works that arereviewed and criticized in a public way among them, On the other hand, even thoughcivil engineering students are also evaluated individually, there is a slight group work insubjects that require laboratories, an activity that is reflected in the reduction of theaverage of individualism as opposed to architecture students.From the results of table 3, we obtain interesting data since the means between bothstudy groups are close to each other, thus there is no significant difference in terms ofindividualism and even though both careers are still on the higher side of the spectrum,there is a greater similarity. These results may be due to how these students had theireducation during the pandemic, being students who had most of their
students to chooseengineering as a career. With an emphasis on smart and connected cities, the SCR2 programprovides summer research experiences (eight weeks for students and six weeks for teachers).This paper presents our learnings and insights of the program for the past four years withevaluation findings. There have been 116 students and 44 teachers who have successfullyparticipated. The research program was conducted on campus in 2019, but due to COVID-19, theprogram was conducted online in 2020. In 2021 and 2022, the program was redesigned to behybrid, and six host sites participated. Despite the changes in the program, students' prowess wasenhanced by their teamwork and engagement in the projects. The post-program survey raisedconcerns about
the leadership,communication, and cultural competencies increasingly required of today's high-tech workforce.The John Lof Leadership Academy (JLLA) is an innovative leadership program for engineeringgraduate students that was founded at the University of Connecticut in 2018 to create culturallycompetent visionaries in the field of engineering. John Lof Scholars develop their leadershipabilities through focused training, specialized workshops and seminars, and active learning. Runby graduate students from various departments based on a “for us, by us” program philosophy, theJLLA empowers its members to develop as leaders in their fields by aiming leadership trainingthrough the lens of each individual’s career and personal goals. Academy
exist from one to another regarding sociability, learning,attention, mood, and other important mental functions [3] – is an important factor to consider.Researchers have begun to explore methods to include neurodiverse student populations tofurther increase diversity and enhance creative problem-solving in engineering [4]-[6][21][22].The inclusive classroom provides the opportunity for success for all students. Re-thinking and re-designing our courses and curricula to provide flexibility and accommodate students’ needs is ofvital importance. Thus, the re-design of the Statics course to accommodate neurodiverse studentshas the potential to be beneficial for all.With the accelerating change of pace in the 21st century, Cropley [7] stated that
variety ofexperiences and types of knowledge acquired at the university, synthesizing and sense-makingthrough the construction of these centerpieces.There are several existing tools that evaluate students’ reflective capabilities [21], [22]. Hattonand Smith’s [6] widely-cited tool identifies four categories of reflective writing. DescriptiveWriting is not reflective, but simply reports events and literature. Descriptive Reflection is anexplanation of students’ rationale based on their personal judgment or evaluation of theliterature. Dialogic Reflection is a discourse with one’s self, an exploration of personal logic andrationale. Finally, Critical Reflection involves giving a reason for decisions or events that relatesto broader historical
engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Analyzing the Needs of Engineering Teaching Assistants: Examining Hidden Deficit IdeasIntroductionThe lack of preparation of graduate students for the professoriate has been documented bydifferent scholars [1, 2]. It is well known that graduate education prepares students to pursuedifferent career paths [1], but a large majority of engineering graduate students will followprimarily corporate and industry positions while a small percentage will chase faculty careers[3]. According to Choe and Borrego [3], doctoral international engineering students are morelikely to pursue an academic career. Nonetheless, it
faculty members who are dedicated toadvancing educational reform have recognized the inadequacies of passive lecture-basedinstruction. They understand that it should be replaced by active, integrated, and project-basedlearning methods [6].According to Jonassen, Strobel and Lee (2006) [7, 10] Problem-based learning transform theclassroom into an example of a professional engineering environment, providing students withthe experience and skills they need to excel in their future careers. Frank and Brazilai 2002 [8,10] McAlpine, Reidsema and Allen (2006) [9, 10] Project and problem-based learning methodsinspire active learning and development of interdisciplinary knowledge [10].Engineering educators believe that students should possess the
events were originally initiated to share, on a peer-to-peer levelwith high school students, what STEM projects, activities, and careers can look like.While the actual events are largely student-run, the administrative aspects of STEM on the Roadare handled by a handful of university faculty and staff. They organize the events, make contactwith high schools, and solicit student volunteers from the collegiate competition teams andresearch clubs. As a result, they have provided an environment where student researchers andcompetition club members can come together to share their passions with like-minded high- andmiddle-school students. Additionally, their work has set a foundation for a unique educationaland social community of students that is
experiences in over 60 programs throughout 20 countries, with the goal of providing transformative learning experiences that empower students to develop global competency skills. Through partnerships with partner universities abroad, alumni, faculty, staff and student groups, Ms. Blumthal leads the IPENG team to provide study abroad advising, informational events, and class presentations. She works with the 12 engineering departments to develop and grow studying abroad pro- gramming with overseas partners to grow connections with universities, and facilitates the study abroad fair. Meredith is responsible for developing faculty-led programing an engagement within the College of Engineering. Her areas of expertise include
the biotech and pharmaceutical industries for eight years. Jessica’s experience leading multidisciplinary teams strengthened her perspective that the ability to empathize, communicate and collaborate is integral to success in engineering.Dr. Andrea Chan, University of Toronto, Canada Andrea Chan is a Research Associate at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering | University of TorontoCatherine MacKenzie Campbell MacKenzie Campbell is a MASc student in Chemical Engineering specializing in Engineering Education. Her thesis is exploring how the quality of work-integrated learning experiences shape women engineers’ career intentions, with a focus on intersectionality and diverse engineering fields
’ institution as it has with manyother institutions across the US.As a Jesuit Catholic university committed to “the ideals of liberal education and the developmentof the whole person,”[11] LUM operates primarily as an undergraduate institution withconsiderable liberal arts requirements. Students who pursue LUM’s ABET-accredited bachelor’sof science in engineering must select one of four concentrations in electrical, computer,mechanical, or materials engineering. At the same time, all students are required to completecourses in the natural sciences and mathematics, as well as in the humanities and social scienceswherein reading, writing, and critical thinking skills are heavily emphasized [12]. The LUMCore Values Statement “calls upon the curriculum to
for academic careers; the Department of Education’s (DoE) STEMGROW Program to encourage students Latino(a) students and students with disabilities to pursue STEM careers; ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Paper ID #38753 and DoE’s Program YES SHE CAN that provides support and mentoring to female pre-college students. She is also a member of two advisory committees to the UTEP’s President: The Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion committee and of the Women’s Advisory Council, in which she served five years as Chair. She is also Co-PI in the NSF Engineering Research Center for Advancing
identify institution-specific climate concerns is an importantfirst step in designing effective change efforts.Our workshop was developed to be run in-person, and in small groups (<12 participants is ideal),with a focus on active discussion amongst department chairs. Based on our research andbolstered by social science literature on faculty job satisfaction, we argue department chairs arekey stakeholders in the department climate change process. We made the decision to groupchairs by college when offering the workshop, with the hope that this would lead to groups ofcolleagues sharing similar challenges and perhaps even a distinct culture within their college.Also, chairs within the same college generally have a baseline level of rapport, which
focusing on aerospaceengineering. The virtual setting of the summer research program allows reaching out to muchlarger student populations in South Texas including those who cannot commute or cannot attendin-person due to part-time jobs or other responsibilities related to their families. Nineteenstudents from different STEM majors were recruited from both community colleges and 4-yruniversities, including 16 Hispanic students. The students were divided into four teams. Eachteam worked together to complete a research project in three weeks with the guidance of afaculty member and a graduate student. Each team met at least once a day and completed twoprogress presentations, one final project presentation, and a written project report. In addition
-related content when the project and documentation include the design,manufacturing or construction, or characterization of one or more systems, components, orexperimental processes using standards / codes.As part of the graduation check-out process to earn the certificate, a student must submit a formto one of the program coordinators. One page of this form relates to the senior capstone projector master’s thesis, and the form is completed in two stages. First, the student discusses theirtopic idea with their course instructor / advisor and then with one of the certificate programcoordinators. If approved, both faculty members sign the form with an initial title for the project.A written project proposal is included at this stage. Once the
of Virginia.Dr. Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University Meg Handley is an Associate Teaching professor and Director Undergraduate Programs for Engineering Leadership. Meg completed her PhD in Workforce Education at Penn State, where she focused on inter- personal behaviors and leadership for early-career engineers. She teaches engineering leadership and an engineering leader coaching course. Her research focuses on coaching skills, inclusive leadership, and career development.Dr. Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas, El Paso An Associate Professor at The University of Texas at El Paso, Dr. Meagan R. Kendall is a founding member of the Department of Engineering Education and Leadership. With a background in
implemented in colleges of engineering that disrupt the status quo regarding who gets to participate in engineering education as students and faculty members; and (3) increased participation and comfort among Black and Brown K– 12 students in pre-college engineering activities that signal to parents and young learners that an engineering career is an option for anyone. These outcomes map to three strategic pillars of the Year of Impact on Racial Equity.”Volunteers for the Year of Impact on Racial Equity were divided into three taskforces, eachfocusing on a distinct pillar: (1) student organizations at Colleges of Engineering and EngineeringTechnology, (2) faculty and administrators in Colleges of Engineering, and (3
navigate the curricular choices available [7], (2) students would need to explore the broaderfields of real-world electrical and computer engineering to building an understanding of theirrelevant career options [7], and (3) student feedback revealed a need and desire for professionalcommunication instruction earlier than the existing junior-level communication requirement [4].The resulting course is a unique fusion of career development, academic planning, professionalcommunications, extended campus orientation, and engineering design [7].ECE Discovery Studio was piloted during 2020-2021 academic year, a year ahead of the officialthreaded curriculum launch. Amid the backdrop of the global pandemic, the course pilot wasrestricted to an online
task or career will be positive; in the context of a career, it might bedescribed as whether an individual can meet goals or values in choosing a particular path. Third,interests - subject-matter relevant or otherwise - impact career choice and persistence. Finally,personal goals drive people to pursue certain paths. These can be categorized as performancegoals, learning goals or competency-based goals. In addition, there are institutional orenvironmental variables, including social support, expectations from others, and economicopportunities that influence career decisions [22]. Various reinforcing relationships exist betweenthese variables in the SCCT model, and variables can have an impact whether they are real orperceived.Within
instructional practices in their engineering courses. Amy’s research interests meet at the intersection of sustainable and resilient infrastructure, emotions in engineering, and engineering identity formation.Dr. James L. Huff, Harding University Dr. James Huff is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Honors College Faculty Fellow at Harding University. He conducts transdisciplinary research on identity that lies at the nexus of applied psychology and engineering education. A recipient of the NSF CAREER grant (No. 2045392) and the director of the Beyond Professional Identity (BPI) lab, Dr. Huff has mentored numerous undergraduate students, doctoral students, and academic professionals from more than 10 academic
, emotional, andbehavioral dimensions. In addition, it seeks to guarantee students an education under theSustainable Development Goal (SDG) #4 (Quality Education), with the necessary skills andknowledge to promote sustainable development, including peace, non-violence, genderequality, and cultural appreciation [2]. However, these competencies are often not easilymodeled in a conventional classroom with specific or limited problem situations. One strategyfor meeting these high demands is Collaborative International Online Learning (COIL),particularly the Global Shared Learning Classroom (GSLC) approach. GSLC is acollaboration between two or more faculty members from different geographic locations orcountries through technology to teach similar or
member in the Department of Computer Science. Her professional experience also includes Winthrop University, The Aerospace Corporation, and IBM. She is a graduate of Johnson C. Smith University (B.S., ’00) and North Carolina State University (M.S., ’02; Ph.D., ’05), becoming the first Black woman to earn a Ph.D. in computer science at the university and 2019 Computer Science Hall of Fame Inductee.Shaundra Bryant Daily, Duke University Shaundra B. Daily is a professor of practice in Electrical and Computer Engineering & Computer Sci- ence at Duke University and Levitan Faculty Fellow, Special Assistant to the Vice Provosts. Prior to joining Duke, she was an associate professor with tenure at the University of Florida
to consider what dispositions I brought to this research as both a graduatestudent and an instructor. My experience as a graduate student increased my ability to noticewhen language was affected by the desire to express competence and reflect a certain identity,two important elements in our study of empathetic disposition. Through my teacher lens, I wasable to discern shifts in speech that indicated a change of attitude or perspective at both historicaland personal levels. As someone who values human-centered research and empathetic pedagogy,I worked to maintain impartiality in my analysis through reflexivity and collaboration with theother analysts on our team to help ensure my interpretations of the data remained close to thestudents
-changing digital landscape are needed. Workforce development and shortages are significantwith needs for talent at all levels. For engineers in particular, workers need to be able utilize andadvance technology, excel in the interdisciplinary nature of complex engineering problems,within interconnected digital spaces, make decisions, and be versed in ‘soft skills’ required forcollaboration and communication.Traditionally, undergraduate and graduate engineering education has been siloed according todisciplinary departments. Students navigate their education through a series of courses intendedto prepare them via methods and tools that define the discipline. This approach is based largelyon 20th-century needs. While team-based and project-based
desired success; and developing mutual trustto jointly cross the mentorship cultural bridge in a transformational mentorship process.Holistically, the paper explores how mentorship empowers participants for further success and growth onboth professional and personal levels, inside and outside of higher education. An extensive discussion ofresearch evidence on the barriers minority students face in graduate school, challenges majority facultyface in cross-racial and gender mentorships, and suggestions on how to address the identified barriers,make this exploration applicable for any faculty or graduate students who desire to maximize theopportunities from relational mentorship. Topic Index: Cultural bridge, relational mentorship, menteeship
Higher Edu- cation, University of Nebraska, and the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation to implement an ecology of validation model at a large scale to promote student success. At UNL, Deepak mentors the AgFutures first-year living-learning community in leadership, service, and civic engagement. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Community building through technology in a biological systems engineering courseConference: American Society for Engineering EducationDivision: Biological and Agricultural Engineering Division (BAE)Tags: Community-building, student-centered strategies, technologyPaper interests: Undergraduates, Graduate, Faculty
experiences for participating scholars to fulfill theirGCSP talent competency. The talent competency encourages engineering students who are partof the GCSP to engage in undergraduate research in an approved team, individual research, ordesign project with a university faculty member, focusing the research on one of the fourteenNAE grand challenges by completing an appropriately approved independent study projectfocusing on one of the four grand challenges’ themes (sustainability, security, health, and joy ofliving). This summer experience consisted of 15 students conducting research in labs for 25hours per week over a 10-week period with additional workshops and weekly hangout meetingswith the director of the GCSP and participating scholars. The
exist.Figure 2 provides a graphic of how thisidea of convergence learning can exist, Figure 2. Promoting Transdisciplinary Learning through Topicsalong with disciplinary and convergence of Convergence while Preserving Academic Disciplines.research of an institution. As studentsenter academic institutions, they typically enter in a major within a disciplinary home which eventuallyresults in them graduating with a degree. Within these disciplinary homes, faculty also refine expertiseand generate new knowledge within their disciplines. But, if there are strategic opportunities for thesedisciplines to converge to provide transdisciplinary learning experiences for students, the university canpromote additional academic outputs such as innovations spurred
bestsuited where a need for a change in vision, process, or culture is necessary [9].Teamwork and productivityUnderstanding and maximizing the skillsets of team members will ensure that resources areused effectively. To have a productive team, team members must work in synergy andcomplement each other.Tools that Aid Effective Personnel ManagementPersonality testsThe personality test is an assessment tool designed to understand the make-up of a person interms of traits, likes, dislikes, areas of strengths, weaknesses, and patterns of thoughts. It isthe consistent differences existing between two people that can either be inherent or learned.This set of tests seeks to unravel the unique set of drives, attitudes, emotional patterns,opinions, etc
students of all genders and race/ethnic/socioeconomicbackgrounds. It is designed to give students an early start in their engineering majors and helpbuild a community of students, faculty, and staff across different engineering disciplines. Forhigh school students this is an opportunity to further explore their interest in engineering whilebuilding networks with students and mentors in the university.Workshops, programs, and other initiatives to bring awareness to issues related to diversity,equity, and inclusion (DEI) in an organization (a workplace or an academic institution) havebeen around since the 1960s [3], [4], with questionable outcomes [5], [6]. However, during thesummer of 2020, amidst the global pandemic, certain events such as the