varieddepending on their interests, skill sets, and research domain.Course Descriptions and PrerequisitesThis seminar was limited to Honors College members in their first- or second-year at MichiganState University, and most of the advertising and recruiting was handled by Honors Collegeadvisers during freshman orientation or sophomore course-planning appointments. For theinitial, project-based seminar (dubbed “Cyber Green”) the course description focused more onengineering aspects of the research problem: UGS 200H: Sustainability in Super Computing This seminar will introduce students to conducting research using High Performance Computing. In the first semester, students will learn how to use Computer Aided Design and High
#required#prerequisite#courses#or#to# refresh#those#who#have#already#taken#those#courses,#but#do#not#feel#academicFready##Veterans#are#already#realizing#benefits#from#their#advanced#degree#in#systems#engineering,#as#evidenced#by#both#employment#opportunities#and#career#opportunities.##As#the#AMPFV#program#continues#to#produce#new#graduates,#future#data#collection#efforts#will#calibrate#program#value#as#determined#from#the#perspectives#of#students,#employers,#and#the#University.##This#paper#elaborates#on#the#threeFyear#effort#for#an#AMPFV#program,#including#the#program#planning,#reFplanning,#evaluation#and#documentation#efforts#over#two#full#cycles#of#program#delivery.##Program!Concept!#The#University#of#Virginia#offers#a#Master's#of
construction personnel are more likelyto be injured on the job 18-21.The dynamic nature of construction work and task unpredictability on projects makes hazardrecognition difficult 22. In fact, a study conducted by Carter and Smith23 indicate a largeproportion of hazards as not being identified or assessed on typical projects. As a result,construction personnel are exposed to hazards that they are unaware of 24,25, which increases therisk of injury occurrence. During preconstruction planning, hazard evaluation generally involvespredicting task-methods and associated hazards. A risk analysis is then performed to identifyappropriate injury prevention techniques. Such approaches are common in research literature.For example, Mitropoulos and Guillama26
. These are alternatives to preferred sizes forshaft cross-sectional diameters. Using preferred sizes in design reduces component varieties andminimizes production cost. It also maximizes the benefits of standardization of components andproducts. Adopting metric prefer sizes at the design phase ensures that subsequent planning anddecisions will be metric based. Design Instructors (technical and non-technical) in our collegesand universities thus have the greatest leverage in accelerating metrication if they would chooseto “go metric”. If graduates of technology and engineering are competent in SI units beforegraduation, they can make a profound impact on the economy and country due to the fact thattechnology drives modern economies. The standard
postulated (and will continue re-searching) why these universities choose to do this and how they plan to recoup these invest-ments. Currently, the authors hypothesize that their return on investment must be more thansimply enhancing their already outstanding reputations and attracting even more qualified stu-dents. There could be other ways of recovering this investment, by charging for completion cer-tificates, student testing, and certain forms of advertising on online pages, e.g., as is currentlypracticed by many web site providers. Moreover, once tuition is charged for online offerings,schools could charge much less than normal but with many more students, they could reap muchgreater revenues than for on-campus learning. Thus economies of scale
plan of action to address areas that the WES would like todevelop further; and (d) four group workshop sessions which focussed on personal and career-related issues, namely, True Colours, a Team-building exercise, Assertiveness and ConflictManagement, and Portfolio Development 13. External training providers presented workshops onthe choices that women face in their work and personal lives and on how to dress and behaveprofessionally in the workplace 6.The principle was accepted that social support affects course achievement, as proposed by Marraand Brogue 9. Therefore, in an effort to provide social support and create an identity for womenengineering students, the engineering school secured its own WELA homeroom. In addition, inan effort to
. The supporting web site for theproject is currently under development, is concept mapped based, built upon studentinput/assessments, and targeted to address known conceptual difficulties in MSE. Theconcept map base for the project is reported in this paper. The paper concludes with adescription of the remaining objectives for the iCollaborate project for the next academicyear and further dissemination plans. At the conclusion of the project, all materials willbe placed on the NSF sponsored National Science Digital Library (NSDL).The National Science Foundation is supporting the project (NSF CCLI/TUES #0941012).IntroductionThe iCollaborate Materials MSE project is a comprehensive research program that has anoverarching goal of improving
-profit colleges may be left out of emerging highreputation online course networks. However, the continued growth ofconventional online programs can benefit the credit ratings of brand-name andniche institutions, especially if the well-reputed institutions band together aroundonline offerings to reduce operating costs (Martin, 2012). On the other hand, ifthe reputable institutions rush too carelessly into MOOCs, they could end upreducing their educational stronghold by diluting their brand. Thus, it is importantfor universities to plan carefully their long-term goals in entering the the MOOCmovement, and control the quality of the courses being posted (Lewin, 2012b).This paper is organized as follows: Section 2 reviews and compares the
information about the process of research. Many of the ideasand plans in place or in progress at the nation’s research institutions are based on ideas laid out inthe Boyer Commission report [6] that highlights an integrated education through undergraduateresearch opportunities.Many of the larger public research schools struggle with low retention rates in STEM. Forinstance, at Washington State University freshman to senior retention in engineering is 48%. Asnoted in the literature [7], many STEM fields use undergraduate research as a capstoneexperience, held until the end of the curriculum as a culminating experience. However, it has Page
team) Oral Proposal/Conceptual Design Review, distribute requested hardware for payloads Solder one Verhage BalloonSat EAsy flight computer and 3-sensor weather station7 Watch move “BLAST” then write an essay on science/engineering, work with peer editor Construction of payload shell – integrate camera, HOBO, flight computer, heater, etc. Program HOBO and flight computer, test camera, conduct “Day in the Life” testing in lab Intersperse building with mini-lectures on Spacecraft Systems and Systems Engineering Submit “Rev. A” of Team Project Doc. – includes Design, Predicted Budgets, Test Plan Structural/strength testing (drop test, yank test) and thermal testing (cold soak) of payload Oral
pressure on the instructor. No longer can theinstructor come to class with a clear, well-defined script for the day’s lecture. Instead, theinstructor finds himself metaphorically “negotiating a swiftly flowing river” in class.15 Thisrequires agile teaching and the flexibility to deal with the unexpected, which is perhaps outsidesome instructors’ comfort zones, particularly for novices or those not confident of the subjectmatter.3 Additionally, it encourages the instructor to give thought beforehand to possible studentmisconceptions and alternative routes for constructing correct understandings, so that on-the-flyadjustments may be more effective. Also, the insights gained by the formative assessment canbe useful for planning subsequent class
application of the collaborative inquiry process was in alignment with the liberatorypedagogy of the Highlander Research and Education Center (the popular education centerfounded by Horton) detailed in their “Methodologies en Color” brochure [22]: “Start withparticipant experiences, look for patterns between those experiences that can highlight sharedstruggle, add new information/theory, practice skills, strategize and plan, take action to changethe world, reflect, and return to the beginning of the spiral!” [p. 1].To help facilitate this process, we borrowed from the “Deepen” experience utilized in theRemaking Education event hosted by Olin College of Engineering and Emerson College whichSarah had attended in Boston in 2018 [45]. We shared stories
How does what you learned in this course compare to what you’ve learned in courses with a traditional format (i.e., lectures and exams)? o What challenges did you face during the course? How did you overcome those challenges? • Have you been able to apply what you learned to your research? If so, how? If not, can you foresee applications in the future? • Did the course impact your perspective about how engineering graduate courses should be taught? If so, how? If not, why not? • Has this course impacted your future career plans and/or your preparation for your future career plans? If so, how?Across the reflection questions, students reflected on the role of themselves, their peers, and theirinstructor in the learning process
disciplines (engineering, biology, sociology,geography, planning, etc.) that study water resources, quality, treatment, and management.Anecdotally, we have seen that of a pool of approximately 100 water-focused students, only thesame small subset participates in every event while over 70% of those invited never volunteer.Therefore, there is a need to assess why we see this occurrence. This study aims to surveyundergraduate and graduate student water scholars’ motivations and barriers for participating involunteer broader impact outreach events outside of their degree requirements. This studycollected quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data were collected through Likert-scaletype responses to motivating and hindering factors. Qualitative
. Thisdesign problem was inspired by regional events such as the Gold King Mine Spill that occurredin 2015, where over 3 million gallons of AMD contaminated water was accidentally released intothe Animas River, impacting water supplies for rural and Indigenous communities. In NewMexico, there are 15,000 abandoned mines, many of which are co-located with vulnerablecommunities, and there is risk of current and future environmental contamination [11]. Studentswork in teams of 3-4 to research AMD, the Gold King Mine Spill, and novel treatment options.Next, they plan a lab experiment to raise the pH of 200 mL of AMD water from 3 (acidic) to 7(neutral), using their choice of 4 materials: limestone, calcium carbonate, activated carbon, andsoda ash. Students
flow velocity where VIV occurs is known asthe lock-in region. A floating offshore platform can lose its stability under VIV, which is theobjective to be investigated in our study. This project was completed for the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth MechanicalEngineering Senior Capstone project and the team, in collaboration with business students fromSt. Bonaventure University to compete in the 2021 Marine Energy Collegiate Competition(MECC) that was sponsored by the Department of Energy. The MECC provided the challenge touniversity students to develop a market-research-supported business plan, pitch their plan and havethe option to compete in the build and test portion of the competition where the proposed energydevice is tested
, plan motion,and make real-time decisions [2]. Artificial intelligence-driven technologies, such asconvolutional neural networks (CNNs), have further enhanced AVs' capabilities, allowing themto detect and classify objects in complex and dynamic environments [1].Object Detection and Scene UnderstandingFor AVs to be effective, they need to be able to detect and react to objects and obstacles in real-time. Object detection models like Faster R-CNN and YOLO (You Only Look Once) havesignificantly improved vehicle perception by identifying pedestrians, traffic signs, and vehiclesmore accurately and efficiently [3][8].A complementary process called scene classification involves understanding the generalenvironment (a city, a highway, a rural area) and
withtasks such as lesson planning, providing detailed feedback, and notably, creating assessments 13,14 .By generating quiz questions tailored to specific topics, ChatGPT has the potential to save timeand introduce a new level of customization to assessments.This study investigates the effectiveness of using ChatGPT to create quizzes that align withlearning objectives and accurately assess student understanding. It aims to provide evidence-basedinsights for educators and AI researchers by addressing the following research questions: • RQ1: How to more effectively generate quizzes using AI? • RQ2: How do AI-generated quizzes compare to manually crafted assessments in measuring understanding and differentiating performance? • RQ3: How
Paper ID #45807Examining the Effects of Gender on Capstone Team CohesionMadeline JoAnna Szoo, Northeastern University Madeline Szoo is a 5th year undergraduate Chemical Engineering and Biochemistry major at Northeastern University (graduation May 2025). She is the current President of the Northeastern University Chapter of Sigma Xi, the Scientific Research Honor Society, and outside of engineering education research, she studies the development of predictive vascularized tumor models for preclinical assays. She plans to pursue her PhD in Biomedical Engineering starting Fall 2025.Dr. Courtney Pfluger, Northeastern
in addition to 1)associated sample citations for referencing validity of each feature with respect to featurepotential in addressing student interest/motivation, and 2) notes that include examples furtherdetailing the listed features. The purpose of this paper is to share and discuss results from datacollected in foundational efforts to determine the impact ENGR 111 may or may not have onengineering student retention.Table 1. Pedagogical features and description for the ENGR 111 course. Feature Ref. [e.g.] Notes ➢ Course instruction & lesson plan(s) directly related to hand tool usage Hand
valuableinsights to enhance their teaching practices, which they plan to incorporate into other courses.These results highlight how growth in pedagogical knowledge gained through these programsoften translates into broader applications in future teaching endeavors.Collaborations with International PartnersQuestions six and seven addressed connections with international partners and collaborationamong students, faculty, and staff. Instructors from the No-COIL and COIL+ programsexpressed enthusiasm about maintaining their established connections, while COIL instructorswere less inclined. Additionally, instructors from the No-COIL and COIL+ programs felt well-prepared for these collaborations, whereas COIL instructors reported feeling less prepared. SomeCOIL
candidate.The software development industry not only created AI platforms, but it is also one of thebiggest beneficiaries of these technologies. Software developers use these products for codecompilation, code debugging, and code-driven testing…even to the point that they prompt an AIproduct for initial coding and then augment it with their own code. Along with MachineLearning and Natural Language Processing, AI is used to automate the entire softwaredevelopment process, which can include software security, software deployment, planning andcost estimation, understanding user behavior, and even strategic decision making. [3]ARCE 352 (Structural Computing I) is a one-unit computer laboratory that is a companioncourse to ARCE 302 (Structural Analysis) at
theinterview.This work involved human subjects in its research. Approval of all ethical and experimentalprocedures and protocols was granted by the Institutional Review Board (IRB-2024-237).Data Collection – Semi-structured InterviewsData for this study were collected using semi-structured interviews designed to explore students’experiences with microelectronics in the course. This approach provided a flexible framework,encouraging participants to share detailed reflections on their prior exposure to microelectronics,their evolving interest in the subject, and their future engagement plans. The semi-structuredformat allowed interviewers to ask follow-up questions, tailoring discussions to the uniqueexperiences and perspectives of each participant. This
themselves to reach out to advisors forindividual assistance. The academic advising team is embedded within the same department asthe instructors of the first-year general engineering course, allowing for collaboration andintegration of actions.One manifestation of instructor-advisor collaboration is the semesterly visit of academic advisorsto the first-year general engineering course to lead discussions about major and careerexploration and academic planning. During this visit, an academic advisor takes over the classwith a presentation or set of activities to introduce students to available career and majorexploration tools and to contextualize the role of academic planning in the major selectionprocess. For the accelerated version of the course
reported that they were not planning onusing the flipped classroom approach in the future. With a question asking if they wouldrecommend the flipped classroom approach to others, 21 of 24 instructors reported that theywould recommend the approach. Overall, the perception of the flipped classroom approachamong those using it is clearly positive.We then asked open-ended questions about the positive and negative aspects of using the flippedclassroom approach. In terms of the positive aspects, the most commonly mentioned idea wasthat the instructors got to know where the students struggled most and could directly engagethem in that moment. This idea was mentioned by 8 of the 24 instructors. Some other commonpositive aspects of using the approach
S6: Western Electric rules for control charts and quiz Week 3: Control Charts S7: Sampling plan S8: Overview of the S chart Week 4: Process Capability G: Full statistical process control gameTable 1. Overview of weekly content outline and corresponding simulation sequences andlearning game in the first four weeks of the learning module on statistical process control.In Week 1, simulation sequence S1 introduces the basic GUI elements and gives an overview ofthe injection molding process, input parameters, and error states, as shown in Figure 2. The firsttask for the user is to fix the tool by adjusting the main barrel temperature. In sequence S2 theuser is then
the benefits of the course and draw conclusions from this work.2. Course Relevance and Industry ConnectionThis course on Networks and Data Communications is offered at the junior level with a three-hour hands-on lab. This course aims to develop the skills of future electrical engineers, computerengineers, and computer scientists. It is a 4-credit-hour course featuring a weekly 3-hour labsession. The curriculum encompasses a broad spectrum of topics spanning the data link layer, thenetwork layer, the transport layer, and the application layer. Key areas covered includeInternetwork planning and design, network components, IP addressing, network utilities, routingalgorithms, routing protocols, multiple access protocols, delay and packet loss
threepartners to the future commercialization efforts of the product. If the Ideator is not contributing anyfurther effort, and the entire commercialization process is going to be managed by the other twopartners, then the allocation of ownership should reflect that ongoing contribution. In this scenarioownership of the company may then shift to 10% to the Ideator and 45% to the other two originalmembers of the group.Second, even if all partners are proceeding equally with continued effort toward commercialization, byallocating 100% of ownership they do not create any reserve of interest to allow for onboarding of futureinvestors or other needed skillsets not present in the current partnership.Another variation of not planning for expansion occurred in
successfully demonstrates improvement in ocean industryawareness, ocean engineering mission planning and ocean hardware operation and electronics.IntroductionMaine’s Changing Aquaculture LandscapeMaine’s aquaculture industries are internationally recognized for quality attributed to its uniquegeography, ocean currents and climate. The Gulf of Maine is one of the richest marineecosystems in the world and boasts harvests of Atlantic salmon, sea vegetables (kelp, algae, etc.)and shellfish (mussels, oysters, etc.), among others, and yields over $137 million of annualeconomic output to Maine’s economy.[1] Aquaculture is also the fastest growing foodproduction sector globally, expected to increase by 5.5% annually through 2032.[2]Maine’s aquaculture harvest
risks 9 . Other areaswhere robotics add to the overall effectiveness of operations include robotic arms in military vehi-cles. Agility and quick response are now the watchwords in current military strategy, and roboticsystems form an essential component for achieving these objectives. Indeed, acquisition plans forthe US military strongly embrace efforts to develop robotic systems that are fully autonomous orsemi-autonomous/cooperative to conduct reconnaissance missions, breaching missions, and otherhighly essential tasks 10 . Integrating robotic arms with such systems would further bolster the mil-itary’s capabilities along various operational spectrums, including urban warfare, tasks conductedin remote fields, or other combat theaters