoning behind eachprogram’s requirements. Regardless of the FE civil exam, an argument can be made for everycivil engineer to have a structural understanding of reinforced concrete since nearly every civilengineering project will touch reinforced concrete in
, such as NSF, DoD, DoE, the MxD and CyManII federal manufacturing institutes, NIST, and the federally-funded projects for hypersonics and energetic materials at Purdue, as well as industrial partners at Rolls Royce, Cummins, Boeing, GM, Ford Motor Company, Collins Aerospace, Lockheed Martin, Textron, Gulfstream, Procter & Gamble, GM, Honda, and others. Professor Hartman has served on various national and international standards development committees related to digital methods and tools supporting product lifecycle data interoperability. Prior to his time at Purdue University, Professor Hartman worked in industry for over eight years at Fairfield Manufacturing, Caterpillar, and Rand Worldwide. Professor