. Evaluation/grading procedure(s) must be defined based on these requirements. The technical content includes design and implementation of engineering systems (hardware and/or software) at upper division level. Service learning content includes diverse activities with community partner(s) so as to benefit both the college students and the partner(s). 3) A minimum 10 service learning hours are required for each student. Each project team must work with an external community partner for the service learning experience. 4) Reflective activities are included in the course where students are encouraged to discuss with other team members and the
.10025115. Chan, Y. M. Video instructions as support for beyond classroom learning. in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (2010). doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.3266. Johanes, P. & Lagerstrom, L. Online videos: What every instructor should know. Comput. Educ. J. (2017).7. Arakaki, D. Y. Lecture Videos to Supplement Electromagnetic Classes at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. in 2017 ASEE Pacific Southwest Section Proceedings (2017).8. Santiago, J. M., Guo, J., Kasley, K. & Phillips, P. Introduction to Engineering Using Google Docs and Interactive Video in Support of an Online Flipped Classroom Approach. in 2017 ASEE Pacific Southwest Section (2017).9. Palmer, S. An evaluation of streaming digital video
engineering, and civil engineering were represented amongthe cohort.Based on their survey responses, 100% of the students’ goals for the experience were metthrough the program as a transformative experience for students in professional, technical, andpersonal areas. The most common expectations, chosen by more than 80% of the participants inthe pre-survey, were Collect and/or analyze data or information to answer a research question, Understand how my work contributes to the “bigger picture” of research in the field, Go on research-related field trip(s) (to other labs, etc.), Attend student conference(s) that include(s) students from other colleges, Prepare/present a poster presentation describing my research and results
has been deemed successful so far with the prior participants on track in theirrespective advanced STEM degrees or careers. The students who are currently progressingthrough their degrees are being tracked to ascertain their final education/career choices.AcknowledgementsThis material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) grant EEC-1659856. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References1. Kuttolamadom, M.A., Liu, M., Wang, J., Tai, B., Noynaert, S., Sagapuram, S., Kennedy, M. Interdisciplinary Research Experiences for Undergraduates in Metrology & Non-Destructive
Tecnologico de Monterrey. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT MODEL TO ENHANCE ACADEMIC QUALITY IN ENGINEERING PROGRAMSAbstractOne of the main challenges in all areas of education is to ensure that the academic quality of theteaching – learning process is enhanced continuously. In this work, we present a continuousimprovement process based on Deming´s Plan-Do-Check-Act (also known as PDCA) continuousquality improvement model which was implemented in the School of Engineering and Sciencesat Tecnologico de Monterrey campus Puebla. This model encompasses a one-year cycle, it startsin August and ends in July. Faculty of the Academic Departments participate in the
Charlotte Lisa R. Merriweather is an associate professor at the University of North Carolina, Charlotte. She received her PhD in Adult Education with a graduate certificate in Qualitative Inquiry from the University of Georgia in 2004. Her research focuses on issueDr. Cathy Howell, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Dr. Cathy D. Howell is a Clinical Assistant Professor and Graduate Program Director at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. She received a Bachelor of Science degree in Community Health and Masterˆa C™s degree in Health Education at East CarolinaDilara Yaya Bryson, University of North Carolina at CharlotteDr. Edith Gnanadass, The University of Memphis Edith Gnanadass has a Ph.D. in Lifelong
National Science Foundation under IUSE (Grant# 2120252).References[1] E. D. Prada, M. Mercedes, and M. Pino-Juste, "Teamwork skills in higher education: Is university training contributing to their mastery?," Psicologia: Reflexao e Critica, vol. 35, 2022.[2] L. Riebe, A. Girardi, and C. Whitsed, "A systematic literature review of teamwork pedagogy in higher education," Small Group Research, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 619-664, 2016.[3] L. Springer, M. E. Stanne, and S. S. Donovan, "Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta- analysis," Review of educational research, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 21-51, 1999.[4] M. Alqassab, J. W. Strijbos, E. Panadero, J. F. Ruiz, M. Warrens
, No. 2219589. Any opinions, findings, and conclusionsor recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] A. C. Graesser, P. Chipman, B. C. Haynes, and A. Olney, “Autotutor: an intelligent tutoring system with mixed-initiative dialogue,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 612–618, 2005. [Online]. Available: http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/te/te48.html#GraesserCHO05[2] J. A. Kulik and J. D. Fletcher, “Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta-analytic review,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 42–78, 2016.[3] K.-I. Malatesta, P. Wiemer-Hastings, and J. Robertson, “Beyond the short answer
Outcomes from a Pilot Medical Innovations Course with Nursing, Engineering, and Biology Undergraduate Students,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 4, pp. 1–14, 2017, doi: 10.1186/s40594-017-0095-y.[5] D. Melian, J. L. Saorin, J. De la Torre-Cantero, and V. Lopez-Chao, “Analysis of the Factorial Structure of Graphic Creativity of Engineering Students through Digital Manufacturing Techniques*,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 36, no. 4, p. 9, 2020.[6] M. E. Andrews, M. Borrego, and A. Boklage, “Self-efficacy and belonging: the impact of a university makerspace,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 24, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40594-021-00285-0.[7] E. C. Hilton, K. G. Talley, S. F. Smith, R. L. Nagel, and J. S. Linsey, “Report on
education," Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 1, 2009.[2] E. W. Johnson and S. G. DeMaris, "Developing an International Engineering Experience for Undergraduate Students at a Small Institution," Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 2, 2007.[3] M. H. Salisbury, P. D. Umbach, M. B. Paulsen, and E. T. Pascarella, "Going Global: Understanding the Choice Process of the Intent to Study Abroad," Research in Higher Education, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 119-143, 2009.[4] G. M. Warnick, M. S. Call, and R. Davies, "Understanding engineering and technology student perceptions: Barriers to study abroad participation," presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference
(TALE). IEEE, 2015, pp. 72–76. [7] K. W. Van Treuren, “Applying active learning to an introductory aeronautics class,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018. [8] C. R. Compeau, A. Talley, and P. Q. Tran, “Active learning in electrical engineering: Measuring the difference,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019. [9] F. Portela, “A new and interactive teaching approach with gamification for motivating students in computer science classrooms,” in First International Computer Programming Education Conference (ICPEC 2020). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum f¨ur Informatik, 2020.[10] G. S. Tewolde, “Effective active learning tools for an embedded systems course,” in 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education
of Higher Education of the School of Engineering and Sciences, and her current role is Academic Services Director. Vianney belongs to the executive committee of the Matilda Latin American Chair for Women in Engineering and belongs to the mentoring and research groups. She belongs to the LACCEI executive board. She is a founding member of Ingenia Women in Engineering and Sciences participating in the linkage, mentoring and dissemination committees. Vianney is a founding member of the OWSD Mexico´s Chapter. She is an IEEE, WIE (Women in Engineering) and IEEE-HKN member. Vianney is a CB Coach certified by the Conscious Business Center. She belongs to the National System of Researchers (SNI). Her research lines
, University of Notre Dame Dr. Kerry Meyers holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education (B.S. & M.S. Mechanical Engineering) and is specifically focused on programs that influence studentˆa C™s experience, affect retention rates, and the factors that determine the overall long term succes ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Replicating the Community-Engaged Educational Ecosystem – differences in outcomes across studentsIntroductionWith the ongoing transition to the knowledge-based, mobile economy, cities in the United Statesrecognize the importance of a STEM-literate workforce. In the depopulated, legacy industrialareas in the Midwest, cities fight to attract and retain an educated
● Reread or rewrite notes or class material ● Perform note recall by recalling sections of notes and concepts as a form of review ● Summarize chapter, section of notes or textbook Understand ● Using flashcards or quizzes to test your understanding of key theories or concepts ● Explaining a problem or concepts to a classmate(s) (in a study session, at office hours, in class, Piazza, discussion board, etc.) ● Solving practice problems with guidance and support from notes and examples Apply ● Represent a concept or problem in a different form (graphically, equation, diagrams, explanation, verbally
competitions-The benefits and challenges," inAmerican Society of Engineering Education AnnualConference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois, June 18-21 2006, pp. 11.1155.1 - 11.1155.11.[2] S. Kulturel-Konak, "Overview of Student Innovation Competitions and Their Roles in STEM Education," in2021 Fall ASEE Middle AtlanticSection Meeting, 2021. [Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/38445.[3] S. Kulturel-Konak, A. Konak, K. Mehta, and D. R. Schneider, "Fostering Innovation Mindset through Student Innovation Competitions and Programs," presented at the ASEE Zone 1 Conference, University Park, PA, March 30-April 1, 2023.[4
. EconomicDevelopment Administration (EDA) under grant award ED22HDQ0230072. References1. Acosta, R., Manuel, S., Tufenkjian, M., 2010, “A Summer Internship at a NAVFAC Facility - An Undergraduate Engineering Student Perspective,” Proceedings of the OCEANS 2010 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE conference, Seattle, WA, September 20-23, 2010.2. Chesler, N. C., Arastoopour Irgens, G., D’angelo, C. M., Bagley, E. A., Shaffer, D. W., 2013, “Design of a Professional Practice Simulator for Educating and Motivating First-Year Engineering Students,” Advances in Engineering Education, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 1-29. Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference
Research, A. Johri, Ed. Routledge, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003287483.[8] J. Cicek, S. Masta, T. Goldfinch, and B. Kloot, "Decolonization in engineering education," in International Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri, Ed. Routledge, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003287483.[9] P. Freire, Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder, 1970.[10] M. A. Meyer, "Holographic Epistemology: Native Common Sense," China Media Research, vol. 9, pp. 94-102, 2013.[11] S. Nadler, "Baruch Spinoza," in The Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2022 Edition), E. N. Zalta, Ed. Standford University, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives
within Clemson Universityˆa C™s Glenn Department of Civil Engineering, the Founder and Owner of Integrated Resilience, LLC, he is a former Fluor Fellow, Director of Resilience Solutions, and Secretariat of the World EconomicDr. Jeffery M Plumblee II, JMP2 LLC Jeffery Plumblee is a project management, innovation, sustainability, and education consultant. He holds his BS, MS, MBA, and PhD from Clemson University, where he focused on civil engineering. Plumblee has managed a faculty grant and training program for an innovation and entrepreneurship nonprofit; served as a tenure-track faculty member in the Department of Engineering Leadership and Program Management at The Citadel; and developed and managed multiple
and internal Cybersecurity committee members:Dr. Sicong Shao, Dr. Jielun Zhang, Dr. Thomas Stokke, and Dr. Ronald Marsh for their feedbackduring the design of the curriculum.Bibliography[1] Hartikainen, S., Rintala, H., Pylväs, L., & Nokelainen, P. (2019). The concept of active learning and themeasurement of learning outcomes: A review of research in engineering higher education. Education Sciences, 9(4),276.[2] Maher, A. (2004). Learning outcomes in higher education: Implications for curriculum design and studentlearning. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 3(2), 46-54.[3] Arum, R., Roksa, J., & Cook, A. (Eds.). (2016). Improving quality in American higher education: Learningoutcomes and assessments for the
of IEEE Women in Engineering, NSF INCLUDES National Network, and Sigma Xi.Dr. Ioana A. Badara, University of BridgeportDr. Navarun Gupta, University of Bridgeport Dr. Navarun Gupta is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at University of Bridgeport. He also serves as the Department Chair there. Dr. Gupta received his Ph.D. from Florida International University in Miami. He has two masterˆa C™s degrees aˆ C”Dr. Junling Hu, University of BridgeportDr. Ausit Mahmood, University of Bridgeport ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Self-evaluation of the Introduction to Scientific Research Course Designed based on the Affinity Research
York: Oxford University Press., 2003.[4] Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2013. doi: 10.17226/18290.[5] A. L. Pawley, “Universalized Narratives: Patterns in How Faculty Members Define ‘Engineering,’” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 309–319, Oct. 2009, doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2009.tb01029.x.[6] W. Grimson and M. Murphy, “The Epistemological Basis of Engineering, and Its Reflection in the Modern Engineering Curriculum,” in Engineering Identities, Epistemologies and Values, vol. 21, S. H. Christensen, C. Didier, A. Jamison, M. Meganck, C. Mitcham, and B. Newberry, Eds., in Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol. 21. , Cham: Springer
be helpful if themap was able to be shown within the tool rather than having to open a separate application. Thisfeedback will be provided to the the automated scoring tool development team to see if there areadditional elements that can be added to improve the user experience.References 1. “The Network,” KEEN - About. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/about.aspx. 2. N. Duval-Couetil, T. Reed‐Rhoads, and S. Haghighi, “Engineering Students and Entrepreneurship Education: Involvement, Attitudes and Outcomes*,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 2012. 3. Kern Family Foundation, The, “Engineering Unleashed,” https://engineeringunleashed.com/, 2021, (accessed January 2021). 4. K
engineering students through community building (Evaluation) AbstractOver the past twelve years, the ESTEEM program, funded by the NSF S-STEM, at University ofCalifornia Santa Barbara (UCSB) has supported 161 low-income undergraduate students inengineering. This paper emphasizes the students’ changing needs and what they foundsupportive over time with a special focus on the shifting needs for community building before,during, and after COVID-19 pandemic remote learning. Without additional support, low-incomeengineering students, who often reflect additional intersecting minoritized identities and are morelikely to be the first in their family to attend college, leave the field at
innovations both within our course and across our curriculum. Any futuredevelopments should generate solutions while looking through the lens of student experience,with a goal to better prepare students to be technically excellent, iterative, collaborative,empathetic, and confident engineers.References1. Santana S. Instrumentation for Evaluating Design-learning and Instruction Within Courses and Across Programs. In: 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access. 2021.2. Sanchez A, Blake LP, Chen D, Jones M, Mao S, Mendelson L, et al. Building Better Engineers: Critical Reflection as a High Impact Practice in Design Learning. In: 2022 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition. 2022.3. McNair TB, Bensimon EM, Malcom-Piqueux
events are accessible to students with vision and V. PARTICIPANT T ECHNICAL S UPPORThearing impairments, ensuring everyone has the opportunity Participants at the FAU Hack-a-Thon have access to essen-to participate. tial productivity tools including Slack, GitHub, WebEx, and This diversity enriches the event by bringing together a Canvas (an educational LMS), which facilitate collaborationwide range of perspectives, which enhances creativity and and project
and the ToyotaUSA Education Foundation to the National Alliance for Partnerships in Equity. The programdescribed in this paper was funded by the National Science Foundation. Early collaborators andcontributors to variations of the rubric include Tegwin Pulley, Audrey Selden, Mimi Lufkin, JuliaThompson, and Michelle Brown. Special thanks to our CISTEME365 participants for theirsupport in realizing the potential of this resource.References 1. Gazibara, S. (2013). “Head, Heart and Hands Learning”-A challenge for contemporary education. The Journal of Education, Culture, and Society, 4(1), 71-82. 2. Piaget, J. (1964). Cognitive Development in Children Development and Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 176-186
review of commitment and implementation of sustainable developmentin higher education: results from a worldwide survey,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 108,pp. 1–18, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.048.[3] T. B. Ramos, S. Caeiro, B. van Hoof, R. Lozano, D. Huisingh, and K. Ceulemans,“Experiences from the implementation of sustainable development in higher educationinstitutions: Environmental Management for Sustainable Universities,” Journal of CleanerProduction, vol. 106, pp. 3–10, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.110.[4] H. Shapira, A. Ketchie, and M. Nehe, “The integration of Design Thinking and StrategicSustainable Development,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 140, pp. 277–287, Jan. 2017,doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro
while doing VIPundergraduate research. We want to highlight not just what they learned in theory, but also the practicalskills they gained during their research. This close look will help us better see the actual advantages andreal-world uses that students get from being part of the VIP program. References[1] J. Gentile, K. Brenner, and A. Stephens, Eds., Undergraduate Research Experiences for STEM Students: Successes, Challenges, and Opportunities. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2017. doi: 10.17226/24622.[2] D. Lopatto, “The Essential Features of Undergraduate Research,” CUR Quart, vol. 24, Nov. 2002.[3] A. L. Zydney, J. S. Bennett, A. Shahid, and K. W. Bauer
have overcome suchbarriers is essential. These pioneers pave the way for future generations, and this work aims toenvision a future when GenAI becomes integral in fostering inclusion within computing andSTEM disciplines. Villanueva and Di Stefano’s recent narrative inquiry underscores the criticalneed for tailored instructional strategies that consider the unique needs of blind students inSTEM [2]. Similarly, Stefik et al.’s research demonstrates how accessible tools, like theSodbeans programming environment, enhance confidence and skills among blind programmingstudents, revealing the impact of well-designed, inclusive technologies[3]. This paper builds onsuch foundational work by examining how GenAI tools shape the academic journeys of
college students. To date, the enrollment in the scholarshipcohorts matches the approximate 2:1 men:women ratio of the overall enrollment in engineeringat our campus (numbers of students reporting alternative gender identifications are small, andtherefore not reported). As the program matures, more efforts need to be made to increase thenumber of women applicants and awardees.In a prior work (Colón et al. 2024), the team provided a first view of the development of thestudents’ sustainability mindset as a result of analyzing the participants from the 2023sustainability engineering cohort, measured using a four-dimensional framework of knowledge(K), skills (S), behaviors (B), and attitudes (A). We found that students progressed in all