grade, 3 hours): Working in small groups, studentscreate a solar scribbler and use the engineering design cycle to refine their STEAM design basedon a hypothesis, test the hypothesis, (i.e. Build, Test, Reflect, Refine, Repeat). For the entire set of lesson instructions and materials, please click here.This material is based upon work supported in part by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Department of Energy (DOE) under NSFCA No. EEC-1041895. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and donot necessarily reflect those of NSF or DOE.
engineering can beexplored.MethodsStudy contextIn fall 2017, students in a total of eight sections of a common first-year engineering course tookfour surveys throughout the semester and were taught by three distinct instructors. Eachinstructor had an equal number of intervention (four sections, n =116) and comparison sections(four sections, n = 137).The students in the intervention sections participated in multiple activities, which are describedsubsequently. Table 1 shows when each of the activities occurred throughout the fall term.Table 1. Activities and Timeline Activity Week of Semester Dean’s Talk and Reflection Questions 2 Teamwork
-on engineering design challenges in the modules. During thisprocess, the phenomenon is also mapped to NGSS to ensure that material would be appropriate for a middleschool teaching environment.Hands-On Activities. Each module included hands-on engineering design challenges for the students toperform while working through the associated phenomenon. During these activities, students are required towork in pairs, which facilitates an environment conducive to learning through collaboration and integrativecomplexity. Additionally, after each section of the modules, students are required to reflect on their ownreasoning, which challenges them to compare their misconceptions about a concept before the module and theirfindings after the module
failure will have on a broad range of stakeholders.Additionally, whereas many engineering ethics case studies focus on human stakeholders andcorporations, here the focus also includes marine and aquatic life, challenging a narrowlyanthropocentric focus by placing environmental issues as a focal point. In this sense our focuspushes beyond both macro-ethical issues, where students are encouraged to adopt a broadenedsocietal viewpoint to deduce the most ethical courses of action, and micro-ethics, where thefocus is towards the professional obligations of an individual engineer.7,8The case as we designed it challenges students to justify the ethicality of deeper water drilling inlight of this disaster, guided by the reflective specification and
comprises a series of design decisions that are madeover multiple semesters.Significant research about faculty development of interactive teaching practices has beenconducted 2–5. Earlier work by McKenna, Yalvac, and Light examined how to createcollaborative partnerships between engineering faculty and learning scientists toencourage collaborative, reflective, and improved teaching. They state, “An extension ofthis work would be to examine the trajectory of change in teaching approaches, that is, toinvestigate the process of change.” (p. 25) 4 We expect learning and change to happenthrough faculty development, and we propose a framework for scaffolding that process ofchange much like engineering education research has proposed constructing
environment impacts students’ perception of the engineering design process.Design Based Wilderness Education PedagogyWhen developing a curriculum targeting the engineering design process, the role that design-thinking plays within a design-based learning environment is of particular interest. As describedby Dym et al., design thinking “reflects the complex processes of inquiry and learning thatdesigners perform in a systems context, making decisions as they proceed, often workingcollaboratively on teams in a social process”3. Design thinking has been explored through manyframeworks broadly divided into two paradigms: design as a rational problem solving process,and design as a process of reflection-in-action4. The wilderness environment is
American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Focus on Social Learning in a First-Year Technical Writing Class: a Canadian Case-Study The University of British Columbia, CanadaAbstract: Incorporation of writing assignments into the first-year curriculum is a keyopportunity for engineering educators. The topics of sustainable consumption and design,environmental issues and global engineering were introduced into a first-year engineeringcommunication course in the Faculty of Applied Science at the University of British Columbia,Vancouver. This successful initiative was further expanded to include writing reflection papers,proposals and research reports on community service learning
to teach,especially in ways that capture students’ interest and attention. A variety of approaches areimplemented including dedicated courses inside and outside of engineering, as well as weavingethical case studies throughout the curriculum 3-5. Creative approaches to teaching engineeringethics including argumentation, eye-witness role playing, videos, engineering ethics lunches, andeven an engineering ethics board game have previously been presented 6-10. The objective of thisassignment was to combine the common practice of integrating an ethics unit into a first yearIntroduction to Engineering course with the innovation of a creative fiction assignment requiringthe students to generate and reflect upon an ethical dilemma of personal
), influenced our efforts to develop the teaching standards used for this project. In addition, a framework that articulates what informed design thinking entails – students using design strategies effectively; making knowledge-‐driven decisions; conducting sustained technological investigations; working creatively; and reflecting upon their actions and thinking – was another foundation upon which this work was built (Crismond & Adams, 2012). The final set of the design teaching standards (see Table 1 for details) created for this project is organized around three dimensions: Dimension I – STEM Concepts – Teachers’ understanding of science, technology
executionAccording to Bringle and Hatcher [1], service-learning is defined as a “course-based, creditbearing educational experience in which students (a) participate in an organized service activitythat meets identified community needs, and (b) reflect on the service activity in such a way as togain further understanding of course content, a broader appreciation of the discipline, and anenhanced sense of personal values and civic responsibility” (p. 112).” Service-learning has beenproven to benefit students in many ways. More specifically, service learning has been found toenhance students’ collaboration skills [2], civic engagement, interpersonal skills [3], [4], andtheir ability to apply knowledge to problem-solving [5].Our service-learning course was
where the instructors could guide the groups, group projects outside of class where thestudents would navigate their own team-building, and individual assignments designed to fosterself-reflections. It is important to note that while team members had specific responsibility forcertain deliverables, the collaborative sessions, group assignments, and various presentationsrequired harmonious orchestration following an Aristotelian model: the whole being greater thanthe sum of its parts.Interdisciplinary sessions are intended to increase the teams' capacity to complete the projectwhile also becoming more aware of themselves in the process. They include: 1. Kickoff session – The purpose of this session is to form connections, elicit and correct
really good lesson for the class. The class talked about how she should havespoken up more during the team part of the exercise and how she hurt her team by not doing so.This allowed everyone to see both the power of the team and also the importance of eachindividual on the team. Thank goodness for that one high scorer!Another of the activities was an escape room type exercise. Escape rooms are physical games inwhich teams must solve a series of puzzles or challenges using clues, teamwork and strategy tocomplete all objectives. In the developed escape room, teams were given a time limit in whichto successfully complete all objectives.Students were required to complete a reflection after each team building activity. This reflectionserved to bring
reflectionpaper that describe how the experience affected them personally.Since its inception in 2001, the ETHOS program has sent over 30 students to five countries totake part in summer service-learning internships. Information obtained from the reflection andtechnical papers and program evaluation sheets indicate that students who have participated inthe international service-learning internships have gained perspectives on the influence ofengineering and technology in the global world. Further, these experiences have providedgrowth in technical knowledge and problem solving, and in language development and culturalawareness.Alumni Assessment StrategyAlthough the ETHOS service-learning internship program has a fairly well established methodfor
demonstrate why people act unethically. After a discussion of each video, each individualstudent is guided through a two-part exercise. The first part, developing a Personal InventoryReport, helps the student engage in self-reflection in order to determine what sorts of situationsthe student might find ethically challenging. In the second part of the exercise, the studentdevelops a personal plan (Adaptive-Strategies Report) addressing what strategies they might usein order to increase the likelihood that they will act ethically in challenging situations (that is, thesituations arrived at while developing the Personal Inventory Report). Page
ethics. Critical reflection is key to significant shifts of frames of reference. In thiscontext the goal of encouraging students to view engineering ethics through the lens of environmentaljustice issues is motivated by transformation learning theory. During the first half of the semesterlectures covered NEPA and EIA in the conventional manner and research papers were assignedfor EIA case studies. Beginning at midterm the relationship of environmental justice issues toNEPA and EIA were introduced and subsequent case study assignments also involvedenvironmental justice issues. For these case studies, the student’s role played the variousstakeholders on both sides of the case study issues. Anecdotally the impact of the interventionwas immediately
response was mixed, though primarily positive (Figure 2). Comments from the end-of-term course evaluations also reflected this dichotomy: • I don't like that you wanted us to struggle with the homework and waste our time. My time is precious. • I liked everything in the class except the fact [that] we did book homework before we learned it. • Homework, online homework, and lectures all went together nicely. • His set up of the homework/glossary/Sappling [sic] made sure you did the work first and had an understanding of the material before it was covered in lecture. • I think that I've learned more in this class in one semester than any other class I've taken here.The principal complaint about the course
used to elicit critical thinking and the application of mathematical conceptsas educators strove to develop a simulation of a physical phenomenon. As the participantsworked through the exercises, the engineering and education faculty pointed out opportunitiesfor reflection on the application of mathematics to solve the problem and asked questions toinitiate discussions of their experiences.One example activity focused on developing a mathematical model for water exiting from ahose. Participants discussed in class what they knew about the situation and what they wanted toknow when they conducted experiments with actual hoses outside. As students collected avariety of data to help develop the model, they wrestled with issues such as how to
and peer-mentoring. Group composition varies tomeet the specific objective of each discussion. For example, broad major groups are used tofacilitate peer mentoring amongst students within disciplines. Groups by year (sophomore,junior, senior) are used to facilitate interdisciplinary discussions amongst students at similarstages in their education. We found that it is important to have less structured time to fosterstudent-student and student-faculty interaction. Topic guidance provides the structure to allowstudents to establish connections, share personally and professionally, and encourage peermentoring. Grading is credit/no-credit and is based primarily on attendance.General seminar themes include student goals and reflections on progress
Paper ID #9395Ethics for the ”Me” Generation - How ”Millennial” Engineering StudentsView Ethical Responsibility in the Engineering ProfessionMrs. Natalie CT Van Tyne P.E., Colorado School of Mines Natalie Van Tyne is a Teaching Associate Professor and Director of the Design EPICS Program at Col- orado School of Mines. Her background is in chemical and environmental engineering, and she is a registered professional engineer in Colorado. She has been teaching first year and second year funda- mental engineering design courses since 2002, and her research interests are in service learning, reflective learning, and
students to reflect upon the effectiveness ofthis approach. The students together proposed that anyone posting an authoritative source mustalso post a summary of the content of the source. Later they continued to improve upon this ideaand soon required anyone posting an authoritative source to process it and include in their notehow the authoritative source could be used to improve the ideas in the group’s discourse.MetadiscourseStudies have shown that when students are engaged in metacognitive activities (e.g., self-reflection, self-explanation, or monitoring), their learning is enhanced. However, metacognitivethinking is not spontaneous. Thus, it is important to incorporate metacognitive support in thedesign of learning environments (Lin, X
, classroommanagement practices, and school administration issues.The course schedule has been included in the Appendix, as well as an education bibliography thatwas supplied to all the course attendees.V. Results of First OfferingOverall, it is felt that the first offering of the course was successful. No students dropped thecourse. All students agreed on a final reflection piece that they knew significantly more aboutteaching and had more confidence at the end of the course than at the beginning.During several formative evaluation sessions, using plus/deltas, brainstorming, and reflectionwritings, there were several recommendations that were utilized in the latter portions of thesemester and many more that will be incorporated in the next offering of the
thereforebeen emphasized in a technical course, and a non-technical course was designed to exploresustainability issues in a global development context. Student participation in Engineers WithoutBorders (EWB), a service organization with a mission to provide sustainable engineeringsolutions for developing communities, also provides informal learning opportunities.These three venues provide different contexts in which to understand sustainability. Theirdifferent emphases produce varying perspectives on sustainability and different levels ofawareness, especially about the social impacts of engineering design and practice. This paperprovides a reflection on the ways in which the environmental, social and economic aspects ofsustainability appear to lend
combined with a student-driven-inquiry teaching style16. Similarly, WISEngineering will incorporate non-linear onlinenavigation elements and will emphasize students’ deep exploration of content. Building upon these approaches, we developed WISEngineering to support authenticengineering design, to foster reflection through the documentation student work, as well as toencourage collaboration among peers.Supporting Authentic Engineering Design Learning from inquiry or design-based approaches depends on careful, appropriate choiceof tasks. Chinn and Malhotra17 define a continuum of scientific inquiry from simple to authentic,with school science often occurring on the simple end, involving over-simplifications and fewdecisions made by the
inproblem solving teams when their unique skills, abilities, or knowledge can contribute to theshared objectives. Part of this development makes use of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator ® StepII. This assessment provides scores on 40 facets of the eight Myers-Briggs Types. An objectiveof the course is to help students develop a richer vocabulary for thinking about themselves andothers. An individual’s clearest facets are used in the course by each student as part of theirweekly reflections on assigned readings. A visual display of the team’s integrated vocabulary isused as a guide in team decision making. A standard transition from Sensing to iNtuitive toThinking to Feeling then back to Sensing is used as students learn to transition between
in creating writing-related activities that would serve thebroader goals of the course: helping students succeed and stay in engineering. These newlistening, reading, writing and oral communications assignments introduce freshmen to theexcitement of engineering and help them envision themselves as engineers. Many of theassignments focus on the relevance of science and math to the challenging and creative work ofengineering.This paper explains a sequence of communications assignments that encourage critical thinkingand reflection about the intellectual and practical dimensions of engineering. The first group ofassignments integrates practice in Internet searching, listening, note taking, responsive writing,reading and academic writing as
reflections of members from a multi-disciplinaryteam. Even though the focus of this particular group is software based, the take-aways for multi-disciplinary collaboration will apply across non-software teams as well. Ultimately, this paperaffords an opportunity for educators to expand on examples of how multiple disciplines cometogether in the tech/engineering workforce. Additionally, the paper implores engineers to engagein lifelong learning as they interact with increasingly multi-disciplinary teams in the workplace.BackgroundMost students who choose to major in engineering do so to become a part of the community ofpractice of professional engineers [1], meaning that they want their college experience to includeadequate exposure to what a career
, constructing one’s sense of self throughconstant development and self-reflection [5]. It includes the traits and characteristics, socialrelations, roles, and social group memberships that define who a person is within a particularsetting. Engineering identity, especially for students, reflects their acceptance of and recognitionas part of the engineering field, influencing their decision to enter and persist in the field [6].When students possess a strong engineering identity, they tend to perceive themselves as futureengineers, fostering their commitment to their pursuit of an engineering career [7]. This identitycontinues to impact their learning, serving as a guiding force throughout their studies [8]. Morelock synthesized the disperse
data sets anddevelop equity-focused projects. This approach is designed to simultaneously teach computingtechnical skills while integrating social, economic, and political dimensions into engineeringwork. The course redesign includes three main components: 1. Small group and whole-class discussions led by the instructor and supported by Equity Learning Assistants (ELAs), who are trained in equity pedagogy. These activities, typically once a week during a lab session, aim to make students aware of the societal implications of their engineering decisions and encourage them to critically evaluate data and technology within broader sociopolitical contexts. Each lab is followed by a reading and reflection assignment to
additional question was added related to ChatGPT,which had risen to prevalence in that time. 5. I think I will need to use ChatGPT at some point in my career.In addition to the MATE 245 class, in the summer of 2023, two undergraduate research studentswere employed to aid in the development of the plastic 3D printing dataset and case study. Thesestudents spent 8 weeks working on developing the 3D printing case study in the Citrine Platform.During this time the students gained more in-depth knowledge of AI and ML through guided andindependent research. The students were invited to provide prompt-based written reflections ontheir understanding and perceptions of ML and how it might be applied to their future careers.Preliminary Findings and
DBT cyclestudents, successfully develop their engineeringepistemic frame, and also provide a wealth of Prototype presentationdata for assessment of learning and professionaldevelopment that can inform the design of future Exit Interviewcourse, curriculum and learning innovations in Figure 2. Nephrotex workflow diagram. DBTengineering disciplines. = design, build, test.AcknowledgementsThis material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under grants DUE-0919347 and EEC-0938517.Bibliography1. Schon, D.A., The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in