Defense Cybersecurity Assurance ProgramAimee T Ulstad P.E., The Ohio State University Aimee Ulstad, P.E is an Associate Professor (Clinical) in the Integrated Systems Engineering Department at The Ohio State University. Prior to joining the faculty at OSU, Aimee was an industry professional in various engineering roles for over 30 years. Aimee received her degrees in Mechanical Engineering and Masters in Business Administration from Ohio State. She began her career as a packaging equipment engineer at Procter and Gamble, then moved to Anheuser-Busch where she worked for over 27 years. She worked as project manager, engineering manager, utility manager, maintenance manager, and finally as the Resident Engineer managing
Shannon is Associate Teaching Professor of Biological Sciences at Missouri University of Sci- ence and Technology. She earned her Bachelor of Arts degree in Biology with Honors from the University of North Carolina and her PhD in Cell and Developmental Biology from the Harvard Medical School. She has been active in biology education research since early in her career. She was a fellow in the Seeding Postdoctoral Innovators in Research and Education (SPIRE) as a Postdoc at UNC. In the SPIRE program Dr. Shannon was introduced to the fellowship of teaching and learning. In 2013, she participated in the American Society for Microbiology Biology Scholars Program Research Residency. During her research residency, she
Glen Livesay is a Professor of Biology and Biomedical Engineering; he co-developed and co-teaches the biomedical engineering capstone design sequence at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Glen’s educational research interests include student learning styles, increasing student engagement with hands- on activities, and more recently, creativity & design. He has received an NSF CAREER award and served as a Fellow at the National Effective Teaching Institute.Prof. Jay Patrick McCormack, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Jay McCormack is an associate professor in the mechanical engineering department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Dr. McCormack received his PhD in mechanical engineering from Carnegie
for broadening the participation of African American students inengineering. The central objective of the project is to conduct a comparative study of the factorsaffecting the success and pathways to engineering careers of African American students at aPredominantly White Institution (PWI), the University of Toledo, and a Historically BlackUniversity (Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University). Through this research we hope togain insight into the factors affecting the social and academic well-being of students at PWIs andHBCUs from a psychological and anthropological perspective.For students from underrepresented groups in STEM at both HBCUs and PWIs it is generallyrecognized that social capital in the form of familial, peer and mentor
mind thatleads students to seek additional information beyond what is presented. Students who arecurious go beyond what they need to know for the test, ask “Why?” and are better poised totransfer knowledge between courses and in their ongoing careers. This first of EM’s three C’s isalso recognized more broadly as a key attribute; for example, in “Curious” by Leslie, oncedemographic factors are accounted for, it is curiosity and conscientiousness that are correlatedwith student success [2].Closely linked to curiosity, motivation helps describe students’ intention to realize this curiosity.There are a number of lenses through which to view both curiosity and motivation. One usefultheory for describing situational interest is Self-Determination
emotionaltrajectories of undergraduate students as they progress through an engineering program?22,23Undergraduate students in the engineering program experienced emotional turbulence as a resultof their experiences throughout their undergraduate career. Emotional turbulence is a termcoined by the research team to represent the variability in activation and valence of emotionsassociated with experiences within a short period of time. For example, during their first year inan engineering program, participants experienced a set of challenges related to the high school tocollege transition, both academically and socially. These challenges resulted in a flurry ofemotions for students, as they felt encouraged and supported upon entering college and werequickly met
. Participants who had significant technical responsibilities as part of theirservice often considered engineering to be a logical next step in their career. However, veteranswith less technical responsibility in their military jobs were more attracted to engineering byfinancial opportunities and/or job security. Veteran students’ relationships with faculty and otherstudents are influenced by their age and their veteran status. While many veterans viewed age asan advantage in engineering study, some cited balancing school with the family and workresponsibilities that often come with age as a disadvantage. Veterans are more likely to tell theirprofessors than other students about their veteran status.In Year 3 (2016-2017), we conducted 62 individual
careers. The ROKET program collaborated with the American Indian LanguageDevelopment Institute (AILDI) at the UA. For over thirty years, AILDI has lead efforts todocument, revitalize, and promote indigenous languages, which then improves articulation ofmainstream science terms to the indigenous population. The collaboration between CIAN andAILDI represented a unique program for science educators working in Native Americancommunities to apply STEM concepts through the lens of native language and culture anddevelop culturally competent STEM curriculum. In total, 289 applications were received for theROKET program, with 50 participants selected from 42 different Native American schoolsacross 12 different states. Some teachers were from the same
engineers and other professionals who are awarded conditional certificates toteach subjects such as physics, chemistry, and advanced mathematics due to the lack of educatorswith these skills.Due to the requirement of advanced degrees in higher education, researchers are recruited toteach despite their relatively little experience teaching. This frequently results in discouraged anddisjoined students at a time that is critical to future studies and careers. This leads us to questionhow much pedagogical training is received by STEM educators, especially in relation to varioustechniques and in developing a course.Formal Training in Education. In general, K-12 educators are expected to be trained in bothteaching pedagogy and their subject area. However
Paper ID #22436Teaching Manufacturing Technology through ’Learning by Doing’ ApproachDr. Zareena Gani, ADMC, Higher Colleges of Technology, UAE Dr. Zareena Gani started her career in Engineering with a degree in Mechanical engineering from MK University, India. She has over 20 years of experience in both academia and industry. She has worked as a Design and Manufacturing engineer in Singapore before joining National University of Singapore from which she obtained her M.Eng degree. She also has worked in Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology (A*STAR) as a Research Fellow before moving to Canada. She gained exposure
be self- directed in their educational planning process and overall academicsuccess. One of the major components of FESP is a required engineering orientation course that istitled ENGR100.ENGR100 is a required course for all incoming first year students to the COE at the University ofIllinois at Chicago. It acclimates students to university support programs such as tutoring centersand career services, while at the same time introducing them to industry leaders and engineeringprofessional societies. In addition to ENGR100, S-STEM Scholars were also required to take acomplementary course to ENGR100, ENGR194.ENGR194, as part of FESP, was offered for the first time in the Fall of 2018. This course wasopened to all engineering students, including
learning scientists in twouniversities has been working on a collaborative grant project funded by the Department ofEducation for the purpose to enhance the student diversity in STEM fields. In this project, weaimed at (1) contextualizing the student learning experience in STEM fields, and (2)implementing an integrated STEM education approach to teach the skills and knowledge that arenecessary to be competent in engineering and technology careers in 21st century. The researchobjective of the present study is to investigate the effectiveness of evidence-based instructionalstrategies and the integration of the maker culture on students’ problem solving and life-longlearning skills. Specifically, we introduce evidence based pedagogy together with
Administrator of the LSAMP, he oversees the day-to-day operation of the NYC Louis Stokes Alliance program across the 18 member campuses of City University of New York. Claude also served as the Co-Director of the Black Studies Program at the City College and the Project Director of the City Col- lege Black Male Leadership and Mentoring Program. The Black Male Leadership and Mentoring Project (BMLMP) at the City College of New York, provides a support system during the critical stages of aca- demic and career development. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Authentic International Research Experience: Program Model in Cartagena
Barton Jr., George Mason University Oscar Barton, Jr., Ph.D, P.E. is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at George Mason University A native of Washington, D.C., Professor Barton received his B.S in Mechanical Engineering from Tuskegee (Institute) University, his M.S in Mechanical Engineering and Ph.D degree in Applied Mechanics from Howard University. Dr. Barton joined the faculty of Mechanical Engineering Department at George Ma- son University fall 2014, after completing a 22 year career at the U.S. Naval Academy. His research focuses on the development of approximate closed form solutions for linear self-adjoint systems, those that govern the responses of composite structures, and the analysis of dynamic systems
likely be sufficient. It made me think about it a lot more than before. It had not [had an] impact on me pursuing graduate school, but did influence a career in corporate research.Based on the above responses, it appears most of the participants are leaning toward attendinggraduate school. A few are thinking about obtaining a Master’s degree first and then continuingto a Ph.D. later or work in industry first and then pursue a higher degree later.The REU experience seems to allow individual participants to know themselves better and learnmore about doing research—both the fun and interesting side the challenging and hard workside. It also helps them to know what to expect from a graduate degree program.The research experience of
networks.Program OverviewThe NYIT REU site was successfully run for three years from April, 2013- March, 2016 underthe support of NSF grant CNS-1263283. During this period, the site was very popular amongundergraduates and has supported a total of 30 REU fellows. The REU program providedinvaluable opportunities for the participating students to apply critical and creative thinking tosolve practical engineering problems, realize their career potentials in STEM, gain insights aboutresearch, and increase their expertise to be competitive both academically and professionally.Research ProjectsThe research projects of the NYIT REU site focused on various aspects of security of mobiledevices and wireless networks. Figure 1 shows an overview of the sample
2016) and will cover topics of interest toincoming engineering freshmen during the first few weeks such as: engineering societies/studentorganizations, study abroad, campus resources, and career services. The next few weeks willhave panels of faculty representing 3-4 engineering majors per week. These faculty have beenasked to briefly (10 minute presentations) present the most exciting and current research andevents within their department. The subsequent lectures will be seminar style with guestspeakers (both faculty and industry have been invited) from a variety of engineering disciplinesfocusing on the grand challenges of various engineering disciplines. Students will be assignedweekly reading assignments related to the lecture topics of
in like making or creating stuff like, something, like good, like a psychologist would be good work, career, or something but uh, I don’t think it would be fun … if I’m making stuff and building stuff all the time, that would be fun, you know? I mean sometimes it would be hard, because there’s always that hard part, but, it’d still be fun, you know?Here, Marquise ponders two career paths. Both are focused on doing good in the world. Bothwould be “good work.” But only one, making things, would be fun. We asked him if the makerclass had changed his sense of what he was capable of. He said, “Yeah, for sure. Cause, like, I wouldn’t have really thought that I could make stuff like this, I for surely didn’t
program’s goal has been to provide a quality program thatmeets accreditation standards while providing the students with a skill set that allows them tosucceed in computing careers. The curriculum content for the Computer Science degree is basedon the 2008 ACM Curriculum Report. The Computer Science degree at UVU is accredited byAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) in 2002 and currently has morethan 850 students. The program also has an advisory board comprised of representatives of localindustry who assist in aligning the program to industry needs and helping to acquire industrysupport and resources.Table 1 and 2 shows the enrollment and graduation trends in the Computer Science program. Ascan be seen from the tables, the
will experience in a career position in industry orgovernment. We have actively encouraged sponsors to not pre-judge what undergraduatestudents are capable of and to provide problems that have truly been challenging to solve. Thisapproach has been a success with respect to the students and the sponsors. The students gainmotivation from the more challenging projects and the sponsors have benefited from realsolutions with several capstone teams producing prototypes that have moved them closer to asolution. Of the 4 sponsor respondents to a survey from the 2013-14 academic year, 3 respondedaffirmatively to the survey question, “Do you feel that you have received, or are on track toreceive, information or results from the student team that you
research experiencesspecifically identified as a necessary research agenda the need for studies that examined themotives for a scientist’s or engineer’s desire for international collaboration, including therelationship to education and career development. The report also called for studies to assessthe impact of international collaboration on the careers of scientists and engineers at all stages.243.0 The Framework of Global Competency for S&E graduatesGlobal competence, as it is most commonly used in the engineering literature, is alternativelyreferred to as cultural competency, multicultural competency, intercultural maturity, cross-cultural adaptation, cross-cultural awareness, or intercultural sensitivity. It assumes thatparticular
, teamwork and communication skills, assessment, and identity construction.Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com- munication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring com- munication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development
leave the university, compared to 21%, 15%, and 10% thatbegin in calculus I, II and III respectively. These values are at the same level as attrition rates forengineering majors over an entire college career, which are reported to be between 40 and 50percent3,5,7,8.At our university, students are not eligible to take introductory engineering courses if they startin precalculus. This adds another obstacle for students that are already starting behind inmathematics. Burtner found that a student’s confidence in their college level mathematics abilitysignificantly predicted persistence in engineering9. If students are getting the message that theirmathematics skills are too weak to take an engineering course in their first semester, many ofthem may
Paper ID #13721Student Perspective on Defining Engineering LeadershipRobyn Paul, University of Calgary Robyn is a Master of Science candidate in Civil Engineering at the Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary. Her research focuses on the impact that teaching engineers leadership has on early career success. She co-founded the Engineering Education Students’ Society and is involved with initiatives to collaborate nationally to increase the conversation with students about engineering education.Dr. Lynne Gradon Cowe Falls P.Eng., University of Calgary
Concepts to Harness Future Innovators and Technologists) project. Professor Harriger’s current interests include application development, outreach to K-12 to interest more students to pursue computing careers, applying IT skills to innovating fitness tools, and wearable computing.Prof. Bradley C. Harriger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Brad Harriger has over 30 years of experience teaching automated manufacturing and has authored/co- authored several related articles. Professor Harriger has served in several leadership roles with Society of Manufacturing Engineers and the American Society for Engineering Education, and is a founding mem- ber of an international Aerospace Automation Consortium, serving on its steering
Aerospace Projects primarily at the Boeing Company. Career accomplishments include creating computerized sys- tems for electronic design and testing, rocket orbital placement of telecommunications satellites, and the design and building of multi-megawatt wind turbines. His career has progressed from technical design engineer to large-corporation executive manager. His labor relations experience includes Vice President of the United States’ largest professional/technical bargaining unit recognized by the Labor Relations Board. Don’s academic career involves educational assignments which include teaching and developing several engineering and business related courses as a University Adjunct Professor, an assignment as a
they learn about career opportunities they will would enjoy after graduating with engineering degree. Observations Texas A&M University at Qatar in 2013 and 2014 has delivered the above stated program under sponsorship of a local petrochemical company. The programs were well received among students and their teachers, in addition to leaders in Qatar’s industrial and government sectors. They have proven to be effective in gaining the attention of the Qatar’s brightest young students as Qatari society places a high value on education in engineering and sciences. For the Future Engineers program, 44 students representing grades
. He is responsible for grow- ing college and career pathways across Denver, and leads implementation of Denver’s $7M Youth Career Connect grant. Joe earned his M.A. from Stanford University and a B.S. from Georgetown University. Page 26.383.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Completing the K-12 Engineering Pipeline by Creating College Pathways: Work in ProgressAbstractOne of the largest school districts in the State of Colorado, Denver Public Schools, has partneredwith a university of science and engineering, Colorado School of Mines, to
second languagesufficiently to allow for efficient social, cultural, and academic exchange [1], [11]. Languagecommunicative competence is the key factor for successful social and professionalcommunication in a cross-cultural environment. However, in practice linguistic knowledgeitself is a necessary but insufficient determinant of cross-cultural interaction. Psychologicalattitude, or readiness to communicate with people speaking another language, is alsoimportant. International academic mobility means more than just the possibility to study abroad.The mutual recognition of diplomas and qualification does not guarantee graduates’competitive ability in the professional sphere. Only professional competence assures asuccessful career in the
major 3–5. Students’ development of math knowledge before college iscommonly influenced by their experiences in math courses, where their experiences createdifferent feelings about math activities. An important factor influencing students’ perceptionsabout math courses and activities is math anxiety. Richardson & Suinn6 defined math anxiety as“feelings of tension and anxiety that interfere with the manipulation of numbers and the solvingof mathematical problems in a wide variety of ordinary life and academic settings” (p. 551).Math anxiety is not just dislike of mathematics or lack of math knowledge, but a set of feelingsthat affect performance in math-related activities that may lead to avoidance of math courses andmath-related careers 7