Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for introductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conduct- ing research on a large scale NSF faculty development project. His team is studying how workshops on strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect faculty be- liefs, classroom practice, and development of disciplinary communities of practice and associated student achievement. He was a coauthor for the best paper award in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2013 and this year has received the Michael Ashby Outstanding Materials Educator Award from the Materials Division of ASEE.Dr. Keith D
the analysis of this project’s data, to be described below, we have drawnheavily on the “epistemic frame elements” introduced by the Epistemic Games research group(epistemicgames.org). This group develops then researches games designed to help school-agedchildren learn to “think like a professional,” developing games for engineering, urban planning,and journalism. The epistemic frame helps researchers think through what “thinking like aprofessional” actually means in the context of people’s speech and actions. Shaffer andcolleagues19 argue (p. 4): The epistemic frame hypothesis suggests that any community of practice has a culture [...] and that culture has a grammar, a structure composed of: • Skills: the things that people within the
successful year of supporting undergraduate women in summer research projects.It has also been offered to groups of women graduate students and their advisors. Based on theWomen in Engineering Programs and Advocates Network (WEPAN)1 Mentor TrainingCurriculum2, the Workshop can be offered with only a modest amount of preparation and thus caneasily be sustained. It can also be customized for various audiences. Goals of the Workshop are:to improve directly the research experience of both undergraduate and graduate students, to givefaculty research advisors a forum to discuss mentoring practices, and to learn "best practices"from one another.The WISE Committee offers this Workshop once a year to the summer REWU students. In 2001-2002, the Workshop was
micromechanics modeling, materials synthesis, structural characterization and device evaluation. The goal of his research is to develop ad- vance structural materials for the next generation ground, aerial and space vehicles with enhanced safety and energy efficiency. Since 2012, his research has been funded by DOE, DOEd, and DOD with a total of 3 million, of which 1.4 million as PI. He has published or submitted 49 technical articles since 2007 (25 referred journals and 24 conference proceedings). Dr. Lin’s teaching interests lies in Mechanical Design, Solid Mechanics, and Dynamics. Currently, he is advising 4 Ph.D. students, 3 Master students, and 2 undergraduate students. Since 2011, 5 Master students graduated from his
research on adultlearners suggests that increased learning gains can be achieved when instruction is designed withstudents’ learning styles in mind [1]-[6]. In addition, several practitioners within the domain ofphysics, as well as engineering education, have noted the importance of teaching with learningstyles in mind [7]-[14]. Furthermore, attention to learning styles and learner diversity has beenshown to increase student interest and motivation to learn. The particular population of students that encompasses the focus of this paper is non-sciencemajors taking introductory physics at American University. Most students take this introductorycourse to satisfy the university’s General Education requirements for graduation. Because thebackgrounds
short video. This generated far better results with students putting morethought into both the demonstrations and the descriptions of their work. Minimal guidance wasgiven in this first trial and, based on these first results, we compiled a best practices guide to set aminimum standard for future classes.Some key best practices we found were: • Keep reports concise and on topic to minimize the video length. • Videos should be no more than 5-8 minutes (for these projects anything longer was repetitive and unnecessarily impacted grading times). • When possible, use a screen recording app rather than an iPhone to take video of terminal operations so text can clearly be read. • Group presentations are possible using a Zoom
, students have a betterunderstanding that engineering design is not just focused on and limited to mechanical andelectrical design, but they will learn that civil engineering design has an important role in thehuman lives. Large and small civil/geotechnical designs are also critically important in theengineering profession in which students can choose a major to practice their engineeringknowledge and design skills.Introducing a real world project to the engineering students foreshadows courses they areexpected to take and learn to become best prepared for such a noble profession. It is observedthat most people including many engineering students do not have a complete picture and idea ofwhat is engineering and in particular geotechnical
AC 2011-259: FACIAL RECOGNITION SYSTEM SCREENING EVALUA-TION METHODOLOGY FOR COMPLEXION BIASESRigoberto Chinchilla, Eastern Illinois University Dr. Rigoberto Chinchilla (PhD in Integrated Engineering, Ohio University) is an Associate Professor in the School of Technology since 2004 and Current Interim Coordinator of Graduate Studies for the School of Technology at Eastern Illinois University. His teaching and research interests include Applied Statistics, Quality Assurance, Computer and Biometric Security, Information Systems, and Automation. Dr. Chinchilla has been a Fulbright scholar, a recipient of a United Nations scholarship, chosen as a Faculty Marshall for the Graduate School, and received an Achievement and
Past President and Wise Woman of the Organization for the Study of Communication, Language, and Gender. She has received career achievement awards from ICA, NCA, the Central States Communication Association, and Purdue University where she was a Distinguished University Professor in communication and engineer- ing education (by courtesy) and Endowed Chair and Director of the Susan Bulkeley Butler Center for Leadership Excellence. Her primary research areas are organizational communication, career, work-life, resilience, feminist/gender, and design. Her grants have focused on ethics, institutional transformation, and diversity-equity-inclusion-belongingness in the professional formation of engineers.Dr. Sean M
Paper ID #37818Defining Engineering Education Research: The ElevatorPitchJeffrey Wayne Paul I am a Engineering Education Research PhD student with a passion for life-long learning. My current research is focused on how we can develop pedagogical content knowledge in instructors using nudge theoryRenato Alan Bezerra RodriguesNikita Dawe PhD Candidate, Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering and Collaborative Specialization in Engineering Education, University of TorontoSherry-ann Ram (Ms) Graduate Student at the University of TorontoNicholas James RuparMandeep Raj PandeyRobyn Paul (PhD Student
engineering practice thatcreates new technology have been redefined in the 21st century (National Academy of Engineering).10, 11The essence of engineering is creative problem-solving and creative development to deliberately bringforth new technology and effective solutions to meet the hopes, wants, and needs of society for thegeneral betterment of human welfare. In this sense, William Wulf, president of the National Academy ofEngineering has rightfully pointed out that: “Engineering is design under constraint.” 12As such, creative engineering practice is neither viewed any longer as a secondary, follow-on function tobasic/or directed scientific research nor is engineering development perceived any longer as that whichtranslates research findings into
the Curriculum and Instruction program at the College of Education, and at the same time, he is pursuing his Master’s degree in Petroleum Engineering at Texas Tech University. He is highly interested in conducting research within the Engineering Education frame- work. Mr. Yeter plans to graduate in December 2016 with both degrees and is looking forward to securing a teaching position within a research university and continuing his in-depth research on Engineering Ed- ucation. He is one of two scholarships awarded by NARST (National Association for Research in Science Teach- ing) to attend the ESERA (European Science Education Research Association) summer research confer- ˇ e Budˇejovice, Czech Republic
students, refining design concepts while tackling newchallenges. The course has also provided opportunities for students to continue their work overthe summer and even after graduation; such continuity has allowed students to deepen andexpand their impact on the communities in which they are working.References[1] D. W. Butin, Service-Learning in Theory and Practice: The Future of Community Engagement in Higher Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.[2] J. Eyler and D. E. Giles, and A. W. Astin, Where’s the Learning in Service-Learning? John Wiley & Sons, 2010.[3] S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth, “Active learning increases student performance in science
industrialengineering and industrial engineering technology. There were no recent articles for curriculumreform for industrial engineering technology curricula. The authors did find articles discussingcurriculum redesign for industrial engineering programs. Researchers at a medium-sized privateuniversity in the northeast United States applied a systems engineering approach to develop anew industrial engineering curriculum. They designed a “flexible” program with acceleratedgraduate programs, a second major, various minor options, study-abroad programs, and practicalhands-on education [4]. Another article investigated how industrial engineering education inSouth Africa is embracing Industry 4.0. The study found that technical universities are morepositively
Machine ComponentDesign course are that students graduating from the Mechanical Engineering program should have:(1) an ability to apply principles of engineering . . . to model, analyze, design, and realize physicalsystems, components or processes; and (2) an ability to work professionally in . . . mechanicalsystems.Proceedings of the 2011 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 4 Develop a project for Machine Component Design Educational objectives Practical experience Topical objectives Student motivation
concepts are taught with passive lecturesand “recipe” labs. A balance must be provided between engineering science andengineering practice to prepare students for the real world. This preparation is alreadyunderway in the architectural engineering (AE) field at some universities. To build onthis foundation, in the electrical and lighting option within AE, developing a relationshipbetween the academic community and the electrical construction industry will helpbridge the gap between fundamental engineering principles and practical installationexperience. This relationship is currently being implemented between the NationalElectrical Contractors Association (NECA), its research foundation ELECTRIInternational (EI), and AE students at the University
) award from the American Public Power Asso- ciation. He is a member of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Materials Research Society (MRS), American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE), and the International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE), where he serves as a conference chair and editor.Dr. Minju Kim, University of California, San Diego Minju Kim is a postdoctoral scholar at the Engaged Teaching Hub at the UCSD Teaching+Learning Com- mons. Minju received her Ph.D in Experimental Psychology at UC San Diego. With Engaged Teaching Hub, Minju has designed TA training materials for oral exams and have conducted quantitative analysis on the value of oral exams as early diagnostic tool (Kim et
concentration in power engineering and smart grid.This research study aims to serve the national interest of enhancing power engineering educationand learning to meet the nation’s urgent needs for a highly qualified next-generation Smart Gridworkforce.To achieve a remarkable change in power engineering education, the research teamadopted the thematic analysis approach[14] to further understand the industry stakeholders’expectations for qualified power engineering graduates in different segments of the industry andto establish a harmony that allows defining a prioritized list of learning objectives that wouldguide the curriculum design of ECE programs. Hence, asking them directly to understand whatthe industry needs is better. Faculty and administrators
10-weeksummer program where students are paired with faculty to engage in a research or design project.The student is paid a weekly stipend of $400 while being mentored one-to-one by a full-timefaculty member. Approximately 29 students took part in this program during the summer of 2019,culminating in a presentation to their peers and faculty mentors, and members of the Dean’sAdvisory Board for the school.It is hypothesized that the process and completion of the research or design project through theprogram positively impacted the students’ confidence and self-efficacy. To determine if thehypothesis is true, the students were assessed through a simple survey, the results of which arepresented. In addition, two of the 29 students were asked
using BIMthroughout the design phase of a project and on the construction site have been researched andhave proven to be beneficial. The growing trend, especially in larger companies, is that mostmembers of a construction team will access a virtual building model in some fashion during thecourse of a project. With the growth of BIM use in construction, it is important for colleges anduniversities - with a construction, building, architecture or related degree - to properly exposetheir students to BIM related technologies and practices in order to prepare them for theworkforce [2]. Only a few of the stakeholders involved in the construction industry actually operate BIMsolutions at the building “process” level [3]. BIM is ultimately a
socioeconomic groups. [23] has given an example ofBlack lesbian engineering students whose reality cannot be adequately understood by discreteconversations on race, gender, and sexual orientation into three separate different groups. Weshould in designing both research and practice explicitly focus on the intersectionality ofmultiple marginalized identities. The minoritized students in this study who embody intersectional marginalized identitiesface systematic oppression of classism, racism, and sexism. These inequitable experiences shapethe decision-making of a minoritized student to enroll, persist or drop out from the engineeringeducation ecosystem. Those students have to divert resources (cognitive, emotional, time) innavigating engineering
instructor) and a final report prepared in the form of a journal paper.Student authors were given the opportunity to submit their manuscripts to the Journal ofUndergraduate Materials Research (JUMR) for consideration. The assessment of individualstudent performance was in the form of quizzes, teammate assessment and class participation.In addition to assessing the impacts on student learning and engagement for the re-designedcourse, this paper also reports on future plans to conduct follow-on research to assess the impactsthe re-designed course may have on the senior year capstone design experience.IntroductionThe beginning of the 2006 academic year marked the first semester of a re-design of thecurriculum in the Department of Materials Science and
Paper ID #20904Development of Engineering Professional Identity and Formation of a Com-munity of Practice in a New Engineering ProgramDr. Lee Kemp Rynearson, Campbell University Lee Rynearson an Assistant Professor of Engineering at Campbell University. He received a B.S. and M.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering from the Rochester Institute of Technology in 2008 and earned his PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University in 2016. He also has previous experience as an instructor of engineering at the Kanazawa Institute of Technology, in Kanazawa, Japan. His current research interests focus on instruction for
, “Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.),” Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2011. 5. Felder, R. M., D. R. Woods, J.E. Stice, and A. Rugarcia, "The future of engineering education II. Teaching methods that work." Chemical Engineering Education, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2000, pp. 26-39. 6. Fink, L. D. "A self-directed guide to designing courses for significant learning," University of Oklahoma, 2003, pp. 1-35. 7. Frank, M., and J. Kasser, “Assessing the Capacity for Engineering Systems Thinking (CEST) and Other Competencies of Systems Engineers,” in “Systems Engineering – Practice and Theory,” InTech 2012. Available online at: http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/32624/InTech
discipline-based hands-on projects are simple, but challenging. Students get theopportunity to work collaboratively on the projects. The course is designed to include twoimportant high impact practices [11] – a) collaborative assignments and projects, and b) first yearexperiences. The college tracks the progress of these cohort students to assess the effectivenessof the course in student success, specifically in increasing retention rate and reducing time tograduation.Student Retention and Graduation RatesAmong the undeclared engineering majors, 66%, 83%, 73%, 76%, and 84%, on average, wereenrolled in EGGN 100 in 2011, 2012, 2013. 2014 and 2015, respectively. There were morestudents in EGGN 100 in 2016 and 2017, mainly due to students who declared
offered EngD. Many schools steer students who are not in astate-approved career and technology program and are unsuccessful taking a foreign languageinto the advanced technology education graduation option and choose to offer ATA which is notas rigorous as EngD to maximize their chances of success. On the other extreme, some schoolsoffer a more advanced Engineering Design and Research course and others offer Project LeadThe Way pre-engineering curriculum. With the new articulation option available, more schoolsare expected to offer EngD starting in 2015 as evidenced by the enrollment of as many as 13teachers in the summer 2015 EngD training.Professional Development for School CounselorsThe GET ET grant Co-Principal Investigator, who is CCBC’s
New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney. Her teaching and research interests include power system modelling, analysis and control, renewable energy integration, smart grids and micro grids. Jayashri has a deep interest in learning and teaching, and consistently implements strategies using technology innovations and industry partnerships to improve students’ active learning. She is institutionally and internationally recognized for the impact of her innovative, research-led and highly effective teaching and leadership. She leads best practice advanced teaching in electrical engineering through imaginative initiatives, including blended industry lectures, teamwork and flipped mode strategies. Esteem indicators include Senior
Engineering Education Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. https://peer.asee.org/19082[18] Seely, B. E. (1999). The other re-engineering of engineering education, 1900-1965. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(3), 285-294.[19] Sinha, K. C., Bullock, D., Hendrickson, C. T., Levinson, H. S., Lyles, R. W., Radwan, A. E., & Li, Z. (2002). Development of Transportation Engineering Research, Education, and Practice in a Changing Civil Engineering World. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 128(4), 301-313. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733- 947x(2002)128:4(301)[20] Todd, R.H., and Magleby, S.P. (2004) Evaluation and Rewards for Faculty Involved in Engineering Design
a hurdle for many test takers. Since the tests are administered in English, studentsfrom other linguistic backgrounds may not perform up to their ability, particularly on the verbalportion [13]. One recent study [14], though, challenges this assumption. Moreover, the tests arenot designed to measure soft skills and leadership, which are important factors affecting successin graduate school [15]. It should be noted that the Educational Testing Service, whichadministers the GRE, is aware of this limitation and is working on another test to assess theseattributes [16]. But it is not part of the current GRE.Test anxiety [17] is another reason why standardized tests might not provide an objectivecomparison of candidates. Many students experience
(b) improving graduate student technical and professional competencies as wellas preparation for a career at the high priority convergent research topic targeted by thetraineeship. Using a cohort-sequential design with retrospective and concurrent comparisongroups, the evaluation includes both formative and summative activities reflective of bestpractices per Patton [8], Kundin [9], Schwandt [10], as well as Hendricks, Plantz, and Pritchard[11]. These activities and mixed-methods data, collected across multiple stakeholders, fostercontinuous program improvement during the project timeline, establish an evidence base forsuccesses and lessons learned, and generate best practice resources.3.1. Transferable skills courseThe 15-week Transferable