. The ABET criterion 3 outcomes are a driving force inmaking sure the course outcomes are appropriate.Freshman Engineering courses have undergone significant evolution in the past few decades. Inrecent years great emphasis has been placed upon broadening the freshman engineeringexperience and improving retention in engineering programs. Several programs have madesignificant changes in recent years to address these issues. 1, 2, 3, 4, 9 Many programs are lessskills-based instruction and more project-based instruction with an emphasis on problem solvingand engineering design. 1, 6,7,8 The United States Air Force Academy, as well as otherinstitutions, have taken a multidisciplinary approach in the first year by making the course opento or required
softwareGrove City College has a 1:1 mobile computing program, now in its second decade, where eachstudent receives at the start of his or her freshman year a computer. For the past four years, thecomputer has been a Hewlett-Packard Tablet PC. Currently, there are about 2500 Tablet PCsused by students and about 120 used by faculty. Page 13.144.2Complementing the hardware program, the college provides software to support the entire CSand engineering curriculum from integrated development environments (IDEs) to applicationssuch as MatLab and Maya. Moreover, the Tablet PC has a variety of software applications thatare pen-aware, such as Microsoft® Word and
conceptualthreads from the required curriculum and strengthens their DSP programming skills with a seriesof mini-projects1.The choice of computational platform for mini-projects and in-class demonstrations is a keydesign decision for the course. Richard Hamming once said “the purpose of computing is insight,not numbers,” and students gain manifold insights when they interact with a signal processingsystem of their own creation. The choice of a development environment for optimum studentlearning revolves around two critical issues: (1) the total time required to transform a conceptinto a working system, and (2) the degree to which the system is interactive. Frustration resultswhen the development process takes too long or is too complicated. In addition
presentation, “Space Exploration-AnAstronaut’s Perspective,” was held on November 16, 2006 and was attended by morethan 100 people. The guest speaker also visited the Early Child Development Center(ECDC) on November 17 where he talked to students and answered their questions. Fig.1 shows two pictures taken at these events. Fig. 1 (a) The audience at the presentation (b) The speaker addressing ECDC studentsThe second presentation, “NASA Careers and the Future of the Space Program,” washeld on April 16, 2007. More than 100 people attended this presentation. The speakeralso participated in evaluating a presentation on April 17th by students preparing tocompete in the “Students Today, NASA Tomorrow
communications, engineering economy, and construction planning, scheduling, estimating, and management. Page 13.762.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Integr ating Engineer ing Ethics Education into a Multi-Disciplinar y Seminar Cour se: Making the ÐUqhvÑ"Qwveqogu RelevantIntr oduction The Department of Engineering Technology at the University of North Carolina atCharlotte (UNCC) has developed and implemented a comprehensive program leading toan academic environment of continuous improvement consistent with the ABETTechnology Criteria 2000 (TC2K).1 With the advent of TC2K, many
endeavorsin the Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning and Refrigeration (HVAC&R) disciplines. 1, 2, 3In 2005, ME seniors and their faculty advisor in the ME Senior Lab I course at WesternKentucky University submitted a proposal to the ASHRAE Undergraduate Senior Project GrantProgram, requesting funds to design, build and test (DBT) a Centrifugal Pump DemonstrationSystem. The proposal was selected by ASHRAE as one of the projects to be funded for the 2006– 2007 academic year.The stated scope of the project was to design, build and test (DBT) an educational demonstrationor instructional unit to allow undergraduate students to evaluate the behavior of centrifugalpumps in a variety of operating conditions. The unit was to be used to complement an
maintain an attitude of equality and respectregarding other species [1, 7, 8, and 9]. More and more disciplines are using the samebuzzword “sustainable” in their professional action; the emphasis in a sustainable engineeringdesign always differs because of hidden value systems within different professional trainings [3,5]. These contradictions always accompany most eco-engineering design processes, especiallythose eco-sensitive environments such as high density urban areas. For example, an Page 13.597.2eco-tourism hill path located in a metropolitan location faces the dilemma of needing to cater torecreation needs while also mitigating any
attempting to learn more about the efficacy of summer bridge programs, we discovered ageneral dearth of relevant performance data in the literature. We identified and examined 12engineering summer bridge programs that serve new freshmen whose math placement is at orbelow pre-calculus, and for which meaningful student performance data has been published. Thedata that we compiled suggests that bridge programs are very successful in helping students toadvance in math placement by at least one level. Less clear is whether bridge studentsoutperform control group students in the years beyond the bridge program (as measured byretention, graduation, and grades), but some evidence suggests that this is the case.1. IntroductionNew freshmen in many engineering
approach utilized various means of teaching mechanisms, consequently addressingvarious types of learners. These means, presented in the following sequence, were:1. Study of theory of machines including kinematics and dynamics22. Observation of working mechanisms and computer animations3. Reverse engineering of mechanisms found in animated toys4. Assembly and successful operation of commercially available automata kits5. An open-ended design project where a group of students had to design and build automata.During the course, students learned the theory governing mechanisms and their uses inthe real-world. The students followed a practical path to learn about joint, element, andmechanism types as well as functions of joints and
, Negotiating the Ideal Faculty Position. The workshops at RiceUniversity are funded through a National Science Foundation (NSF) ADVANCE institutionaltransformation grant. At each of these workshops, a national invitation was extended and 350-730 women responded with applications. This level of response clearly demonstrates the interestin the topic and, at the same time, the lack of information available to women in their localinstitutions.One to three follow-up surveys have been completed by the workshop participants. Thelongitudinal data show that these workshops have had a strong impact on the participants’ careerpaths, with a high percentage pursuing (and succeeding in) academic careers.The workshops have three goals: 1. To provide critical
experiences of wiki-based learning in the classroom.Professor Michalek's Design Decisions Wiki (DDWiki) is located athttp://ddl.me.cmu.edu/ddwiki. Professor McGaughey's Nanoscale Transport PhenomenaWiki (NTPWiki) is located at http://ntpl.me.cmu.edu/ntpwiki.2. Wiki softwareMost wiki software is open source code, and numerous wiki engines are available at nocost. The most popular one is MediaWiki6, the same engine used for Wikipedia.MediaWiki is written in the hypertext scripting language PHP7, incorporating a databasemanagement system. We choose and also recommend using MediaWiki to setup aclassroom wiki for several reasons: 1. It has large-scale database capabilities and high operational reliability
and the constructionindustry. The board assists in preparation of surveys and reports as required for theiraccreditation as well as other information the SDCET program. They promote financial supportto the program and the student organization, Penn State Professional Engineers and Contractors(PSPEC).The SDCET Advisory board has been identified by the college to be an excellent example of anoutstanding board 1. Their activities show how different an industry and a construction programbenefits. The advisory board activities include: construction awareness luncheon for high schoolcounselors, review of course syllabi, informal gatherings, student forums, a networking evening,and resource to the program and faculty
to only one or two laboratory courses. Recent research1-6 on the merit of active studentinteraction with physical models has revitalized interest in the use of such models, not just inlaboratory classes but—more importantly—as an integral part of traditional lecture-basedengineering courses.Couple of years ago, the authors had an opportunity to design and develop a structural testingsystem at the Raspet Flight Research Laboratory at Mississippi State University. In oneexperiment, a whiffletree loading mechanism (WLM), as shown in Fig. 1, was designed and usedfor static testing of a full-scale composite aircraft wing. For simplicity, the wings were mountedupside-down and loaded downward to simulate the lift force distribution. Whiffletree
philosophy of linear programming convert the project time-cost trade-off problemsto minimizing the objective cost function, subject to inequality time constraints, and then solvethe problem. Computerized “CPM” procedure and the application of project managementsystem had been developed by many researchers, for example, [1], [2], [8], and [7].Computerized “CPM” procedure using spreadsheets to solve the time-cost tradeoffs problem alsoalready was integrated as parts of the standard OR textbook, for example, [5] and [6].The advantages of linear programming algorithms used to obtain the optimal solutions includeefficiency and accuracy. To simplifying the mathematical formulation and its application intime-cost tradeoff problem, it will be helpful if
participants using the T4E format as a model.In 1999, a group of nine educators formally evaluated ETW as part of a Program DesignWorkshop3. As a result, the curriculum of the ETW was refined and formalized and the programwas successfully transported to the University of Arkansas in the summer of 2000. By 2002,there were ExCEEd Teaching Workshops offered at West Point, the University of Arkansas andNorthern Arizona University. Those three institutions have provided the home of the ETW eversince as shown in Table 1, although ASCE is always considering new locations.In the summer of 2004, the United Engineering Foundation funded these workshops and theother professional societies (ASME, IEEE, AIChE) sent participants to what became the ExcEEd(Excellence
design process to Mechanics of Materials in generate alternatives order to introduce design early CE450 • Construction project management • Creative problem solving Figure 1 The Civil Engineering Three-Course Sequence for Non-Engineering MajorsAs shown in Figure 1, CE300 students are introduced to statics and mechanics of materials. Bythe end of the course, they are able to analyze and design axial members (such as trusses andcables), beams, and torsional members3. CE350 provides instruction on
the types of models are explained in terms of duration, incorporation withpromotion and tenure, and what components of educational practice are included in the model.Next, the various characteristics of individual models are documented in terms of content andpracticum components, contexts for implementation, and how the models work within theirvarious contexts. Finally, due to the inherently political and emotional nature of considering theuse of these models with the US, a brief reflection on experiences and lessons learned from thesemodels is presented as relevant to US higher education.1. IntroductionFew would disagree with the idea that educating the next generation of leaders in both academiaand industry is at the heart of what higher
designed. The first one is based on the NACA 44153aerodynamic geometry profile (see the cross section area in Figure 1). It can span agreater area than other designs. The twist and slope of decrease was put in by usingComputer Aided Design Solidworks, and then altered for a 3" chord. The second onewas designed with a smaller size and a twist angle of 30 degrees, and it was designed forrunning three to six blades on the wind turbine. NACA 4415 Airfoil Chord 15 10 Y (%) 5 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 -5 X (%)Figure 1: NACA 4415 stations and ordinates given in percent of airfoil
rating system, providing the necessary quantitative analysis to determine the rank of learn(potential to convey concepts) and like (level of engagement) for each of the learning modes. As noted, theresearch focused on a first-year design course and results revealed a wide array of learning and engagementlevel combinations for the activities used in the course. Each mode was profiled with a learn-likedesignation using a correlation metric. It was not surprising that many of the learning modes in the highlearn/high like quadrant touch upon multiple learning styles and those in the low learn/low like quadrantaddressed only a limited scope of the students’ learning styles. The options suggested for handling thelow/low modes were to (1) eliminate the
Applied Science (A.A.S.) degreesassociated with manufacturing and related technologies. This reform has resulted in a statewidedegree in Engineering Technology with a common technology core, based on a nationalcertification, and five specialization tracks to meet local needs.There are a number of benefits to this change or consolidation of Engineering Technology 2-yearprograms in Florida. These include: 1) A degree program that meets manufacturers’ skills andknowledge competencies related to foundational skills in engineering technology. 2) AllCommunity Colleges in the State can market jointly to students and industry employers with acommon degree program and certification; 3) Completion of the common technology corecreates a portable completion
ranging from“Finding Nano” to robotics to ecology.The development of an extensive partnership beyond Clarkson’s campus has been a criticallyimportant aspect of the success and growth of our outreach programs. Partners include thecounty-wide Board of Cooperative Educational Services (BOCES) and other nearby Universitiesthat provide synergistic expertise, including educational assessment. The partnership helps toprovide an umbrella organization and common themes across all individual programs, whichhelp to main continuity for all stakeholders as the specific funding sources come and go. Thecommon elements that have been consistent across all individual programs and that have beenshown to be critical to our success include: (1) hands-on, inquiry and
AC 2008-1657: VIDEO LECTURE ON THE PYTHAGOREAN THEORYBertram Pariser, Technical Career Institute, Inc.Cyrus Meherji, Technical Career Institute, Inc. Page 13.1383.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Video Lecture on PYTHAGOREAN THEORYAbstractPythagoras derived the famous equation a2 +b2 =c2. This discovery enabled the Greeks tobuild the Acropolis and the Parthenon. This equation is probably the most famous equation inmathematics. There are hundreds of proofs to the Pythagorean Theorem in mathematical literature.My derivation of "A GEOMETRICAL PROOF OF PYTHAGORAS’ THEOREM" 1 is difficult for ourstudents to understand. Students, who use the video
teamwork environment, these high achievers feel that the poorer studentswaste their time. Also, the less talented students can be encouraged to participate strongly in theproject, thus eliminating a significant number of “passengers”.1. Introduction“We need to work to support ourselves and we want a life, therefore time for study is scarce”depicts the typical full-time student characteristics in ACU, Australia. Part-time students, withages varying between 25 and 50, have one or more of the following responsibilities: • a demanding job; • family; and • the need to improve their career potential.The scarcity of time for study is witnessed by the aforementioned student characterization and assuch, it is desirable to design courses which
the soul “encompasses every dimension of human existence.” Aquinas, drawingupon Boethius, further argues that each person is not only an individual substance, but anindividual substance that is connected to other similar substances. The person then exists bothindividually and in communion with other persons. (Summa Theologica I.29 art 1)The high regard for the person as such is not limited to those who would consider themselvesThomists. Immanuel Kant argues the Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals that persons areend in themselves and that human communities should be viewed as a “kingdom of ends’. Kantdoes not explicitly adopt or a reject the person as unity of body and soul, but he certainly seeshuman beings as using their bodies as
discussed above gives us thenecessary clues to help overcome these difficulties. Without data, it is difficult for goodengineers to feel comfortable with change, but without an arena to experiment and actually makechanges, it is impossible to collect the data necessary to move ahead. With this in mind, in thesummer of 2007,14 an interdepartmental collaborative pilot unit was proposed at the Universityof Illinois at Urbana-Champaign to make it possible to collect data on proposed curriculumchanges. The pilot unit was called iFoundry or the Illinois Foundry for Technology Vision andLeadership, and the proposal contained a number of key elements: 1. Create a collaborative interdepartmental pilot unit among key undergraduate curricula to
encouraging the engineers to retrieve othersolutions from their memory and from databases. Alterative representations are developed bothintuitively and through the use of databases readily available on the web. The alternativelinguistic representations are then organized into WordTrees facilitating the identification ofpotential analogies and analogous domains. Analogies, along with analogous domains, are thenresearched. Concept generation can then be based on the new representations and analogies. Acase study illustrates and evaluates the method. This method is appropriate for both professionaland student engineers. The WordTree Method fills a gap in design class providing a tool fordesign-by-analogy.1. Introduction Engineering innovation is
the current barriers to integrating sustainability into engineeringeducation – creating effective learning materials and proving the effectiveness of new teachingstrategies – that enables engineering faculty to more easily incorporate sustainability approachesinto curricula. The objectives of the project are to design, develop, implement, disseminate, andassess the success and effectiveness of the proposed transformational learning practices and peer-to-peer networks. The paper begins with a brief overview of the entire project and then focuseson: 1) the components of a new textbook created for an Introduction to EnvironmentalEngineering course and 2) identical Green Engineering courses to be offered at partneruniversities that build upon the
those deviations that are significantlydifferent (in a statistical sense) from normal variation in the measurements are worthcorrecting. Thus we need a criterion to determine what constitutes c"ÒtgcnÓ"fgxkcvkqp"cpf"what is just random variability in the measurement.A Shewart chart (see Figure 1) is the most basic tool for determining which variations aredue to a fundamental shift in the process variable and which are merely measurement o u t l i e r f i r s t d e t e c t i o n o f d
seminar series offered to undergraduate studentsengaged in research with the Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) atthe University of Wisconsin - Madison.IntroductionIn response to initiatives by the National Science Foundation, including the Recognition Awardsfor the Integration of Research and Education (RAIRE), as well as a growing realization thatundergraduate researchers benefit from training in ancillary research skills such as searching thescientific literature or presenting research findings,1 many institutions have developedundergraduate research programs that incorporate additional training on research skills as part oftheir mission. In addition to providing undergraduate students with opportunities to
morescholarly activities, and engineering education is a case-in-point. The post-WWII and Sputnikeras saw a massive influx of federal support for research in higher education, increased hiring ofresearch-oriented faculty members, and curriculum revisions that reflected faculty members'interests. By 2000, engineering education looked more like that in a traditional science than in aprofession.3 Government, business, and professional societies pressed for engineering educationreforms in order to sustain America's technological and economic leadership. Consistent with Finkelstein et al.,1 one explanation for the failure of engineeringprograms to provide graduates with important professional skills is that most engineeringstudents are taught by