encourage open-ended Q&A to address pertinent issues or concerns thateach student may be experiencing. During this time, the faculty members provide their help andinsights while the other graduate students share their experiences.MotivationFollowing leadership changes within the college, the STEM education research faculty wereempowered to reinvigorate programs that support their research area. A primary support enginefor any research program is the graduate students. Professors A and B decided to focus onconnecting with and supporting that group who would in turn contribute to the breadth of STEMeducation research produced by the University. Professor A, who was already the programcoordinator for the Ph.D. in Engineering Education program, was
://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3287216. 2019.[14] T. Saheb, “Ethically contentious aspects of artificial intelligence surveillance: a social science perspective,” AI and Ethics, 3(2), pp. 369-379. 2023.[15] A. Etzioni and O. Etzioni, “Pros and cons of autonomous weapon systems”. Military Review, May-June, 2017. pp. 72–81, 2017.[16] D.M.A. Karwat, “Engineering for the people: Putting peace, social justice, and environmental protection at the heart of all engineering,” In National Academy of Engineering. Frontiers of Engineering: Reports on Leading-Edge Engineering from the 2018 Symposium. 2019.[17] J.R. Mihelcic, C.C. Naughton, M.E. Verbyla, Q. Zhang, R.W. Schweitzer, S.M. Oakley, E.C. Wells, and L.M. Whiteford, “The grandest
Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2015.5. M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2002.
quantcrit to gifted education research: an introduction,” Gifted Child Quarterly, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 80–89, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1177/00169862221116636.[24] L. R. Bergman and K. Trost, “The Person-Oriented Versus the Variable-Oriented Approach: Are They Complementary, Opposites, or Exploring Different Worlds?,” Merrill Palmer Q., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 601–632, 2006, doi: 10.1353/mpq.2006.0023.[25] M. C. Howard and M. E. Hoffman, “Variable-Centered, Person-Centered, and Person- Specific Approaches,” Organizational Research Methods, vol. 21, no. 4, p. 109442811774402, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1177/1094428117744021.
IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 1329-1336, IEEE, 2021.[2]. B. A. Quismorio, M. A. D. Pasquin, and C. S. Tayco, "Assessing the alignment of Philippine higher education with the emerging demands for data science and analytics workforce," PIDS Discussion Paper Series, 2019, no. 2019-34.[3]. M. Almgerbi, A. De Mauro, A. Kahlawi, and V. Poggioni, "A systematic review of data analytics job requirements and online-courses," Journal of Computer Information Systems, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 422-434, 2022.[4]. E. Milonas, Q. Zhang, and D. Li, "Do Undergraduate Data Science Program Competencies Vary by College Rankings?" In Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN
, M. Heagney, and L. Thomas, “Improving Student Retention in Higher Education: Improving Teaching and Learning,” Australian Universities’ Review, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 9–18, 2009.[25] T. D. Nguyen, J. W. Kramer, and B. J. Evans, “The Effects of Grant Aid on Student Persistence and Degree Attainment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Causal Evidence,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 831–874, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.3102/0034654319877156.[26] Li, C. Q. (2021). Teaching Mechatronics to Non-traditional Mechanical Engineering Students-An Adaptive Approach. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 11(3).e[27] Turner, P. E., Johnston, E., Kebritchi, M., Evans, S., & Heflich, D. A. (2018
study on technology acceptance, perceptions, efficacy, and detection chances. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100172, 2023.[14] J. D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, R. Y. Wong, B. Hartmann, and Q. Yang, Why Johnny can’t prompt: how non-AI experts try (and fail) to design LLM prompts. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-21), April 2023.[15] A. Johnson, ChatGPT In Schools: Here’s Where It’s Banned—And How It Could Potentially Help Students. Forbes, 2023. [online]. https://www.forbes.com/sites/ariannajohnson/2023/01/18/chatgpt-in-schools-heres-where- its-banned-and-how-it-could-potentially-help-students/?sh=acc10006e2c6 [accessed 5 February 2024].[16] Zhaw
ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Salt Lake City, Utah: ASEE Conferences, Jun.2018, p. 30371. doi: 10.18260/1-2--30371.[22] Q. Cutts, E. Cutts, S. Draper, P. O’Donnell, and P. Saffrey, “Manipulating mindset topositively influence introductory programming performance,” in Proceedings of the 41st ACMtechnical symposium on Computer science education, Milwaukee Wisconsin USA: ACM, Mar.2010, pp. 431–435. doi: 10.1145/1734263.1734409.[23] S. A. Ambrose, M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. C. Lovett, and M. K. Norman, Howlearning works: seven research-based principles for smart teaching, First edition. in The Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, a Wiley Imprint, 2010.[24] B. Wisniewski, K. Zierer, and
manufacturing: a state of art review," Sustainable Futures, vol. 2, p. 100023, 2020.[6] S. Sahoo and C. Y. Lo, "Smart manufacturing powered by recent technological advancements: A review," Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 64, pp. 236-250, 2022. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2024, American Society for Engineering Education ETD 315[7] J. Lee, P. C. Chua, L. Chen, P. H. N. Ng, Y. Kim, Q. Wu, et al., "Key enabling technologies for smart factory in automotive industry: status and applications," International Journal of Precision
interview with a human resources representative from a similar-sized engineering firmrevealed that a cohort-based learning approach could curb feelings of imposter syndrome and aidin onboarding new hires to the organization. The new hire group met bi-weekly for one year. Thefirst monthly meeting was for sharing experiences, and the second was for one-on-one Q&Asessions with senior leaders, human resources, and other internal operations staff members aboutthe culture and how the organization worked. This approach helped to clarify expectations, fosterengagement, and retain those new hires.Educators can proactively address imposter syndrome in university students transitioning to theworkplace by incorporating confidence-building activities and
various aspects of a system. We thus performed a content analysison the data sources, grouping evidence of participant sentiment into the relevant component of themodel in order to determine how participants perceive the recent changes to the law.Results1. Policies In some cases, HEFS had factually incorrect perceptions of the new policies. Forexample, one person registered for the webinar but then contacted the organizers to explain whythey would not be participating: upon reading some of the resources that the facilitators hadshared with participants in preparation for the first webinar, they learned that their institution – amilitary academy – was not subject to the recent SCOTUS ruling. Another participant noted that“For now, reading the Q
. Cherng, B. Q. Li, and N. Natarajan, "Development of a Mechatronics Course for SeniorMechanical Engineering Students," in 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 23-26,2013[2] H. Vasquez and A. A. Fuentes, "Integration of Sensors and Low-Cost Microcontrollers intothe Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Design Sequence," in 120th ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, June 23-26, 2013[3] M. Barger and R. Gilbert, "New Mechatronics Education Initiatives in 2-year Programs," in2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Palace Convention Center, Salt Lake City, UT,June 24-27, 2018[4] S. A. Yost and D. D. Maggio, "The Mechatronics Road Show: Building on Success inMechatronics Curriculum Development," in 2004 American Society for
, instructors informed sponsors that students hadn't received anofficial rubric, inviting sponsors to suggest improvements in data presentation, especiallyconcerning industry norms. After the presentations and Q&A sessions, each team receiveddetailed grading rubrics, ensuring transparency in assignment grading. Students were apprisedthat the Course Exit survey would feature three questions regarding the elimination of rubrics ina senior-level course, emphasizing anonymity to foster honest opinions without fear ofretaliation.The decision to eliminate the rubric and empower students to self-assess their presentationcontent and style stemmed from a significant factor—the prior workshop on HeilmeierCatechism during Capstone 1. In this workshop, student
three consecutive days. The three sub-topics are 1) AssetManagement Overview and Lifecycle Cost, 2) Asset Maintenance and Reliability, and 3)Managing Aging Assets. Each day, the course was held for two sessions with a break in between.The morning session comprised lectures, an hour of industry expert speaking session, and 15minutes of Q&A. The afternoon session was reserved for student evaluations and study caseactivities on the topics learned in the morning. The themes covered in the course are not often partof Bachelor’s-degree curricula, especially at electrical engineering schools. The aim of these topicswas to advance the students’ creativity and their ability to evaluate engineering problems and,accordingly, employ innovative decision
development the design project for the capstone course) to meet with the instructor and officers from the office of alumni engagement, with a dynamic of fast Q&A sessions as described in Figure 4. These meetings are scheduled in the last week of classes (before the week of finals) in one class session, where one group attends the meeting (15-20 minutes) while the other groups keep working on the final report of technical project.The first three editions of the project were included as a regular (mandatory) component of thecourse. However, more recently, the Department has been reviewing the curricular load forstudents, in response to some criticism of potential excessive demand for students’ independentwork
equipment — makes scheduling in-sync with whole-class lecturespossible.The working section of the flow loop is a transparent square tube with internal sides of h = 44 mmand a length of at least 300 mm depending on the model. Water is pumped from a source by anelectric submersible pump, for example an aquarium pump, providing flow rates on the order ofup to 300 litres per hour (Q = 83 × 10−6 m3 /s), leading to channel Reynolds numbers up toReh ≡ Q/(hν) ≈ 1900 where ν is the kinematic viscosity. At these flow rates the flow is laminar,but the channel boundary layers are thin.Flow conditioning using a sponge and honeycomb was effective to achieve a uniform flow at theentrance — if bubbles are absent. Tracer fluid with neutral buoyancy can be sourced
programming,” Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2003, pp. 359-362.[21] L. Porter, D. Bouvier, Q. Cutts, S. Grissom, C. Lee, R. McCartney, D. Zingaro, and B. Simon, “A multi-institutional study of peer instruction in introductory computing,” Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (SIGCSE '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2016, pp. 358-363.[22] T. Greer, Q. Hao, M. Jing, and B. Barnes, “On the effects of active learning environments in computing education,” Proceedings of the 50th
technical and professional skills,” International Journal forService Learning in Engineering, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 1, Spring 2013.[25] R. S. Harichandran, M.-I. Carnasciali, N. O. Erdil, C. Q. Li, J. Nocito-Gobel, and S. D.Daniels, “Developing entrepreneurial thinking in engineering students by utilizing integratedonline modules,” presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2015, pp.[26] N. O. Erdil, R. S. Harichandran, J. Nocito-Gobel, C. Q. Li, and M.-I. Carnasciali, “Impact ofintegrated e-learning modules in developing an entrepreneurial mindset based on deployment at25 institutions,” presented
elaboration,” PLoS Med., vol. 6, no. 7, 2009, doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.[11] M. J. Page et al., “PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews,” BMJ, vol. 372, 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160.[12] M. Petticrew and H. Roberts, Systematic reviews in the social Sciences. Blackwell Publishing, 2006.[13] D. R. Becker, A. Miao, R. Duncan, and M. M. McClelland, “Behavioral self-regulation and executive function both predict visuomotor skills and early academic achievement,” Early Child. Res. Q., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 411–424, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.04.014.[14] R. Samuelsson, “Embodied reasoning with digital tools in the preschool ecology
(WIL)?,” November 2021. [Online]. Available: https://cewilcanada.ca/CEWIL/CEWIL/About-Us/Work-Integrated- Learning.aspx?hkey=ed772be2-00d0-46cd-a5b8-873000a18b41. [Accessed 21 January 2024].[3] Q. Liu, D. Reeve, C. Rottmann and E. Moore, “Examining Workplace Affordance and Student Engagement in Engineering Co-op and Internship Literature,” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 116-129, 2020.[4] R. Adams, D. Evangelou, L. English, A. D. De Figueiredo, N. Mousoulides, A. L. Pawley, C. Schiefellite, R. Stevens, M. Svinicki, J. M. Trenor and D. W. Wilson, “Multiple Perspectives on Engaging Future Engineers,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 48-88, 2013
usefulness, UI design, technical soundness, and presentation quality including the Q&A session. Notably, the external evaluators were unaware of the feedback exploration approach used. 4. ChatGPT Feedback: For some of the checkpoints, we provided students with the pre-designed prompts. They were encouraged to use these prompts, to seek feedback from ChatGPT on their projects. These prompts were tailored to the specific requirements of each checkpoint, which enabled ChatGPT to offer both comprehensive and detailed feedback.Fig. 1 presents the detailed steps involved in the process of retaining valuable knowledgeobtained from various sources throughout the course duration to build a more specializedgenerative feedback