Paper ID #16895Developing a Questionnaire and Evaluation Methods for a High School RocketProgramMr. Ibrahim Halil Yeter, Texas Tech University Ibrahim H. Yeter is currently a PhD candidate in the Curriculum and Instruction program at the College of Education, and at the same time, he is pursuing his Master’s degree in Petroleum Engineering at Texas Tech University. He is highly interested in conducting research within the Engineering Education frame- work. Mr. Yeter plans to graduate in December 2016 with both degrees and is looking forward to securing a teaching position within a research university and continuing his
mechanical engineering [18], computer science[19], and electrical engineering [20]. Also, flipped classroom methods often include PL [21].However, this literature search did not yield any results dealing with PPPL or GGPL methods,except for our previous work [22 and 23]. There, PPPL is first defined, then implemented in a labproject, and compared to a PL only learning method, all in an f2f environment. Here, some of theresults from [22 and 23] are compared to PPPL as implemented in a cyberspace lab environment.Curricular Context The lab project described here is a part of a required one-semester three credit-hourundergraduate senior-level Computer-Integrated Manufacturing (CIM) course taught inmechatronics and industrial engineering. The
startedlooking into the feasibility of making the graduate engineering program more accessible. Thiswould not only allow us to meet the growing demand for engineers in West Michigan, but itwould be well aligned with our program’s student-centric focus. To prepare the students for thegraduate-level engineering work, an exhaustive list of prerequisite undergraduate classes thatstudents must take has been approved. While each applicant’s curriculum is tailored, GVSU’sSchool of Engineering developed a general plan to onboard students from a variety of non-engineering undergraduate backgrounds. Applicants are granted conditional admission to thegraduate program predicated on completing the prerequisite classes with a B or better grade.These plans allow the
Paper ID #37959Exploring the nature of engineering during home-based engineeringactivities designed for Spanish- and English-speaking families withyoung children (Fundamental, Diversity)Catherine Wagner, University of Notre Dame Catherine Wagner is a research staff member at the Center for STEM Education at the University of Notre Dame. She earned her Master of Education degree from Notre Dame in 2019 while teaching middle school science. She has collaborated with faculty in the Center for STEM on engineering research for several years, most recently leading an undergraduate research lab on early childhood engineering
Engineering Scholars Program; Engineering Graphics and Spatial Visualization Courses for the last five years. She was pre- viously the Director of the Engineering Co-op and Internship Program at Ohio State. Olga received her Bachelor’s Degree in Industrial and Systems Engineering from Ohio State and Master’s Degree in Indus- trial Engineering from Arizona State University. She has twelve years of industry experience in areas of Automotive and Systems Engineering.Aimee T Ulstad P.E., Ohio State University Aimee Ulstad, P.E is an Associate Professor of Practice in the Integrated Systems Engineering Department at The Ohio State University. Prior to joining the faculty at Ohio State, Aimee was an industry professional in
Paper ID #27793The On-going Status of The 3+1 Dual Degree Program in Electrical Engineer-ing and Computer Engineering between Northern Arizona University andChongqing University of Post and TelecommunicationDr. Xi Zhou, Northern Arizona University Dr. Zhou is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the School of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Sys- tems at Northern Arizona University and is primarily focused on the NAU/CQUPT dual degree program. He completed his Ph.D in Material Science and Engineering in 2014 at Norfolk State University in Vir- ginia. Dr. Zhou’s research interests are in semiconductors and electronics. He
Paper ID #41209High School Computing Education: The Landscape of Equity-Enabling Research(Fundamental)Dr. Julie M. Smith, CSEdResearch.org Dr. Julie M. Smith is a senior education researcher at CSEdResearch.org. She holds degrees in Curriculum & Instruction and Software Development. She also completed a doctoral program in Learning Technologies at the University of North Texas. Her research focus is computer science education, particularly the intersection of learning analytics, learning theory, and equity and excellence. She was a research assistant at MIT’s Teaching Systems Lab, working on a program aimed at
Paper ID #13838Find That Plane!: Evaluation of a High School Summer Science and Engi-neering Camp Introducing Robotics to Simulate the Search for MalaysianAirlines Flight 370 (Works in Progress)Dr. Ricky T Castles, East Carolina University Dr. Ricky Castles is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering at East Carolina Univer- sity. He is primarily affiliated with the ECU Electrical Engineering concentration. His research work focuses on the use of wireless sensor networks, microcontrollers, and physiological data collection for a variety of applications. His primary interest is in the area of adaptive tutorial
, where $3000 wasgiven on day 1 of the program. The overall goals were to provide (1) Resource Recognition by introducing students tothe various academic and personal resources available on campus, (2) Personal Preparationthrough programming on subjects such as personal finance and mental health, (3) CareerPreparation through writing workshops and curriculum vitae editing, and (4) Network Buildingby connecting students with current graduate students. Students were also matched with facultyto conduct summer research in their field of interest. After a successful pilot in 2021, theprogram was conducted with a larger group of students in the summer of 2022.Program Structure:GREaT GradS Timeline – GREaT GradS runs on an accelerated
their first semester, adecrease in loss of students from the fall semester to the spring semester, and a 90.5% retentionrate for the 2015 cohort for the first time in the history of the college.IntroductionFirst year students encounter much stress as they navigate living for the first time away fromhome, separating from their parents, and encountering a rigorous curriculum. Colleges are facinga lot of pressure to achieve over 90% first year retention rates. In this college, the admissionrequirements are for students to be eligible to start in Engineering is to be ready to takeprecalculus (set in 2013) or a higher math course by the start of their first fall semester at school.Over 40% of the students at the university are Pell grant eligible
Paper ID #37870Designing and Implementing a Workshop on the Intersection between SocialJustice and EngineeringKavitha Chintam, Northwestern University Kavitha Chintam is a Ph.D. Candidate at Northwestern University in the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering.Dr. Alexis N. Prybutok, University of Washington Alex Prybutok (she/her) is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Washington. She earned her B.S. in Chemical Engineering and her B.S. in Biochemistry from the University of Texas at Austin in 2016 and her Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Northwestern
Distribution Program at Texas A&M University. His research interests include integration of supply chain management with new product development decisions, distributor service portfolio optimization, and engineering education.Prof. Om Prakash Yadav, North Carolina A&T State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 International Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Research Program on BigData in Energy and Related Infrastructure: Challenges and Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic and University Policies and PracticesAbstractEngineering workplaces are becoming globalized because of the growth of the internationaleconomy and improvements in information technology. Engineering programs
. Students taking the engineering math intervention coursewere retained in the college of engineering at much higher rates (over 70% versus roughly 56%)and were also farther along in the math curriculum one year later.This improvement is achieved by providing the students an opportunity to remediate and retakethe math placement test in a given semester and by providing math-in-context examples throughengineering based lectures. By providing an opportunity for students increase their placementscore high enough to move more than one course through the curriculum, they are incentivized towork through and persist through any difficult topics. This may be a superior motivator for somestudents.In Fall of 2015 the course was modified again and began using
curriculum for their STEM program, he also has 14 years’ experience in the Civil Engineering Industry. John Ross has a BS in Civil Engineering, and a MA in Agriculture and Extension Education with an emphasis in technology, both from New Mexico State University.Ms. Elizabeth Ann Howard, New Mexico State University Elizabeth Howard serves as the Program Manager for the College of Engineering at New Mexico State University. Elizabeth is currently serving as the program coordinator for the Freshman Year Experience program at NMSU which includes hiring and managing the college mentors, and overall coordination of the program. Elizabeth has worked in the College of Engineering for the past 4 years in student affairs.Dr. Rolfe
, retain, andprepare students in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields to addresschallenges facing the 21st Century. This paper describes a method for integrating behavioralinstinct learning modules into freshman engineering classes. The method includes an onlineinstinct assessment, in-class activities created to illustrate instinctive behavior related toengineering tasks, practicing awareness through class projects, and reflective writing toencourage students to critically think about this awareness for future classes, activities, andcareers. The effectiveness of the methods described herein will be evaluated through the use ofsurveys, reflective essays, and interviews with faculty and students. The assessments have
classes developedand launched in Fall 2020. The first MSEM graduates completed their degrees in December2022. This paper presents the primary challenges curriculum development, graduating studentfeedback, and future planning for the program.KeywordsMaster’s program, engineering education, curriculum developmentIntroductionTennessee Tech University launched an effort in 2016 which addressed the planning,development, and operation of a new, online, graduate program in engineering management.The Master of Science in Engineering Management (MSEM) program was launched as acompletely online and asynchronous program of study, with courses offered collaborativelybetween the College of Engineering (COE) and the College of Business (COB). The primarygoal
failure: An introduction to forensic structural engineering,” Australian Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2010, doi: 10.1080/13287982.2010.11465051.[3] C. Reynolds, “Rewriting the Curriculum: a Review and Proposal of Forensic Engineering Coursework in U.S. Universities Background,” Forensic Engineering (2003), pp. 307– 319, 2003.[4] N. Delatte, “An approach to forensic engineering education in the USA,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Forensic Engineering, vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 123–129, 2012, doi: 10.1680/fen.[5] S. E. Chen and R. Janardhanam, “Forensic Engineering Education Reform,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Forensic
toretain information learned from interventions. Tafur, Douglas, Diefes-Dux[6] observed studentsfor third and fourth grade students for two years and found that they were able to earn thehighest test scores and demonstrate retention of the engineering knowledge learned in previousyears. Furthermore, some second grade students who were exposed to engineering curriculum,matriculated to third grades classes that did not include engineering curriculum. When tested,these students demonstrated an increase in engineering knowledge. This was evidence that theyretained the information taught to them in the second grade.Douglas, Wiles, Yoon & Deifes-Dux[7] performed a case study on one school in the data set andinterviewed four teachers about their
Nandikolla, California State University - Northridge Dr. Nandikolla has backgrounds in Mechanical, Electrical and Control Engineering and has developed courses in electro-mechanical areas to improve engineering curriculum. She has experience developing and teaching engineering core courses with hands-on experimentation and industry collaboration within classroom encouraging creativity and teamwork.Dr. George Youssef, San Diego State University Dr. George Youssef received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from University of California Los An- geles in 2010 and joined the faculty at San Diego State University after four years appointment at Califor- nia State University Northridge. His research interest is in the general
classroom practices with course goals and science educationreform documents.AcknowledgmentsWe would like to thank the local CLC Site Coordinators for providing access to theirafterschool programs and being flexible to accommodate our student’s schedules. References1. National Research Council, A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. 2011, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.2. National Academy of Engineering, Messaging for engineering: From research to action. 2013, Washington DC: National Academies Press.3. Mann, E.L., et al., Integrating engineering into K-6 curriculum: Developing talent in the STEM disciplines
a50/50 mixed program, offered at New Jersey Institute of Technology’s Center for Pre-CollegePrograms during the summer of 2015 were effective in increasing all of the students’ contentknowledge in Engineering, Communications, Computer Applications and Mathematics.Although the programs followed the same curriculum and were taught by the same team ofinstructors, some differential effects were seen for students in the single-gender programs asopposed to the mixed-gender program.The female students in the single-gender program showed greater improvements in engineeringcontent knowledge and computer applications than the female students in the mixed-genderprogram. These results, in addition to significant increases in self-efficacy and an increase
are two well-known high school programsavailable, Project Lead the Way, PLTW 1, and the Infinity Project 2. However both programs areexpensive and neither allows any flexibility to the teachers. Furthermore, there is a lack ofprogram outcomes assessments for Project Infinity, while reports on PLTW have shown existingissues. For instance, a curriculum content analysis concluded that the PLTW curriculumaddressed fewer content standards and showed far fewer points of integration of mathematicalknowledge than would be expected 3. Further, other published empirical studies showed mixedresults from state achievement test scores 4. In addition, neither of these two programs arealigned with the current standards. What had been considered alignment
friendships and study groups within their Peer Adviser cohort. This is an important step in students integrating into the McCormick community. Students forming friendships and student group is a major goal of the change in advising. Forming student cohorts around a major, with a Peer Adviser has been very helpful for some students. Having a network of friends is important in helping students normalize their experiences. This is also helpful in forming study groups. Students know each other, and have people they can study with before major exams. Peer Advisers are helping uncover problems early. The Peer advisers are helping students normalize their experiences especially the stress students feel during their first round of Midterm exams. To hear an
Paper ID #38811Re-Evaluating the Examination of Minoritized Social Identities amongI-Corps Hub Program ParticipantsDr. Alanna Epstein, University of Michigan Alanna D. Epstein is an Assistant Research Scientist studying motivation, instruction, and entrepreneurial outcomes in the context of the NSF Innovation Corps (”I-Corps”) training program. She received her Ph.D. from the Combined Program in Education and Psychology at the University of Michigan, and her Bachelor’s degree in psychology was completed at Oberlin College. Her dissertation work focused on the longitudinal development high school students’ motivational
conducting a formal needs assessment 2. Developing an institute-style professional development program 3. Meeting immediate or short-term teacher needs via: a. Supplying Arduino activities b. Developing an engineering discipline exploration opportunity for studentsThe following sections describe each current focus area, ending with future directions of thisCAREER project. Understanding Teacher NeedsThis research area specifically focuses on identifying the needs of teachers in rural SouthwestVirginia related to integrating engineering in their classrooms. The goals of this research area aretwofold: 1) to meet immediate needs by providing easily-implementable engineering activitiesand resources
curriculumreform focuses on disseminating recent advanced practices while fostering the development ofcritical skills among CM students. To achieve this, approximately 59 undergraduate and graduatestudents are introduced to an advanced contract delivery module on ways of gaining competitivebenefits during procurement and construction project delivery of infrastructure projects. Aquestionnaire survey evaluated the necessity of integrating recent, novel, and advancedconstruction practices in the curriculum. The obtained data is analyzed through Ordinary leastsquare regression analysis by utilizing machine learning techniques such as Pearson’s correlationheat map, train-test split, and cross-validation to develop a logistic regression model. The
as curriculum development, contextualization of fundamental engi- neering sciences and integrating social justice into engineering education. She earned her MS and PhD in Civil Engineering from Clemson University, and her BS in Engineering from Harvey Mudd College.Dr. Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of San Diego Dr. Joel Alejandro (Alex) Mejia is an assistant professor in the Department of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. His research has contributed to the integration of critical theoretical frame- works and Chicano Cultural Studies to investigate and analyze existing deficit models in engineering education. Dr. Mejia’s work also examines how asset-based models impact the validation and
interdisciplinarysolutions to complex infrastructure challenges. In October 2018, the University of Puerto Ricoreceived a Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI) collaborative award from the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) to develop an integrated curriculum on resilient and sustainable infrastructure.The project titled “Resilient Infrastructure and Sustainability Education – UndergraduateProgram (RISE-UP) aims to educate future environmental designers and engineers to design andbuild a more resilient and sustainable infrastructure for Puerto Rico.This paper presents the design, initial implementation, and assessment of a curriculumencompassing synergistic interactions among these four domains: integrated project delivery,user-centered design, interdisciplinary problem
graduate students and hidden curriculum in engineering.Dr. Diana Chen, University of San Diego Dr. Diana A. Chen is an Assistant Professor of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. She joined the Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering in 2016. Her research interests are in areas of sustainable design, including biomimicry and adaptability in structural, city, and regional applications. Additionally, her scholarship includes topics such as curriculum development, contextualization of fundamental engi- neering sciences and integrating social justice into engineering education. She earned her MS and PhD in Civil Engineering from Clemson University, and her BS in Engineering from Harvey Mudd College
years,students will choose one of three concentrations: environmental engineering, sustainable builtenvironments engineering, or electrical and computer engineering. These concentrations buildon the expertise and resources that already exist on campus.Each year, the entire cohort will take an interdisciplinary project course that integrates thecontent that students are learning that year, and builds necessary skills in project management,communication skills, working in teams and working with communities or other stakeholders.Additionally, we have planned the curriculum for students to be able to travel abroad during theFall of their Junior year, to work with communities in different cultures and settings, and expandtheir perspectives in