jobs andaccepting a job offer. For a subset of codes, two researchers independently coded thedata, and discrepancies were re-evaluated for the application of the appropriate code.We then compared the codes from the open-ended responses to the responses of the jobselection factors ranking (i.e., closed-ended) question. The goal of this comparison was todevelop deeper insights into the limitations of any one measure—and to ultimately makerecommendations for better stand-alone measures. In addition, comparisons were madebetween the job search factors responses and respondent characteristics (backgroundexperiences, socioeconomic and demographic classifications, and job-relatedperceptions). Chi-square tests were used to determine significant
innovation management as part of aninnovation ecosystem, and all parts of this continuum have been the focus of worthwhileinnovation management internships as considered in our study.Even with this inclusive view of innovation management, however, specific literature oninternships and innovation management education for engineers is limited. Concerning thesignificance of internships on entrepreneurship education, the recent work of Duval-Couetil et albegins by noting that “to date, few researchers have examined to what extent differing programmodels and experiential activities impact students’ perceptions of their entrepreneurialknowledge, skills, and self-efficacy.” (Duval-Couetil, Shartrand and Reed, 2016.) Althoughinternships are not discussed in
educational activities; and (2) theresources deployed by the educational institution to provide learning opportunities (Kuh et al.2011, p. 44). Previous studies show the more engaged students are, the more they learn (Astin,1984; Carini, Kuh, & Klein, 2006; Cross, 1999). Furthermore, engagement is also positivelycorrelated to grades (Handelsman, Briggs, Sullivan, & Towler, 2005).Interaction between students and the instructor has been recognized as an essential component forengagement and learning (Astin, 1984; Ewell & Jones, 1996; Fries-Britt, 2000; Schwitzer &Lovell, 1999). Additionally, students that actively interact with professors and other studentsmanifest higher self-efficacy and overall satisfaction with the course (Maeroff
energy demandburden as they are available through more defined communications, rather than have to operateat pre-determined values. The complexity of these levels was meant to match the expertise of the high school studentsattending the lessons. Smart Grid and Micro-Grid were both highly collaborative lessons withinteraction amongst all parties to promote self-discovery of the system in discussion.Assessment The Young Scholar’s group knowledge and experience gains were observed in several areasincluding science self-efficacy, science understanding, sense of inclusion, and energy beliefs,knowledge, and behavior. (Assessing Women and Men in Engineering (AWE). (n.d.),DeWaters,J. Quaqish, B.,Graham, M., & Powers, S. (2013). Riggs, I.M
to set personal goals to progress in their skill development, and toenhance student confidence in their self-efficacy related to non-technical skills. These aims alignwith the philosophy described in Ponton et al.13 that engineering educators must train students incourse content while preparing them to become practicing professionals.Self-reflection assignments have been used in three offerings of an undergraduate chemicalreaction engineering course. Data from the second offering were collected with InstitutionalReview Board approval and are presented here. The self-reflection assignments involve briefessays and goal setting related to professional, non-technical skills. The assignments utilize theself-evaluation rubric6 originally designed
interplay of self-efficacy, learning goal orientation, and transformational leadership. Teaching and teacher education, 26(5), 1154-1161.Schӧn, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books, Inc.Schӧn, D. A. (1987), Educating the Reflective Practioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the profession. San Francisco: Jossey-BassTom, A. R. (1985). Inquiring into inquiry-oriented teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 36(5), 35-44.Valli, L. (1990). Moral approaches to reflective practice. Encouraging reflective practice in education: An analysis of issues and programs, 39-56. Teachers College PressValli, L. (1997). Listening to other voices: A
several characteristics shared by all. Barrett, et. al (2015), Forest, et.al (2014), and Wilczynski (2015) all noted the sense of community embraced by universitymakerspaces, exhibited by an environment conducive to collaboration between students. There iscurrently a need for a baseline to study university makerspaces, their best practices, and thespecific ways that they can benefit engineering education. Morosz, et. al (2015) posited thatMaking activities in university makerspaces can improve retention and encourage broaderparticipation in engineering, noting that “there is a strong relationship between the amount ofengineering experiences and engineering design self-efficacy,” a quality which has been shownto increase retention among
Underrepresented Racial Groups,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 51, No. 5, 2014, pp. 555-580. 7. A. Carpi, D.M Ronan, H.M. Falconer, and N.H. Lents, “Cultivating Minority Scientists: Undergraduate Research Increases Self-Efficacy and Career Ambitions for Underrepresented Students in STEM,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol 52, no. 2, 2017, pp. 169-194. 8. R. Taraban and R. Logue, “Academic Factors that Affect Undergraduate Research Experiences,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 104, no. 2, 2012, pp. 499-514. 9. J. Vianden, “What Matters in College to Students: Critical Incidents in the Undergraduate Experience,” Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, vol. 52 no. 3
Fear of Failure, Procrastination and Self-Efficacy to Academic Success in College for First and Non First-Generation Students in a Private Non-Selective Institution. 2013.18. Chen X, Carroll D. First-Generation Students in Postsecondary Education A Look at Their College Transcripts Postsecondary Education Descriptive Analysis Report.; 2005.19. Hoffman M, Richmond J, Morrow J, Salomone K. Investigating “Sense of Belonging” in First-Year College Students. J Coll Student Retent Res Theory Pract. 2002;4(3):227-256.20. Foor C, Walden S, Trytten D. “I wish that I belonged more in this whole engineering group:” Achieving individual diversity. J Eng Educ. 2007;(April):103-115.21. Stevens R, O’Conner K, Garrison L
difficult decisions about how they allocate their time. Financialcost refers to students’ perceived challenges related to both expenses associated with doctoralstudy and opportunity costs related to devoting time to their degree instead of potentially morelucrative employment. Academic cost reflects students’ challenges related to both the culturaland academic demands associated with pursuing a doctoral degree, and does not exclusivelyreflect their sense of self-efficacy in engineering.IV. MethodsLimited empirical literature suggests returning students may face distinct challenges related totheir decisions to pursue engineering doctoral study. Our team’s prior work7, 29 suggests Eccles’expectancy-value theory is a useful lens for examining the
presented at more than 100 international, national and re- gional research conferences. Some of his more general research areas of interest include teacher and student’s self-efficacy and motivation research, reading and mathematics education research, and quality of teacher preparation research. Recently, he concluded several educational program evaluations across Texas in the areas of reading, bilingual education and technology. Three of the most recent evaluations in- clude study on middle school students writing, evaluation of the impact of technology in schools, Reading First Grants, a bilingual education program, a nursing student training program funded by the NSF and a Department of Education grant in Green
, as they worked concurrently on group projects and began to frame and build theirunderstanding of individual, year-long projects. Themes include both cognitive, design-relatedchallenges, such as scoping and problem framing, and personal capabilities representingstudents’ self-efficacy, such as time management and maturation. In addition, we noted theimportance of the students’ self-monitoring of their own ability, and the ways in which thisemerged in group and individual work.Scoping and Problem FramingOne of the fundamental challenges in addressing ill-structured problems is the negotiation of anappropriate problem frame, which describes the scope of work and allows the designer tounderstand the dimensions of the solution space16,24. While
motivation and increasedconfidence. On the importance of learning through experiencing small successes in playing theguitar, Greg commented: “You start really slowly and it doesn't sound good at all, but eventually you get the calluses on your fingers, you work over time, you get more coordination, you learn how to read tablature on the internet, that's what I learned from. Then you just get more confidence in yourself and it just builds on itself.”This negative case serves to re-affirm that the causal mechanism is closely related tomotivational constructs such as self-efficacy. Had the small successes not lead to buildingconfidence and interest, Greg would have likely quit learning to play the guitar.RQ3: Comparisons Across
Educational Psychology with the specialties in Gifted Education and Research Methods & Measurement, respectively from Purdue University. Her work centers on P-16 engineering education research, as a psychometrician, program evaluator, and institutional data analyst. She has authored/co-authored more than 30 journal articles and conference proceedings and served as a reviewer of journals in engineering education, STEM education, and educational psychology, as well as an external evaluator and an advisory board member on several NSF-funded projects.Dr. Noemi V. Mendoza Diaz, Texas A&M University Dr. Mendoza Diaz is Instructional Assistant Professor at the Dwight College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. She
elementary schools isworthwhile for students and society at large, its implementation is not a trivial matter. One of thechallenges is that most elementary teachers have not had pre-service coursework or in-serviceprofessional learning experiences related to engineering education, and many elementaryteachers lack self confidence or self efficacy with respect to teaching engineering.10-13 Anotherchallenge has to do with the use of fail words and ideas about what failure means in theelementary context. What it means to fail in engineering is different than what it means to fail ineducation.9 In most elementary school environments the concept of failure and the fail wordsthemselves have very negative connotations. A simple online search of “failing
modified the curriculum to the needs of scholars.Week 1 instruction focused on algebraic concepts and dimensional analysis. Week 2 addressedcalculus concepts. The course received excellent evaluations from students and data analysisshowed measurable gains in knowledge as assessed by pre- and post-tests. All but one student inCohort 1 achieved growth during Math Boot Camp. The mean post-test score across all threecohorts was 81/100 (SD = 15), versus a mean pre-test mean of 52/100 (SD = 29). Using a pairedt-‐test, we found that growth was statistically significant, t(26) = 6.376, p < 0.0001. Besidesmaking virtually all students feel like they had improved their mathematics skills, students alsoreported that they had increased confidence in other
need to hire female math and science instructors and teachers and parents need workshops to help them envision a broader future for their girls.Demetry and Sontgerathi11 reported on the long-lasting effects on perceptions of engineering andengineering self-efficacy for a two-week summer camp held at Worcester Polytechnic Institutefor rising seventh-grade girls. They found that girls who attended the camp and who sustainedtheir contact with the program (e.g. returning to the program as a staff member) had morepositive and accurate perceptions of engineering. Multiple interventions were important – girlswho participated in multiple STEM programs or events had stronger long-term outcomes.Participants in the camp did show
with theleadership of both women and men in positions of power.Thematic analysis of interviews reveals that the gender equality so far achieved by thedepartment has been a result of very deliberate structural changes, (e.g. hiring processes), and astrong representation of proactive department members with high levels of self-efficacy—theyare both aware of gender issues and believe in their ability to enact change. Different butcomplementary actions, from changing the way the admissions office recruits admissionscandidates to broadening the faculty hiring searches, have compounded over time to produce thecurrent state of near parity in the undergraduate population. These actions may not have beencoordinated, but, taken together, resulted in a
studies focused on solving is at the core of adistinction that we wish to draw attention to between ‘problem-solving’ and the solving ofproblems.According to a joint executive report from the National Science Foundation (NSF) and theNational Endowment for the Arts (NEA), student skills in engineering problem-solving(specifically in electrical engineering and computer science) are in dire need of a boost. Thereport states that “undergraduate and graduate students who study electrical engineering andcomputer science lack the ability or self-efficacy to create new ideas and innovations that stretchbeyond rote classroom exercises”1.Other high-profile reports agree: The National Academy of Engineering lamented in 2004 that“engineering students are not
shifted the traditionalemphasis on math prerequisite requirements to an emphasis on engineering motivation for math.The program had an overwhelming impact on engineering student retention, motivation andsuccess at Wright State University. Results of a longitudinal study suggested that the approachhad the potential to double the number of the nation's engineering graduates, while bothmaintaining their quality and increasing their diversity. The results suggested that the impact ofthe course on student motivation and self-efficacy had contributed to increased graduation rateswith the greatest impact on the student groups who stood the most to gain.Mentorship program, Interaction with industry: Johnson et. al.14 described a peer mentoringprogram at