education,” Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2019.[11] B. Hughes, et al. “Do I think I’m an engineer? Understanding the impact of engineeringidentity on retention,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2016.10.18260/1-2--32674.[12] A. Godwin, “Development of a measure of engineering identity,” 2016 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016. 10.18260/p.26122.[13] J.C. Major, A. Kirn, “Engineering identity and project-based learning: How does activelearning develop student identity?” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus,Ohio, 2017. 10.18260/1-2--28255.[14] O. Pierrakos, T. K. Beam, J. Constantz, A. Johri and R. Anderson, "On the development of aprofessional identity: engineering
. 2, p. eaau4734, 2019, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau4734.[9] C. Finelli, K. Richardson, and S. Daly, “Factors that Influence Faculty Motivation ofEffective Teaching Practices in Engineering,” 2013 ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Proc., p.23.590.1-23.590.11, 2013, doi: 10.18260/1-2--19604.[10] L. R. Lattuca and J. S. Stark, Shaping the college curriculum: Academic plans in context.John Wiley & Sons, 2009.[11] J. C. Garibay, S. Vincent, and P. Ong, “Diversity Content in Stem? How Faculty ValuesTranslate into Curricular Inclusion Unevenly for Different Subjects in Environmental AndSustainability Programs,” J. Women Minor. Sci. Eng., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 61–90, 2020, doi:10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2020029900.[12] T. Russo‐Tait, “Science Faculty Conceptions
," 2012. Accessed: 5/2019. [Online]. Available: Makezine.com: https://cdn.makezine.com/make/sales/Maker-Market-Study.pdf[3] M. Tomko, R. Nagel, M. Alemán, and J. Linsey, "Learning in Academic Makerspaces: How Inclusivity Affords Learning for Female Students in Various University Makerspaces," presented at the ASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.[4] V. Bean, N. M. Farmer, and B. A. Kerr, " An exploration of women’s engagement in Makerspaces," Gifted and Talented International, vol. 30, no. 1-2, pp. 61-67, 2015, doi: doi:10.1080/15332276.2015.1137456.[5] J. L. Saorín, D. Melian-Diaz, A. Bonnet, C. C. Carrera, C. Meier, and J. De La Torre-Cantero, "Makerspace teaching-learning environment to
technology in engineering education. He has served on the ASEE Pacific Southwest Section Board of Directors since 2014, including as the PSW Section Chair for 2018-2019.Ms. Deanna Miranda BarriosMs. Cecilia Nguyen, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Assessing the influence of an online video tutorial library on undergraduate mechanical engineering studentsAbstractSince 2013, the Mechanical Engineering Department at California State Polytechnic University,Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona) has created over 600 videos for its curriculum across 12 courses.These videos are available to the public as an
student engagement, critical thinking and learning. A SAGE white paper.[4] Kelly, R. (2022). Report: Top Uses of Video in Teaching and Learning. Campus Technology.Retrieved from Report: Top Uses of Video in Teaching and Learning -- Campus Technology[5] Birdwell, J.A. & Peshkin, M. (2015). Capturing technical lectures on light board. 122ndASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Seattle, WA., June 14-17, 2015.[6] Ganbat, D. & Naidandorj, R. (2018). Experiences of using ICT for teaching courses of“Mechanics of Materials.” Proceedings of the ISCSET-2018 Workshop, Novosibirsk, Russia,August 12-18, 2018. 11-18.[7] Kamat, A., & Yari, N. (2019, April). Methods for teaching statics. In 2019 ASEE Zone IConference & Workshop.[8] Lubrick, M
non-Indigenousperspectives [5]. Friesen et al. have examined the outcomes of increasing concepts of Indigenousconcerns and knowledge in several design, capstone, and theoretical courses [7]. Work has alsobeen done to inspect the integrations of learning modules and technical courses that are wovenwith Indigenous topics [8], [9]. In the United States and the American Society of EngineeringEducation (ASEE), discussions have been done to compare engineering and Native Americanphilosophies of learning [10], increase recruitment of underrepresented and minority groups [11],explore how to engage with Native American communities and culture [12], and conductparticipatory research with the communities [13].Efforts have been made on equity, diversity
goals such as no poverty, zero hunger, and cleanwater and sanitation [7]. ASME contends that “mechanical engineering practitioners will need tobetter understand the global marketplace in terms of economics, user needs, values and culture[8].” Each of these reports highlights the growing responsibility of engineers to consider globalneeds and impacts in the design process. These broader implications of design solutions and changes to the responsibilities ofengineers are reflected in changes made in 2019 to the ABET Criteria for AccreditingEngineering Programs, which describe the criteria that must be met by all accredited engineeringprograms and help to guide the direction of engineering education [9]. Specifically, the StudentOutcomes
community.IntroductionIn this paper, we provide an update for the years 2019-2023 to the implementation of the EarlyResearch Scholars Program (ERSP), developed at the University of California San Diego, to ourinstitution, the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC). The program, funded by the NationalScience Foundation Improving Undergraduate STEM Education program, was designed to supportretention of students from marginalized backgrounds in the field of computing especially duringthe second year of their major [1].Currently, the project at UIC is in its fourth grant year, having served four cohorts of students since2019. The program has served majority women or non-binary students and continues to strive forrepresentation of minoritized students in the fields
component to the program, community college transfer students will likely continue tohave varying levels of graduation rates and graduation successes. Programs expanded from thisstudy would benefit from the basic structure, but require additional expansions into moreelaborate financial package designs.References[1] "Tennessee Promise." https://www.tn.gov/tnpromise.html (accessed 02/24/23.[2] R. M. Ellestad, D. J. Keffer, J. Retherford, C. Wetteland, M. Kocak, and T. Griffin, "NSF S-STEM: Transfer Success Co-Design for Engineering Disciplines (TranSCEnD)," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019.[3] V. Tinto, Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. ERIC, 1987.[4
parallel--by satisfaction withthe package and perception of whether the university honored the package [6]. In a study at apublic University in the Southeastern United States published in 2019, it was found that womenreport lower levels of satisfaction and lower perception that the university honored their packagesthan men [7]. Similarly, among early-career clinician-researchers, a positive association was foundbetween access to adequate research equipment, which start-up packages can provide, andprofessional success [8]. By the same token, University of California San Diego reported in 2023statistically significant gender disparities in lab space in favor of men at its Scripps Institution ofOceanography. These differences could not be explained
(accessed Feb. 28, 2023).[2] “Citation report - 728 - Web of Science Core Collection.” https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/citation-report/8c75c603-7be4-4c44-a972- 0c3425970bd1-72586299 (accessed Feb. 28, 2023).[3] M. E. Thompson, “Grade Expectations: The Role of First-Year Grades in Predicting the Pursuit of STEM Majors for First- and Continuing-Generation Students,” J. High. Educ., vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 961– 985, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1080/00221546.2021.1907169.[4] J. Bastiaan and R. Bastiaan, “Increasing the Interest of Elementary School Girls in STEM Fields Through Outreach Activities,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, p. 32961. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32961.[5] D. P. Holland, S
. 4We’d like our presentation to generate some good conversation in the room throughoutgiven the typical length of these sessions, and so we’ve broken up our session into two parts, where we have some conversation in the middle of the session and then at the end. We also want to emphasize that the presentation is bringing together two different related ideas, and so you can think of it as describing two different studies in one.As of 2019, Black/ African American and Hispanic tenure‐track faculty represented only 2.5% and 3.7%, respectively, of all tenure‐track engineering faculty: a 0% increase in each group since 2011, and a 0.6% and 1.4% decrease, respectively, from each group reaching its peak representation in 2017. (ASEE “By
. A. S. Ralston, “Barriers and bottlenecks in engineering mathematics: How performance throughout a math sequence affects retention and persistence to graduation,” in October 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2019.[8] J. J. Pembridge and M. A. Verleger, “First-year math and physics courses and their role in predicting academic success in subsequent courses,” in Proceedings of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2013.[9] D. G. Beanland, “Challenges and opportunities facing the education of engineers-Address to Victoria division of engineers Australia seg meeting.” Melbourne, 2010.[10] PCAST President’s Council on Advisors on Science and Technology and President’s Council on
Paper ID #33449Transition of an Interactive, Hands-on Learning Tool to a Virtual Formatin the Covid-19 EraMrs. Olivia Reynolds, Washington State University Second year chemical engineering doctoral student pursuing research on the development and dissem- ination of low-cost, hands-on learning modules displaying heat and mass transfer concepts in a highly visual, interactive format. Graduated from Washington State University with a B.S. degree in chemical engineering in 2017 and an M.S. degree in chemical engineering in 2019 with an emphasis on biosensors research.Kitana Kaiphanliam, Washington State University Kitana
. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assign- ment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received for the best paper published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS.Hayaam Osman, Purdue University at West Lafayette American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Advanced Placement
. Barton, G. E. Relyea, and S. A. Knowlton, “Rethinking the subscription paradigmfor journals: Using interlibrary loan in collection development for serials,” Coll. Res. Libr., vol.79, no. 2, pp. 279–290, 2018, doi: 10.5860/crl.79.2.279.[6] M. Smith, “Living in denial: The relationship between access denied turnaways and ILLrequests,” Ser. Libr., vol. 75, no. 1–4, pp. 31–41, 2019, doi: 10.1080/0361526X.2019.1593914.[7] S. B. Wainscott and R. J. Zwiercan, “Improving access to standards,” ASEE Annu. Conf.Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2020-June, p. 13, 2020, doi: 10.18260/1-2--34790.[8] P. P. Frank and R. L. Bothmann, “Assessing undergraduate interlibrary loan use,” J.Interlibrary Loan, Doc. Deliv. Electron. Reserv., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 33–48
math & science academy, career academy, a magnet school, and neighborhood highschools throughout the Chicago area. Participants in the 2019 program were seven CPS teachers,including three males and four females, with a range of teaching experience from 1 to 17 years(average 5.6 years). The teacher fellows included two Asian, 2 Black, 2 White and 1 teacher whochose not to respond. At the conclusion of each week of the program, teacher fellows completed a survey inQualtrics to evaluate their weekly experience in their research lab and educational workshop. Allsurveys were developed using a university Qualtrics account for survey administration andanalysis. The principal investigators used Dedoose.com to conduct a qualitative
://www.sciencebusiness.net/sites/default/files/archive/Assets/94fe6d15-5432-4cf9-a656-633248e63541.pdf. [Accessed 19 Jan 2020].[6] S. Kaul, G.A. Chang, PM Yanik, and CW Ferguson (2015, June), “Development of a MentorshipProgram in Engineering and Engineering Technology,” presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Seattle, Washington.[7] M. Nelson, B. Ahn, and CN Nelson (2019, June), “Make to Innovate: Blending of Project-basedLearning and Flipped Classroom Pedagogies to Provide Real-world Engineering Experiences toEngineering Students,” presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida.
- chanical Engineers), headquartered in New York, NY. He was responsible for ASME’s worldwide activ- ities in undergraduate degree program accreditation and curriculum advancement, ME/MET department leadership development via leadership summits and workshops; ASME EdResearch projects in practice- oriented curricula and diversity/inclusion strategy in ME/MET education and workforce development programs; and precollege engineering education curriculum and teacher development. Mr. Perry joined ASME in 1991 as Director of Professional Development after serving as Deputy Executive Director and Interim Executive Director for the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) in Washing- ton, DC. He holds an AAS and BS in
in the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineer- ing at the Georgia Institute of Technological. Dr. Linsey received her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas. Her research area is design cognition including systematic methods and tools for innovative design with a particular focus on concept generation and design-by-analogy. Her research seeks to understand designers’ cognitive processes with the goal of creating better tools and approaches to enhance engineering design. She has authored over 100 technical publications including twenty-three journal papers, five book chapters, and she holds two patents. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
of K-16 engineering learners; and teaching engineering.Dr. Glenda D. Young Collins, Mississippi State University Dr. Glenda D. Young Collins completed her doctoral work at Virginia Tech in the Department of Engi- neering Education. Her research interests include the role of university-industry partnerships in shaping student career expectations and pathways, the student to workforce continuum, and broadening participa- tion in engineering. Dr. Collins has worked as an Employer Relations Assistant for the VT Career and c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #27724 Professional
research.Other faculty interested in applying this tool in their classes, or in tracking its ongoingdevelopment, may find the online calculators freely available at www.pyromat.org.AcknowledgementThis project was funded in part by an Affordable Course Transformation grant from Penn StateUniversity.References[1] S. Bakrania and A. Carrig, “Touching Water: Exploring Thermodynamic Properties with Clausius App,” presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.[2] “EES: Engineering Equation Solver | F-Chart Software : Engineering Software.” [Online]. Available: http://www.fchart.com/ees/. [Accessed: 04-Feb-2019].[3] C. R. Martin, J. P. Moore, and J. A. Ranalli, “Teaching the foundations of thermodynamics with PYro,” in 2016 IEEE
pedagogical research that enhances students class experience and interdisciplinary research in which software engineering is used to empower other disciplines. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Lean Manufacturing Initiative to Streamline the Advising Process, A Work-in-progressAbstract In this work-in-progress, we describe a novel advising process that employs student Peer Mentors (PM) to enhance the operational efficiency of academic advisors. A “Lean manufacturing” framework is used to classify all activities as value-added or non-value- added ones. By applying this framework to our current advising process for first-year students within the School of
predictors of preparedness for college (SAT scores), thoseexam attendees (attending 2 or 3 exam sessions) outperformed their non-exam (attending 0 or 1exam session) attending peers with similar scores. Qualitative survey data indicated strongpositive perceptions of the collaborative exam review and its impact on students’ study time anduse of effective study strategies.IntroductionIn the summer of 2019, our research collaborators attended the Annual ASEE Conference and inparticular, a session presentation on the use of collaborative practice exams in historicallydifficult introductory math and science courses at the University of Kansas [1]. The methodimplemented by this team is detailed in their paper and described below.The collaborative mock exam
Education, 2020 Implementation of Competency-Based Learning Assessment in an Undergraduate Thermodynamics CourseAbstractThis paper examines the implementation of competency-based learning assessment in anundergraduate thermodynamics course. Following a method presented for an undergraduatedynamics class at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference, subject matter in this class was dividedinto three categories – preliminary, required, and supplementary topics. Each category includedmultiple sub-topics, with a total of 13 sub-topics for the whole semester. Students were quizzedon each subtopic. Students could not take quizzes on topics in the next category unless theyreceived a score of 88% or better on all the quizzes in the current
Paper ID #30852Reducing Student Resistance to Active Learning: Applying ResearchResults to Faculty DevelopmentLea K. Marlor, University of Michigan Lea Marlor is a Ph.D. student at the University of Michigan, studying Engineering Education Research. She joined the University of Michigan in Sept 2019. Previously, she was the Associate Director of Education for the Center for Energy Efficient Electronics Science, a NSF-funded Science and Technology Center at the University of California, Berkeley. She managed undergraduate research programs to recruit and retain underrepresented students in science and engineering and
company has since evolved to cover MaterialsIntelligence through software at all levels: from academia to industry. In 2019, it was acquiredby an engineering simulation company, which has expanded the focus to include materialsinformation for simulations of all kinds.In this paper, strategies on how to enable active learning usage in materials science courses viasoftware and connected resources will be discussed. First, a brief overview of knowledgetransfer, teaching methods, and active learning will be provided for motivation of the work.Then, a description of the software and the resources provided to support the community ofmaterials educators will be given. Use cases, when applicable, will be referenced. Finally, goalsand the next steps for
engineering areoften talented in music, suggesting that a viable musical presence within an engineeringcurriculum makes sense. A first approach towards introducing the conductorless orchestramodel to other schools will occur at the 2019 ASEE Zone 1 International Conference in Niagara 3Falls, New York. The photo below captures the OCO students who will be performing on April12, 2019, for the ASEE conference.A second milestone will be an accessible website hub that offers scaffolding, materials, andtools to support the conductorless orchestra model at other engineering schools.A Conductorless Orchestra Hub A summer grant from the 2019 Innovation and Research Fund at Olin College will enable thecreation
mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Experiences of Engineering Students with Disabilities in the Accommodations ProcessBackground and MotivationStudents with disabilities attend higher education institutions, but the exact number is not clear.In the 2019-2020 academic school year, 21% percent of undergraduate students reported havinga disability, of which eight percent were formally registered as having a disability with theirinstitution (Postsecondary National Policy Institute (PNPI), 2022). These numbers are anunderestimation. Disabled students may not be
identity development.AcknowledgementsThis worked is supported by the Department of Engineering and King’s InternationalFoundation at King’s College London. The views expressed are my own.References[1] A. Godwin and A. Kirn, “Identity-based motivation: Connections between first-year students’ engineering role identities and future-time perspectives,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 362–383, 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20324.[2] A. Patrick and M. Borrego, “A Review of the Literature Relevant to Engineering Identity,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2016, p. 26428. doi: 10.18260/p.26428.[3] M. S. Ross, J. L. Huff, and A. Godwin, “Resilient