questions are generally related to the heat transfer processes/geometriesdescribed in said figure. Students are asked to carefully scrutinize the figure toidentify the probable mode(s) of heat transfer. During the review period, groups ofstudents work together to come up with potential exam problems related to thecovered content and then identify strategies, methodologies, and/or relevantequations to obtain solutions. The primary role of the instructor during theseactivities is to ensure that the discussions are relevant to the upcoming exam’scontent or focus. Review sessions are typically held the day before the exam, andthe preview figures are provided in advance. The review activity is based onvarious studies supporting collaborative learning as
seventies,” Hum. Relat., vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1179–1204, 1982.[5] S. Assegaff and A. R. C. Hussin, “Review of Knowledge Management Systems As Socio-Technical System,” p. 6.[6] E. Molleman and M. Broekhuis, “Sociotechnical systems: towards an organizational learning approach,” J. Eng. Technol. Manag., vol. 18, no. 3–4, pp. 271–294, Sep. 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0923-4748(01)00038-8.[7] T. Reiman and P. Oedewald, “Assessment of complex sociotechnical systems – Theoretical issues concerning the use of organizational culture and organizational core task concepts,” Saf. Sci., vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 745–768, Aug. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.07.010.[8] S. Winter, N. Berente, J. Howison, and B. Butler, “Beyond the
teachers developed an engineering learning sequence thatconnected to a design opportunity within their local context (see Hammack et al., 2022 foradditional curriculum detail). After developing the lessons, participating teachers enacted thelessons with their elementary students. Participants included 43 4th and 5th grade students dividedinto two groups, those who attended school on a Native American reservation (n=23) and thosewho attended a small town school not located on a reservation (n=20). To measure the impacts ofthe program, students completed the Students Attitudes towards STEM survey ([S-STEM],Friday Institute, 2012) and the Engineering Identity Develop Scale ([EIDS], Capobianco et al.,2017) before and after engaging in the community
Science, vol. 37, pp. 331-356, 2007.[4] W. Faulkner, "Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures. II. Gender in/authenticity and the in/visibility paradox," Engineering Studies, vol. 1, pp. 169-189, 2009.[5] M. Tremblay, T. Wils, and C. Proulx, "Determinants of career path preferences among Canadian engineers," Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 19, pp. 1-23, 2002.[6] R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, and G. Hackett, "Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis," Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 47, p. 36, 2000.[7] R. W. Lent, H.-B. Sheu, C. S. Gloster, and G. Wilkins, "Longitudinal test of the social cognitive model of choice in engineering
. She holds a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Minnesota. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Engineering a Transfer Friendly Experience with Alternative Pathways to ExcellenceAbstract:The Alternative Pathways to Excellence (APEX) program is an NSF funded S-STEM Track 2project that seeks to strengthen efforts to recruit and retain STEM transfer students by integratingfinancial, academic, and practical supports.The APEX program provides student support services, formal and informal mentoring, curricularand co-curricular supports, and cohort building activities all formulated to create accessiblepathways into engineering careers for a population
Cincinnati. Along with his current role as the Manager of Diversity, Inclusion, and Community Engagement for the Co ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Greater Equity, Access, and Readiness for Success in Engineering and Technology (GEARSET) - An Alternate Pathway to Engineering and ETIntroductionThe Greater Equity, Access, and Readiness for Engineering and Technology (GEARSET)Program, an NSF funded S-STEM program was developed to address several institutional needsat the university. The original target population for the GEARSET program was identified as asubset of the students who applied to the College of Engineering (COE) at the University ofToledo (UToledo) and do not meet all the admissions
out a brief reflectivestatement to share in the main room.Workshop design strategies used within each component were guided by literatureEach workshop component utilized a variety of strategies [33] to ensure active participation andcreation of a safe environment (Table 1).Table 1. Workshop features selected during the design of the workshop. Workshop Design How it was employed Literature Basis Strategies Common vocabulary The workshop pre-work and A common vocabulary can help introduction component(s) participants feel comfortable using contained definitions of appropriate words to engage in common diversity, equity, and
, “Reading mastery as pedagogy of erasure,” J. Res. Rural Educ., vol. 26, no. 13, 2011, [Online]. Available: http://jrre.psu.edu/articles/26-13.pdf.[16] E. Shizha, “Indigenous knowledge systems and the curriculum,” in African Indigenous Knowledge and the Disciplines, G. Emeagwali and G. J. S. Dei, Eds., Rotterdam: SensePublishers, 2014, pp. 113–129. doi: 10.1007/978-94-6209-770-4_11.[17] M. Kovach, Indigenous Methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. University of Toronto Press, 2009. Accessed: Sep. 23, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://read.dukeupress.edu/ethnohistory/article/58/4/727/26209/Indigenous-Methodolo gies-Characteristics[18] G. J. S. Dei, “Indegenizing the school curriculum
[31]. As design thinking is naturally embedded within engineeringproblems, it is essential for students to start to be exposed as early as possible to acquire thenecessary problem-solving skills. To initiate, teachers should be equipped to teachengineering in their teaching subjects [32]. Carroll et al. [33] combined DT with a classroomlearning environment in various manners and found how DT linked to academic standardsand the learning of content in the classroom. Meanwhile, DT is interdisciplinary [34],building new scholarly spaces by combining disciplines. McLaughlin et al.’s [35] workproved this view and portrays DT’s validity across fields and institutions.In engineering, design is seen as the main or distinguishing activity [9]. As such
* Resources Time Affiliation S F/S A Total 1 Fri What is Anti- ARCH - - - - An Anti-Racist Manifesto [8] 6/26/20 Racist Design, student Why I’m an architect that designs for social impact, 5-6 PM Planning and not buildings | Liz Ogbu TED Talk [9] Building? Black in Design Session 3, Mobilizing and Organizing [10] 2 Wed Placemaking as
. https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/fedsupport/2018/.[3] J. C. Kelly, M. F. Chouikha, C. J. Scott, K. A. Connor, D. Geddis, M. Ndoye, S. Abraham, M. Velez-Reyes, S. Zein-Sabatto, and R. Yaqub, “The inclusive engineering consortium stakeholders workshop,” in ASEE’s Virtual Conference, June 2020.[4] J. Hemming, K. Eide, E. Harwood, R. Ali, Z. Zhu, J. Cutler and the National Research Mentoring Network Coachingi Group Directors, “Exploring professional development for new investigators underrepresented in the federal funded biomedical research workforce,” Ethnicity & Disease, vol 29, supplement 1, pp 123-128, 2019.[5] V. L. Shavers, P. Fagan, D. Lawrence, W. McCaskill-Stevens, P. McDonald, D. Browne, D. McLinden
education, K-12 STEM teacher professional development, and preservice teacher preparation in STEM.Dr. Joanna K. Garner, Old Dominion University Dr. Garner is Executive Director of The Center for Educational Partnerships at Old Dominion University, VA. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Near-Peer Mentoring and Early Exposure to Computer Science – Quantitative and Qualitative Results - SummaryIntroductionThe CS/M Scholars Program at Western Washington University (WWU) is funded by an NSFTrack 2 S-STEM grant (Award Number 1742110). The grant funds scholarships for low-incomehigh-achieving students majoring in computer science or math and
remotely on their year-long projects at the end of August. The mid-termpresentations were held on January, 2021 and it appeared that all students were making very goodprogress. Advisors meet with students weekly over ZOOM. While everyone is looking forward toreturning to our traditional format, we have all adjusted and I really believe that this year’s programis running as well as it would under traditional circumstances.References[1] ”Envisioning the Data Science Discipline: The Undergraduate Perspective: Interim Report” National Academies Press: OpenBook, https://www.nap.edu/read/24886/[2] Berman, F., Rutenbar, R., Hailpern, B., Christensen, H., Davidson, S., Estrin, D., aˆ Szalay, A. S. Realizing the potential of data science
), 1st-generation status (a student whose parent(s) did notcomplete a four-year college or university degree) and finally by responses based on scoring on theengineering self-efficacy scale (threshold value of 4.0 out of 5 set as high-ESE).Thirty-two females completed the survey and twenty-four males, one student identified as genderqueer ornon-binary. This data point was not considered when comparing differences in gender due to the smallsample size but was considered for analysis of 1st-generation and low- vs. high-engineering self-efficacy.Eighteen students reported being 1st-generation, thirty-nine were not. Twenty-one scored 4.0 or greater onmeasures of engineering self-efficacy, thirty-six scored below 4.0.To examine the reliability of the
[22]. During World War II (1939-45),women engaged in roles that were previously exclusive to males although women did not benefitequally [34]. The 1960’s and 1970’s led to the creation of law and programs to promote equityand challenge gender-related disparities including the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the Title IX of theEducation Amendments Act of 1972, and the Women’s Educational Equity Act of 1974 to namea few. Nonetheless, these women scientists continued to bring “modest but essential change tohigher education in the years 1972-1985” [35, p. 39].In the Nineteenth and Twentieth century, women studying or working in engineering wereperceived as outcasts. The first women pursuing engineering were labeled as “others”; a smallthreatening group of
marginalized populations. A potentiallimitation of this study involves the first author having relationships with most of theparticipants. It will be interesting to replicate the study with participants who are unknown to thefirst author. Those participants might be less willing to be interrogated and challenged.References[1] S. Stokes, Into the Wildfire: Campus Racial Climate and the Trump Presidency (Doctoral dissertation, 2020, University of Southern California).[2] S. R. Harper, An anti‐deficit achievement framework for research on students of color in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2010, (148), 63-74.[3] Z. W. Taylor, A sage on two stages: What a Black academic taught a white scholar about cross-cultural mentoring. Texas
can be evaluated in terms of t effectiveness ascompared to the other capstone courses to inform changes can be made to the Global Capstone.Citations(1 )Chubin, D. E., May, G. S., & Babco, E. L. (2005). Diversifying the Engineering Workforce. Journal ofEngineering Education, 94(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2005.tb00830.x(2) De Graaff, E., & Ravesteijn, W. (2001). Training complete engineers: Global enterprise andengineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 26(4), 419–427.https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790110068701(3) Jesiek, Zhu, Q., Woo, S. E., Thompson, J., & Mazzurco, A. (2014). Global Engineering Competency inContext: Situations and Behaviors. 16.(4) Lucena, J., Downey, G., Jesiek, B., &
to one another during the career decision-making process(Lent et al., 1994). SCCT served as the basis of the interview protocol administered in this study,the deductive data analysis process, and in considering the implications of the study.Figure 1Social Cognitive Career TheoryNote. From “Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest,Choice, and Performance,” by R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, and G. Hackett, 1994, Journal ofVocational Behavior, 45, pp. 79-122.MethodologyResearch design. An embedded, multiple-case study design (Yin, 2018) was utilized to explorethe ways in which 22 engineering postdoctoral scholars describe the appeal of pursuing a careerin the professoriate. Interviews, grounded by SCCT (Lent et al
for EAC programs) and CETAA (CommitteeTelecommunication(s) for ETAC programs) committee meetings.INCOSE, Systems No Still working on initial criteria requirementsSNAME, Naval Architecture and Feedback from program heads and discussion No Yes Ad hocMarine Engineering among society reps. Any changes to Program Criteria have beenSPIE, Optical and
-Colleges-Are- Best- and/245758?cid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en&elqTrackId=61c76ff393544f33916 cdf7efa62f902&elq=1228defe891449bf8337f489863032f4&elqaid=22356&elqat=1&elqC ampaignId=110123. Burgher, J.K., D. M. Finkel, B. J. Van Wie, and O. O. Adesope, "Implementing and Assessing Interactive Physical Models in the Fluid Mechanics Classroom," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 2501–2516, 2016.4. Hunsu, N.J., O. Adesope, and B.J. Van Wie, “Engendering situational interest through innovative instruction in an engineering classroom: what really mattered?” Instructional Science, vol. 45, pp. 789-804, 2017.5. Liu C., C. Chen, S. Chen, T. Tsai, C. Chu, C
Professoriate, vol. 3, 2010.[10] C. M. Lewis, N. Shah, and K. Falkner, “Equity and Diversity,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research, Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp. 481–510.[11] G. Rulifson and A. Bielefeldt, “Health stress and support system narratives of engineering students,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings, 2020.[12] C. M. Vogt, “Faculty as a critical juncture in student retention and performance in engineering programs,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 27–36, 2008.[13] S. E. Walden, D. A. Trytten, and R. L. Shehab, “Research-based recommendations for creating an inclusive culture for diversity and equity in engineering education,” in 2018
measured by the REFERENCESstudents GPA after Introduction to Engineering. Studentswere divided into two groups according to their nationality, [1] J. L. Hieb, K. B. Lyle, P. A. S. Ralston, and J. Chariker, “Predictingand divided again according to which version of the course performance in a first engineering calculus course: implications forthey took. The interaction effect between nationality andFirst Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference July 31 – August 2, 2016, Columbus, OH W1A-3
underrepresented minorities.References[1] Puccinelli, TJ, Fitzpatrick, M., Masters, G., Murphy, JG, The Evolution of the Freshman Engineering Experience to Increase Active Learning, Retention, and Diversity--Work in Progress. American Society for Engineering Education, 2016.[2] B. M. Olds and R. L. Miller, "The effect of a first-year integrated engineering curriculum on graduation rates and student satisfaction: A longitudinal study," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, p. 23, 2004.[3] S. S. Courter, S. B. Millar, and L. Lyons, "From the students' point of view: Experiences in a freshman engineering design course," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 87, pp. 283-288, 1998.[4] D. W. Knight, L. E. Carlson, and
and the College ofDesign provided a 3-year contract for a shared faculty appointment and funds for travel,maintenance, and upgrades to the program with the the goal to be self-sustained and/or supportedin large part by external funds and grants.Session OverviewAs of June 2017, FLEx has delivered a total of 171 sessions both on campus and around the stateof Iowa (Figures 3 & 4). The number of sessions have continued to increase each year, with2017 poised to exceed 2016’s previously record total. Notable sessions and locations include theIowa State Fair, 4-H, Women in Science and Engineering (WiSE), Precollegiate Programs forTalented and Gifted, Upward Bound, and Science Bound.Sessions begin with a short 15-minute presentation on design
sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.[2] Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2012). Leaving engineering: A multi- year single institution study. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 6–27.[3] Eris, O., Chachra, D., Chen, H. L., Sheppard, S., Ludlow, L., Rosca, C., Bailey, T., & Toye, G. (2010). Outcomes of a longitudinal administration of the persistence in engineering survey. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 371–395.[4] Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.[5] Sandoval, W. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: Introduction. Educational Psychologist
Used To Enhance Introductory CircuitAnalysis Paper presented at 1998 Annual Conference, Seattle, Washington.https://peer.asee.org/7076[6] Stace, S., & Medoff, H., & Margle, J. (2003, June), Incorporating Musical Instrument DesignInto A Freshmen Engineering Course Paper presented at 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville,Tennessee. https://peer.asee.org/12535[7] Rogers, C., & McDonald, J., & Nocera, T., & Cyr, M. (1998, June), The Design AndPerformance Of Musical Instruments Paper presented at 1998 Annual Conference, Seattle,Washington. https://peer.asee.org/7015[8] Robinson, C., & Baxter, S. C. (2013, June), Turning STEM into STEAM Paper presented at2013 ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, Georgia. https://peer.asee.org/22656[9