by AI has made AI literacy a crucial competency forindividual development, turning its cultivation into a “human issue [3].” This need isparticularly urgent for higher education students [4], as industries worldwide require top talentswith AI literacy to drive the intelligent transformation of business processes and products,while making trustworthy and ethical decisions [5]. In response, students are calling for AIliteracy to be integrated into their higher education curricula to better prepare for the challengesof the intelligent era and future careers. For instance, a survey on the use of generative AIamong undergraduates [6], found that students most commonly recommended offering relevantcourses and lectures, with a particular focus on
and equity causes” [6, p.708]. As such, Black facultymentors see current and prospective student mentees as an extension of themselves [6]. In response,Black faculty mentors apply social empathic and equity ethic practices in their mentoringapproaches, which builds trust and rapport with students [6]. As a result, Black faculty mentors areflooded with a disproportionate number of requests from students as well as institutions toparticipate in formal and informal diversity-related service as compared with their Whitecounterparts [6]. However, there is still an overall lack of knowledge of the types of asset-basedstrategies used by Black faculty mentors [8]-[10] in lieu of their cultural taxation [6] and howprofessional development can be used
instructors at four Canadianinstitutions.Although there is research on engineering ethics education3,4,5,6, there is a gap in examining howengineering instructors view the inclusion of ethics and the other hallmarks of STSE in their ownteaching. This research was designed to help fill this gap in the field, focusing on three keyresearch questions: (1) How do undergraduate engineering instructors describe their teachinggoals and practices?; (2) How do undergraduate engineering instructors describe their teachinggoals and practices with respect to exploring the relationship between engineering, society andthe environment (i.e. STSE)?; and (3) What are the specific challenges or enabling factors inexploring the relationship between engineering, society
). Addressing these challenges requiresstrategic planning, leadership, ongoing training, ethical decision making, and a genuine effort tocreate an inclusive culture. The purpose of this paper is to highlight some of the strategies usedin building Wake Forest Engineering and what has now become one of the most diverseacademic units on the Wake Forest University (WFU) campus and the highest ranked (US NewsReport 2023) academic unit on campus. Despite WFU being a predominantly white institution,Wake Forest Engineering as one of the newest academic units on campus adopted hiringpractices that enabled the hiring of a very diverse engineering faculty team – over 50% femalefaculty, 25% racial and ethnic diversity, engineering disciplinary diversity, etc
research interests include: engineering for social justice, engineering with community, innovation, ethics, transformative learning, reflection, professional identity.Mr. Ramon Benitez, Virginia Tech Ramon Benitez is interested in how engineering identity and animal participatory design can be used to recruit Chicano K-12 students to engineering professions. Benitez completed his BS in Metallurgical and Materials Engineering at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP), and is now a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech (VT). Benitez seeks to understand how to best instruct and assess ethical reasoning of engineering practices and engineering responsibilities, including wildlife and humanity, in
has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living- learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service- learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Kevin G. Sutterer P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Kevin Sutterer is Professor and Department Head of Civil Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Tech- nology in Terre
Paper ID #14655Sports, arts and concrete canoes: Engineers learning to lead outside the for-mal curriculumDr. Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto Cindy Rottmann is a Research Associate at the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (ILead) at the University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering leadership, engineering ethics education, critical theory, teacher leadership and social justice teacher unionism.Dr. Robin Sacks, University of Toronto Dr. Sacks is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering at the University of Toronto teaching leadership and positive
, science, and engineering(b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility(g) an ability to communicate effectively(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context(i) a recognition of the need for
Paper ID #21160Perceptions of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge Outcomes by SeniorStudents: Effect of Activities, Internships, and Career GoalsDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She serves as the ABET assessment coordinator for her department. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity
research interests center around interdisciplinary collaboration in engineering and engineering education, including studies of the collaborative relationships between engineers and education researchers. She was recently awarded a CAREER grant from NSF to study interdisciplinarity in engineering graduate programs nationwide.Jenny Lo, Virginia Tech Jenny Lo, assistant professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, is interested in understanding and improving engineering curriculum related to introductory engineering courses, engineering design, engineering ethics, and undergraduate research
measures. b. Ethical and professional responsibilitiesIssues such as ethics in engineering businesses are best addressed through context; otherwise thesubject essentially receives lip service. The conflict between quality product/process and costeffectiveness should be illustrated through examples of where this issue arose and was/was not Page 25.800.3addressed, e.g., costs of oil spills, externalities in production processes, social vs. out of pocketcosts. Ethics is becoming increasingly important in engineering and business courses and is afocus of ABET5 (2011) accreditation as reflected in the associate-level Criterion 3Ah andbachelor-level
range of intended goals. The University of Virginia’s engineering school hasboth an undergraduate thesis that has been required of every student since the early 1900s and anestablished Systems Engineering capstone project that has been in place since 1988. Both projectstreat constraints in areas such as economics, the environment, ethics, politics, sustainability, andsocial considerations as integral parts of engineering problem solving and decision-making. In sodoing, they anticipated and reflect the integrated approach of EC 2000.Most students who major in Systems Engineering (SE) use their capstone project as the basis forthe undergraduate thesis, which is jointly advised and must be jointly approved by a facultymember from the humanities
Page 25.70.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 A Model for the Development of Personal and Professional Social Responsibility for EngineersAbstractImportant attributes for engineering professionals include an understanding of the global andsocietal impacts of engineering projects and a well-developed professional and ethical code ofresponsibility; these attributes must be developed in engineering students. Furthermore, the roleof an engineer is becoming increasingly global, requiring an international perspective and cross-cultural skills. The core foundation for these skills can be found in a well-developed sense ofsocial responsibility, contextualized by the
) ● sub-disciplinary cultures (Gilbert, 2008; Godfrey, 2007; Murphy et al., 2007) ● national cultures (Downey and Lucena, 2005) ● assessment cultures (Borrego, 2008).Godfrey [9] also cites studies of cultural change in engineering education, related to the role of ● institutional culture in effecting change (Covington and Froyd, 2004; Kelly and Murphy, 2007; Kezar and Eckel, 2002; Merton et al., 2004), and ● measuring cultural change (Fromm and McGourty, 2001; Lattuca, Terenzini, and Volkwein, 2006).4.1.2 Observable Engineering Education Cultural Beliefs and ValuesBeliefs such as meritocracy, ethics, complexity, difficulty, worthiness and stress are beingstudied with respect to engineering education culture and the impact on
programmingeducation and real-time feedback, relieving teachers’ workload while giving studentspersonalized curricular information tailored to their needs. Additionally, AI is usually used as adata analytics tool to predict student performance. The reviewed articles focus on AI’s cognitiveand affective impact on students and found positive effects on those variables. At the same time,AI allows for better analysis and utilization of data on student behavior while programming.Limitations in the current reviewed articles on AI in K-12 CS education include insufficientattention to theoretical adoption, ethical concerns, and methodological issues like small samplesizes. This review highlights the critical role of AI in K-12 CS education and illuminatesdirections
Intelligence (AI) applications have become an integral part of our lives, from socialapplications on smartphones to crewless vehicles. However, as they remain in the domain of“computer magic,” these new advancements of knowledge processing and reasoning using AI toolswill not be of a great benefit to humanity, unless a complementary education environment isprovided to help students and communities become involved in this scientific revolution early,ethically, and systematically. Introducing and exploring AI concepts and basics earlier in thestudents’ learning journey will help address the future AI job market needs as well as AI ethicsissues and will open the door for new innovative AI applications in all segments of life. The long-term goal of this
introduction to disciplinary conventions, scientific ethics, and informationliteracy specific to science. The course was designed to achieve these goals in two main ways:students were assigned typical composition assignments but with a scientific component, and thecourse emphasized the practical and analytical elements of the writing process to help demystifyit.Table 1 – University of Colorado Denver Composition Program Outcomes, with TypicalAssignments for Traditional Composition and ELC Composition Classes. Outcomes Traditional Composition Composition Assignments Source: [14] Assignments Adapted for ELC Rhetorical knowledge & Rhetorical analysis
States Coast Guard Academy (CGA), located in New London, Connecticut, is thesmallest of the United States military academies with approximately 1100 cadets. The mission ofthe CGA is to educate, train and develop leaders of character who are ethically, intellectually,and professionally prepared to serve their country and humanity [1]. CGA offers Bachelor ofScience degrees in nine majors, including civil engineering, and all cadets are required tograduate in four years. The civil and environmental engineering curriculum is broad and providesa solid background in the structures, environmental, geotechnical, and construction sub-fields ofcivil engineering. Graduates pursue several different career paths and many of them serve in theUnited States
, rather thanPh.D. level academic writing and speaking. Joshua Schimel’s Writing Science is among the fewresources for learning how to write scientific and engineering journal papers along with H.Glasman-Deal’s textbook focusing on science writing for non-native English speakers [2,3].Engineering communications theory and practice is described in [4], and a recent effort todevelop an engineering writing course for Ph.D. students in China is elaborated in [5].[6] investigates the benefits of providing ethics education in an engineering graduate program inorder to raise awareness of ethical norms and wider exposure to the societal implications andcontext of the field of engineering. In fact, the addition of ethics-based writing assignments tothe
, Solutions, and Impacts (ISI); Ethics (Ethics); Teamwork(Team); and Engineering Communication (Comm Engr). These indicators guided our contentanalysis and served as a coding rubric showing engineering content evidence. The standard wascoded only when the engineering content was met and if students were doing and involved in theengineering framework. One standard could have multiple key QEE indicators. Each researchercoded the standard separately to reach the consistency of and validate the codes with the QEEframework. Each standard document included key terms and definitions, for instance, design,solution, investigation, criteria, constraints, materials, test, failure, and model. These key termsand definitions served as guidance for the
applications Figure 7. NWK - Computer Networks compliance mapping (85% Overall).7. PPP - Preparation for Professional PracticeUpon closer inspection of the LOs in the PPP KA, which complies with 79% of the IEEE/ACMrecommendations, as shown in Figure 8, a common weakness emerges in the philosophicalframeworks and cultural issues, contemporary issues, and professional and ethicalresponsibilities KUs: ethics. Studies on how to better incorporate ethics education in CEcurricula [17] suggest that the solution is threefold: develop case studies based on real-worldexamples for students to practice and develop ethical reasoning skills, combining (wheneverpossible) ethics with technical content across the curriculum, and engaging the faculty to
. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Decreasing Student Stress Through Multi-Attempt Digital Engineering Assessments with Rotating QuestionsAbstract:This paper will discuss building multi-attempt quizzes and exams that use the Canvas LearningManagement System (LMS) to deliver engineering assessments designed to lower overallstudent stress and anxiety. These assessments use practice-focused questions that force studentsto build programs (C++ and Matlab), draft engineering drawings (AutoCAD and Solidworks),and apply engineering design, ethics, and intellectual property concepts to solve open-responsequestions. Each time a student takes the
’ moralbehaviors. It postulates a developmental path toward a post-conventional/principled decision-making guided by generally accepted ethical principles and the equal consideration of others inall aspects. In contrast, Gilligan [14] explicates that connectivity and relations with othersemerge as a powerful axis in women’s moral development; integration of responsibility andcare—rather than universalizable ethical guidelines and equal consideration of others—characterizes the first significant transition in women’s developmental process. Feminist scholars attest that knowledge is fundamentally grounded in people’s experience[15]; given that women experience a different lifeworld from that of men, their knowledge andways of knowing also
studentsat the University of Michigan are here because they want to make the world a better place.Subsequently, the module asks students to consider engineering from a number of angles,including perspectives from junior and senior level engineering students that reinforce the socialdimensions of engineering. The module familiarizes students with the ABET criteria and theNSPE code of ethics [13], [15], while highlighting the ways in which these emphasize theimportance of engineers developing in social areas. Upon completing the module, students havebeen confronted with the idea that social engagement and the analysis of the social impacts ofengineering decisions is a core part of what a practicing engineer should do.Design & Decision
engineering/professional identity abound. Some of these include: The attitudes, beliefs and standards which support the practitioner role and the development of an identity as a member of the profession with a clear understanding of the responsibilities of being a professional [1]. How closely an individual relates to a particular field, profession, or occupation [6]. The relatively stable and enduring constellation of attributes, beliefs, values, motives and experiences in terms of which people define themselves in a professional role [7]. To serve the public with specialized knowledge and skills through commitment to the field’s public purposes and ethical standards’ [8].These definitions include
one example beingthe American Society of Civil Engineering (ASCE) Code of Ethics which states that “The Codeof Ethics of ASCE requires civil engineers to strive to comply with the principles of sustainabledevelopment in the performance of their professional duties…[including] global leadership in thepromotion of responsible, economically sound, and environmentally sustainable solutions thatenhance the quality of life, protect and efficiently use natural resources4.” Since the UnitedNations Stockholm Conference on the Human Environment in 1972, there has been growinginternational interest in the role of higher education in fostering a sustainable future5. Agenda216 and a series of higher education for sustainable development declarations in
provides oversight for leadership development and inter- national activities within the college and he works actively with students, faculty and staff to promote and develop increased capabilities in global agility and leadership. His research and teaching interests in- clude developing global agility, globalization, leadership, project management, ethics, and manufacturing processes. Gregg has lived in numerous locations within the USA and Europe and has worked in many places including North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. Prior to joining BYU, Gregg worked for Becton Dickinson, a Global Medical Technology fortune 500 Company. In this capacity he worked as a product development engineer, quality
recognized pre-college initiative STEM program, FreshStart, which has served more than 2500 students since its inception. Dr. Wickliff has been blessed since 2013 to work daily in the area of her passion – developing young professionals – in her exciting role at Texas A&M University. She is a Professor of Engineering Practice and Mentor to a group of STEM POSSE Scholars. At Texas A&M University, she has taught Capstone Senior Design, Foundations of Engineering courses, Statics & Dynamics, Ethics and Engineergin, and Engineering Leadership Development courses. She is also the founding director of the Zachry Leadership Program. She has also taught Project Management and Risk Management courses for the University
drainage assessment and redesign.Engineer Better Medicines Students are tasked with addressing issues related to heart disease and ethical responsibilities specific to biomedical engineering.Make Solar Energy Economical The project focuses on solar energy applications on campus including cost benefit and GHG payback analyses of a new 1.4MW photovoltaic array.Provide Access to Clean Water Students are tasked with development and preparation of a proposal to the Bill
engineering Ph.D. studentsrequires relevancy to the research field of students. Among other inferences, we see that giventhe time-strapped situation of most Ph.D. engineering students, instruction that relates closely toin-progress work is meaningful and thus, an anchor to attention and improvement. To improvefluency and flow, in writing and speaking, a topical focus on ethical issues has served to linkspecialized technical information to broader social communication that ultimately helps connectsstudents to greater communication opportunities.IntroductionPh.D. engineering students and faculty alike understand the critical need to communicateeffectively in order to lead research projects, teach, mentor, write papers and proposals, and togenerally