Asee peer logo
Displaying results 211 - 232 of 232 in total
Conference Session
What's New in Entrepreneurship Education
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Matt O'Connor; Kathleen Simione; Dale Jasinski; Chad Nehrt
lot of effort into the plans. While the teams made incredible strides from last fall, to me, the ending results do not really read like business plans. The problems range from writing skills to content and organization. Since I would ultimately like to have outside experts review the plans and provide feedback, I am reflecting on ways we can improve the Page 9.191.8 finalized business plans." “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education To make the plans more
Conference Session
ECE Online Courses, Labs and Programs
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Abhilasha Tibrewal; Tarek Sobh
minimum standards. Inthe United States, accreditation is a non-governmental, peer review process that ensureseducational quality. Educational programs volunteer to periodically undergo this reviewto determine if minimum criteria are being met. Accreditation verifies that a programmeets the criteria, ensuring a quality educational experience. In this regards, the Schoolof Engineering of the University of Bridgeport should define its mission and objectives tomeet the needs of constituencies. Below are some of the goals of the School ofEngineering, which guided the preparation for the accreditation process in Fall 2003. • The prepared educational objectives should be comprehensive, measurable and flexible, and clearly tied to the mission
Conference Session
Teaching Teaming Skills Through Design
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Zvi Aronson; Souran Manoochehri; Peter Dominick; Kishore Pochiraju; Beth McGrath; George Korfiatis; Keith Sheppard
; Vince, R. (1998). “Sustainable learning and change in international virtual teams: Fromimperceptible behavior to rigorous practice”, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 19(2), pp.83-88.14 McGourty, J & deMeuse, K.P. (2000). The Team Developer, John-Wiley & Sons.15 Greenberg, J & Baron, R.A. (2000).Behavior in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.16 Morehead, G., & Griffen, R.W. (1998). Organizational behavior: Managing people and organizations. Page 9.1289.9NY: Houghton Mifflin Company.consider using survey based data, (peer and self-reports) along with student journals asways to measure
Conference Session
ET Design Projects
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Harry Fox
meets in the lab with each robot project assigned its own work bencharea. Students work on their projects for most of the in-class time, while the instructor movesfrom project site to project site commenting on ongoing work, guiding students’ creative efforts,and answering student questions.The course has evolved into a form that resembles the “studio” approach described in theliterature3 . Some of the reported characteristics of the traditional architectural studio or artiststudio appearing in the senior design course are: • Open-ended projects lasting a semester or more. • Design solutions which undergo multiple and rapid iterations. • Frequent formal and informal critique of work by peers, instructors, and visitors
Conference Session
Capstone Design II
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Vikas Jain; Durward Sobek
the process used to achieve thatoutcome.Having found little in the literature on this topic, we then contacted numerous mechanicalengineering capstone instructors around the US. We received some 30 evaluation rubrics forsenior capstone projects, and about six client satisfaction surveys. We also looked up the designevaluation criteria for eight national engineering design contests.These data indicate that typically instructors base their senior design project assessment on somecombination of: written final reports, final presentations, interim reports/presentations, quizzes,prototypes, peer evaluation, design journals/notebooks, or evaluator judgment. Interestingly,these data strongly indicate that capstone instructors typically do not
Conference Session
New Program/Course Success Stories
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Josh Humphries; David Radcliffe
typically involves experimentation, simulation or an industry-based investigation. Itis undertaken individually and is usually worth a quarter of the credit for the year. In addition,senior students typically undertake a team based capstone design project, also worth one quarterof the credit for the year. Unlike their peers in the humanities and the social sciences,engineering students do not normally have a course on “research methods”. Rather, preparationfor undertaking a research thesis is assumed to accumulate from their exposure to researchmethods in laboratory classes (experimental and computer based) throughout their degreeprogram. This can be considered a shortcoming as we become more intentional about developingthe research capabilities of
Conference Session
Assessment Issues II
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Ramon Vasquez; Anand Sharma
led to thedevelopment of assessment tools and strategies package. These were adopted for common useby all programs with each one at liberty to modify or be selective about the recommendedmethods or tools. The package contained an outcomes assessment matrix, an assessmentstrategies matrix, and various custom-designed assessment forms for integrating ethics, oral andwritten reports, teamwork, peer evaluation, course/project evaluations, exit survey, alumnisurvey, employer survey, and internships. Felder and Brent11 have also reported on a strategy forintegrating program-level and course-level activities to fulfill the ABET criteria.Principal Drivers for ChangePeggy L. Maki12, Director of Assessment, AAHE, stated, “All too frequently higher
Conference Session
Emerging Trends in Engineering Education
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Wesley Bliven; Elizabeth Eschenbach
answer.ObservationsThis section will first present the feedback we have received from the participants on theirexperience in our class. The lessons we have learned in teaching will be explained.Teacher/participants Attitudes and FeedbackFeedback from teachers rate the Mechanical Dissection as one their favorite aspects of theRedwood Science Institute. Many teachers gain confidence in their ability to use tools and theirdiagnostic abilities. We have received testimonials from teachers that use mechanical dissectionin their classes ranging from 2nd grade to 8th grade. Teachers say the activity provides anotherapproach for students to learn, as some students are not able to focus on reading and writing, butbecome extremely focused when dissecting their device
Conference Session
Unique Courses & Services for Freshmen
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Audeen Fentiman; John Demel; Richard Freuler
different varieties of trees.Figure 2. The 2002 FEH Robot Final Competition.In addition to the design/build/document project experience, FEH students can read and createsketches and CAD drawings, write computer programs in C/C++ and MATLAB, and go into alab and take and analyze experimental data.When the students interview with companies as they seek co-op or internship appointments, theyare encouraged to take their final report and project notebook to the interview so that they candiscuss what they have accomplished in a team project. Most interviewers are impressed that a Page 9.271.6 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering
Conference Session
Emerging Trends in Engineering Education
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Peter Wiesner; Karen Miu
filtering sites on the Webthrough a review process. One drawback of the Scout Reports is that they are issuedonce and not updated.Another approach to vetting websites is provided by an organization called Fields ofKnowledge, which claims that “…robotic keyword searches, popularity gauges, in-housegeeks, paid rankings in search-engine results, and by-chance browsing have gainedalarming leverage upon students' search for knowledge.” This organization urges thatprofessors and other accredited scholars must vet knowledge and asserts that academicauthority is being usurped by “technonauts.”10 Fields of Knowledge provides a Web-based industry-sponsored service called Infography that invites professors, librarians, andother research scholars to write
Conference Session
Improving Teaching & Learning
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Dennis Truax
of peer knowledge, to action-based learning, andfinally to the use of work-integrated learning in which students are asked to reflect on theory interms of their experience.5Integral to this process is an effort to provide a learning experience that meets the educationalneeds of the student from a technical perspective. In fact, this author contends that the laboratorydesign can address several of the accreditation process mandates. Specifically, accreditedprograms must demonstrate that their graduates have: • an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (ABET Criterion 3a), • an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze and interpret data (ABET Criterion 3b
Conference Session
Retention: Keeping the Women Students
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Rose Marra; Cherith Moore; Mieke Schuurman; Barbara Bogue
academic achievement (e.g. 17) and to career choice (e.g. 21).Literature about the experiences of women in engineering frequently addresses self-efficacy andits related constructs (e.g. confidence, self-esteem). In terms of self-appraisal, a general patternof loss emerges throughout the engineering education. Women enter engineering reporting highlevels of self-confidence and self-esteem 22. Their self-confidence declines precipitously duringthe first year and, although it does begin to elevate, it will never again reach the same heights 10.During this time, women compare themselves unfavorably to their male peers and judgethemselves more harshly than the men judge themselves 23. Women are aware of this andidentify low self-confidence as a major
Conference Session
Assessment & Quality Accredition in Engineering Education
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
John Rowe; Tim Mulroy
variety of workingenvironments, mostly within England but with a significant number working in other countries.In program documentation, the advantages of placement are celebrated and attempts to quantifythe learning outcomes achieved have been made. However, because of the wide variety ofgeographical and cultural locations, work environments and the faculty lack of day to daycontrol once a student has been placed, it is difficult to write these learning outcomes from anevidence base.In this paper a qualitative approach has been used to illuminate the academic, personal andprofessional development of students resulting from the placement experience, based on theanalysis of semi-structured student interview data. This paper reports upon the
Conference Session
Emerging Trends in Engineering Education
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Tim Ameel; Ian Harvey; Bruce Gale
course was taught, but it was found that thehomework questions from the book were not well suited to the class, poorly written, inconsistentwith the textbook itself, and structured inconsistently such that it was challenging for students tofeel comfortable with the questions. Thus, during upcoming classes, the instructor hasdetermined to write his own homework problems to complement the text, lectures, and labs.During the last three weeks of the course, design problems were assigned that allowed thestudents to integrate all of their learning to date, instead of homework from the text. The designproblems proved to generate a number of very creative solutions. They were also excellentpreparation for the final exam, which involved a design problem
Conference Session
Technological Literacy I
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Paul Predecki; Albert Rosa; George Edwards
, local companiesand non-profits advocates to provide key lectures. Who we invite depends on the Issue. Oneperson we always invited was the Head of freshmen English who reminded students themechanics of how to write good policy papers. There are two teaching assistants assigned perquarter to help with the various duties especially setting up the laboratories and observing in theseminars.V. Course ContentThe following section outlines the content and syllabus for each module. Since the content ofthe first three modules remains mostly constant the following represents what has been deliveredthroughout the various yearly offerings. The Issue module varies greatly and what is describedrepresents a general philosophy of what is typically covered. A
Conference Session
Student Teams & Active Learning
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Jeannie Brown Leonard; Janet Schmidt; Linda Schmidt; Paige Smith
Listener, Fact Seeker, Innovator and GoalDirector). While roles such as these speak to the group process part of the ideally functioningteam, engineering educators have overlooked another set of important team roles. These areroles related to the accomplishment of the engineering project and require specific skills such asdesign (“Design Specialist”), construction ability (“Builder”), report writing (“TechnicalWriter”), or computational expertise (“Number Cruncher”). These roles are distinguishable fromthe group process roles noted above which directly impact group dynamics and harmony.Adoption of specific functional roles by students in teams can impact their subject mattermastery. Unlike the team model typically used in the corporate world that
Conference Session
Women in Engineering: Faculty/Curriculum
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Heidi Diefes-Dux; Brenda Capobianco; Judith Zawojewski; Margret Hjalmarson; P.K. Imbrie; Deborah Follman
-ended survey items) was conducted via open coding15. We marked segments of data by attachingcode words (abbreviation of key words) to those segments, and retrieved all segments identifiedby the same code or by a combination of code words. Examples of codes generated from studentinterview data included “RW-APP” and “PRAC-EXP”. These codes indicated that studentsassociated the MEA’s as providing “real world appeal” or “practical experiences.” We thenorganized and re-organized our segments of coded data into categories. To determine theplausibility of our categories, we employed the process of peer debriefing whereby we consultedwith other members of the research team. These consulting sessions allowed us to uncoverpatterns and emerging themes
Conference Session
Emerging Trends in Engineering Education
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Toshiyuki Yamamoto; Kazuya Takemata; Masakatsu Matsuishi
Copyright ø 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationin groups to tackle an engineering topic relating to daily life. Each group chooses an engineeringtopic related to daily life, defines its domain, and solves problems that may have multiplesolutions. After choosing a topic, the students in a group hold brainstorming sessions, define thedomain of the topic, work on the most optimal solution and its design, refine the design, presentthe results in class, and evaluate each group member’s contribution by peer evaluation. Mostgroup activities go beyond the in-class meeting hours. The following photos are snapshots takenin the study lounge. Students are actively engaged in their projects. Figure 1. Snapshots of Group Activities in the 24-hour
Conference Session
Engineering Education in Muslim Worlds: Introductory Workshop
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Sedki Riad; Mostafa Kamel
.‚ Lecture delivery and testing modes that encourage self-learning and practical problem solving, rather than memorizing notes and solving boilerplate problems.‚ The existence of modern laboratories and workshops and their maintenance.‚ Faculty members and assistants that are in touch with their peers in reputable universities abroad so as to learn about modern trends in curricula development, delivery technologies, student evaluation methodologies and needed supplementary material.‚ Student per class densities that allow meaningful interaction between students and faculty members, as well as actually performing practical experiments rather than watching technicians perform experiments.‚ The present outdated structure of
Conference Session
Engineering Education: An International Perspective
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Waddah Akili
? What will be their nature? What percentage of the grade will depend on exams? How will other indicators (homework, participation, attendance, projects, etc.)be counted towards the grade? It is equally important that the instructor provides periodic assessment of students’ performance during the semester. The intent is: (1) to alert those that have fallen behind, and at the same time, (2) motivate “achievers” to stay the course.4) A “Back up” Plan to Assist Slow Learners and/or Potential Switchers: Many students are in engineering for a variety of reasons. Some are in because of peer pressure, or for other known or unknown reasons. They are not sure of their capabilities, having negative perception of the “class environment” and
Conference Session
Emerging Trends in Engineering Education
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
J. Keith Clutter; Alberto Arroyo; Amir Karimi
Conference Session
New Ideas in Energy Education
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Timothy Skvarenina
Education”the card they were holding to stand up as I went through the questions. This way the students were notreporting their own answers. The results were quite revealing. Of 54 students in the class: ! 42 said they would report ethical misconduct where they were employed ! 52 admitted to downloading music and not buying the CD ! 40 admitted to downloading movies ! 29 admitted to cheating on an exam or quiz ! 19 said they would report someone they knew was cheating on an examThe class was concluded with a short “quiz.” I asked each student to reflect and write down the twomore important things they learned from the discussion in class. A number of students were surprisedat how wide spread the