Institute ofTechnology." In Elements of Quality Online Education: Practice and Direction, edited by J. Bourne and J. C.Moore, 261-78. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium, 2002. 7. Collis, B., “Course Redesign for Blended Learning: Modern Optics for Technical Professionals,”International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 13 (2003): 22-38. 8. Kaleta, R., Skibba, K. and Joosten, T., "Discovering, Designing, and Delivering Hybrid Courses." InBlended Learning: Research Perspectives, edited by A. G. Picciano and C. D. Dziuban, 111-43. Needam, MA: TheSloan Consortium, 2007. 9. Peercy, P. S. and Cramer, S. M., “Redefining Quality in Engineering Education Through HybridInstruction,” Journal of Engineering
tools available to students. Therehas been a tremendous amount of work on best practices for instruction in college courses, andresearchers have identified the value of formative assessments to help students and instructorsidentify strengths and weaknesses and adjust instruction. We add to this discussion byundertaking a psychometric analysis of classroom tests. In particular, we will focus on themeasurement precision when tests are analyzed using Item Response Theory (IRT), a non-linearlatent variable model that evaluates the student’s probability of responding to items correctlyconditional on ability level. A useful byproduct of IRT analysis is that measurement uncertaintyis quantified conditional on ability level, and it often reveals that
: MethodologyThe flipped class format can be used as a more engaging and effective teaching method;however, flipped classes typically require a large amount of materials to be developed. Thesematerials can require a significant upfront time commitment, which can be a barrier for adoption.This can be especially true for a faculty member that has spent years developing a traditionallecture style course.Dr. Anna Howard at NC State has several years experience teaching a flipped statics course.Through some trial and error, best practices were identified for the types of materials to use,including: short three to five minute videos summarizing the lectures key topics29, pencastivideos of example problems, skeleton course notes for students to complete on their
Engineering Education Research Center (EERC) in the Swanson School of Engineering, and serves as a Center Associate for the Learning Research and Development Center. Her principal research is in engineering education assessment, which has been funded by the NSF, Department of Ed, Sloan, EIF, and NCIIA. Dr. Sacre’s current research focuses on three distinct but highly correlated areas – innovative design and entrepreneurship, engineering modeling, and global competency in engineering. She is currently associate editor for the AEE Journal.Dr. Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California Gisele Ragusa is a Professor of Engineering Education at the University of Southern California. She conducts research on college
methods include the use of content experts, reviews of existinginstruments, and lists of behaviors and descriptors commonly associated with the construct(s) wewish to assess. Unfortunately, however, item creation sometimes becomes overly dependentupon a researcher’s personal attitudes about the construct(s) being tested, or on “borrowing”items from other instruments that may or may not be sound measures of the construct(s) ofinterest. These risks are particularly likely for new researchers in engineering education, whomay have little experience with best practices in social science research.One way to support best practices in the development of new surveys and assessments is to usean instrument blueprint to guide the creation of items, as well
supported after the partnership was initiatedAs a practical matter, almost all of the Cohort 3 students represent very difficult cases thatextend over a very long period of time. These cases also span the two support service structures.Since this research focuses on the role of the SAA partnership in student academic outcomes, we Page 26.1049.8will focus our analysis on Cohorts 1 and 2 only.Data for the cohorts are parsed by a number of different factors, including: number of semestersbefore graduation of our first contact with a student, academic major, gender, race, and status aseither a first-year admit or a transfer student to the school of
tools and application and having also total quality management diploma and being quality master holder dealing with all quality systems as documentation , CAPA management , RCA , facility maintenance and also ISO 9000/2008 expert in addition to being certified from Bernard Castle in UK as sterile area facility Design expert as per ISO regulations . Egyptian pharmacist graduate of 2007 who started my career as a research and development pharmacist in SEDICO pharmaceuticals in EGYPT for about 2 years dealing with new dosage forms formulation and then rotated to Methodology and stability department in which i dealt with dosage form analysis and innovation of new methods of analysis dealing with all laboratory
implementation. The problem synthesis phase involves buildingthe solution approach and the problem implementation phase involves the actual implementationof the solution. Simulations and computational models are implemented in the problem synthesisphase and using these simulations and models, the problem solution is implemented in theproblem implementation phase.In this study, we investigate the impact of coupling the integrated model of problem solving withthe use of modeling and simulation for learning the concepts of kinetics of materials in graduateengineering students. The theoretical framework guided our learning and research design asfollows. Students first conducted a preliminary literature review on a given topic, then they wereasked to
, but also the costs and benefits of nuclear energy and other energy sources.They appreciated the complexities of the field, the physics and chemistry behind it, and thesociopolitical issues surrounding it. They demonstrated critical thinking, learned how to questionand verify sources of information, and practiced their independent research skills andresourcefulness. At the end of the course, the students walked away with knowledge and skillsthat has solidly contributed to their preparation for a university-level engineering class.Introduction to Civil Engineering: Course Objectives and ComponentsThe Introduction to Civil Engineering course exposed student to both the art and the science ofengineered structures. Using principles of math and
for the globalworkforce is a national priority in the U.S.1 In order to address this need, educational institutionshave made great efforts to increase the recruitment and retention of students in engineering andimprove students’ professional skills through engagement in educational purposeful activities.Involvement in out of class activity has been believed as an effective way of promoting students’cognitive, affective, and career development in higher education.2, 3 The Final Report for theCenter for the Advancement of Engineering Education posits that research on student experienceis fundamental to informing the evolution of engineering education.4 College impact researchsuggests that focusing on what students do during college, both inside
, software engineering and innovation management. Recently his paper won the Best Teaching Strategies Paper award at the most respected international conference in the area of engineering education - Annual conference of American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE).Gautam Akiwate, University of California, San Diego Gautam Akiwate is currently a graduate student at the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at the University of California, San Diego with broad areas of interest. He got his bachelor’s degree from the College of Engineering, Pune. While in COEP, Gautam was involved in a lot of activities including a CUBESAT mission. Gautam’s current research interests are systems and networking in addition to
processes and strategies involved in engineering design using solid modeling, spatial thinking, and conceptual and procedural knowledge interplay in novice engineering students.Christopher Green, Utah State University Christopher Green is a senior in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering program, with an Aerospace Emphasis and a minor in Computer Science. He plans to finish his undergrad in Dec. 2015, and continue to earn his MS in Aerospace Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering Education. In addition to school, he researches common misconceptions students struggle with in engineering and develops ways to overcome them. After graduation, his career goals include working in the industry of unmanned aerial vehicles and
burning) because scientists and engineers are the people who know the facts best. Q7 80211 Technological developments can be controlled by citizens. Q8 20111 The US government should give scientists research money to explore the curious unknowns of nature and the universe. Q9 60611 Today in many fields of science in the United States, there are many more male scientists than female scientists. The MAIN reason for this is: Q10 40311 We always have to make trade-offs (compromises) between the positive and negative effects of science and technology. Q11 80111 When a new technology is developed (for example, a new computer), it may or may not be put
course for future goals were used. Procedures regarding saliva collectionspecifically followed best practices guidelines provided by the Institution of InterdisciplinarySalivary Bioscience Research (IISBR) at Arizona State University. Upon entering the classroom, students were given a packet of materials that describedthe study. This packet also included a saliva collection kit, a self-report survey, consent formand a bottle of water. The saliva collection kit contained two oral swabs and two collectionvials marked with the participants’ unique identification code. After collecting signed consentforms, a researcher explained the saliva collecting process and instructed students to rinsetheir mouths with water and to place the oral cotton
and learning process. The goal of this project is to explore the educational philosophiesenacted in the most impactful undergraduate classrooms, according to graduate students’perceptions, in order to give the new educator a foundation for their own course design process.Previous ResearchWhy Examine Students’ Perceptions of Learning Environments?At the start of the new semester, students enter a classroom not as “blank slates,” but withparticular conceptions about teaching and learning based on their prior experiences5. As a result,the effects of learning activities and perceptions of classroom interactions among the instructorand the students may differ by student5,8. Further, research has also shown that students’conceptions about teaching
Paper ID #11752Exploring Neural Engineering with a Teacher-Authored Science Curriculum(Curriculum Exchange)Kristen M Clapper Bergsman, Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering Kristen Clapper Bergsman is the Pre-College Education Manager at the Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering at the University of Washington. She is also a doctoral student and graduate research assistant in Learning Sciences and Human Development at the University of Washington. Previously, Kristen worked as an educational consultant offering support in curriculum development and production. She received her M.Ed. in Curriculum and Instruction
. Her research focuses on methods to improve the teaching and learning of team effectiveness in engineering design courses.Dr. Penny Kinnear, University of Toronto Penny Kinnear currently works with the Engineering Communication Program at the University of Toronto where she focuses on the development and delivery of Professional Language support for a highly student body. She has a background in applied linguistics, second language and bilingual education and writing education. She is co-author of the book, ”Sociocultural Theory in Second Language Education: An in- troduction through narratives.” Her current research projects include a longitudinal study on professional identity development of Chemical Engineering
morelikely to implement codes into their work even when not required or enforced by law. A portionof learning to build back stronger includes educating to the IRC. Understanding the current statusand best practice for teaching students majoring in architecture, civil engineering, andconstruction science management (here in after known as “construction students”) about the IRCprovides the first step to mitigating communities in the future 6.BackgroundA literature review for teaching about the IRC produced no new publications since the early2000’s when the International Code Council (ICC) was formed and states began adoptingversions of the IRC. Prior to the ICC, research publications discussed the difficulty in codeintegration to the curricula due to
, forexample, and at the micro-level, related to instrument design and usage, depending on the projectfocus. A holistic view will help students understand the broader impact that device design canhave on overall improved interactions, experiences and outcomes in these environments.For most of the students, who are primarily undergraduates (although there are some first yearmedical students, and occasionally MFA Design graduate students and MBA students), this is adrastically different approach to problem solving than they have learned in previous classes, andperhaps more so for the bioengineering students. Usually, the subject matter of focus for aparticular team’s problem is new to all of the students, regardless of discipline, and
Paper ID #11164Case Study Based Educational Tools for Teaching Software V&V Course atUndergraduate LevelDr. Priya Manohar, Robert Morris University Dr. Priyadarshan (Priya) Manohar Dr. Priyadarshan Manohar is an Associate Professor of Engineering and Co-Director Research and Outreach Center (ROC) at Robert Morris University, Pittsburgh, PA. He has a Ph. D. in Materials Engineering (1998) and Graduate Diploma in Computer Science (1999) from Uni- versity of Wollongong, Australia and holds Bachelor of Engineering (Metallurgical Engineering) degree from Pune University, India (1985). He has worked as a post-doctoral fellow
Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Extension Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science departments on diversifying their under- graduate student population. Dr. Brawner previously served as principal evaluator of the NSF-sponsored SUCCEED Coalition. She remains an active researcher with MIDFIELD, studying gender issues, trans- fers, and matriculation models in engineering.Dr. Catherine Mobley, Clemson University Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 20 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a
. First, the Scholars created a need specification statements that included:defining the problem, explaining the significance of the problem, describing the physiology ofthe problem, describing how the problem is currently approached, explaining the issues withthese approaches from all three observational perspectives, summarizing new approaches on thehorizon, and listing the constraints that any future solution will have to meet. Second, theScholars generated three potential solution concepts as well as a preliminary productdevelopment plan that reflects FDA design control and regulatory best practices. Plans includedrealistic timelines considering the necessary research, experimentation and an iterative designprocess.Of the three plans that
undergraduate, graduate and industrial programs.Dr. Carl-Henric Lennart Nilsson, Technology management Associate Professor Carl-Henric Nilsson is a business development specialist focused on industrialization processes with a PhD in Industrial Management. He has founded several startups and is currently CEO of Kunskapspartner AB and researcher at Lund University specializing in pedagogics, entrepreneurship, business development and industrialization. Page 19.7.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Design as an integrating factor in an international cross
Paper ID #13238Changes in Latino/a Adolescents’ Engineering Self-efficacy and Perceptionsof Engineering After Addressing Authentic Engineering Design ChallengesDr. Joel Alejandro Mejia, West Virginia University Joel Alejandro Mejia is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at West Virginia University. He is interested in research regarding underrepresentation of minority groups in Science, Technology, Engi- neering, and Mathematics (STEM), especially the use of culturally responsive practices in engineering education. He is particularly interested in the use of comprehension strategy instruction in linguistically
by (1) integrating new student orientation with math assessment and learning, (2) linking STEM faculty educational training with STEM freshman learning communities and with orientation, and (3) integrating and expanding, based on research best practices, existing programs such as learning communities, undergraduate research, and faculty development. The program targets all first year students for success and is expected to have a significant impact on at-risk students. Students at-risk for not earning or completing a STEM degree include those who are underprepared in math, those with financial need, Hispanic students, women, and students with low self-efficacy.”The grant was motivated by significant
of Physics Teachers’ Millikan Medal. He holds five patents and begun three companies. Materials and curricula developed by Dr. Sadler are used by an estimated fifteen million students every year.Dr. Gerhard Sonnert, Harvard University Gerhard Sonnert is a Research Associate at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and an As- sociate of the Harvard Physics Department. He received master’s and doctorate degrees in sociology from the University of Erlangen, Germany, and a Master’s in Public Administration from Harvard University. One of his major research interests has been the impact of gender on science careers. This research has resulted in two books (both authored with the assistance of Gerald Holton
Paper ID #14163Design Elements of a Mobile Robotics Course Based on Student FeedbackProf. Alisa Gilmore P.E., University of Nebraska, Lincoln Alisa N. Gilmore, M.S.E.C.E., P.E. is an Associate Professor of Practice at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. She has developed and teaches courses in robotics, telecommunications, circuits and controls. Page 26.460.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Design Elements of a Mobile Robotics Course
Page 26.1753.5 impacts on people and the natural environment that may limit possible solutions. MS-ETS1-3. Students, who demonstrate understanding, will be able to analyze data from tests to determine similarities and differences among several design solutions to identify the best characteristics of each that can be combined into a new solution to better meet the criteria for success.Respondents were provided a link that allowed them to view these performance expectationswithin the NGSS context. This enabled them to view the other Engineering Design performanceexpectations, as well as the Science and Engineering Practices, Disciplinary Core Ideas, andCrosscutting Concepts which the NGSS indicate underpin these
instrumentation.Kyle Joe Branch, University of Utah Kyle Branch is a second-year graduate student at the University of Utah Department of Chemical Engi- neering. He has helped develop and teach the described freshman laboratory course. His main research interest is in engineering education, focusing on the creation and analysis of interactive simulations for undergraduate chemical engineering courses. Page 26.1337.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Results & Lessons Learned from a Chemical Engineering Freshman Design LaboratoryAbstractA
engaged in team projects. This integration ofengineering with other disciplines would further enhance the experience of students and betterprepare them for teamwork after graduation by enhancing learning and facilitating self-efficacyand innovation.References 1. Holley, K.A., 2009, "Best Practices Related to Interdisciplinary Education," ASHE Higher Education Report, 35(2), 89-99. 2. Hotaling, N., Hermann, C. D., Fasse, B. B., Bost, L. F., and Foresta, C. R., 2012, “A Quantitative Analysis of the Effects of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Course,” Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 630-656. 3. Zohar, Ori. Letter to the author. 25 Jan 2015. TS