goals andinterests for the future. Details of the program design and outcomes have been reported inprevious work [1-4].During the academic year, RAMP directors work with students on their individual needs,connecting students electing to participate in research with faculty mentors and findingopportunities for community engagement for those interested in volunteering and outreachactivities. Informal meetings, interviews, and cohort get-togethers are also organized. Theseevents have helped inform students' progress, their experiences, accomplishments, andchallenges. A key component of RAMP has been the engagement of students in focus groupsusing the framework of participatory action research [2]. In Fall 2023, a group of seven RAMPstudents from
, a secure space for thedevelopment of all individuals. This methodology allowed for the co-construction of knowledgewith students and faculties, illuminating the proposal for institutional actions that ensure theeffective incorporation of gender equality. It is intended to expand this work by organizingworkshops involving students and faculty members from all school campuses.Keywords: gender, institutional sensitivity, gender stereotypes, Lego Serious PlayIntroduction and FrameworkWomen are underrepresented in science and technology, particularly in leadership positions andspecialized, higher-paying roles. The representation of women in these fields is notably low, atmost 20% in OECD countries [1]. While participation rates may vary between
engineer.Introduction: what does it mean to be inclusive in engineering education?Active learning coupled with high-structure course design has proven to benefit all learners inthe STEM fields and has the potential to close achievement gaps for minoritized and under-resourced learners [1-6]. Active and experiential learning asks students to become activeparticipants in their knowledge construction through activities that often better align withprofessional engineering practice. This contrasts with didactic approaches traditionally utilized inuniversity engineering classrooms, affording learners more opportunities to practice within theirintended discipline [1-5,7-9]. Synergistically, high-structure learning makes participation in theseopportunities to practice
retention and engagement in the university community?This 1-unit introductory course has been developed around three themes: • Entering the Engineering/Computer Science Profession • Engaging in the University Community • Building Skills for SuccessTo develop students’ professional skills and knowledge of career paths available, the first-yearstudents in this course meet with student leaders, engage in breakout group discussions with theChairperson or a faculty member from their intended major, watch and reflect on brief videosabout each of the majors offered in the School of Engineering and Computer Science, andparticipate in classroom activities focused on professional communication and ethics.Active engagement in the university community is
Oettinger White, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 1 By the book: 2 Is induced travel missing 3 from transportation engineering textbooks? 4 5 ABSTRACT: 6 Induced travel is the new travel that materializes in the aftermath of an expansion of 7 transportation infrastructure (e.g., a wider road). Accounting for induced travel is essential for 8 accurately describing the long-term benefits and environmental impacts of a project. However, 9 engineers rarely account for induced travel during project planning and design, in part due
outcomes.Results indicated positive attitudes and their enthusiastic time investment. The at-home projectsenhanced learning, fostered critical thinking, and aligned with evolving engineering educationpriorities. In future iterations, we plan to allocate more time and extend project timelines forgreater learning experience.Keywords: Unit operations laboratory, at-home experiments, critical thinking, bridging corecourse silos.1. INTRODUCTIONIn the 2022 report, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicinerecommended an increased emphasis on experimental learning to facilitate effective connectionsamong core courses, often referred to as 'the silos' [1]. ABET also mandates that students acquirethe skills to design and conduct experiments
instructional practices into their courses [1], they alsohighlight a deficiency in the success of such adoption [2], [3]. Barriers to adopting EBIPs includeinadequate preparation time, content coverage concerns, unsupportive colleagues or departmentalculture, limited professional development opportunities, negative student reactions, andmisalignment with instructor reward structures [4], [5]. Instructors commonly cite a lack of time,especially the initial commitment required to transition from traditional lecture-focused methods,as a key obstacle to instructional change [6], [7]. In order to turn daunting barriers into instructionalsuccesses, engineering faculty and teaching training centers need to be intentional in planning forEBIP implementation
programs that boost the academic success of different groups of students. She teaches in active learning environments and strives to bring EE and CER into practice.Gloria J. Kim, University of Florida Dr. Gloria Kim is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at the University of Florida (UF). She is also an affiliate faculty in UF’s Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. She received her B.S. in chemistry from Seoul National University, M.S. in biomedical engineering from Johns Hopkins University, and Ph.D. in biomedical engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology. As an instructional associate professor, she was awarded several grants from the National Science Foundation (IUSE Level 1, IRES
institutions and industry cannot be overstated [1, 2]. Out of the four key stakeholders(students, faculty, industry and society) in engineering education, industry is considered a majorone as it is a ultimate customer for the students universities graduate [3]. Not only does theindustry set the requirements for the engineering education but also plays a pivotal role inshaping the curriculum to meet the evolving needs of the workforce. The relationship betweenacademia and industry relies on feedback between the stakeholders (students, faculty andindustry) allowing educational institutions to align their programs with industry standards andadvancements, ensuring that graduates are well-prepared and relevant in a rapidly changingconsumer market space
graduate student interaction with UG students to foster growthacross the digital-physical divide, emphasizing the potential for online graduate students toemerge as successful mentors. The findings underscore their ability to bridge geographicaldisparities in higher education and foster rich collaboration in various learning environments forall students.Introduction In recent years, the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly pushed for more virtualeducation opportunities in higher education, where educational institutions had no choice but toresort to virtual teaching methods [1]. However, the COVID-19 pandemic alone does not fuel theneed for more access to virtual education opportunities; advances in communication technology,overcoming gender
, and Mechanical Engineering [1-3]. Various efforts have beenmade to enhance the understanding and visualization of fundamental concepts in engineering mechanicsby demonstrating different types of physical tools in classroom setups. [4-7]. However, developing suchtools takes lot of works. Oftentimes, the instructor has to rely on the tools that are readily available on themarket or improvise and it presents challenges in terms of time commitment and costs. The demonstrationunit outlined in this paper addresses these challenges. The author constructed a laboratory scale model ofa textbook exercise problem to demonstrate a system of parallel forces. It is engineered to be low-cost,compact, and portable. Any instructor can easily replicate the
, the students who designed this projectalso developed a prototype McKibben Creature that adhered to the project scope. General manufacturingand design methodologies for that robot are provided.IntroductionSoft robotics specialize in the use of flexible compliant materials to produce actuation as opposed tocommonly used rigid links [1]. The use of these soft systems are particularly advantageous in prostheticsand surgical machinery but have the potential to evolve in a wide variety of fields [2]. The McKibbenCreature project strives to introduce and familiarize students to soft robotic concepts, specifically pneumaticactuation. The goal is to expose students to this new growing field of engineering early in their academiccareers to hopefully
V.R. SimulationIntroductionOver the years, humans have conquered more outer spaces than our oceans, overcoming manychallenges [1]. Underwater robots have been present for decades and used for multiple purposes.A few applications include researching deep sea marine life, disaster prevention, search andrescue underwater [2, 3], etc. An efficient underwater vehicle can perform the tasks that humanscan’t do due to the pressure of the ocean. This BYOE paper chronicles a decisive journey in therealm of robotics - an Underwater Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) equipped with an onboardcamera and an innovative pneumatic claw system. As we delve into these experiences, we sharethe skills honed, the profound discoveries made, and the challenges overcome
objective was centered around creating compelling projects tailoredfor educational purposes, aimed at enhancing undergraduate learning experiences in mechanicalengineering through soft robotics. As soft robotics is a relatively new field [1], manyundergraduate students are unaware of its existence or unfamiliar with the opportunities in thisfield. As a result, there is an urgent need to increase students’ awareness of this emergingengineering field. There are many valuable engineering skills students can be exposed to throughthe field of soft robotics, including mechanical design, soft material behavior, physics principles,and creative thinking during design. Utilizing soft materials for such a project offers theadvantage of facilitating smooth
scientific concepts and exciting them about the field. Students introduced to this projectwill be exposed to various topics of soft materials, magnetism, and parametric design that interplayin the design of soft robotic systems. This paper presents a “Wacky-Waving-Non-Inflatable-Arm-Flailing-Tube-Man” that undergraduate students can design, build, analyze, and test. The projectcan be tailored as a classroom activity, a laboratory exercise, or a group project. Students willdesign several tests to determine the best design to achieve a tailored flailing configuration. Thetwo major elements of their designs that students will be able to modify include: 1) a selectionamong a subset of provided silicone elastomers that they will select based on their
, meaning that eachstudent already has unique pre-existing knowledge about how materials behave. From cooking,to skincare and makeup, to car maintenance, we all have hands-on life experience with countlessmaterials that guides us towards an understanding of structure-property relationships.In this work, we implement a final project in an introductory MSE course in which students areasked to 1) identify an area of opportunity or “problem” on campus, 2) propose a materials-enabled solution to the problem, and 3) present a poster that outlines the proposed on-campusproject. By setting the project on-campus, students are being asked to draw from their own lifeexperience and think about issues that impact themselves and other members of the
Thonny code for Raspberry PI and semi-microcuvettes. Students are asked to examine the relationship between agar hydrogels' properties and afood dye's diffusion. The equipment takes an image of a cuvette at set time points. Image J isused to analyze the images taken by the camera. A calibration curve relating the RBG colorsaturation of the food dye to the concentration is created. Once the calibration is completed,timelapse diffusion experiments begin. Students must decide how long to run each experiment,how often to image the cuvette, and the range of agar weight percentages to test. Cuvettes filledwith 1 mL of agar hydrogel will be loaded with 1 mL of a high concentration of food dye on top.Using the calibration data and the timelapse
. He is currently non-tenure track faculty in mechanical engineering at Georgia Tech, lecturing in mechanic ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Chasing assessment: The faculty experience of trying to implement evidence based practices wellA significant focus in engineering education research is encouraging faculty to improve the way theyteach [1], [2], [3]. A research to implementation pipeline exists to achieve that goal - new approaches aredeveloped and disseminated, faculty are trained or supported in implementation, and then results areevaluated [4], [5], [6]. Such efforts are often measured through increased use of evidence-based practices[7] as part of a
Manufacturing Engineering at University of Southern California. His current professional interests include design thinking, collaborative engineering, technological innovation, and education reform. He has over 330 ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 ChatGPT and Me: Collaborative Creativity in a Group Brainstorming with Generative AIIntroductionThe emergence of generative AI (genAI), exemplified by ChatGPT, offers unprecedentedopportunities to the education system. However, as this technological advancement gainsmomentum, concerns surrounding hallucination [1, 2] and academic integrity [3, 4] have beenraised, casting doubt on its applicability in educational
Paper ID #41787ChatGPT as a Tool for Equitable Education in Engineering ClassesSourojit Ghosh, University of Washington ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 ChatGPT as a Tool for Equitable Education in Engineering Classes Sourojit Ghosh, University of Washington, SeattleIntroduction 2022 is set to go down in history as the year that the world met ChatGPT – a generativeAI tool designed to accept text-based input and perform a large variety of tasks such asanswering questions, writing text, summarizing content, generating code, and many more.Trained on the large language model GPT-3/3.5 [1
, MiguelAndres is working on a framework to support and conduct undergraduate research.Sixto Duran Ballen ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Pilot Study - Development of Critical Thinking in Construction Engineering Students Aided by Artificial Intelligence. Isabel Guala2, Daniel Abril1, Miguel Andrés Guerra1*, Sixto Durán-Ballén1 1 Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Colegio de Ciencias e Ingenierías, Departamento de Ingeniería Civil, Casilla Postal 17-1200-841, Quito 170901, Ecuador. 2 Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Colegio de Arquitectura y Diseño de Interiores, Arquitectura, Casilla
cognitive space where the dilemma is acknowledged andanalyzed, to preliminary interactions with trusted others to better understand the issue, to © American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 1 2024 ASEE Annual Conferenceassessing organizational cultures and stakes, to ultimately engaging with others to raise concernsand seek alternatives. Stepwise rehearsal of interactions includes a breakdown of the stepsnecessary to engage with others at each of these circles, from preparing to frame concerns toscripting difficult conversations. This paper presents the pedagogical foundations for this
, fix the faults, and then assess the fixes. Overall, 41% of students fixed all the faults. The most commonly used troubleshooting strategies were tracing, full system testing, gaining domain knowledge, and pattern matching. The most uncommon strategies were analytical reasoning and rebuilding.1 IntroductionLab instructors generally agree that troubleshooting is a vital skill for student success [1] becausemistakes are inevitable and part of the learning process. Although instructors typically agree trou-bleshooting is important, it is often not an explicit course learning goal and it is not taught as aseparate skill beyond the mechanics of using a specific troubleshooting tool [2], [3]. Understand-ing the skills and methods
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Classicle Sticks: An Activity to Improve Student EngagementAbstractA game played in some middle-school classrooms has been adapted for engineering lecture courses with 15-45 students inthe classroom and is described in detail. It has been implemented previously in Electrical Engineering at Texas StateUniversity in Electronics 1 & 2, Electromagnetics, and Linear Control Systems and those experiences served to improveand fine-tune the activity to its present form. It was measured in Electronics-1 in Electrical Engineering, and in Staticsand Strength of Materials and Structural Analysis courses in Engineering Technology. The activity is designed to improvestudent
graduate students. The quantitative visualizationsshowed that the students engaged in knowledge-sharing and interdisciplinary learningevents seventeen times in all three project meeting sessions.Implications: The insights derived from this research can prove valuable in implementingeffective team-based course intervention strategies that pertain to project-based modeling andsimulation instruction. Students and practitioners are furnished with evidence-based outcomesendorsing the need to fully integrate comprehensive team-focused problem-solving methods intackling complex STEM-based modeling and simulation challenges.1. Introduction and BackgroundComputational modeling and simulation (CMS) involve the application of computationalscience principles
and Outreach STEM Education graduate student at Tufts University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 1 Context Matters: Characterizing First-Year Engineering Students’ Shifting Perspectives when Reflecting on Different Sociotechnical and Justice TopicsIntroductionThis practice paper relates to the overall mission of ECSJ, specifically transformative learningtoward action. For well over a decade, there have been numerous critiques of the social/technicaldualism present in engineering education and calls to disrupt it [1]. Researchers have varyingmotivations
improvestudents’ anxiety, confidence, and engagement in similar programming courses.Keywords: First-Year Program, Introductory Programming, Collaborative Learning, Educationalinterventions, Vertical Non-Permanent Surfaces, Learning AnxietyIntroductionIntroductory programming is an essential aspect of an engineer’s education. Engineers are usuallytasks with solving complex and complicated real-world problems. To successfully solve suchproblems, an in-depth understanding of how to develop and utilize mathematical andcomputational models to solve problems is vital. Studies have shown that explicitly teaching first-year engineering students how to develop models to solve problems has several benefits [1, 2].Even though programming is a crucial aspect of the
Medicine released their report onNew Directions for Chemical Engineering [1]. In this report, a section on curricular reformincluded recommendations “that would help students understand how individual core conceptsmerge into the practice of chemical engineering” and “include earlier and more frequentexperiential learning through physical laboratories and virtual simulations” as well as otherrecommendations.However, implementation of curricular reform can be challenging. A paper by Davis andJacobsen, which focused on mentoring undergraduate research projects, provided faculty insightsto barriers to curricular innovation [2]. This paper identified three main barriers: preparation,time constraints, and demands related to the promotion and tenure
in research knowledge and skills, deeper relationships with mentors, and clarity andinsight into career paths. This work involves thematic analysis of interviews with GEAR-SRparticipants and highlights student voices, including those traditionally marginalized in STEM.The advantages of undergraduate research experiences (UREs) are widely recognized, leading tohigher student retention, a sense of belonging in their field, improved academic outcomes, and agreater likelihood of pursuing advanced degrees [1, 5, 6]. This positive effect can be even greaterfor traditionally minoritized students [7], including students who are Black/African American,Hispanic/Latino(a), American Indian, and Pacific Islander. However, finding and performingresearch
Engineering Education, 2024 Work in Progress: Grading Through a Capability Lens1. AbstractThe purpose of this WIP research paper is to briefly consider the basis of higher education’scurrent grading system and to discuss an implemented grading structure based on a humandevelopment framework which was part of a departmental cultural shift. The letter-grademarking system is relatively new compared to the institution of higher education [1] and bringswith it a secondary effect of an “A” ranking conveying significant value and meaning to theinterpreter. Students (and faculty) bring their own interpretation of what it means to be an ‘A’student and connect this to their personal identity [2]. The shift to letter-based grades coincidedwith