Asee peer logo
Displaying results 211 - 240 of 259 in total
Conference Session
Active Learning in BME, Session I
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nicole L Ramo, Colorado State University; Jasmine Erin Nejad, Colorado State University; Ketul C. Popat, Colorado State University; Kimberly Catton P.E., Colorado State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering
.” [Online]. Available: https://learningassistantalliance.org/modules/about/about_laa.php.[29] V. Betihavas, H. Bridgman, R. Kornhaber, and M. Cross, “The evidence for ‘flipping out’: A systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education,” Nurse Educ. Today, vol. 38, pp. 15–21, 2016.[30] R. M. Felder and R. Brent, “Understanding Student Differences,” no. January, 2005.[31] R. M. Felder, “Learning Styles and Strategies,” North Carolina State University, 2000. [Online]. Available: http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/ILSdir/styles.pdf.[32] D. Bye, D. Pushkar, and M. Conway, “Motivation, interest, and positive affect in traditional and nontraditional undergraduate students,” Adult Educ. Q., vol
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sandra Furnbach Clavijo P.E., Stevens Institute of Technology; Leslie R. Brunell, Stevens Institute of Technology; Keith G. Sheppard, Stevens Institute of Technology; Kishore V. Pochiraju, Stevens Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
Antennas and Propagation Magazine, vol. 45(1), pp. 134-138, 2003.[2] T. Byers, T. Seelig, S. Sheppard, and P. Weilerstein, “Entrepreneurship: its role in engineering education,” The Bridge, vol. 43(2), pp. 35-4, 2013.[3] T. J. Kriewall and K. Mekemson, “Instilling the entrepreneurial mindset into engineering undergraduates,” The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, vol. 1(1), pp. 5-19, July 2010. [Online]. Available: http://www.jeenonline.com/Vol1/Num1/Vol1No1P1.pdf [Accessed March 1, 2018].[4] E. Cao, S. Gilmartin, Q. Jin, C. Dungs, and S. Sheppard, “Business program participation and engineering innovation: an exploration of engineering students’ minors, certificates, and concentrations,” The Journal
Conference Session
Division for Experimentation & Lab-oriented Studies Technical Session 5
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sulakshana Lal, Curtin University; Anthony Denis Lucey, Curtin University; Euan Lindsay, Charles Sturt University; David Franklin Treagust, Curtin University; Mauro Mocerino, Curtin University; John Matthew Long, Deakin University; Marjan G. Zadnik, Curtin University of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies
year engineering students: Perceptions of engineers and engineering work amongst domestic and international students,” Int. J. First Year High. Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 89–105, 2015.[12] L. Q. Prendergast, “Retention, Success, and Satisfaction of Engineering Students Based on the First-Year Experience,” The State University of New Jersey, 2013.[13] S. W. Tho, Y. Y. Yeung, R. Wei, K. W. Chan, and W. W. So, “A Systematic Review of Remote Laboratory Work in Science Education with the Support of Visualizing its Structure through the HistCite and CiteSpace Software,” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 1217–1236, 2017.[14] E. Fabregas, G. Farias, S. Dormido-Canto, S. Dormido, and F. Esquembre, “Developing a
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rosalyn W. Berne, University of Virginia
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
Dr.Thomas’ initial visit to the class, he delivered a detailed lecture on the technologyinvolved in IVF. Being engineers, the students especially appreciated the technicalelements of his lecture, and they asked many questions about the workings of the devicesand processes he described. But his presence was insignificant to the ethics focus of thecourse. Indeed; the subject of ethics never came up, not in his lecture or in the Q & A.This changed, however, in subsequent years, when students left the classroom to travelacross town, to meet with Dr. Thomas inside of his IVF lab.It was there that the students passed by the waiting room for patients seeking help withreproduction, and then saw with their own eyes, the array of technology involved in
Conference Session
Student Empathy and Human-Centered Design
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lexie Mitchell, Colorado School of Mines; Leslie Light, Colorado School of Mines
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
in Spring 2015, the ITD program created new class activitiesto help students understand the difference between their perceptions and experiences of aproblem, and those of the people actually affected by that problem.These activities include: ● Subject Matter Expert (SME) Talks: Experts present on various aspects of the problem, followed by a 20-minute Q&A session. ● User Empathy Experience: Re-creation of the problem context on class premises, where students execute project-relevant tasks. ● Stakeholder Engagement Experience: Students are sent off campus to observe and interact with users/stakeholders. ● A reflection assignment: Analysis of what they thought were problems for the users compared with what
Conference Session
Mentoring Practices and Project Teams
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Emily Miller, University of Virginia; Reid Bailey, University of Virginia
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Dysfunctional Cooperative Learning Teams Based on Students' Academic Achievement," J Eng Educ, vol. 99, (1), pp. 45-54, 2010.[16] M. C. Thomas and K. W. Phillips, "When What You Know Is Not Enough: Expertise and Gender Dynamics in Task Groups," Person. Soc. Psychol Bull., vol. 30, (12), pp. 15851598, 2004.[17] A. Joshi, "By Whom and When Is Women’s Expertise Recognized? The Interactive Effects of Gender and Education in Science and Engineering Teams," Adm. Sci. Q., vol. 59, (2), pp. 202-239, 2014.[18] H. Tajfel and J. C. Turner, The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. 2004.[19] L. U. Eric and G. L. Cohen, "Constructed Criteria: Redefining Merit to Justify Discrimination," Psychol. Sci., vol. 16, (6), pp. 474-480, 2005
Conference Session
Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Leroy L. Long III, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach; Trevion S. Henderson, University of Michigan; Michael Steven Williams, University of Missouri
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
12ReferencesAina, C., Baici, E., & Casalone, G. (2011). Time to degree: students' abilities, university characteristics orsomething else? Evidence from Italy. Education Economics, 19(3), 311-325.Alexander, M. (2012). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. The New Press.Bensimon, E. M., & Bishop, R. (2012). Introduction: Why" critical"? The need for new ways of knowing. TheReview of Higher Education, 36(1), 1-7.Chen, X. (2013). STEM Attrition: College Students’ Paths Into and Out of STEM Fields (NCES 2014-001). NationalCenter for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.Dika, S. L., Pando, M. A., Tempest, B. Q., & Allen, M. E. (2017). Examining the Cultural
Conference Session
Understanding Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion from Students' Perspectives
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Susannah C. Davis, Oregon State University; Naeun Cheon, University of Washington; Elba Camila Moise, University of Washington; Susan Bobbitt Nolen, University of Washington
Tagged Topics
ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity
students: Results of a longitudinal study,” Journal of Higher Education, vol. 69 no. 6, pp. 589-620, 1998.46. P. Q. Hall, Problems and solutions in the education, employment and personal choices of minority women in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1981.47. Datnow, A., & Cooper, R. (1997). Peer networks of African American students in independent schools: Affirming academic success and racial identity. The Journal of Negro Education, 66, 56–72.48. D. A. Guiffrida, “African American student organizations as agents of social integration,” Journal of College Student Development, vol. 44 no. 3, pp. 304–319, 2003.49. S. Hurtado, D. F. Carter, “Effects of college transition and
Conference Session
Aerospace Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Marty Mathews Jr., University of Wisconsin, Platteville; Antonette T. Cummings P.E., University of Wisconsin, Platteville
Tagged Divisions
Aerospace
Studies, pp. 587-634, 2001.[14] E. Coyle, L. Jamieson, and W. Oakes, "EPICS: Engineering Projects in Community Service," International Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 139-150, 2005.[15] C. B. Zoltowski, W. C. Oakes, and M. E. Cardella, "Teaching Human-Centered Design with Service-Learning," in 2010 Annual Conference and Exposition, Louisville, KY, 2010, pp. 1-13: American Society for Engineering Education.[16] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc, 2002.[17] S. R. Daly, R. S. Adams, and G. M. Bodner, "What Does it Mean to Design? A Qualitative Investigation of Design Professionals’ Experiences," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101
Conference Session
Cognitive Engagement
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Benjamin David Lutz, Oregon State University; Allyson Jo Barlow, Oregon State University; Nathaniel Hunsu, University of Georgia; Cassandra J. Groen, Virginia Tech; Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University; Olusola Adesope, Washington State University; Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., Virginia Tech
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Using nStudy Trace Data and the ICAP Framework. Paper presented at the LAL@ LAK.Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students' goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of educational psychology, 80(4), 514.Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and psychological measurement, 53(3), 801-813.Pitterson, N. P., Brown, S., Pascoe, J., & Fisher, K. Q. (2016). Measuring cognitive engagement through interactive, constructive, active and passive learning activities. Paper presented at the Frontiers in
Conference Session
Design in the BME curriculum
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Timothy E. Allen, University of Virginia; David Chen, University of Virginia
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering
solutions, select & prototype concepts, and gather patient/clinical feedback on proposed solutions. Students presented their need, design process, and proposed solution in a video format. Experienced faculty, clinicians, local entrepreneurs, and design faculty from the School of Engineering and Applied Sciences and from the School of Architecture were available to question the students about their ideas in an organic and realistic manner in the Q&A following the video presentation. Students were evaluated on 1) the quality and level of accomplishment in their designs, and 2) the quality of the video presentation and communication of the process and outcomes.Assessments in 2017 (both J-Term and
Conference Session
Engineering Leadership Competency and Skill Development
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Leadership Development
Society of Professional Engineers, Engineering Body of Knowledge, First Edition. Alexandria, VA: NSPE, 2013, 60 pp.[3] AIChE, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Body of Knowledge for Chemical Engineers, Release 1.0. New York, NY: AIChE, 2015, 116 pp.[4] ASCE, American Society of Civil Engineers, Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future, Second Edition. Reston, VA: ASCE, 2008, 181 pp.[5] American Society for Engineering Education, ASEE. ASEE Papers on Engineering Education Repository, PEER. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/advanced_search?q=leadership+&q_in%5B%5D=title&q_in%5B%5D =conference_session_name&q_in%5B%5D=topics&q_in
Conference Session
Cognitive Engagement
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rongrong Liu; Jiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
on nonresponse in web surveys.Social Science Computer Review, 25(3), 372.[24] Zhu, J., Hu, Y., Liu, Q., & Cox, M. F. (2015). Validation of an instrument for Chineseengineering students’ epistemological development. International Journal of Chinese Education,4(2): 135-161.[25] National Academy of Engineering. (2005). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering inthe new century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Conference Session
Career Decisions and Faculty Development
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lori C. Bland, George Mason University; Jill K. Nelson, George Mason University; Margret Hjalmarson, George Mason University; Anastasia P. Samaras, George Mason University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
1424 O’Keefe, C. M., & Head, R. J. (2011). Application of logic models in a large scientific research program. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34, 174–184. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.02.00825 Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.26 Funnell, S. C., Rogers, P. J. (2011). Purposeful program theory: Effective use of theories of change and logic models. San Francisco: Wiley.27 Kelly, A. E. (2014). Design-based research in engineering education: Current state and next steps. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (pp. 497–418). New York: Cambridge University Press.28 Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 8
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jidong Huang, California State University, Fullerton
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
prototypes, startingwith a “minimum viable prototype.” Compared to traditional approach, lean start-up favorsexperimentation over elaborate planning, customer feedback over intuition and iterative designover traditional “big design up front” development (Blank, 2013).Student DemographicsStudent participants for the STEM-Inc project were recruited through multiple efforts (Huang,2017). Recruiting flyers were created and distributed to the classes at the four participatingschools via STEM-Inc teacher participants when the school year started. Additionally, a STEM-Inc open house and live engineering/computer science project demonstration with Q&A sessionwas held at each one of the four schools, mostly during the lunch hours in September
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Shiloh James Howland, Brigham Young University; Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Randall Davies, Brigham Young University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
Conference Session
Undergraduate Peer Educators: Mentoring, Observing, Learning
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Chandra Anne Turpen, University of Maryland, College Park; Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park; Jennifer Radoff, University of Maryland, College Park; Andrew Elby, University of Maryland, College Park; Hannah Sabo; Gina Marie Quan, University of Maryland, College Park
Tagged Topics
ASEE Board of Directors, Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
Conference Session
Novel Classrooms
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Julie L. P. Jessop, University of Iowa; Anna L. Flaming, University of Iowa
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
Conference Session
Faculty Track - Technical Session II
Collection
2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference
Authors
Nicole N. Aljoe, Northeastern University; Stacy Blake-Beard, Simmons College; Michele C. Deramo, Virginia Tech; Barbara J. Guthrie, Northeastern University; Kathleen Kenney, Northeastern University; Carol B. Muller, Stanford University; Jan Rinehart, Northeastern University; Rania Sanford, Stanford University; Shawna Vican, University of Delaware
Tagged Topics
Faculty
lived experiences of faculty women ofcolor, including “surviving and thriving” strategies; 3) sessions on diversity research; 4) hands-on workshops focused on career development strategies; and 5) a screening of the documentary“Living Thinkers: An Autobiography of Black Women in the Ivory Tower” followed by a Q&Asession with the filmmaker. The conference was also designed to encourage networking andincluded a poster session, a breakout session where small groups brainstormed solutions to careerproblems, and an evening networking reception.The conference drew 181 attendees from more than 50 institutions across the US, includinguniversity faculty, administrators, post-doctoral fellows, and graduate students. While mostparticipants were from
Conference Session
First-Generation Track - Technical Session IV
Collection
2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference
Authors
Dina Verdín, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno; Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Geoff Potvin, Florida International University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, First Generation
American Educational Research Association, New York, 2018.[21] H. Boone and A. Kirn, “First Generation Students Identification with and Feelings of Belongingness in Engineering,” in Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016.[22] S. Allie et al., “Learning as acquiring a discursive identity through participation in a community: Improving student learning in engineering education,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 359–367, 2009.[23] J. E. Stets and P. J. Burke, “Identity theory and social identity theory,” Soc. Psychol. Q., pp. 224–237, 2000.[24] R. Stevens, K. O’Connor, L. Garrison, A. Jocuns, and D. M. Amos, “Becoming an engineer: Toward a three dimensional view
Conference Session
Scaling class size and technology – New Engineering Educators Division
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Peggy C. Boylan-Ashraf, San Jose State University; John R. Haughery, Iowa State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
Conference Session
Division for Experimentation & Lab-oriented Studies Technical Session 3
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David F. Radcliffe, Swinburne University of Technology; Mary K. Pilotte, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies
by periodic impromptu concept presentations, plus groupand individual reflections on stakeholder needs, design criteria, etc. When the students reportedback to the PDE class, it consisted of a poster presentation with supporting evidence anddemonstration of a physical artefact. Through a rigorous Q&A session the visiting studentscommunicated and defended their design choices. Since the local students had not met as a classsince day one, the expectation was that the visitor presentations would help the local studentsprogress their own designs, and perhaps rethink their impressions of important contextual issues.The intensive investigation activities around the Jakarta project was interspersed with shorttechnical visits and workshops, one
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy; Kristin L. Wood, Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD); Aaron P Bauer, United States Air Force Academy; Blake Perez, Singapore University of Technology and Design; Milton Doria, United States Air Force Academy; Michael Lawrence Anderson P.E., United States Air Force; Luke Jensen, CREO
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
Conference Session
Understanding Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion from Students' Perspectives
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ashley R. Taylor, Virginia Tech; Walter C. Lee, Virginia Tech; Benjamin David Lutz, Oregon State University; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Cynthia Hampton, Virginia Tech
Tagged Topics
ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity
Conference Session
Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Scott Alexander Kaiser, Utah Valley University; Reza Kamali, Utah Valley University; Paul Weber, Utah Valley University; Afsaneh Minaie, Utah Valley University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics and Physics
Raton: CNC Press, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books?id=DiFMPmXSsLUC&pg=SA2- PA1#v=onepage&q&f=false [2] R. P. Feynman, “There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom,” Science and Engineering, pp. 22–36, 1960. [Online]. Available: http://calteches.library.caltech.edu/47/2/1960Bottom.pdf [3] M. Ruivenkamp and A. Rip, “Entanglement of Imaging and Imagining of Nanotechnology,” Nanoethics; Dordrecht, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 185–193, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://search-proquest- com.ezproxy.uvu.edu/docview/887465026/3ADDD4C0F5D0457BPQ/1?accountid=14779 [4] A. D. Derjaguin, B. V. and Titijevskaia, A. S. and Abricossova, I. I. and Malkina, “Investigations of the forces of interaction of
Conference Session
Electrical and Computer Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Saharnaz Baghdadchi, University of California, San Diego; Rebecca Anne Hardesty, University of California, San Diego; Paul Andreas Hadjipieris, University of California, San Diego; Jace Hargis, University of California, San Diego
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
to think about the topic and assess their learning of thatconcept. In the second step, the students got the chance to communicate their findings or theconfusions with other students. Also, during the second step, the instructor joined the students'conversations, and it provided the opportunity for all of the students to interact with theirprofessor in the format of a discussion rather than a formal Q and A practiced in the standardlecture classes. The students were asked to explain their solutions or their approach to solving theproblems to each other so they would exchange ideas and get exposed to different ways ofsolving a problem. The instructor asked the students to find another student who came up with adifferent answer and challenge
Conference Session
Integrating Experiential Learning into the Curriculum
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Fu Zhongli, National University of Defense Technology; Zihan Lin, National University of Defense Technology; Tianqi Zhang, National University of Defense and Technology; Zhao Zhao, National University of Defense Technology; Tong Wu, National University of Defense Technology; Huang Zhang, National University of Defense Technology; Zhang Jianing, Changsha SunVote Limited, China; Changfang Zhang, National University of Defense Technology; Yan Xu, Changsha SunVote Limited
Tagged Divisions
Cooperative and Experiential Education
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 11
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Liping Liu, Lawrence Technological University; James A. Mynderse, Lawrence Technological University; Robert W Fletcher, Lawrence Technological University; Andrew L Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
contrarian view of accepted (i.e., typical) solutions. g. Identify an unexpected opportunity for your design. h. Create extraordinary value for a customer or stakeholder. i. Integrate information from many sources to gain insight. j. Assess and manage risk. k. Persist through failure. l. Apply creative thinking to ambiguous problems. m. Apply systems thinking to complex problems. n. Evaluate economic drivers. o. Examine a customer’s or stakeholder’s needs. p. Understand the motivations and perspectives of others. q. Convey engineering solutions in economic terms. r. Substantiate claims with data and facts.The answers were provided in five scales: 1. None at all 2. Slightly 3. On some occasions 4. Many times 5
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John M. Santiago Jr., Colorado Technical University; Jing Guo, Colorado Technical University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mathias J. Klenk, Technical University of Munich; Tua A. Björklund, Aalto University Design Factory; Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, SKG Analysis; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation