relatively consistentover time. Additionally, students who finished with high leader effectiveness believed that theassignment of roles positively contributed to the team in terms of division of tasks and teameffectiveness. These same students also believed that the assignment of roles positivelycontributed to their sense of purpose and ability to articulate contributions to the project.IntroductionAs engineering education evolves based on societal needs, leadership becomes increasinglyimportant in preparing students to address new challenges. The addition of leadership to the 2019ABET requirements [1] exemplifies this evolution, leading engineering educators to defineintentional ways of integrating leadership development into engineering curriculum
engineeringtechnology students’ written communication skills at these participating campuses, it haspotential use for other institutions to positively impact their students’ written communication.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNos. 2013467, 2013496, and 2013541.IntroductionCommunicating content knowledge effectively in oral and written formats is important forengineering and engineering technology students. Additionally, it is essential for the ABET-accredited programs from which they graduate to ensure that students hone and demonstratethese skills [1]. Anecdotal observations by engineering and engineering technology instructorsand prior research have shown that this is not the outcome observed by
andaccessible education. While our institution has a variety of “consultants” in place through Academic andStudent Affairs faculty and staff, students often have physical and knowledge barriers to accessing them.Our unique embedded model offers an ecosystem of readily available consultants specific and located inproximity to engineering students. Through this workshop we aim to 1) define an expanded philosophyof student success, 2) share important logistical and financial considerations in forming such a teamapproach, and 3) review our methods in researching the outcome of an embedded position. Ourphilosophy of student success extends beyond offering the typical supports of academic coaching andtutoring and takes a team approach of expert consultants
instructor of English. She has been involved in a number of federal grants, including two NSF STEM grants, an EU-AtlantDr. Steven Nozaki, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend Ph.D. Engineering Education - The Ohio State UniversityJohanna Bodenhamer Graduate Research Assistant ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Introduction:The impact of tutors on STEM student writing has been the subject of multiple recent studies, forexample, [1-4]. In a series of earlier papers, the authors describe (a) the measurement of different writingregisters or ‘diatypes’ in various STEM disciplines [5], (b) the results when these measurementtechniques are applied to student writing samples from a Mechanical
implementation. WATTS serves as a model for institutions (large orsmall) to capitalize on existing infrastructure and resources to achieve large-scale improvementsto undergraduate STEM writing while increasing interdisciplinary collaboration and institutionalsupport.IntroductionEngineers need strong communication skills throughout their careers [1] which is why ABETincludes student outcomes such as “an ability to communicate effectively with a range ofaudiences” within their accreditation criteria [2]. Although undergraduate students have someunderstanding of its importance, employers are more aware of the need to communicateeffectively [3]. Beyond being simply a secondary concern, integrating technical writing intocoursework can help students grasp
focuses on involving postsecondary studentsto better their experiences at different levels, psychological and physical [1]. Instructors haveinvolved students in 1) individual and collaborative activities with hands-on, experiential,problem-based or inquiry-based components and 2) feedback strategies using peer feedback andinstructor feedback [2],[3]. These active learning and collaborative pedagogies enhanceinteraction and increase student engagement with content and peers and better learning andachievement in in-person, blended, and online STEM courses [4], [5], [3].Even with such innovative pedagogies and resulting higher grades, STEM students may feelunsatisfied with the course experience citing lack of interaction as the main reason [6
escape room activity implemented in these two civilengineering courses.IntroductionEscape rooms are an interactive game where teams work together to solve puzzles in order tocollect clues to ultimately escape the room (or solve the final puzzle) [1]. Escape rooms typicallyhave a fixed time limit, which increases the unpredictability of success and can encourageadditional engagement and active participation [2], [3]. Participants typically complete escaperooms as social or team building activities. Escape rooms have three primary formats: singleroom, multi-room, and escape room in a box. The single room and multi-room escape rooms aretypically developed by commercial companies where the participants enter the room and arecompletely engulfed in
’ likelihood of finding a job upon graduation, andentrepreneurship education increases the awareness to become self-employed and form newventures [1] – [4]. However, the factors influencing lower-income students’ career decisionsspecifically are underexplored.For this paper, we surveyed all Flit-GAP students to understand their perceptions of their futurecareer paths with a particular focus on how they select the career path for them. We utilizesurveys conducted at the end of the first year of the first cohort of participation to exploratorilyexamine various demographic and psychological factors that would support a student’s selectionof one career pathway over another. While all the career pathways may be valuable, lower-income students may be
computing.1 IntroductionWhile decades of efforts have sought to broaden participation in computing, women andnon-binary students remain minoritized in the discipline [1, 2]. The lack of gender parity poses anongoing challenge for post-secondary academic institutions in the United States (U.S.).According to the 2021 Taulbee report [2], 22.3% of baccalaureate degrees in computer science(CS) were awarded to women, and approximately zero percent of degrees were awarded tonon-binary students. The extent of the problem is especially apparent when one considers that therepresentation in the U.S. is quite different, with 50.5% of the total population of the countryidentifying as women [3] and 1.6% identifying as transgender or non-binary [4
Antonio, thus showing the transferability ofthe curriculum.IntroductionThe 2017 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicines’ report on UndergraduateResearch Experiences (URE) for STEM Students: Successes, Challenges, and Opportunitiesmakes over 50 references to teams and teamwork, such as the URE’s tendency to “emphasize andexpect collaboration and teamwork” [1]. The report does not contain systematic recommendationsfor team training among its numerous contributing sources. This absence may indicate that teamtraining measures do not keep up with the increased curricular use of team projects. In fact,students are often required to work in groups without adequate preparation and guidelines for suchinterpersonal interactions [2-9
Universities. The consortium is a strategic priority of eachinstitution. In Year 1, 42 students participated in the scholarship program at the three institutions (16 FIU;14 UCF; 11 USF).Rationale:The NSF considers areas such as Data Science, Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity,and Quantum Computing as among the highest impact and growth fields going forward. Student demandfor computing programs is at an all-time high, including large numbers of students who change majors aftertheir freshman year (and would thus not be considered for scholarships that target first-year CS majors).Meanwhile, there is a significant shortage of both computing professionals and qualified faculty to teach atuniversities and a lag in computing graduation
stayed online); managers andleaders are facing challenges such as lack of employee engagement, high turnovers, and more.According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, over the month of November 2022, there hadbeen 5.9 million cases of workplace separations, including 4.2 million quits, 1.4 million layoffsand discharges, and 0.35 million of other types of separations in the country. On the other side,there had been 6.1 million hires [1]. Although the pandemic did not start the resignations, itdefinitely spurred the “Great Resignation”, also known as the “Big Quit” or the “GreatReshuffle” [2], where people exited their current positions in a massive amount due to variousreasons like relocation, reconsideration, reshuffling, etc. as described in
engineering experiences that involvemaking and testing solutions.A fundamental aspect of GOAL programming is the inclusion of culminating events whereinmultiple classrooms come together for challenges and competitions. These events motivateconnectedness to content and offer opportunities for discussion and collaborative design. Eventsare used to build connections to UMD and include information sessions regarding pathways foradmissions and transfer, familiarizing students with pathways toward higher education.Figure 1 illustrates the GOAL activities over the past three years. Over 5000 kits have beendistributed to middle school (MS) and high school (HS) students. The implementation has beenprimarily through two neighboring school districts, and those
community to University of Maryland 2 | eng.umd.eduEquity-centered engineering starts with K-12 education. The GOAL Engineering Kitsseek to close the opportunity gaps in engineering education by:1. Supporting a pathway for K-12 students to engage with high quality engineeringactivities, with a current focus on middle and high school students and especiallyhistorically underrepresented and first generation students.2. Supporting local K-12 educators with integrating engineering activities, includingteacher curriculum support and connecting students and teachers to highereducation and admission pathways.3. Empowering undergraduates to engage with their local community and educators,including focusing on incorporating DEI in the design
model which provided visualand performance feedback about energy use, daylight, and cost as the students changedskyscraper variables. Students with higher STEM self-competency (SC) selected higher-performing designs, viewed more design iterations, and ranked the building’s appearance as theirlowest priority. These results inform future design educators about student outlook prior to anyprofessional training and reveal potential limitations in student approaches to multidisciplinarybuilding design tasks.1.0 INTRODUCTION Aspects of college students’ career choices are influenced by how closely they identifywith the subject matter, particularly in STEM fields [1], which may influence them to behave ina way they feel is emblematic of that
design solution; “What do you need to know in order to solve theproblem?” We examined 150 middle-school student engineering notebooks to determine: 1. Dostudents correctly anticipate the presence of each type of STEM connection in the unit (science,technology, engineering, mathematics)? 2. Do students correctly anticipate the nature of theSTEM connections in the unit? In answering these questions, we can discover if studentsdetermine that they must learn the very same STEM concept(s) for which the curriculum wasdesigned. If students anticipate the correct connections, we have reason to believe this supportsstudents’ feelings of autonomy, competence, and motivation. The answer to our questionsprovides the impetus for further investigation into
, collected in an anonymous survey, was examined, and compared tothe performance of the students. Based on the observations, it appears that the effect of onlineteaching was course specific where some impact of the students’ performance was observed. Inthis context, the potential benefits of an online delivery mode of design content require furtherinvestigation. 1. IntroductionThe impact of the pandemic on teaching is examined around the world. UNESCO identified“severe” impact in Canada resulting from closure of in-person learning for elementary and highschool children [1]. A survey from Statistics Canada in April-May 2020 reported that 92% ofCanadian post secondary students had courses moved online [2]. The survey also reported that5% of
participants and how it can help foster the nextgeneration of STEM education researchers. In particular, research on the program has shownthe significant impact of the field schools on increasing agency, self-efficacy and sense ofbelonging to discipline-based education research (DBER) for emerging educationresearchers, which highlights the relevant features to consider when designing facultyprofessional development opportunities.Overview of faculty professional developmentHistorically within the context of higher education, faculty professional development hasfocused on improving the teaching part of faculty’s roles [1]. In STEM education, this facultyprofessional development lens has specifically focused on instructional change to encouragefaculty to
digitalinequalities that could prevent some students from receiving a high-quality education. The loss ofaccess to campus Wi-Fi and university devices has posed a challenge for some students,particularly those from lower-income families, who struggle with consistent internet connectivityand updating/maintaining their technological devices. This research is a continuation of aprevious study [1] that analyzed the student perspective on remote hardware and equity inelectrical and computer engineering education in the post-pandemic era. That previous study,which was based on a limited sample of students, revealed intriguing trends in students’perceptions of equity, which prompted us to conduct a more extensive survey, the focus of thispaper.According to Katz’s
taught high school technology and engineering education (Robotics/Engineering, AP Computer Science, and Video Production). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 (Work in Progress) A Systematic Literature Review of Engineering Education in Middle School GradesIntroductionThis work-in-progress paper is a systematic literature review of engineering learning andteaching in middle school classrooms. Following the release of the Next Generation of ScienceStandards (NGSS) in 2013, most state science standards now include engineering in somecapacity [1] [2]. This has resulted in a dramatic increase in research on pre-college engineeringeducation in recent years [3]. However, the
skills.Motivation and Desired TakeawaysIn this section we will discuss our main objectives going into this research from both educationaland technical points of view.1. Educational PerspectiveFrom an educational perspective, the main motivation of this research is to see how anundergraduate student approaches learning a completely new, high-level topic and converges ona final system design from the divergence of exploratory learning. Additionally, we gave thestudent the opportunity to improve on both technical skills and general problem-solving skillsthrough this research project that would be hard to obtain exposure to in the traditionalengineering classroom environment. These skills include: • Hands-on system development skills: Assembling not just
equations and graphs without building intuition behind thetopics. This paper focuses on easing the process of introducing an early topic in calculus knownas the derivative through visual and intuitive examples that relate to day-to-day life experiences.Such examples provide an initial grounding for this concept in mathematics. An introductionwhere the concept is relatable can provide a general sense of the idea behind derivative, on top ofwhich students can expand their knowledge with more formal textbook definitions. Examplesused in this paper include topics such as 1) different slopes as experienced when traveling up anddown hills, 2) rates of losing calories during running, walking, sitting, and sleeping, 3) rates offilling out water in
and minority protégés participating in the LouisStokes Alliance for Minority Participation (LSAMP) program in Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) across four different universities within a statewideuniversity system, in the United States of America, to learn the following regarding mentoringrelationships for minority STEM students: (1) how students respond to ideas and projects, (2)how students conquer challenges and respond to setbacks, (3) how students set and pursue theiracademic goals, (4) how students describe their undergraduate research mentoring relationshipwith peers and professors, (5) how students maintain their focus in a professional developmentprogram such as LSAMP, (6) how students characterize and describe
Learning through Teaching, Group Quizzes, Engineering Communication22 Introduction23 Many undergraduate mechanical engineering concepts have been developed and remain24 unchanged for many decades. For example, the principles of solid and fluid mechanics, heat25 transfer, and thermodynamics were developed hundreds of years ago and continue to be central26 to the study of mechanical engineering [1]. This unchanging nature of many mechanical27 engineering concepts is what makes them so familiar to students. Nonetheless, they may still find28 it difficult to grasp the underlying principles and mathematical derivations that govern their29 behavior and hence, struggle with analyzing or designing such systems. Studies have shown that30
Natives) in science, technology,engineering and math (STEM) [1]. This National Science Foundation (NSF) funded grant hasimplemented several programs to focus on critical transitions for students such as high school tocollege, two-year to four-year institution transfers, and those final years as students head towardgraduation. Ongoing activities funded by this grant include research experiences, transferpathways, and co-curricular activities. In 2020, a Scholar Program was also created at theuniversity to help support students as they make progress toward their baccalaureate degree.The outcomes for the Scholar program were for students to become more knowledgeable aboutthemselves and what they need to succeed in their academic and personal success
dataneeds to be clearly tied to equity driven questions and purpose; data cannot be examined in avoid and data systems should be revised according to equity needs. States are often using datasystems outside of the intended design and face limitations when trying to surface inequity forpopulations based on gender, disability, ethnicity and race, which are exacerbated when lookingintersectionally. Across states, teams are now asking deeper and more complex questions aboutpathways, policy, and purpose.IntroductionBuilding off prior efforts to understand the evolution of measurement approaches in the K–12broadening participation in computing (BPC) movement [1], this work provides a detailed lookinto collaborative processes for examining state-based
engineering students.IntroductionAs science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) jobs continue to grow at highrates, data continue to show persistent gaps in degree attainment and workforce representationfor several groups who have been historically marginalized in computer science and engineeringfields [1], [2]. Educators seek to evaluate how well we are preparing a diverse workforce to meetthe demands of that sector. A growing body of recent research shows that diversity is animportant component of the STEM workforce, sparking creativity and innovation through variedperspectives [3], [4]. With systematic and structural biases continuing to marginalize women andminorities seeking STEM degrees [5], we fail to achieve the level of
repository to answer those questions. The chatbot's impact on the student's universityexperience is measured in a class by conducting class surveys among the students. The authorshave planned a pilot study of the chatbot and its implementation for a course in Spring 2023.Results will be reported in the final paper.Introduction:Chatbots have revolutionized various industries, such as airlines, medical, and insurance. It canhandle many customers and respond to their varying inquiries. This progress in chatbot technologyis partly due to the recent advancements in natural language processing. There are limitedempirical studies examining the effectiveness of various learning designs or strategies whenincorporating chatbots in education [1]. Ongoing
under progress. This paper will show in detail both projects and how they helpedin improving students thinking skills while employing the stages and steps set down bythe general design thinking ladder/framework.IntroductionArt has been a representation of man's creativity since prehistoric times, frompetroglyphs and pictographs to the creation of Mona Lisa. Engineering and engineeringsolutions have been used to improve life since the same prehistoric time frame, fromthe creation of the first wheel to the water wheel and the watermill. It can be said, then,that art and engineering are fundamentally and inherently connected. Bran Ferrenexplained this connection in his TED talk in 2014 [1]. Through his experience Branrealized that art without
formed in high-school and first-year non-engineering college courses such as ‘school is a game,’ ‘being smart / being right iswhat matters,’ and ‘students are in competition for limited opportunities’ [1]. This quote aboutidentity captures our motivation to meet students where they are so we can walk togethertowards the light of a new educational model and pattern for instructor-student relationships:“It’s never about behavior, it’s about identity - versions of an old self have to die in order for anew, brilliant one to emerge and see the light [2].”The characteristics of the desired professional culture (Pro-culture) are described by the U.S.Department of Labor’s Engineering Competency Model (developed with the AmericanAssociation of