. “Integrating Industry-Driven Competencies in Education And Training Through Employer Engagement”, Community College Virtual Symposium, U.S. Department of Education Office of Vocational and Adult Education, January 2012.2. MSU Denver undergraduate catalog. http://catalog.msudenver.edu/preview_program.php?catoid=23&poid=5894&returnto=1306.3. “Facility Management Accreditation Commission (FMAC) Bachelor’s Degree Programs Accreditation Standards”, Adopted October 2017, IFMA publication.4. Laux, C. and Sanchez D., “Curriculum Innovation Driven by Industry Inputs: Engineering Technology Pathways”, Proceedings of the 2013 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration, Session ETD 335.5. Engineering Technology
Paper ID #17950Curriculum Service Learning Workshop for STEM OutreachDr. Ulan Dakeev, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Dr. Ulan Dakeev is an Assistant Professor in Industrial Technology Department in the College of Engi- neering, Texas A&M University - Kingsville. His areas of research include Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, renewable wind energy, quality in higher education, motivation, and engagement of students.Dr. Muhittin Yilmaz, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Dr. Muhittin Yilmaz received the B.S. degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering from Gazi Univer- sity, Ankara, Turkey, and the M.Sc
work is documented and further discussed in [5].DiscussionWe are currently looking at developing a zero-year curriculum for entering engineering freshmanstudents who are not calculus-ready. This pilot course, if successful, may become a mandatoryfreshman class for students ready for college geometry and trigonometry. For other students, itwould be available as an elective class.This pilot course mainly addresses retention problems of students who have poor mathematicalskills or who do not understand the important connections between math, science andengineering. Other educators have had success in integrating math and science classes [6, 7], butthese attempts have typically waited until the students are calculus-ready. The approach in ourpilot
Paper ID #13493Innovating Engineering Curriculum for First-Year RetentionMs. Elisabeth A. Chapman, Clarkson University Ms. Chapman is an Instructor and Advisor (First Year Engineering Studies Majors) in the Wallace H. Coulter School of Engineering, Clarkson University in Potsdam, NY.Miss Elisabeth Maria Wultsch, Clarkson University Instructor/Advisor Clarkson University Potsdam NYDr. Jan DeWaters, Clarkson University Jan DeWaters is an Assistant Professor in the Wallace H. Coulter School of Engineering at Clarkson Uni- versity, in Potsdam, New York. She teaches introductory courses on energy issues and energy systems, and
andplanning concepts to technological problems. The requirement for all students to completeoriginal research and publish the results in a thesis would be the primary tool in developing thisspecialization and integrating the knowledge toward the application of the science. As ultimately implemented, the AFIT PSM Degree Program in Combating Weapons ofMass Destruction is a six-academic quarter (18 month) degree program as is typical of otherAFIT masters programs. Figure 1 provides an overview of the courses and scheduling. For the first quarter, all students follow the same schedule and complete an officiallyrecorded certificate program – the certificate element of a PSM. The graduate Certificate inCombating Weapons of Mass Destruction Program
taught with an integrated approach in mind. The central idea being to show the students howall STEM subjects tend to rely on each other, and that having a tactile application for these principlesenhances the learning process.ROV State-wide Competition In addition to having teachers explain pertinent STEM concepts and supervise the construction ofan ROV, we thought it would be beneficial to offer a motivation for the students to strive to optimize theirROV design. Many similar organizations such as MATE and SeaPerch have had great success with andsupport for competitions, and we felt that using a similar motivation would prove effective. We constructeda small slalom course out of PVC pipe that stood on the bottom of the pool. The given
Paper ID #42059Board 143: Work in Progress: Mind and Computer: Integration of Brain-ComputerInterfaces in Engineering CurriculaDr. Roya Salehzadeh, Lawrence Technological University Roya Salehzadeh, PhD, is an Associate Professor in the A. Leon Linton Department of Mechanical, Robotics, and Industrial Engineering at Lawrence Technological University. Her research focuses on human-robot interaction, brain-computer interfaces, and artificial intelligence.Dr. James A. Mynderse, Lawrence Technological University James A. Mynderse, PhD is an Associate Professor in the A. Leon Linton Department of Mechanical, Robotics, and
conference of the American Society for Engineering Education” 5 • Design Project I/IIThe laboratory component is an integral part of the CME program. Hands-on experiences areemphasized throughout the curriculum in various laboratory and lecture-lab courses. Studentsgain experiences in experimental methods in a number of laboratory course as well. Because ofthe hands on experiences and involvement with industry, the CME program has been involvedwith a number of regional and national engineering competitions. These include compositebridge building and solar car race competitions.The major contribution that this undergraduate CME program has
2006-378: INFUSING THE MATERIALS ENGINEERING CURRICULUM WITHSUSTAINABILITY PRINCIPLESKatherine Chen, California Polytechnic State University KATHERINE C. CHEN is an Associate Professor in the Materials Engineering Department at Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo, CA. She received her bachelor degrees (in Chemistry and Materials Science & Engineering) from Michigan State University, and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. At Cal Poly, she teaches numerous materials engineering courses and labs.Linda Vanasupa, California Polytechnic State University Linda Vanasupa is a professor in the Materials Engineering Department at the California Polytechnic State
accept responsibility.IntroductionThe university classroom creates a multitude of opportunities and challenges for both the studentpopulation and faculty teaching the class. With rising enrollments in engineering curricula andgreater numbers of students matriculating per year, higher emphasis is placed on course gradesas a metric for student distinction which results in amplified pressure on the students to not onlysucceed, but to excel. This leads some students to try and find an easy way out, namely cheating.For faculty, the challenges are to minimize the likelihood of cheating, to detect it when it occurs,and to deal sternly but fairly with the cheaters.Academic integrity violations (such as cheating, lying, and stealing) are a widespread
even feed pets and play with them while their owners are at work or out of town.As the demand for skilled designers is increasing in the industry, it is not a surprise that the IoT-related courses started to emerge in the ID curriculums. The interconnectivity of products isbecoming a standard in the product development process rather than an option; consequently,companies look for designers who can conceptualize such products.This paper asks the vital question, perhaps as a self-criticizing way: “Are we ready to address thedemand when potential employers ask for a new breed of designers who are capable of designinginterconnected products?”The authors of this paper investigated this question by conducting mixed methodology researchwith ID
Paper ID #9749Press Play: A Course in Interactive Device DesignDr. David Sirkin, Stanford University David Sirkin teaches interactive device design in Stanford University’s department of Electrical Engi- neering, and is a postdoctoral researcher at the Center for Design Research and Communication between Humans and Interactive Media lab.Ms. Wendy G Ju, Stanford University Wendy Ju is Executive Director of Interaction Design Research at Stanford University’s Center for Design Research. She is also an Assistant Professor in the Graduate Design Program at California College of the Arts. She recently completed a stint at
people are with technology usage and comprehension [5].Despite the increased use of technology, there is no clear indication if the comprehension oftechnology has been the same largely due to a widely varying means of testing digitalcompetency. While largely reliant on the student standards set forth by the International Societyfor Technology in Education, many state curriculums do not enforce a means to test and measurestudents’ digital education. With an increasing dependence on technology for both education andworkforce success, we consider whether or not industry professionals and higher educationbelieve digital competency should be assessed in primary and secondary education.PurposeOur research aims to evaluate the extent to which digital
, theprogram faculty consist of members from chemical engineering, electrical engineering,mechanical engineering, industrial and systems engineering, civil engineering, andenvironmental sciences and policy. Program faculty worked the remainder of 2011 and into 2012to develop a curriculum that integrated technical fundamentals and some advanced topics fromexisting courses, economic analysis from existing Engineering Economy and Economics ofEnergy courses, a revived Engineering and Public Policy course, a new Applied SystemsEngineering course, and a few Energy Engineering specific courses on Fuel and EnergyConversions. A flowchart of the current curriculum is included as an Appendix to this paper.It is important to note that the program is substantially
Stanford University forover half a century and has engaged students in an immersive yearlong (nine months) coursesequence with industry-sponsored projects focusing on various phases of integrated designthinking through engineering fabrication. Through transitions in the teaching team, projectsponsors, and paralleling the evolution in modern and innovative engineering practices andchanging societal needs, ME310 maintains a pedagogical emphasis on helping student teamsmeet defined process milestones in order to produce a refined functional prototype that ispresented to the broader design community at the end of the year [8]. In ME310, many alumni,as practicing professionals in industry, come back to the course to serve as project advisors,sometimes
, and wearable sensing.Holly Matto, George Mason University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeast Section Conference Supporting creativity and innovation in STEAM undergraduate curriculum through extracurricular hands-on learning Nathalia Peixoto, Linghan Zhang, Padmanabhan Seshaiyer, Holly Matto George Mason University, Fairfax VA 22030Abstract Faculty from several colleges offered an intensive summer program with the objective ofimpacting student engagement in multidisciplinary research activities through specific curiosityand networking. George Mason University funded 10 undergraduate
Directors of Engineering Without Borders - USA. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A New Framework for Student-Led Cocurricular Design ProjectsAbstractThis report describes an academic framework to introduce student-led extracurricular engineeringdesign projects to an undergraduate curriculum. Typically, student-led projects are limitedexclusively to the domain of extracurricular groups with only a few examples of universitiesassigning academic credit value to this work. Over the past four years, the Harvard School ofEngineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) has designed and implemented a structure in whichstudents who participate in the Harvard chapter’s Engineers Without Borders USA projects
Paper ID #27493Construction Curriculum of the Future: Changes and ChallengesDr. Ihab Mohammad Hamdi Saad P.E., Northern Kentucky University Dr. Ihab Saad is Professor of Construction Management and an alumnus of the University of Kentucky in Lexington where he received his Ph.D. in 1996 from the department of Civil Engineering and Construc- tion. He has over 25 years of experience in the construction industry primarily in the civil/construction project management area. Dr. Saad received his Bachelor of Science and Master’s degrees in Civil En- gineering from Cairo University in his native country Egypt in 1984, and 1993
Faculty of Education in the area of Counselling Psy- chology through the University of Manitoba. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Integrating Career Development Supports into a Biosystems Engineering Program: Study DesignAbstractCareer development is an important area of growth for post-secondary students, includingengineering students who are learning about who they are and what they want in their careers.Career development support may be particularly useful for students in less known areas ofengineering, such as biosystems engineering, who may benefit from support in understandingtheir career possibilities and learning to articulate their skills to employers. This
1. However, a perceived inability to assess creative attributes of students’ work has oftenprecluded creativity instruction in the classroom. The Consensual Assessment Technique (CAT)has shown promise in a variety of domains for its potential as a valid and reliable means ofcreativity assessment. Relying upon an operational definition of creativity and a group of ratersexperienced in a given domain, the CAT offers the field of engineering education an assessmentmethod that has demonstrated discriminant validity for dimensions of creativity as well as fortechnical strength and aesthetic appeal. This paper reports on a web-based adaptation of the CATfor rating student projects developed during a week-long engineering camp. High school
essential to engineering in a problem-solving environment 2. To provide a context for considering the interactions and synergistic relations between properties in engineering systemsThe proposed course outline for the first offering is given in Table 3. Because there is no text forthe course the first two years of offerings will be used to generate an extensive set of coursenotes and examples based on the best available demonstrations of a computational context forfoundational engineering courses. In cooperation with colleagues from the ENE curriculum a Page 11.993.7series of integrated and evaluated on-line modules are
students often do not enjoysuch substantive community experiences, and, in part because of this, they achieve lower rates ofpersistence to degree completion. Studies have examined this discrepancy in persistence todegree and found that the physical separation between an online student and their educationalinstitution can lead to a sense of isolation. This sense of isolation in turn can lead to an onlinestudent’s sense of alienation from their institution and powerlessness to change their situation.Numerous underlying factors appear to contribute to these feelings, including the usability of thetechnology tools that power the online education environment and the quality of student-facultyand student-student interactions that those tools enable. As
2 summarizes the total time to build three devices. Table 2: Time Comparison Student-Made Model Rapidly-Manufactured Model Total Time (hrs) 10 hours 0.5 hoursThe rapidly-manufactured model is more time efficient to produce, though the costs are muchhigher. Ideal for mass production, rapid manufacturing would be more efficient overall in theproduction of this hands-on learning device to assist in middle-school science curriculum. Keepin mind that the unit cost for rapidly manufacturing these devices will decrease with an increasedoutput of devices. The initial cost for producing the mold to manufacture the
Paper ID #17160Gaining Insights into the Effects of Culturally Responsive Curriculum onHistorically Underrepresented Students’ Desire for Computer ScienceMs. Omoju Miller, UC Berkeley Omoju Miller is the lead researcher on the ”Hiphopathy” project at UC Berkeley. She has an undergrad- uate degree in Computer Science (2001) and a Master’s degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering (2004) from the University of Memphis. She has over a decade of experience in the technology indus- try. She is currently a doctoral candidate at UC Berkeley in Computer Science Education. Omoju also served in a volunteer capacity as an advisor to
, American Society for Engineering Education3. Damrosch, David. We Scholars: Changing the Culture of the University. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.4. Maimoulides, Jim. “The Eversharp CA: The pen that killed Eversharp.” Available at http://www.penhero.com, 2003.5. McKeage, K., D. Skinner, R. Seymour, D. Donahue, and T. Christensen. “Implementing an interdisciplinary Marketing/Engineering course project: Project format, preliminary evaluation, and critical factor review.” Journal of Marketing Education 21 (3), pp. 217-231, 1999.6. Morreale, S., P. Shockley-Zalabak, and P.Whitney. “The Center for Excellence in Oral Communication: Integrating communication across the curriculum.” Communication Education 42, pp. 10
than twelve percent of the total aerospace work force [1]. The squeakywheel comprising airplane and space engineering graduate demands overshadows the missilecommunity needs wheel for specialized expertise in missile system design engineering.The paucity of missile engineering degree programs at universities within the United Statessuggests that the development of a model graduate missile engineering system design curriculumwould be of interest to both academe and industry. Accordingly, a model graduate missileengineering system design curriculum is presented for discussion.A model curriculum can be expected to provide a template for what should be an idealspecification of learning behaviors required in a given field of endeavor. These
it is more than just an engineeringexperience.Core curriculumApplicants can choose from twenty possible disciplines. The disciplines range from astronomy toarchitecture and from engineering to environmental issues to name some. All the twentydisciplines have similar curriculum structure but different approaches in delivering the same. Thecore curriculum for the governor’s scholars programs is threefold: Focus Area: a “major” subject of study, assigned according to scholar preference as indicated on the application. General Studies: an area of study assigned by staff to challenge the scholars. Courses frequently include service-learning components in the community. Seminar: a discussion-based small group session
. The course is taught every semester and is a core course in the engineeringtechnology curriculum. The self-guided activity is and will remain an active part of thecourse. Page 11.413.6The following case study discusses and explains how a group of students designed theirown thermodynamic experiment based on the implemented PBL approach.Case Study: Household RefrigeratorAs part of the thermodynamic course in the Department of Engineering Technology andIndustrial Distribution at Texas A&M University, students learned the laws ofthermodynamics for closed and open systems. They also learned specific applications ofthose laws like in the case of power and
. Golub, T.G. Dube, J. Zhang, “Integration of 3-D Printed Drone Project in General Engineering Curriculum,” In ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2019. 6. A. Stern, Y. Rosenthal, N. Dresler, D. Ashkenazi, “Additive manufacturing: An education strategy for engineering students,” Additive Manufacturing, vol. 27, 2019, pp. 503-514.7. Oppliger, Doug. "Using first Lego league to enhance engineering education and to increase the pool of future engineering students (work in progress)." In 32nd annual frontiers in education, vol. 3, pp. S4D-S4D. IEEE, 2002.8. Bubbar, Kush, Alexandros Dimopolous, Roslyn Gaetz, Peter Wild, and Michael McWilliam. "Evolution of the Design Engineering Mentorship Program." Proceedings of the Canadian
1. Cluster Structure for First-Year Engineering Curriculum at Texas A&Maccommodate the diverse needs of its entering students.Student TeamsThere are several reasons for using student teams as an integral part of the class. First,employers are requesting engineering graduates with improved skills and more experience inworking within a team structure. Industry changed to team decisions because of the ir experiencethat more creative solutions to problems occurred in a team environment. Second, engineeringprograms applying for accreditation under Engineering Criteria 2000 of the Accreditation Boardof Engineering and Technology (ABET) are asked to demonstrate that their graduates have “anability to function on multi-disciplinary teams.” 7