commercialize the ProspectorTM hematology analyzer in Sept 2022. Dr. Chen’s main research interests are developing innovative biomaterials and nanomaterials for drug delivery, cell/tissue imaging, biosensors, and hematology analysis applications. He has co-invented multiple patents and co-authored 29 peer-reviewed journal articles and proceedings papers.Ahmed Abuhussein, Gannon University 15th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience Conference (FYEE): Boston, Massachusetts Jul 28 Full Paper: Comprehensive Analysis and Assessment of An Introduction to Engineering and Computing CourseLongfei Zhou1,4,*,+, Varun K. Kasaraneni2,+, Longyan Chen1,+, Ahmed Abuhussein3,+, Nicholas Devine4,+1 Department of
least one of the five group projects. Theseprojects, in conjunction with classroom discussions, highlight the distinctive responsibilitiesassociated with leaders, managers and producers on teams.During one of the initial class meeting the students were asked to write down what they felt werethe important attributes of a leader. The instructor then discussed the roles of leaders, managersand producers on teams. He pointed out that every student will serve as a leader and as amanager on at least one of the five group projects. The instructors assign the teams and identifyboth the leader and manager on each project. Students should use these opportunities to assesstheir interests and capabilities in the various roles.As of early October, the
reference point for when the next time the outcomes are assessed, and (d)provide necessary and objective information to the person writing the accreditation self-studydocument. This latter point is especially important since in the case of ABET accreditedprograms, the EOCR contributes to a well-documented story on how a program is meeting itsassigned student outcomes and to what degree there is continuous improvement. The EOCR isespecially valuable for curriculum reviews since changes to the particulars of a program arebased on hard evidence as stated in the EOCR and not simply anecdotal stories.Key aspects of the EOCR process include: the instructor and interested faculty that generate theEOCR document, and the assessment tools and corresponding
were selected from the Pacific EarthquakeEngineering Research Center (PEER) Ground Motion Database based on their location,intensity, and the duration5. The selected ground movements were imported into SAP2000 wherea time-history analysis of the frame will be performed in order to review the buildings response.These ground motions will act as a seismic load on the structure in the east-west direction andwill provide an accurate representation of how well the structure performs under high seismicactivity. As seen in Figure 3, the ASCE 7-10 approximate fundamental period of thestructure, .29 seconds, is 41% shorter than that of the model. This discrepancy in the ASCE 7-10calculation of the fundamental period presents a highly conservative
thantheir peers without ADHD [15].1.2 Strengths-based approachThe work of the project is anchored by a strengths-based approach toward teaching and learningin general, and neurodiversity in particular. The literature related to strengths-based educationsuggests that incorporation of student strengths into the learning environment may enhancestudent engagement and motivation [16], [17]. For neurodivergent students, such as those withADHD, who may struggle to maintain interest and motivation within the traditional classroom, astrengths-based approach may be particularly impactful. Schreiner [18] writes that “strengths-oriented teaching recognizes the talents students bring to the learning environment and usesthose talents as the foundation for
, such as the final project,were vital to our learning as engineering students. Specifically, the way our professor taught thecourse was rated either on par or higher than the department and university mean in theeffectiveness of instruction. Along with the 5-point scale, students were also able to leaveanonymous feedback about their opinions of the course. A response from one of our peers sumsup our views on the course by saying, “If you devote the time and energy to [our professor’s]class[,] it is extremely rewarding as you will come out with coding experience, 3D modeling, aswell as tangible products and technical writing.”The course also helped us with our time management skills. One of our peers said, “He [ourprofessor] has a strong focus
design process Page 13.1009.2through project-based instruction with a blend of technical skills and non-technical or so-called“soft” skills. At the time of the writing of this paper, the first semester course, EG109, had beencompleted, and EG110 had just begun. The objective of this paper is to describe thedevelopment, design, and first year implementation of the course.After six years of discipline-specific freshman engineering courses for Civil Engineering,Mechanical Engineering and Electrical Engineering majors, it was decided that all Engineeringand Construction Management majors would share the same curriculum during their freshmanyear. The
various pedagogical techniques that a facultymember employs to connect and teach students. The traditional teacher-centered pedagogy isassociated with top down, hierarchal pedagogy that reinforces passive learning, rolememorization, and hinders the development of higher level cognitive skills ( (Duckworth, 2009;Cristillo, 2010). On the other hand, student-centered pedagogical strategies which promotekeeping students actively thinking, writing, comparing, and applying new knowledge result indeep learning and better student performance (Weimer, 2002; Wohlfarth, et al., 2008). In ameta-analysis of 119 studies, across grades K-20, Cornelius-White, found that learner-centeredvariables such as non-directive verbal interactions, incorporation of higher
Paper ID #12574Integration of Information Literacy Skills to Mechanical Engineering Cap-stone ProjectsDr. Farshid Zabihian, West Virginia University Institute of Technology Farshid Zabihian, Ph.D., P.Eng. Assistant Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering West Virginia University Institute of Technology Education: Ph.D., Mechanical Engineering,Ryerson University, 2011 M.S. Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, 1998 B.S. Mechanical Engineering, Amir Kabir University of Technology, 1996 Authored or coauthored more than 70 papers in Journals and peer-reviewed conferences.Ms. Mary L
peers 88% of the time.During the spring semester, the SCALE-UP students had higher scores 69% of the time. Ingeneral, when the traditional students did better, the problems tended to be one-step problemslike simple unit conversions and the performance differences were smaller.In addition, the students in both the first and second semester SCALE-UP classes performed wellon qualitative and complex quantitative problems. The students learned to reason qualitativelyand to write short essays using physics concepts without calculations. In general, theydemonstrated a high level of understanding. The SCALE-UP students’ performance on all threetypes of exam problems suggests a better understanding of the main concepts
. Page 22.735.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 In addition to his client focused efforts, Darrel has authored numerous peer refereed publications, scien- tific and technical reports, and white papers. Darrel holds a Ph.D. from Texas A&M University in Human Resource Development, a M.S. from the University of Illinois in Human Resource Development, and B.S. in Agricultural Leadership and Education from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.Rick L. Homkes, Purdue UniversitySarah E. Leach, Purdue University, Statewide Technology Sarah Leach is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology. She is a registered pro- fessional engineer with over 15 years of
ourinstrument was guided by the research question: What influence does the instrumental andpsychosocial support that engineering graduate students perceive from their advisor haveon their thesis self-efficacy? Using SCCT as our theoretical foundation, this work focuseson the development and validation of the Advisor Support and Self-efficacy for Thesiscompletion (ASSET) instrument with graduate students pursuing master’s and doctoraldegrees in engineering disciplines.Our resultant construct of Thesis Self-efficacy measures the confidence that a student has in theirabilities to complete specific tasks that are key to the writing of their dissertation, thesis, orapplied project report, while our Advisor Support construct measures a student’s perception
. The goal is to encourage students to step back, as it were, and reflect on things thatwent well and things that didn’t go so well; we also encourage them to consider ways to avoidsuch pitfalls in the future and build on what they’ve learned. For example, the portfolioassignment asks students (as part of the assignment) to provide thoughtful responses to whateach of them has learned about their strengths and weaknesses as a writer (such as their use oflanguage, organizing their writing effectively, and developing clarity in their writing), and whatareas each of them will continue to work on as they move forward. We also ask them to considerthe value of the two peer reviews we have conducted during two writing labs, where studentsboth give and
and Creativity into standard ECS courses o The Importance of Innovation and Creativity in the Way we TeachOther o Role of technology o Mechanics of teaching (administrivia) o Testing o Grading o Writing o Assessment o Peer evaluation o Business o Compensation Page 25.602.6ECS Teaching Seminar SurveyBefore the seminars and Mini-Conferences can be implemented, it was necessary to surveythe faculty to determine interest and get feedback on the basic concept to improve teachingexcellence. The first item to determine was, “what time would be the best time to hold theseminars to maximize availability?” We didn’t want
Engineering program since 2009. He received his Ph.D. degree in Petroleum Engineering from Texas A&M University. He held a Principal position with Schlumberger and has more than 18 years of experience worldwide in technical and management positions in well testing, field development, and production enhancement. He served as SPE Drilling & Completion journal review chairman, SPE Cedric K. Ferguson Medal Award committee member, SPE Drilling, and Completion Advisory committee, and SPE advanced technology workshops. He received the A Peer Apart SPE Award, which is dedicated to the technical excellence of authors to the industry. He received the Associate of Former Student of Texas A&M University College-level
technicalwriting by providing various models and templates. The students were first introduced to articlesin the Science Section of the New York Times as an example of writing that exemplifies theclarity and conciseness needed to explain technology and science to the average reader. Inaddition, the international template known as IMRaD, (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Page 22.5.8Discussion) was explained and modeled from articles found in peer-reviewed publications. Thiswas done in preparation for the students’ own technical report on research topics that representedcurrent challenge in technology and science. Many students choose to report on
area 4.48 Develop and manage budgets for research 8 projects 4.48 8 Synthesize information 4.48 8 Manage multiple projects 4.48 8 Write peer-reviewed papers 4.48 Delegate tasks/projects based on others' 9 strengths 4.43 Understand how your research fits into the 9 field more broadly 4.43 9 Create proposals 4.43 9 Write grant proposals 4.43 10 Work in teams 4.38 10 Find problems 4.38 10
the workshop,CIVE 202 instructors identified department-level requirements, accreditation-level requirements, generaldata analysis skills, and engineering skills and translated these requirements into a set of learningoutcomes for CIVE 202. The instructors generated a list of coding and engineering skills using apreviously developed syllabus for the class and their own personal experiences coding big data analysisprojects in R and Python for past research and consulting projects. Instructors wanted to emphasize notonly how to sequence and write code, but also how to present code and to understand what types of tasksstudents may need to code using real-world consulting and project-based examples that would requirestudents to understand how to
and WestVirginia require students to complete three or four math courses, but those course selections canvary.KeywordsMath, College Preparation, High School Diploma, Civil Engineering, Tutoring, RetentionIntroductionCivil engineering is built upon a core set of mathematics, science, and humanities topics.Incoming students are expected to have a level of base knowledge acquired prior to matriculatinginto a civil engineering program. How they obtain this knowledge is unique to every student dueto the vast number of options to gain secondary education and prepare for college. In manycases, the depth of this knowledge varies greatly, especially in mathematics, science, and writing. © American Society for Engineering
not necessarily result in all students completing the required activities. Some students takeon little responsibility for the team activity and depend on their peers to complete the work.Since it is a team activity, these students benefit academically from their peers’ efforts thoughtheir new knowledge is limited. Thus, assessing the outcomes of team projects may noteffectively measure individual student learning.This study addresses one means to increase the responsibility, and thus learning, of individualteam members when completing a team-based project. It reports on an intervention the courseinstructor made to increase individual contribution to a team design project and theintervention’s result on student learning and contribution
Teaching AssistantsAbstractThis complete experience-based practice paper describes the ongoing development of diversity,equity, and inclusion (DEI) training for undergraduate engineering teaching assistants in a first-year, team project-based design course. At a large private university, undergraduate teachingassistants play a key role in first-year student success and the mentorship of their cornerstonedesign project. As the first points of reference for students, they assist with content delivery,guide students through hands-on labs and projects, and deliver regular feedback on assignments.Effective teaching assistants are leaders, thus their training as educators is essential to our first-year students’ success. To support this endeavor, peer
: Practices1 – List and describe: Practices1 – List and describe: Assessment Strategies: Describe the ways in which students will express, clarify, justify, interpret, and represent (text, drawing, diagrams, presentations, etc…) their ideas and respond to peer and teacher feedback. Research Question 1.2 ‐ Approach 1.2.1 ‐ Approach 1.2.2 ‐ Approach 1.2.3 ‐ Materials: Materials: Materials
completed by both a testand control group. They found the faceted taxonomy was useful for categorizing the sourcesused for the assignment, understanding the assignment was geared toward online sources and hadno requirement to use scholarly sources. For this pilot study, 30 bibliographies were scored.Rosenzweig, Thill, and Lambert [7] adapted the same faceted taxonomy to assess researchpapers in an English writing course. Their goal was to better understand the sources selected bystudents and how they determined authority. They chose to use only the facets for authoridentity, editorial process, and publication purpose. They did not use the numerical scores usedby Leeder, Markey, and Yakel [6] instead taking a more descriptive approach. They scored
education, wireless and sensor networks, and signal and information processing.Dr. Randal T Abler, Georgia Institute of Technology c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Diversity and Student Persistence in the Vertically Integrated Project (VIP) Course SequenceAbstractWhile historically underserved students derive differentially greater benefits from participationin research with faculty, they engage in the activity at lower rates than their peers. In contrast tothe national trend, the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Program at the Georgia Institute ofTechnology enrolls representative proportions of Black/African American students andHispanic/Latino students with
subject• show that they care about their students• make efforts to be available for extra help• review course material with the students before exams/finalsSome relevant quotes from the surveys: "He writes summaries of the material covered and then e-mails them to us. His summaries explain the material very well." "She explains what Professor ---- attempts to teach." "He gets to know all the students well. It makes for a comfortable atmosphere where questions are easy to ask." "She is the only reason I am passing the course."The "worst" TAs:• were not approachable• were short-tempered• ran recitations which the students considered "not helpful"• were not prepared for class• got "annoyed" when
/coding, computer aided design, laser cutting, and 3D printing. Through ASPIRE,students are able to engage with their peers, form networks, and gain a sense of community. Inthe past two summers, 41 students have participated in the program. This paper provides detailson the design and evaluation of the ASPIRE program.IntroductionThe STEM “pipeline” that is imagined to guide Science Technology Engineering and Math(STEM) students from middle school into successful STEM careers has sprung leaks atessentially every junction. In its most common configuration, it implies a single path that oftenrequires students to develop an interest in STEM by middle school, choose particular math andscience courses in middle- and high-school, and gain experience and
Construction Management, and offers a B.S.in Engineering with specializations in Mechanical, Civil, Electrical, and Computer Engineering.Students may also define a custom specialization. In 2012, when the STILAS grant was awarded,women constituted 12% of the graduating engineering class, while underrepresented minoritystudents constituted 4%. As of this writing, approximately 18% of engineering students arewomen, and 8% are underrepresented minorities.Description of the STILAS ProgramThe original intent of the STILAS program was to build on the university’s existing InterculturalLeadership Ambassadors (ILA) program to support more STEM students. Started in 2007, the ILAprogram works to recruit and retain underrepresented and first-generation students
debt and finding a job. As a cohort, the studentsparticipated in periodic vertically-integrated discussion groups with faculty mentors and theirpeers at multiple levels of seniority, and were introduced to university resources designed toaddress specific student needs. Results of a follow-on survey suggested that peer-to-peerdiscussions can be useful in alleviating anxiety on particular topics. It was also observed that theinteractions facilitated by these group discussions are helpful in developing a sense ofcommunity and shared enthusiasm among the cohort.Keywords: Engineering student anxiety, Remediation1. IntroductionSources of anxiety among engineering and engineering technology students may stem from bothacademic and non-academic demands
there is no consensus at this stage, it is agreed that innovation isthe key and engineering is essential to this task….”Of the identified soft skills, engineering students are often most challenged to develop and honetheir skills in creativity and innovation. For engineers, creativity may be defined as developingnovel and original ideas with emphasis on their applicability to solving problems2, 3. This Page 26.748.2definition of creativity is more specific for engineering students than for students in other majors(i.e. art, music, creative writing, theater, etc.). For engineers to exercise creativity within theirdiscipline, they must emphasize
techniques in academic areassuch as writing/composition, science education, and geography instruction. The areas of designand technology have proven to be especially effective topics for ACJ assessment, and are ofspecial interest to the authors.This introductory paper examines the fundamental principles of comparative judging andadaptive comparative judging, and discusses some of the most recent and relevant research onthis topic. Key web-based ACJ tools and products are briefly reviewed—especially as they relateto academic settings. Applications in the areas of portfolio evaluation, graphics assessment, andpeer critiquing are also explored.Adaptive comparative judging has proven to be a method or assessment tool that is relativelystraightforward to