Memberships Journals Reviewer: 2006 - Nucleosides Nucleotides & Nucleic Acids 2010 - Royal Society of Chemistry 2010 - Current Chemical Biology 2010 - Journal of Encapsulation and Adsorption Sciences Memberships 2007 - IS3NA (The International Society for Nucleosides Nucleotides & Nucleic Acids) 2009 - 2012 ASTS (African Society for Toxicological Sciences) 2009 - 2011 NOBCChE (National Orga- nization for the Professional Advancement of Black Chemists and Chemical Engineers) 2012 - 2014 ACS (American Chemical Society), Organic Chemistry and Toxicology Divisions 2013 - 2014 Policy council of head Start (YMCA), Towson, MD Contribution to Science 1 - My previous research has been to understand the chemistry of
for civil engineering technology while others do not.One state describes civil engineering technologist duties as, “…may inspect portions of constructionprojects; take part in field survey work…make and check engineering computations; prepare portionsof written reports; assist in the design of highways and buildings including landscaping projects; andconduct complex field and laboratory tests of engineering materials [1].” This agency’s jobdescription goes further to state technologists may supervise technicians working for the agency.Although these persons are not in “responsible charge”, they have a large degree of responsibility andautonomy in performing their duties.Civil Engineering Technologist in IndustryASCE policy statement also
laboratories in their Mechatronic courses.1. IntroductionThe reshoring of manufacturing in the United States requires a retraining of a workforce toutilize advanced manufacturing tools and techniques and automation [1]. Automation requirestraining in mechatronics, which integrates mechanical and electrical systems to developautomated systems that are controlled with programming. Mechatronics is the foundation ofautomated systems and has become not only a need to shorten the current manufacturing skillsgap [2], but also serves as a platform to provide STEM education. Mechatronics is an important area of study for several STEM related fields, butspecifically for the applied ones such as Engineering Technology (ET). ET as a discipline hasexisted
withdrawal rates lowered significantly.1. IntroductionThe last decade has seen an increase in the open education movement including opencourseware, open textbooks, and Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC). The main focus of thismovement is on broadening access to information through the use of open and free content. Blissand Smith [1] explain the usefulness of this movement: “The implicit goal was to equalize accessto disadvantaged and advantaged peoples of the world – in MIT’s language, to create ‘a sharedintellectual Commons’.” This open movement and its ethos have been something of an antidoteto the disproportionate inflation of textbook costs over the past two decades [2], with the averageexpense for books and supplies estimated at $1,240 per year
education and theimportance of four-year graduation rates are as equally important as preparation of well-roundedengineers. Integration of CAD, FEA, and CFD as separate courses in undergraduate curricula or as partof fundamental core courses (e.g. fluid mechanics, solid mechanics) is commonly known [1-3].Especially CAD is widely accepted as a core course in many undergraduate engineeringcurricula. On the other hand, FEA and CFD are offered either as electives or as a component ofother common courses such as fluid mechanics and solid mechanics, to expose students to suchtools and software early on. However, integration of design and engineering analysis techniquesunder one core course is not a common approach, especially at the undergraduate
Mechanical Engineering Summer Undergraduate ResearchProgram. Here, we report on our experience and summarize our key learnings from our successful12-week program.1. IntroductionUndergraduate research is afundamental part of theresearch activities in mostlaboratories at institutions ofhigher education [1].Integration in ongoingresearch work is a uniquelearning experience andtypically compliments astudent’s academiccurriculum. According toBloom’s taxonomy, see Figure1, analyzing, evaluating, and Figure 1 Bloom's Taxonomy outlines educational learning objectives into levels ofcreating is the most effective complexity and specificity [2]. Our research program builds on
, and planned for this to be a 30 students in totalcornerstone of our program. 15 menUSF is one of the most ethnically diverse 14 womenschools in the nation. 1 non-binaryWe have a great deal to offer to the tech, 30% Hispanicdesign and engineering world. 13.3% Black 20% Asian 13.3% two or more races 23.3% White Admission Criteria• Three years of high school math - to highest level offered at the school• Three years of science, two of them with labs• Passion activities• Community engagement activities First two years
. Furthermore, a narrative is jointly constructed by the speaker and listener on how theychoose to selectively filter the event [1]. This narrative analysis provides a lens into theexperiences of a Latina engineering student at the University of Colorado Boulder but does notrepresent the interpretations and understandings as generalizable fact. It is an attempt to provideinsight into this student’s experience.This paper provides a narrative analysis of a seven-minute interview excerpt from a Latinawoman (pseudonym Iliana) who currently practices engineering as a career and who studiedmechanical engineering at and graduated from the University of Colorado Boulder’s College ofEngineering and Applied Science (CEAS). This project analyzed the description
% first generation, 51% white, the first-time freshman acceptance rate is 22%, and the entering class included15% transfer students. Although the universities are in the same system, the tuition and fees at Cal State LA are $6750/yrwhile at Cal Poly tuition and fees is $9950/yr. The higher fees provide Cal Poly with more resources that can be used inmany ways to support students. An indication of the resource imbalance can be seen in the tenure/tenure-track faculty tostudent ratio in the engineering colleges: Cal State LA is 59:1 and Cal Poly is 45:1. These differences allow us to comparethe responses of employees and students at the two universities with a diversity and equity lens. Cal State LA is classified asa Hispanic Serving Institutions
so that they will fit into the engineering world in one way or another,whether that is learning sufficient math or learning how to deal with bias and harassment.Suppose, rather than a pipeline, we consider the diversification of STEM through the lens of a garden.This paper will discuss a new model that leads to different types of programming that can have asignificant effect on increasing diversity and inclusion.IntroductionIn 2010, Heather Metcalf at UCLA published a critical review of the STEM workforce literature [1]. In herreview she argues that several recurrent themes appear across the literature. These themes include afocus on the supply side focus, linearity, homogenization of people, view of people as passive, andothers. In her
more nuanced, lack complete information and usually admit multiplesolutions. Real-life problem solving may not have a structured and established solution processwith known input-output relationships. Thus, the real-world problem space is uncertain andambiguous. Schrader, Riggs and Williams [1] capture the progression of complexity of theproblem space by differentiating between ‘uncertainty’ and ‘ambiguity’ in context of problemsolving as follows:“Uncertainty: Characteristic of a situation in which the problem solver considers the structure ofthe problem (including the set of relevant variables) as given, but is dissatisfied with his or herknowledge of the value of these variables.Ambiguity level 1: Characteristic of a situation in which the
Belong Here Workshop Series reaching over 7,800 participants. Workshops have reached the following audiences (*data was not collected separately for the workshop mixed audiences): ● Undergraduate Students Only: 6808 ● Graduate Students Only: 193 ● Staff Only: 175 ● Faculty Only: 154 ● Industry Professionals Only: 115 ● Mixed Audience: 403 8Enrique:You Belong Here Workshop Campaign Reach and Impact:Workshop delivery has grown from 30 participants in 1 workshop in 2016 to 539 participants in 9 workshops in 2017 to 2,991 participants in 46 workshops in 2018 and over 4,000 in 2019.The Bias Busters team is currently exploring evaluation
, the percentage of women graduates goes down by .76 percent. Theauthor believes that this analysis points to the need for additional professional developmentaround diversity and inclusion among engineering faculty and to ensure Asian-American faculty,in particular, are engaged. Increased research is being done on inherent bias among engineeringfaculty. This paper suggests a need to include a separate category for Asian-American faculty tobe included in the research.KeywordsDiversity, inclusion, women, inherent biasIntroductionThere has been little progress in attracting women into academic engineering programs. In 2000,20.8% of the bachelor’s degrees were awarded to women and in 2018 the number had risen toonly 21.9% [1].There has been
andbelonging in engineering education. We find that 42% of students surveyed either agree orstrongly agree that use of master-slave terminology is problematic, including 100% of Femaleand 100% of African American students, and that the use of the terminology may createconditions to evoke Stereotype Threat.Introduction A key concern for improving the graduation rates of engineering students fromhistorically excluded backgrounds is the high attrition levels that these students face during thecourse of their study. Prior work shows that attrition at the collegiate level is the leading cause oflow STEM graduation rates for historically excluded groups [1]. A specific study conducted atBrown University found the undergraduate retention rate for
thecomplex needs of our 21st century Coast Guard in service to the American people.A Systems Engineering Approach:The proposed framework, born from a systems-engineering perspective, is shown in Figure 1.Systems engineering is a field which understands the complexity of the behavior and interactionamong individual system components. As a discipline, systems engineering is used to solve someof society’s most complex challenges. Systems engineering is rooted in understanding bothnatural systems (climate, social systems, etc), as well as, technical and human-made systems(cybersecurity, transportation, aviation, etc). Just as in the human body, organizations haveseveral systems and sub-systems working together to keep the organization healthy. As
freshmen retention in the SE major motivated the SE department chair, departmental academic advisors and faculty, and the college’s women in computing director to launch this set of aligned activities in collaboration with the NSF ADVANCE funded program (NSF #1209115) at the university level. The resulting activities ideally enhance diversity and inclusion for students from all underrepresented groups in the program with a focus on groups based on gender. 1Four experiential learning experiences have been created and concurrently implemented within the SE department to promote an inclusive academic environment. These include: (1) faculty
anticipate each panelist spending 1 – 2 minutesdescribing what they believe to be the most pressing issues facing academic research editors, authors,and reviewers, and initiatives already under way related to diversity, equity and inclusivity (10 minutestotal). An open discussion will follow. Discussion prompts will be prepared and posed to the panelists byone of the co-moderators. Sample prompts include: • What actions can we take to guide reviewers in writing constructive reviews to ensure that manuscript submissions are treated equitably? • There are conflicting opinions in publications about capitalization and use of descriptive terms such as those referring to race, ethnicity and disability. What are the roles and
analysis is a way of understanding and inquiring into participant’s experience through a collaborationbetween the researcher and participants, over time, in a place or series of places, and social interaction with theenvironment (Clandinin and Connelly, [1]). It has particular power and insight in highlighting the voices ofmarginalised and minority groups in engineering education research. This group would include women, LGTBIQand indigenous people (Pawley and Phillips, [6]).This paper presents the outcome of the effect of the pedagogy differences for vocational education graduatestransitioning to higher education. It uses the study outcomes of a narrative analysis of the investigation ofstudents’ academic transition lived-experiences in
education systems, individual and social development, technology use and STEM learning, and educational environments for diverse learners. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Enacting Culturally Relevant Pedagogy for Underrepresented Minorities in STEM Classrooms: Challenges and OpportunitiesKeywords: culturally relevant pedagogy, culturally relevant teaching, racial/ethnic minorities,STEM. Introduction Historically, the process of learning and teaching has been theorized from the perspectiveof novice and experienced practitioners [1]. However, in the 1990s, a period that has come to
each week in an n-of-1 big data approach. This approach hasthe empirical benefit of allowing more inclusive and personalized analyses to draw conclusions. Byobserving the requirements of an approved IRB protocol, the analysis based on the transcripts ofthe video recordings, and the examination of change within each individual over time wasconfidential and conducted with de-identified data. Video recordings are coded and analyzed usingHyperRESEARCHTM version 3.7.5.The result calibrates students’ comprehension, integration, and application of impactful, data-driven research skills. The metacognitive development portion examines the influence anddynamics of anticipatory cognition, stereotype threat, identity, and academic self-efficacy as
embedded. Evidence of gendered and race-baseddiscrimination is particularly robust, indicating that women and faculty of color experience arange of overt and covert inequities throughout their professional careers when compared to menand white faculty respectively [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10] [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20].Covert inequities and microaggressions as they play out in 2020 in colleges and universities inthe U.S. are often very difficult to address because they are subtle, even invisible (especially tothe often well-intended perpetrator); other equities are still far from subtle. In STEM fields,gendered discrimination issues have often been described with the “leaky pipeline” metaphor:women leave STEM fields in greater
engineering solutions inglobal, economic, environmental, and societal contexts.” [1] While social justice (SJ) is notexplicitly mentioned, these concerns certainly fall under this criterion. The SJ principles ofequity, access, participation, and rights are relevant to both engineered works and theengineering education process itself. The 2017 update to the American Society of CivilEngineers (ASCE) Code of Ethics added a requirement for engineers to “treat all persons fairlyand encourage equitable participation.” [2] While there have been strong proponents for theintegration of SJ into engineering education, e.g. [3-11], it is unclear whether or not these effortsare common. In addition, given the national spotlight on racism in 2020 [12-13], a number
. He has work experiences in automotive electronics (Delphi Automotive Systems) and consumer products (International Flavors and Fragrances) prior to his current role. He served on the executive committee of the ASEE Women in Engineering division from 2010 to present. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Gender differences in the functionality of regret on academic performanceIntroductionDespite increases in female enrollment levels in engineering programs, the gender gap is stillsignificant. Women accounted for approximately 23% of first-year students who desire to majorin engineering programs in 2014 in the U.S. [1], and the actual female
working as a Research Assistant for an NSF-funded project at UTEP dedicated to broadening the participation of Latinx students in higher edu- cation. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Identity Capital and Persistence among Latinx Engineering/CS Undergraduates on the US-Mexico BorderAbout 10% of engineering and computer science degrees in the U.S. were awarded to Hispanicsfrom 2004 to 2014 [1], while only 8% of the engineering workforce and 7% of the computingworkforce, respectively, was comprised of Hispanics, as of 2018 [2]. In spite of concertedefforts over the last several decades at expanding their enrollment and
education.Purpose: WWithin each story, we incorporate aspects of student identity and faculty interactions to helpuncover new insights about inclusion in engineering education.Methodology: We conducted one-on-one interviews with six minoritized undergraduate studentsas a part of a larger pilot study. This paper centers on the story of one participant, Alice, a Latinainternational student who experiences mental health struggles. Through narrative and discourseanalysis techniques, we synthesized three key stories for our analysis.Findings: Story 1 centers on Alice’s identity as an international student and facultymicroaggressions regarding international status. Story 2 centers on Alice’s diagnosed anxiety andchallenges with requesting accommodations from
, & Access, whose mission is to establish a strategic plan for access, attainment, inclusion, and diversity at Mines. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Increasing Retention and Graduation Rates for Women in STEM Dr. Amy Landis, Faculty Fellow for Diversity, Inclusion and Access, ProfessorAnnette Pilkington, Director Women in Science, Engineering and Mathematics Program WISEM.MINES.EDU #womenatminesSLIDE 1 Notes: This presentation will review the efforts of Mines Women in Science and
NSF-funded project at UTEP dedicated to broadening the participation of Latinx students in higher edu- cation. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Latinx Students’ Sense of Belonging in Engineering and Computer Science at an HSIThe persistent under-representation of Latinx people, particularly Latinas, in Engineering andComputer Science (E&CS) is well-documented. This under-representation occurs both in thepipeline into and through undergraduate E&CS studies, as well as into the profession: only one-tenth of E&CS degrees were awarded to “Hispanics” in the ten-year period from 2004 to 2014[1], while 2018 data showed that only 8% of the
Paper ID #32200Dr. Ashley K Randall, Arizona State University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021EMPOWERING STEM PERSISTENCE AMONG GRADUATE WOMEN 1 Lessons from Diverse Women in STEM: Acknowledging Institutional Challenges and Empowering Agency Towards STEM PersistenceSophie Schuyler1, Jonathan Briseño1, Madison Natarajan1, Anushka Sista1, Kerrie Wilkins-Yel1, Amanda Arnold2, Jennifer M. Bekki3, Bianca L. Bernstein2, & Ashley K. Randall2 1 Department of Counseling and School Psychology, University of Massachusetts Boston 2 Counseling and
society.Curriculum Phase One: Teach power tools safety and rules of operation through the design and construction of an individual project (picture frame). Phase Two: Participants work collaboratively to design and build a group project (Free Little Library), which they present on the last day of the program. Phase Three: Participants “present” final project to community partner.Project Details M-Power Tools Team Project Details: ● Teams of 4 participants were tasked with designing and building a Little Free Library for 1 of 4 “community partners.” ● “Community Partners” included two local
engineering withmarginalized identities navigate their workplace cultures, specifically looking at howthey can authentically be themselves. The data shown within this presentation werecollected as part of a larger NSF-funded study qualitatively assessing themanifestation of racism within the technology industry.From literature, we know that Black engineers leave their workplaces at a higher ratethan White engineers. This is largely due to the toxic workplace environments definedby White men that are unwelcoming for minoritized people [1], [2]. With this work,we intend to understand their experiences and combat racism in tech. The narrativesshared by the participants will provide a depiction of what is occurring in tech. Theintention of this is to