Paper ID #14633Enhancing Verification and Validation Education Using Active Learning ToolsDeveloped through an Academia-Industry PartnershipDr. Sushil Acharya, Robert Morris University Acharya joined Robert Morris University in Spring 2005 after serving 15 years in the Software Indus- try. His teaching involvement and research interest are in the area of Software Engineering education, Software Verification & Validation, Data Mining, Neural Networks, and Enterprise Resource Planning. He also has interest in Learning Objectives based Education Material Design and Development. Acharya is a co-author of ”Discrete
ethics, engineers can object to or abstain from a project on moral grounds.If objecting to a project by appeal to one’s professional code is to carry weight, the codemust play a justificatory role in the objection (i.e., it must appeal to one or more of theaxioms listed in the code that the engineer would violate by participating), otherwise theobjection is based on mere private conscience. For instance, in Thiokol’s case, had Lundrefused to change his mind and keep the astronauts’ welfare as his top consideration, hewould have implicitly appealed to Canon I of the ABET code. What sort of a general guide is this, and, more importantly, how does it relate toengineers’ moral choices? An engineer that adheres to her code has good reason to do
codes orpractices that allows one to make ethical decisions.[22] Haws (2006) called for a holistic andcontextualized ethics education that would help students develop “enactive mastery, as theyencounter moral dilemma and work through ethical deliberations” while being provided“vicarious experience, encountering the moral dilemma of others with whom they identify;and expert testimony, following those whose expertise they accept”.[23] More recently,scholars’ research on the goals of engineering ethics can be covered in two dimensions:internalization in mind, including knowledge and consciousness, and externalization inaction.[24] First, at the “knowledge” level, MIT D-Lab has designed a series of courses, such asIntroduction to Energy in Global
Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference and Exposition Proceedings, June, St. Louis, MO.51. Swan, C., Paterson, K.G. (2011). ISES – A Longitudinal Study to Measure the Impacts of Service on Engineering Students, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference and Exposition Proceedings, June, Vancouver, BC.52. Tonso, K. L. (2006). Student Engineers and Engineer Identity: Campus Engineer Identities as Figured World, Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1: 273-307.53. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development, in L.S. Vygotsky, Mind and Society: The development of higher psychological processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 70-91.54. Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). The development of
Paper ID #9724Examining the Engineering Design Process of First-Year Engineering Stu-dents During a Hands-on, In-class Design Challenge.Ms. Jessica E S Swenson, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach Jessica Swenson is a graduate student at Tufts University. She is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering with a research focus on engineering education. She received a M.S. from Tufts University in science, technology, engineering and math education and a B.S. from Northwestern University in mechan- ical engineering. Her current research involves examining the design process of undergraduate students
AC 2011-1146: DAILY REVIEW QUIZZES A HINDRANCE OR A HELP?James E Bluman, U.S. Military Academy Major James Bluman is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical En- gineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He has served the United States Army for the last 12 years as an officer and Army Aviator. He is a graduate of West Point (BS in Mechanical Engineering) and The Pennsylvania State University (MS in Aerospace Engineering). Major Bluman’s re- search interests are in swashplateless and conventional helicopter rotor dynamics and innovative teaching methods.Kathryn Purchase, United States Military Academy Major Kathryn Purchase is currently an Instructor in the
, andconversations within the research team upon conclusion of the course.Concept MapsConcept maps are used in these courses to meet the first learning objective. Concept mappinghelps students meta-cognitively arrange their understanding of a complex web of ideas. Thishigher level form of thinking is a habit of mind essential to engineers, and as such, it is importantto help students develop this meta-cognitive capacity within the classroom. Concept maps wereused within both pilot courses at two universities during the Fall 2013 school semester. Eachcourse asked students to develop their own concept maps depicting their understanding ofsustainability. Students developed their concept maps once at the beginning of the semester and asecond time at the end
encounter, secondary STEM teacher professional development, and issues of power in STEM education discourse. He is also an Anthropology doctoral candidate at the University of Cape Town, where he was previously awarded a Master’s degree. His dissertation research is focused on exploring the ethical becoming of architecture students within courses utilizing community-engaged pedagogies.Dr. Justin L. Hess, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis Dr. Justin L Hess is the Assistant Director of the STEM Education Innovation and Research Institute at IUPUI. His research interests include ethics, design, and sustainability. Dr. Hess received each of his degrees from Purdue University, including a PhD in Engineering
Paper ID #24812Designing a Reference Training Course and Cultivating a Community of Prac-tice: Utilizing the LMS for Staff Training and DevelopmentSarah Jane Dooley, Dalhousie University Sarah Jane Dooley is Reference Coordinator and Liaison Librarian for Engineering at Dalhousie Univer- sity’s Sexton Design & Technology Library in Halifax, Nova Scotia. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Designing a Reference Training Course and Cultivating a Community of Practice: Utilizing the LMS for Staff Training and DevelopmentAbstractThis paper will review research pertaining to the value of
Moral Mind: How Five Sets of Innate Intuitions Guide the Development of Many Culture-Specific Virtues, and Perhaps Even Modules,” in The Innate Mind, Vol. 3, P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, and S. Stich, Eds. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 367–391.[19] J. Haidt, The Righteous Mind. New York: Vintage Press, 2012.[20] M. Martin and R. Schinzinger, Introduction to Engineering Ethics, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2009.[21] R. J. Baum, “Ethics and Engineering Curricula,” Hastings on the Hudson, 1980.[22] B. Stappenbelt, “Ethics in engineering: Student perceptions and their professional identity development,” J. Technol. Sci. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 86–93, 2013, doi: 10.3926/jotse.51.[23] J
Robotics BS in Electrical and Professionals in Artificial Intelligence and Computer Engineering Industry Machine Learning Figure 5. MSET Curriculum and focus areasFigure 5 presents the overview of the proposed MSET degree with Mechatronics and Robotics asan option. The MERO program is designed to keep the diverse student population at theuniversity in mind. The student from both the Electrical and Mechanical engineering disciplinescan enroll in the curriculum as well as the engineering technology students. All the courses willbe delivered both in traditional face-to-face and online formats.Students need to complete 30 credit hours to earn the MSET degree
Copyright © 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Figure 3 Blogs are useful sources of informationWhen class ended, fewer students had created podcasts than initially expected. When asked onthe post-survey if they had made a podcast, only 24% had done so. Half of the class had optedout, but 21% had initially planned to do so and had changed their minds. Another 5% wishedthey had created a podcast. Their perceptions of whether or not a podcast is a good medium tolearn technical content did not vary substantially between the beginning and end of the semester.They did indicate, however, that they invested more time creating a podcast (average of 39hours) over writing a paper (31 hours). Keep in mind that that is not a
AC 2009-365: CREATING AN ACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTJohn Marshall, University of Southern Maine John Marshall received his Ph.D. from Texas A&M University and is the Internship Coordinator for the Department of Technology at the University of Southern Maine. His areas of specialization include Power and Energy Processing, Applied Process Control Engineering, Automation, Fluid Power, and Facility Planning. Page 14.380.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Creating an Active Learning EnvironmentThe participants populating our schools are becoming more diverse. They are
be argued that they tend to emphasize therole of ethics in the life of the individual engineer rather than the ethical implications ofengineering as a profession, as a force that shapes and affects society. Given the role oftechnology in the modern world, it is crucial to bear in mind Herkert’s distinction between“microethics” and “macroethics.” [3] Macroethics, as Herkert defines it, is the study of the ethicsof the profession of engineering, of engineers as a whole. It seems self-evident that we mustinclude the macroethical view in ethics education, but this view is difficult to emphasize incertain pedagogical modalities. Many ethics pedagogies focus on the role of the individualengineer, particularly case studies that analyze issues such
Paper ID #14394Applied ABET Student Outcome Continuous Improvement ProcessProf. Byron G. Garry, South Dakota State University BYRON GARRY is an Associate Professor and Undergraduate Program Coordinator in the Department of Construction & Operations Management in the College of Engineering at South Dakota State University. He has been a member of ASEE since 1998. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Applied ABET Student Outcome Continuous Improvement ProcessAbstractA sustainable continuous improvement process was desired for use in the ABET
Page 26.478.5considered in this engineering solution and she listed these ideas on the board. Responsesgathered included: How will vacationers be affected by the smell created by the treatment? 4(People). Where will the effluent go when the pipe is flushed? Will it affect the wildlife?(Planet). Who will do the wok? Unions? (Politics), How much will it cost? (Prosperity)With this framework in mind, the student were then again given the original assignment as agroup and asked to frame the challenges (#1 - #3) with the 4 Ps in mind. This assignment wasalso turned in.3. Do they retain the 4 Ps weeks later after learning the technical
listen toothers with an open mind) and Q21 (work on collaborative projects as a team).In addition to the survey questions, participants were asked to respond to five prompts(Q31) about various outcomes of the project. In response to the prompts, one studentsaid: “collaborating with different people from different technical backgrounds is thebiggest advantage of the program in giving students the ability to learn from peoplewith different perspectives and gain a wider view of engineering”. Another studentwrote: “gaining valuable teamwork and management skills in a setting where themain objective was shared by many”.Effective Communication: To evaluate development with respect to effectivecommunication, participants were asked to rate their growth
Paper ID #27792An Interdisciplinary Research-based Education Program for Engaging Plant/AgricultureSciences, Chemical Sciences, and Engineering Students (iREP-4-PACE) atMinority InstitutionsDr. Sharanabasaweshwara Asundi, Old Dominion University Sharan Asundi, a native of INDIA, is a Ph.D. from University of Florida working as an Assistant Profes- sor of Space Systems Engineering in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Old Dominion University (ODU). Currently, he is engaged in several teaching and research activities, largely focused on furthering the Space Systems Engineering Program at ODU. He has
be asked to transcend traditional engineering design inorder to participate in the design of sustainable societies. With that image in mind, the Centerfor Sustainable Engineering defines “sustainable engineering” as “engineering for humandevelopment that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of futuregenerations to meet their own needs.” (17)With these thoughts in mind, and a defined focus on sustainability and engineering design in ournew curriculum, we defined the “sustainable design process” in our curriculum to be theintegration of four distinct elements into teaching the engineering design process. Theseelements are the: technical requirements, economic requirements, environmental requirements,and social
AC 2007-1928: CULTIVATING A SUSTAINABILITY CULTURE IN IRISHSECOND LEVEL SCHOOLSSonya Quinn, University of Limerick Sonya Quinn graduated with first class honours from the University of Limerick in 2005 in Technology Education. She is currently a researcher in environmental sustainability in the University of Limerick undertaking a Masters by research in the area of sustainability and second level schools in Ireland. Sonya is also a tutor in the Explore Engineering Summer Camp, which is run as an introduction to engineering programme in the University of Limerick and is a consultant tutor in the technology learning centre.William Gaughran, University of Limerick Dr Bill Gaughran is a Senior
program is electrical systems. This topic complements otherengineering courses focused on applied physical sciences and plays a significant role in anengineering student’s academic career.In general, circuits and electrical systems are good models for the study of energy systems andthe applied math required to analyze and design circuits and systems are invaluable to anengineer, specifically a general engineer. With the concept of “systems” in mind, this articledescribes the planning, rationale, development, and delivery an electrical engineering course inthe ECU general engineering program. It provides a brief review of peer programs and outlinesseveral observations from the first experience and presents opportunities and suggestions
factors for attempting to mitigate the problem. Hearing from outside speakers helps to create an atmosphere of “reality” in students’ minds with respect to the project, and also is a good chance for students to learn more about the challenges faced in the ‘real world’ of engineering practice. The question that students sometimes ask, “is this really important?” is readily banished when an outside authority explains that sewage flowing into residential basements is the side-effect of undersized, failing combined sewers. 2. Review of available data. The sponsoring agency may have paper maps, GIS data, past studies, master plans, and/or reports for the subject area, and other information that can
York Times(“Why Science Majors Change Their Minds-It’s Just So Darn Hard”) cites roughly 40 percent ofstudents who start out as engineering and science majors end up switching to other subjects oreventually fail to get their degree.3 The President of the United States along with industrygroups have called on colleges to graduate 10,000 more engineers along with 100,000 newteachers with majors in STEM-science, technology, engineering and math. Among a handful ofother reasons that contribute to high attrition rates, the article points out that American students,particularly gifted students with above average admission scores, likely cruised through highschool without developing disciplined habits. This is both troubling and in sharp contrast
AC 2011-2465: INTRODUCING ELEMENTS OF SUSTAINABILITY INTOFORMAL AND INFORMAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING EDU-CATIONJean D MacRae, University of Maine Jean MacRae is an Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Maine, where she is faculty adviser of the student chapter of Engineers Without Borders. Page 22.957.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Introducing elements of sustainability into formal and informal environmental engineering educationThe pressing need to find ways to improve quality of life on a crowded planet with
AC 2012-3581: A PEER-TUTOR’S PERSPECTIVE ON PEER-TUTORINGIN THERMODYNAMICSDr. Craig J. Hoff, Kettering University Craig J. Hoff is a professor of mechanical engineering at Kettering University, where he teaches courses in energy systems and automotive engineering.Dr. Gregory W. Davis, Kettering UniversityMiss Kathryn L. Hoff Page 25.85.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 A Peer-Tutor’s Perspective on Peer-Tutoring in ThermodynamicsAbstractThe purpose of this study was to examine the effects of peer tutoring on student performance in aMechanical Engineering
the following historical quotes from various engineers, as summarized by Ferguson. Drawing on your life experiences, do you agree or disagree with these opinions? Be specific in your responses. Under what circumstances have you made use of your “mind’s eye?” a. “Drawing techniques are the “true alphabet” of the engineer” Isambard Kingdom Brunel, civil engineer. b. “Most eminent scientists agree that non-verbal forms of thought are much more important to their thought than verbal ones.” Root Bernstein. c. For an 18th century water-powered flour mill design: “The arrangement I have so far completed [in my mind] before I began [to build] my mill that I have in my bed
Paper ID #8619The Paperless Lab – Streamlining a Modern Unit Operations LaboratoryCourse to Reduce Faculty Time CommitmentDr. Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University Dr. Matthew Cooper is a Teaching Assistant Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at North Carolina State University. He was born in Elkins, W.Va. and received his B.S. in Chemical Engineering from West Virginia University. Following a position as an oilfield engineer with Schlumberger, Dr. Cooper received his MS and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Ohio University. Upon completion of graduate studies in 2008, Dr
Concepts inEngineering Mechanics. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. June 16-19, Tampa, Fl.Paper ID: 24780.[18] Marquez, E., Garcia Jr., S. Scaffolding Student Success: Developing a Culturally ResponsiveApproach to Support Underrepresented Minorities in Engineering Undergraduate Research. 2021ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 27-30, Long Beach, California. Paper ID: 33507[19] Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.[20] Saldaňa, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage.[21] Keil, M., Lee, H., and Deng, T. Understanding the most critical skills for managing ITprojects: A Delphi study of
, “People need people: students feeling impacts of online school isolation,” Ryerson Folio, November 4th 2020[2] J. Bailenson, “Nonverbal overload: A theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue,” Technology, Mind, and Behavior, Volume 2, Issue 1, Feb 23, 2021[3] M.J. Callaghan, K. McCusker, J. Lopez Losada, J.G. Harkin & S. Wilson (2009) Engineering Education Island: Teaching Engineering in Virtual Worlds, Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 8:3, 2-18, DOI: 10.11120/ital.2009.08030002
define an entrepreneurial mindset(EM) [9]. Entrepreneurially minded learning (EML) activities, as championed by KEEN,combine problem‑based or project-based learning activities with student skills associated with anentrepreneurial mindset. For example, these additional skills might include integratinginformation from many sources to gain insight, conveying engineering solutions in economicterms, and identifying unexpected opportunities to create value. EML activities emphasize“discovery, opportunity identification, and value creation with attention given to effectualthinking over causal (predictive) thinking” [10].Within engineering and the KEEN framework in particular, an entrepreneurial mindset is not thesame as entrepreneurship. Unlike