Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vukica M. Jovanovic, Old Dominion University; George McLeod, Old Dominion University ; Thomas E. Alberts, Old Dominion University; Cynthia Tomovic, Old Dominion University; Otilia Popescu, Old Dominion University; Tysha Batts; Mary Louise Sandy, Virginia Space Grant Consortium

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

focused on building robots that can workin hazardous environments, but they also learned about different majors that explore roboticsconcepts in manufacturing, as well as the application of hydraulics for flood gates.AcknowledgmentThe project team wants to acknowledge Virginia Space Grant Consortium for its partnership inand continuous funding for the ODU BLAST program. 7References:[1] R. S. Andersen, S. Bøgh, T. B. Moeslund, and O. Madsen, "Intuitive task programming of stud welding robots for ship construction," in Industrial Technology (ICIT), 2015 IEEE International Conference on, 2015, pp. 3302-3307: IEEE.[2] S. Pfeiffer, "Robots, Industry 4.0 and humans, or why assembly work

Conference Session

Innovations in Curriculum, Projects, and Pedagogy in Aerospace Engineering Education

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chadia A. Aji, Tuskegee University; M. Javed Khan, Tuskegee University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

/10573560308223[11] D. H. Schunk (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation, Educational Psychologist, vol.26(3-4), pp. 207-231, DOI: 10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133[12] D. H. Schunk & C. A. Mullen (2012). Self-efficacy as an engaged learner. In S. L.Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp.219-235). New York, NY, US: Springer Science + Business Media, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_10[13] E. Skinner & M. J. Belmont (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effect of teacherbehavior and student engagement across the school year, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol.85(4), Dec, 1993, pp. 571-581, DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571[14] E. Kahu (2013). Framing student

Conference Session

FOCUS ON EXHIBITS: Welcome Reception & NEW THIS YEAR! 2018 Best Division Paper Nominee Poster Session Sponsored by Engineering Unleashed

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kurt M Degoede, Elizabethtown College

Tagged Topics

ASEE Headquarters

and for the motion of a system of 1 or 2 rigid accelerations (linear and rotational) of 2 or 3 bodies moving in the plane. (Includes use of interconnected rigid bodies. P1.) R3 – Apply ode45 to solve equations of motion Supplemental Skills (must pass all R skills before S skills improve grade) S1 – Analyze oblique impact between two S1.1 – Analyze oblique impact between two rigid bodies. rigid bodies. S2 – Solve for the kinetics of mass flow S1.2 – Utilize principles of energy and systems. momentum to solve for the motion of a S3 – Determine the angular momentum of a system of 1 or 2 bodies. rigid body moving in 3D

Conference Session

Technical Session 1: Issues Impacting Students Learning How to Program

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

A.T.M. Golam Bari, University of South Florida; Alessio Gaspar, University of South Florida; R. Paul Wiegand, University of Central Florida, School of Modeling, Simulation, & Training; Dmytro Vitel; Kok Cheng Tan; Stephen John Kozakoff, University of South Florida

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

displays “Welcome to Java”p u b l i c c l a s s Welcome { p u b l i c s t a t i c v o i d main ( S t r i n g [ ] a r g s ) { System . o u t . p r i n t l n ( ” Welcome t o J a v a ! ” ) ; }}After applying the above transforms in program 5 and shuffling the valid and invalid line ofcodes, we get the following Parsons puzzle. System . o u t . p r i n t l n ( ” Welcome t o J a v a ! ” ) } }p u b l i c C l a s s Welcome { p u b l i c s t a t i c v o i d main ( S t r i n g [ ] a r g s ) {p u b l i c c l a s s Welcome { System . o u t . p r i n t l n ( ” Welcome t o J a v a ! ” ) ;p u b l i c s t a t i c c h a r main ( S t r i n g [ ] a r g s ) {Similarly, P P2 is mapped into a different Parsons puzzle, using the same mapping process

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 6: Technology-enhanced Instruction and Assessment

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Watkins, Vanderbilt University; Merredith D. Portsmore, Tufts University; Rebecca D. Swanson, Tufts University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. 2001.[5] N. Cross, Designerly Ways of Knowing. London: Springer-Verlag, 2007.[6] D. Crismond and R. S. Adams, “A Scholarship of Integration : The Matrix of Informed Design,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 738–797, 2012.[7] S. R. Daly, R. S. Adams, and G. M. Bodner, “What Does it Mean to Design? A Qualitative Investigation of Design Professionals’ Experiences,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 187–219, 2012.[8] H. Wang, T. J. Moore, G. H. Roehrig, and M. S. Park, “STEM Integration : Teacher Perceptions and Practice STEM Integration : Teacher Perceptions and Practice,” J. Pre- 13 College Eng. Educ. Res., vol. 1

Conference Session

Energy & Technology in Pre-College Engineering Education

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew J. Traum, Engineer Inc.; Sharon Liz Karackattu, Oak Hall School

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

section, student-customized rockets outperformedthe unmodified baseline vehicle.At the class’s conclusion, 79 students (out of 107 enrolled) completed a computerizedanonymous indirect survey to self-assess their attitudes about the course specifically andengineering in general as a result of the rocket project. Results were lackluster compared toexpectations based on similar s novel classroom lesson pedagogical studies previouslyconducted. Only 54.4% of students reported increased interest in the class over the semester.62.0% reported improved understanding of the rocket design process. 57.0% reported being ableto see interconnections between science, math, engineering, and technology as a result of thecourse. Despite these disappointing results

Conference Session

Environmental Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenny Patricia Quintana-Cifuentes, Purdue University; Paul Asunda, Purdue University; Senay Purzer, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

. Malmberg, “Students’ qualification in environmental and sustainability education — epistemic gaps or composites of critical thinking?,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 259–275, 2016.[30] S. Perini, M. Margoudi, M. Fradinho, O. Marco, and M. Dipartimento, “Increasing middle school students’ awareness and interest in manufacturing through digital game-based learning (DGBL),” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., no. January, 2017.[31] L. Stanszus et al., “Education for sustainable consumption through Mindfulness Training: Development of a consumption-specific Intervention,” J. Tea, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 5–22, 2017.[32] C. Ormond et al., “Environmental education as Teacher Education: Melancholic reflections from an emerging

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ferris Pfeiffer, University of Missouri; Johannes Strobel, University of Missouri; Suzanne Burgoyne, University of Missouri

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

] N. A. o. E. 2005, Engineering Research and America's Future: Meeting the Challehges of a Global Economy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.[2] J. Estrin, Closing the innovation gap : reigniting the spark of creativity in a global economy / Judy Estrin. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2009, p. 254.[3] N. S. Foundation, "Preparing the Next Generation of STEM Innovators: Identifying and Developing our Nation’s Human Capital," National Science Foundation, p. 62, 2010.[4] T. Haertel, C. Terkowsky, and I. Jahnke, "Where have all the inventors gone?," Proceedings of ICL, pp. --, 2012.[5] A. A. Astin, Helen S., "Undergraduate Science Education: The Impact of Different College Environments on the

Conference Session

Making an Impact: Building Support with Data and Design

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel Figueiredo, University of Waterloo; Angela Henshilwood, University of Toronto; Michelle Spence, University of Toronto; Mindy Thuna, University of Toronto; Siu Hong Yu, University of Waterloo

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries

Civil and Environmental Engineering Researchers at Two Canadian UniversitiesIntroductionIn the fall of 2017 and winter of 2018, librarians from the University of Toronto (U of T) andUniversity of Waterloo (Waterloo) interviewed civil and environmental engineering researchersat their respective institutions to learn about their research practices and needs [1], [2]. All of theresearchers interviewed are tenured or tenure stream faculty with the title of Assistant, Associate,or full Professor. The interviewees will be referred to as “researchers” for the most partthroughout this paper because that is the preferred term in the contexts described. The interviewswere part of a larger study facilitated by Ithaka S+R, a not-for

Conference Session

Online Programs and Program Assessment

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter Wesley Odom, Purdue University; Hillary E. Merzdorf, Purdue University; Francisco J. Montalvo, Purdue University; Jason Marion Davis

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

expectations. Engagement according toSmith et al.’s [11] model depends on the effectiveness of teams, as students work in learningcontexts that require high activity and problem-solving. In addition to these functional definitions of engagement, an assessment instrument hasalso been developed in order to standardize definitions and measurement of engagement in highereducation. The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) was developed in 2000 to assessundergraduate student engagement [21]. It consists of four themes with indicators that defineengagement: (1) academic challenge, with the indicators of higher-order learning, reflective &integrative learning, learning strategies, and quantitative reasoning; (2) learning with peers, withthe

Conference Session

ASEE TUESDAY PLENARY FEATURING BEST PAPERS & INDUSTRY DAY SPEAKER Sponsored by University of South Florida & University of Maryland

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Abisola Coretta Kusimo, Stanford University ; Marissa Elena Thompson, Stanford University ; Sara A. Atwood, Elizabethtown College; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Topics

ASEE Board of Directors, Corporate Member Council

of the LelandStanford Junior University. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not representviews of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education or the Board of Trustees of the LelandStanford Junior University.References[1] K. Crenshaw, “Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics,” University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, pp. 139-167, 1989.[2] E. Pascarella, L. S. Hagerdorn, E. Whitt, P. M. Yeager, M. I. Edison, P. T. Terenzini, A. Noura, “Women's Perceptions of a "Chilly Climate" and Their Cognitive Outcomes during the First Year of College,” Journal of College Student Development, 38(2

Conference Session

Work-In-Progress Postcard Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tracy L. Carter, Northeastern University; Sarah A. Wilson, University of Kentucky; Samira Azarin; Janie Brennan, Washington University in St. Louis; Amy J. Karlsson, University of Maryland; Chris Barr, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Activity-based (A) vs. passive (P)3 Stand-alone (S) vs. Instructor-led #8: Hazard eval., risk assessment Relevant to Other Courses (Y/N

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 5: Assessment

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan M. Hicks, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Kerrie A. Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

accuracy and noteswere taken by the interviewer at the time of the interviews.Qualitative modeling with the FRAM. The FRAM consists of four steps: (1) functionidentification and description, (2) variability identification, (3) variability aggregation, and (4)control mechanism identification [25]. The functions that comprise each model, identified anddefined in the first step, represent all actions that occur within the system. Each function ischaracterized by up to six factors: input(s), output(s), precondition(s), resource(s) or executivecondition(s), control(s), and time. A function may be a foreground function if it is the primaryprocess of concern or a background function if it affects the process but is not directly involved.The first three

Conference Session

Technical Session 12: Teaching and Learning

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nabeel Alzahrani, University of California, Riverside; Frank Vahid, University of California, Riverside; Alex Daniel Edgcomb, zyBooks, A Wiley Brand

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

, probably to see the impact on output. We attribute this attempt to the incorrect left-side variable error. ● 1 min later, the student adds a cout of r as well, probably to make sure r's value is as expected. We again attribute this attempt to the left-side error. ● 1 min later, the student changes the left-side to area. We attribute to the left-side error, which is now fixed. ● In 5 submissions over the next 9 minutes, the student tries changing line 2's expression to PI * 2 * r, then 2 * r * PI, then PI * (r * 2), then PI * r * 2.0, and finally PI * r * r.Humans can recognize what the errors were, and can attribute 3 attempts and 3 minutes to solvethe left-side error and 5 attempts and 9 minutes to the squaring error. Most

Conference Session

Ocean and Marine Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sanjay Tewari, Missouri University of Science & Technology

Tagged Divisions

Ocean and Marine

Paper ID #25088Problem-based Learning As A Pedagogy For Individual Students - Quanti-fying The Long-term Effects of Land Subsidence and Rising Sea Levels InCoastal Areas For Greater Student EngagementDr. Sanjay Tewari, Missouri University of Science & Technology Dr. Tewari is Assistant Teaching Professor of Civil Engineering at the Missouri University of Science & Technology, Rolla, MO. Prior to joining Missouri S&T, he worked as Assistant Professor at Louisiana Tech University. He earned his Bachelor of Engineering (Civil Engineering) and Master of Technology (Chemical Engineering) in India. He later joined Texas

Conference Session

SED Technical Session: Systems Thinking

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Erin Stirgus; Morteza Nagahi, Mississippi State University; Junfeng Ma, Mississippi State University; Raed Jaradat, Mississippi State University; Lesley Strawderman, Mississippi State University; Deborah K. Eakin, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

average(GPA).Systems-Thinking Skills and Impacting FactorsPrior studies assessed an individual’s systems thinking using different systems thinkingcharacteristics and measurements within education domain. For example, Hopper and Stave [6]developed ways to assess the effectiveness of systems thinking interventions in the field ofeducation by defining systems thinking, determining what systems thinking interventions werebeing used in the current education models, and describing how the effects of interventions havebeen measured. Their definition uses the learning objectives in Bloom et al.’s [7] taxonomy tocreate their own proposed taxonomy as it pertains to systems thinking. Hopper and Stave’s [6]taxonomy consisted of different measures including

Conference Session

ConstDiv Technical Session 3 - Social & Leadership

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Suat Gunhan, University of Texas, San Antonio

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

integrating engineering economics problems into Project Management course, inviting guestlecturers from the leadership team of construction companies, requiring groups of students tointerview industry professionals (involving industry professionals) and team presentations inclassroom.References[1] Engineering News Record, “Project Delivery: Studies Affirm Design-Build Speed, Cost,Future.” November 19-26, 6, McGraw Hill, 2018.   [2] McGraw Hill, Construction, "Project delivery systems–How they impact efficiency andprofitability in the buildings sector." Bedford, MA (2014).[3] S. Toor and G. Ofori, "Leadership for future construction industry: Agenda for

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 2 - Design & Manufacturing Topics

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jorge Rodriguez P.E., Western Michigan University; Diana Bairaktarova, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

selection paths based on specific class or numerical valueof selected parameter (e.g., final test score). Each node represents a splitting rule for one specificattribute (e.g., answer to a test question). This analytic tool has as well the option to reducepredictive errors by searching for an optimal decision-tree development, according to a specifiedcriterion [12].The objective in this study is to search for dominant factors that predict positive test scoreimprovement when comparing pre-intervention to post-intervention evaluation of students’spatial visualization skills. Another goal is to identify influential test question(s) and/ordemographic factors that will move the predictive modeling efforts into a broader identificationand grouping of

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adrian Leos; Kaitlin Harlan; Brooke A. Merrill, Texas A&M University; Sin-Ning Cindy Liu, Texas A&M University; Cynthia K. Lang, Texas A&M University; Robert C. Martin, Texas A&M University; Carolyn L. Sandoval, University of California, San Diego; Mindy Bergman, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

observationcoding. Lastly, the sample classroom videos and validation keys give Toolkit users anopportunity to practice conducting and coding full-length classroom observations in a low-stakessetting, before observing a real classroom.References1. Litzler, E., Lange, S. E., & Brainard, S. G. (2005, June). Climate for graduate students in science and engineering departments. In Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education annual conference & exposition. Portland, OR.2. Walton, G. M., Logel, C., Peach, J. M., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2015). Two brief interventions to mitigate a “chilly climate” transform women’s experience, relationships, and achievement in engineering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Subodh Bhandari, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Amar Raheja, California State Polytechnic University; Fang Tang, Cal Poly Pomona; Zekeriya Aliyazicioglu, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Erika DeJonghe, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

morewomen into the program. Results of these efforts and other success stories will be reported infuture.AcknowledgementThe project is funded by the NSF’s EEC Program. We would also like to thank NorthropGrumman Corporation and NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center for hosting the participantsand giving them a tour of their research labs and facilities. We would also like to thank NorthropGrumman Corporation, Lockheed Martin Corporation, and NASA AFRC for their continuedsupport of the Cal Poly Pomona’s UAV Lab.References1. Bhandari, S., Aliyazicioglu, Z., Tang, F., and Raheja, A., “Research Experience for Undergraduates in UAV Technologies,” Proceedings of American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 25-28

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vukica M. Jovanovic, Old Dominion University; Anthony W. Dean, Old Dominion University; Kim Bullington Sibson, Old Dominion University; Cynthia Tomovic, Old Dominion University; Rafael Landaeta, Old Dominion University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

DescriptionThe main focus of this NSF Scholarship in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics(S-STEM) project is to provide 70 scholarships and student support services to student veteranswhich will address the major barriers to degree completion in engineering and engineeringtechnology. Students who participate in this program are veterans who are either juniors orseniors. They also have to demonstrate a financial need, motivation, and proven academicexcellence, and have exhausted their Post-911 GI Bill benefits. The students participating in thisprogram are from one of the following majors that are available at our college. These are: Civiland Environmental Engineering, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Mechanical andAerospace Engineering

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Merredith D. Portsmore, Tufts University; Jessica Watkins, Vanderbilt University; Rebecca Deborah Swanson, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

based upon work supported by the National ScienceFoundation under Grant Number 1720334.REFERENCES[1] National Research Council, A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. The National Academies Press, 2012.[2] Achieve Inc., Next Generation Science Standards Achieve, Inc. on behalf of the twenty- six states and partners that collaborated on the NGSS,, 2013.[3] E. R. Banilower, P. S. Smith, K. A. Malzahn, C. L. Plumley, E. M. Gordon, and M. L. Hayes, "Report of the 2018 NSSME+," Horizon Research, Inc, Chapel Hill, NC, 2018.[4] R. L. Custer and J. L. Daugherty, "Professional Development for Teachers of Engineering: Research and Related Activities," The Bridge, vol

Conference Session

Mechanics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eric Constans, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Karl Dyer, Rowan University; Shraddha Sangelkar, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

) ℎ = 𝑐𝑐 sin 𝛿𝛿 Figure 6: The dimensions g and h can be related to r through the angle θ3. Figure 7: The dimensions g and h can be related to s through the angle 𝜃𝜃3 .Next, going back to the variables r and s defined earlier, we can write 𝑟𝑟 = 𝑔𝑔 cos 𝜃𝜃3 + ℎ sin 𝜃𝜃3 (25) 𝑠𝑠 = ℎ cos 𝜃𝜃3 − 𝑔𝑔 sin 𝜃𝜃3as shown in Figure 6 and Figure 7. We now have two equations with one unknown, θ3. Eachequation is transcendental and difficult to solve on its own. Therefore, we will employ a fewtricks to isolate θ3. First

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Capstone Design Projects

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark David Bedillion, Carnegie Mellon University; Marsha Lovett, Carnegie Mellon University; Karim Heinz Muci-Kuchler, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Cassandra M. Degen, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

reprints for government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation hereon.Finally, the authors would like to thank the students that took EMSD course at CMU in the fall2018 semester for their useful feedback.Bibliography[1] Frank, M., Sadeh, A., and Ashkenasi, S., 2011, "The relationship among systems engineers' capacityfor engineering systems thinking, project types, and project success," Project Management Journal, 42(5),pp. 31-41.[2] Monat, J., and Gannon, T., 2018, "Applying Systems Thinking to Engineering and Design," Systems,6(3), p. 34.[3] Aurigemma, J., Chandrasekharan, S., Nersessian, N. J., and Newstetter, W., 2013, "Turningexperiments into objects: The cognitive processes involved in the design of a lab‐on‐a‐chip device,"Journal of

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 21: Student Grades and Feedback

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Derrick James Satterfield, University of Nevada, Reno; Marissa A. Tsugawa, University of Nevada, Reno; Heather Perkins, North Carolina State University; Matthew Bahnson, North Carolina State University; Cheryl Cass, SAS Institute; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

] Committee on Revitalizing Graduate STEM Education for the 21st Century, Board on Higher Education and Workforce, Policy and Global Affairs, and National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Graduate STEM education for the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2018.[8] J. L. Lott, S. Gardner, and D. A. Powers, “Doctoral student attrition in the stem fields: an exploratory event history analysis,” Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 247–266, Aug. 2009.[9] E. Crede and M. Borrego, “Learning in Graduate Engineering Research Groups of Various Sizes,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 565–589, Jul. 2012.[10] E. Horowitz, N. Sorensen, N

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University; Rocio C. Chavela Guerra, American Society for Engineering Education; Kacey Beddoes

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

multicultural curriculum predict current attitudes and activities," Journal of College Student Development, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 385-402, 2010.[12] P. Gurin, "Expert Report. "Gratz et al. v. Bollinger, et al." No. 97-75321 (E.D. Mich.); "Grutter, et al. v. Bollinger, et al." No. 97-75928 (E.D. Mich.)," Equity & Excellence in Education, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 36-62, 09/01/ 1999.[13] S. Hurtado, "Linking diversity and educational purpose: how diversity affects the classroom environment and student development," in Diversity Challenged: Evidence on the Impact of Affirmative Action, G. Orfield, Ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Publishing Group, 2001, pp. 187-203.[14] C. Herring, "Does diversity pay?: Race

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division - WIP Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong Joint Institute; Charlemagne Manuel

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Morals, Values & Ethics - YourMorals.Org.” [Online]. Available: https://www.yourmorals.org/index.php. [Accessed: 04-Feb-2019].[3] J. Graham, B. A. Nosek, J. Haidt, R. Iyer, S. Koleva, and P. H. Ditto, “Mapping the Moral Domain,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 2011.[4] “The Moral Sense Test.” [Online]. Available: http://www.moralsensetest.com/. [Accessed: 04-Feb-2019].[5] “Moral Machine.” [Online]. Available: http://moralmachine.mit.edu/. [Accessed: 04-Feb- 2019].[6] E. Awad et al., “The Moral Machine experiment,” Nature, vol. 563, no. 7729, pp. 59–64, 2018.[7] A. Schleicher, “China opens a new university every week,” BBC, 16-Mar-2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.bbc.com/news/business-35776555

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ona Egbue, University of South Carolina Upstate; Arshia Khan, University of Minnesota Duluth; Rania Al-Hammoud P.Eng., University of Waterloo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Differences and the Differences They Make” Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 325–333, 2006.[2] C. Corbett, & C. Hill. “Solving the equation: The variables for women’s success in engineering and computing”. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women, 2015.[3] L. Babcock, L., & S. Laschever, “Women don’t ask: The high cost of avoiding negotiation and positive strategies for change”. New York, NY: Bantam Books, 2007.[4] C A. Moss-Racusin, J. F. Dovidio, V. L. Brescoll, M. J. Graham, & J. Handelsman, “Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 109, no. 41, pp. 16474–16479, 2012.[5] S. Cheryan, S. A. Ziegler, A. K. Montoya, and L. Jiang

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacques C. Richard, Texas A&M University; So Yoon Yoon, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Paper ID #27140Impact of a Research Experience Program in Aerospace Engineering on Un-dergraduate Students: Year TwoDr. Jacques C. Richard, Texas A&M University Dr. Richard got his Ph. D. at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1989 & a B. S. at Boston University, 1984. He was at NASA Glenn, 1989-1995, worked at Argonne National Lab, 1996-1997, taught at Chicago State University, 1997-2002. Dr. Richard is a Sr. Lecturer & Research Associate in Aerospace Engi- neering @ Texas A&M since 1/03. His research is focused on computational plasma modeling using spectral and lattice Boltzmann methods for studying

Conference Session

PSW Section Meeting Papers - Disregard start and end time - for online paper access only

Collection

2019 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

James M Widmann, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; John Chen P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Camaryn Elizabeth Chambers, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Alidod Ghazvini; Lisa Marie Kusakabe

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Pacific Southwest Section Meeting Paper Submissions

scalefrom 1, very inaccurately, to 7, very accurately. A higher score in each personality trait shows thestudent’s personality is strong in that trait.Grit: This construct was proposed by the psychologist Angela Duckworth and is defined as thepassion and perseverance for long-term goals.13 Grit is usually unrelated or inversely related tointelligence or talent. The two subcategories of grit are consistency of interest and perseverance ofeffort. Perseverance of effort is a superior predictor of GPA while consistency of interest is a betterpredictor of number of lifetime career changes.14 Undergraduates who scored higher in Grit alsoearned higher GPAs than their peers despite having lower SAT scores.13 The Grit-S (short gritscale), which is comprised