teaching the engineering design courses have workedcollaboratively to develop these courses so that the content will be developmental with seamlessintegration and transitions over the seven semester sequence. This was achieved by havingweekly or biweekly meetings to discuss the execution of these courses as well as many meetingsduring summers, before the start and after the completion of each semester to reflect and identifyareas of improvement in content, delivery, and assessment.Our pedagogical vision in teaching these engineering design courses is to enable masterylearning through directed and non-directed, group-based and independent, simple and complex,structured and unstructured, problem-based learning experiences that incrementally expose
students' critical thinking, intellectual growth and communication skills. • Offer a unique curriculum development, by traditional undergraduate standards, where faculty integrate their current research results into the curriculum. This curriculum will be Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Page 8.36.2 Copyright © 2003, American Society For Engineering Education interesting and dynamic, reflecting changes in the faculty’s and the Machine Learning community's research interests over time. • Offer the opportunity to a multi
Mechanical Engineering. The Mission of the College is to provide acontemporary, person-centered educational experience characterized by high academic standards,reflection on values and principles, and preparation for a life-long career. In this regard it is alsoimportant to note that, consistent with this Mission, there is a strong emphasis on providingeducational opportunities to first generation college students. As mentioned earlier, retention of students has both institutional and global ramifications. Page 8.63.1Considering the stringent economic constraints facing most colleges and universities, the “costs” “Proceedings of the 2003
alumnisurveys, capstone design courses, employer surveys, exit interviews, industrial advisory boards,and nationally standardized tests4.Assessment of student learning is at the center of many forces currently working to transformAmerican higher education. Currently, there are several trends taking place in the way highereducation is viewed. First, there is a growing demand for public accountability, as reflected instate legislation. Approximately two-thirds of the states had developed assessment mandates by1990, either through legislation or state agency regulation5. Since 1990, state-level measures ofinstitutional performance have been developed in eighteen to twenty states6. Secondly, there isgrowing internal pressure to become more productive
Microelectronics course, students areasked to characterize the circuits with a RLC resonator, pn diodes, MOSFETs and BJTs.Furthermore, students are trained on how to layout a Printed-Circuit-Board (PCB) and assemblethe related components.A graduate course on Embedded Systems has been revised to reflect the state of the art inembedded systems design. A new hardware platform has been introduced to allow defining theembedded processor specifications, memory organization, and logic, and build the firmwareneeded to realize the embedded application. The t-pad development kit, by Terasic, which is basedon the DE2-115 development board design around the Altera’s Cyclone IV Field ProgrammableGate Array (FPGA) provides a suitable platform for hands-on education of
reviews, (e)piloting the items to a small sample to ensure clarity, and (f) scrutinizing the self-report nature ofthe instrument. More specifically, pilotingthe survey with a group of LTS experts (N=5) and alsowitha group of LTS non-experts (N=5) enabled us to gain insight into the degree to whichresponses on the instrument reflected the faculty‟s actual knowledge of the construct of interestand to examine how the instrument functions across different population groups.Shortly prior to a two-day EFELTS LTS Experts Summit in September 2011, participantscompleted the LTS Faculty Survey online administered on the Qualtrics platform. Demographicinformation on the participants was collected, as well information regarding their positions attheir
required to select two of the four majorsthat had been presented in the plenary sessions then compare and contrast the two majors, reporton an out-of-class discussion about the majors with another student, and then reflect upon theirassessment of the major relative to their current interests. After the completion of the second setof major discussions in Weeks 7-9, the essay assignment was repeated for those remainingmajors. The plenary assignments concluded with a third and final essay in which the studentswere asked: “Which major or majors most made you consider engineering as a profession, and Page 25.851.6why?”; “Which major or majors appealed
the participants developed cross culturalunderstanding and weltanschauung (global perspective), and how the principal investigatorsrevised their plan based on the feedback obtained during the project’s activities (Table 3). Page 25.940.11 The process evaluation is reflected in the logic model by the relationships of how theImplementation Plan was executed through formal agreements, protocols, curricula, value-addedexperiences identified in the institution component of the logic model.Product (Outcome) The product evaluation focused on program results, connecting outcomes with the othermeasurements taken in the earlier areas of
building at all times, withchildren off task. Instructions are not good enough to use without help.” These observationnarratives make apparent the range of student engagement in the lessons and the nature of theirengagement, both of which may reflect the learning that was anticipated to be taking place.Through our coding of observation narratives it also became apparent there were a range ofinteractions among students and between students and teacher. For example, during one lessonthe observation was made, “Focus and joy in classroom were obvious. Lots of give and take withstudents, and emphasis on doing and re-doing to make things work,” and in another “Whenstudents were turned loose, they designed their own methods and tested them with
remain substantial opportunitiesto improve the quality even further in subsequent offerings of this course. The quality of theMentoring and Education sections was found to have the greatest improvement followed bypresentation organization. It can be noted that presentation delivery and answers to questionswere above the ‘better’ rating. The originality of the research idea was uniformly rated lower.This aspect of the proposals has been a highly debated one among the departmental faculty withdiffering views on the benefits to the students if the requirement is an original idea or simplytheir existing Ph.D. research project. This score is likely a reflection of that ongoing debate.In section B, faculty were asked to rate their assessment of the
involve these things. In reflecting on their classroom experiences, the majority of the students found thecoursework helpful because it enhanced their theoretical knowledge in electrical engineering. Afew talked about how, at the time they took a course, they thought the knowledge taught was Page 15.545.5useless, but also how they eventually found it useful. Problem-solving was one way to ascertainthe value of the knowledge learned in the classroom. As David replied when asked whethersolving well-structured problems helped him with ill-structured problems: “You’re not going tosolve a circuit for the customer or get any of your work done
(Environmental Design)Table 4 shows the assessment matrix from 2007-2008 and 2008-2009. It is shaded inseveral ways to show key features related to the two points noted above. The overallpoints allocated to a particular outcome is coded to show outcomes below 50 and 100points (note that the exact number of points for this threshold is somewhat arbitrary andcan vary from year to year depending on the overall points for the senior design project)to clearly show areas with minimal points assigned that need more emphasis in futureyears.Since the senior design experience has been used to assess all program outcomes, thisallows points to be shifted to better reflect a distribution of points and desired effortacross the outcomes. Additionally, the percentages
each of the stakeholders. • Instant Gratification: Determining and embedding incentives along each step in the Mashavu process for each of the stakeholders. • Social Harmony: Examined how designs and programs within Mashavu would fit into East African society. How would things work with the social norms and power systems? • Clinical Encounter: Ensure that a patient’s visit would resemble a face-to-face visit with the doctor. Designed medical records that would reflect the information a doctor needs to do a proper evaluation. Page 15.188.6 • Legal: Developing the Mashavu code of ethics to be followed
’ writings reflect more of “casual” (like informal talking) thinking rather than real report writing skills. Reading habits have gone down significantly. Some students tend not to read the book or the notes (neither before the lecture nor after the lecture). When I started my teaching career I noticed students spending significant amount of time going through worked out examples from the book. I always make it a point to solve problems that are not worked out in the book. This way the students have opportunities to see variety of problem solving skills. The number of opportunities available makes it convenient in one aspect; however, this also inhibits a lack of drive on the part of
the National Science Foundation under thegrant TUES 1245482. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References1. Ma, J., and J. Nickerson. 2006. Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review. ACM Computing Surveys, 38(3), 1-24.2. Wieman C. and K. Perkins. 2005. Transforming physics education. Physics Today,58(11), 36-41.3. Perkins, K., Adams, W., Dubson, M., Finkelstein, N., Reid, S., Wieman, C., & LeMaster, R. 2006. PhET: Interactive simulations for teaching and learning physics. The Physics Teacher, 44, 18.4. Finkelstein, N.D., W.K. Adams, C.J
to be provided for them. Although these instructors were previously aware of some ofthe concepts students found challenging, they pointed out that the written assessments providedinsight as to why students struggled with these ideas. For example, in a question about genetics,one instructor noted that the reports revealed that many students thought that transcription andtranslation are the same process. We learned valuable lessons from this pilot study about 1) how to improve the presentationand user-friendliness of reports; 2) how to improve the scheduling of the AACR assessments andto incentivize homework assignments; and 3) the need for professional development to supportfaculty use of these assessments. These lessons are reflected in
free-thinking and reflection.9Types of incidental writing include, but are not limited to, activities such as personal journal orportfolio writing, “think pieces”, blog entries, and lab books or notebooks. An example ofincidental writing includes assigning students to write daily journals discussing their experiencesand challenges with homework assignments. The instructor can then choose to review the entriesin order to answer questions or clarify confusing information, or the journals can remain strictlyfor the personal use of the student.9 Most examples of journaling found in research appear to besuccessful utilizations with minimum additional work needed from instructors.5The term “think pieces” is a general term encompassing any short
provide a central location for game assets. Also, the web presence helped to maintaina constant visual “brand” as the collaborative passed from one semester to the next with new de-signers entering the collaborative as others graduated.This ongoing collaboration is intended to examine the design and production process of each dis-cipline, observe and reflect on the efficacy of that process and seek that interstitial area betweenthe two disciplines - the "overlap" - and make meaningful reform to the next collaboration. Aftertwo semesters, from fall 2012 to spring 2013, the faculty and student collaborators found sub-stance in the overlap, frustrations in the process and sufficient value in the effort and product tojustify continuing the
teachingschedules. To decrease impact on faculty time, lunches are kept to one-hour. Thefirst part of the hour is unscheduled, to provide participants with an opportunity toget their food, get settled, and socialize/network with other attendees. Theremainder of the session is used to give a presentation on a professionaldevelopment topic (leadership, communication, time management, lab management,worklife balance, negotiation, networking, administrative pathways on campus, usingteams or peer-editing in class) or a climate-related gender issue (stereotype threat,student-incivility, implicit bias, impact, respect, effectiveness). Participants areencouraged to contribute, share, and reflect during the sessions. All presentationsare posted on the program
hierarchy, which is the collection ofall decision alternatives.The final step in the AHP is to establish the total global score. This is done by combining thenormalized local priority weights of the alternatives, sub-criteria and criteria levels throughsuccessive multiplication. That is, the weights at the lowest level are multiplied with respect toall successive upper levels in the hierarchy. The new composite weights are normalized; themagnitude indicates the relative preference of the decision alternative. The decision alternativethat receives the highest value reflects the optimal alternative.Every step in the AHP process can involve a group of decision makers. Each of the stakeholderscan select the objective, the decision criteria and the
discussions, because the instructor was better informed of students' learning needs. The instructor devoted attentions to those content slides that most students feel "more painful" during content lectures. The instructor also reviewed students’ entries on the Discussion Board to prepare for what questions to ask and what problems to exercise for these painful slides/concepts.2) The in-class discussion materials, which were posted on the learning management system 24 hours before the weekly lecture time, included further explanations of difficult contents, reflections of important concepts, problem solving examples, and interactive questions/answers.3) The entire 2-hour class time was devoted to the in-class discussion
reflects the overall lowrepresentation of minorities and women in the mechanical engineering profession. Workshopattendees develop crucial skills to help them negotiate, network, navigate and lead change, andcommunicate. In addition, connecting attendees within the design community early in theircareers, will give them opportunities to support each other throughout their careers. Ourhypothesis is that building a community that provides networking and support, opportunities forcollaboration, and professional development, will lead to greater career success, personalfulfillment and professional happiness, retention, and greater participation/contribution fromwomen and minorities, as suggested in the literature.Literature ReviewAlthough the