Paper ID #32223A Workshop for Shared Teaching Materials for Advanced Manufacturing ¨ E. Okudan-Kremer, Iowa State University of Science and TechnologyDr. Gul G¨ul E. Kremer received her PhD from the Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engi- neering of Missouri University of Science & Technology. Her research interests include multi-criteria decision analysis methods applied to improvement of products and systems. She is a senior member of IIE, a fellow of ASME, a former Fulbright scholar and NRC Faculty Fellow. Her recent research focus includes sustainable product design and enhancing creativity in
produced include a concept map. Students leave the course with a clear listof which topics they mastered and which they are still working on. This model still permits roomfor traditional laboratory and project components.IntroductionIn standard teaching, course topics are covered on a set schedule and exams occur at set schedules.If students have not learned the material for an earlier portion of the class, the course moves alonganyway and focuses on new more difficult material that builds on the previous material thatstudent still does not understand. This promotes a fixed mindset promoting the idea that if youdidn’t get a concept, you never will. At the end of the course, students may only have a partialunderstanding of the material and may be
Paper ID #33998Achieving Capstone Design Objectives During Necessitated COVID-19 On-lineTeachingDr. Mohamed E. El-Sayed, Eastern Michigan University Dr. Mohamed El-Sayed, P.E., Professor and former Director, School of Engineering Technology at East- ern Michigan University. For over twenty years, he had served as a professor of mechanical engineering and director of the Vehicle Integration & Durability Laboratory at Kettering University, in Michigan, United States. He is a well-recognized technical leader in vehicle integration, vehicle development, op- timization, and validation. He is the SAE international Medal of
2017 ASEE Mid Atlantic SectionSpring Conference: Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland Apr 7 Paper ID #20861Experiential Learning for Teaching Structural Analysis to Non-EngineeringStudentsDr. Mehdi Shokouhian, Morgan State University Dr. Mehdi Shokouhian is a Full-time Faculty Lecturer in the Department of Construction Management, and an Adjunct Faculty in the Department of Civil Engineering at Morgan State University. Dr. Shok- ouhian earned his PhD Degree in Structural Engineering at the Tsinghua University in Beijing China. His PhD research focused on ductility-based design and structural stability of high
AC 2009-2193: TEACHING SOCIAL COMPLEXITY AND MULTIDISCIPLINARYTEAM BUILDING: AN EXPERIMENTAL ENGINEERING APPROACHCraig Laramee, State University of New York, BinghamtonShelley Dionne, State University of New York, BinghamtonHiroki Sayama, State University of New York, BinghamtonDavid Wilson, State University of New York, Binghamton Page 14.1151.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Teaching Social Complexity and Multidisciplinary Team Building: An Experimental Engineering ApproachAbstractNumerous organizations, including the National Science Foundation (NSF), the AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology (ABET), and the National Academy of
2006-64: TEACHING LEAN MANUFACTURING CONCEPTS USING PHYSICALSIMULATIONS WITHIN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMAlok Verma, Old Dominion University Alok K. Verma is Ray Ferrari Professor and, Director of the Automated Manufacturing Laboratory at Old Dominion University. He also serves as the Chief Technologist of the Lean Institute and MET Program Director at ODU. Alok received his B.S. in Aeronautical Engineering, MS in Engineering Mechanics and PhD in Mechanical Engineering. Alok is a licensed professional engineer in the state of Virginia, a certified manufacturing engineer and has certification in Lean Manufacturing and Six Sigma. His publications are in the areas of Lean Manufacturing
0 0 Figure 11. Line voltage as a function of distance and time for pulse propagation.ConclusionThe authors have discussed a series of MATLAB programs written to assist in the teaching ofelectrical transmission lines. Both sinusoidal steady-state and transient behaviors areexamined graphically with dynamic animations being the most instructive. The programs can beused in the classroom or in the computer laboratory, although some careful thought by theinstructor on how they will be used is required to get the maximum benefit. These and otherpartial differential equation animation programs are available at the University of WyomingMATLAB animation resource website at www.eng.uwyo.edu/classes/matlabanimateThese
Paper ID #241612018 ASEE Zone IV Conference: Boulder, Colorado Mar 25Using Excel as a Tool to Teach Manufacturing and Heat TransferDr. Odon M Musimbi, Metropolitan State University of Denver Odon M. Musimbi, PhD. Assistant Professor, Metropolitan State University of Denver PhD, Engineering (Mechanical), Colorado School of Mines(2011) MS, Engineering Systems, Colorado School of Mines(2011) Diploma, Mechanical Engineer, University of Kinshasa (1994)Dr. Ing. Jean Paul Mulanza, University of Kinshasa Dr.Ing Jean-Paul S. Mulanza Professor, (1990-Present) Department of Mechanical Engineering Polytechnic Faculty University of Kin
experience.This paper describes a direct method of teaching ergonomics topics by incorporating a researchstudy into a classroom laboratory experience. This results in a hands-on, active learningexperience that will impact all students in the class. In addition to learning research methods byparticipation, this approach incorporates additional topics and broader contemporary topics.2. PurposeThe traditional ergonomics syllabus has focused on the physical requirements of manual laborworkers. While manufacturing and other jobs requiring physical labor remain vital componentsin the workforce, many developed countries have transitioned to a knowledge economy. By2003, more than half of all workers in the United States used a computer1 and the number
Paper ID #18766Applying Scratch Programming to Facilitate Teaching in k-12 ClassroomsDr. Afrin Naz, West Virginia University Institute of Technology Dr. Afrin Naz is an assistant professor at the Computer Science and Information Systems department at West Virginia University Institute of Technology. She is working with high school teachers to inspire the K-12 students to the STEM fields. In last four years Dr. Naz and her team launched six workshops for high school teachers. Currently her team is training the high school teachers to offer online materials to supplement their face-to-face classroom.Dr. Mingyu Lu, West
Paper ID #29343Practical approach towards teaching a content intensive subject inhigher educationProf. James Lambrechts P.E., Wentworth Institute of Technology James Lambrechts received a B.S. from the University of Maryland and an M.S. from Purdue University, both in civil engineering. He was a geotechnical engineer for 27 years with Haley & Aldrich, Inc. in Boston before taking a position at Wentworth in 2005.Dr. Anuja Kamat, Wentworth Institute of Technology Anuja Kamat is an Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Wentworth Institute of Technology, Boston. Prof. Kamat received her Ph.D. in Civil
AC 2008-657: TEACHING THE SN METHOD: ZERO TO INTERNATIONALBENCHMARK IN SIX WEEKSErich Schneider, University of Texas at Austin Dr. Schneider is an Assistant Professor of Nuclear and Radiation Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. Since joining the UT faculty in 2006, Dr. Schneider has been active in the development of a modern nuclear energy systems analysis curriculum including courses in computational radiation transport and the nuclear fuel cycle. Prior to joining UT, Dr. Schneider was a Technical Staff Member in the Nuclear Systems Design group at Los Alamos National Laboratory
learned it toomust be kept current to be engaging. Continued study of the latest teaching methods, learning thenew technology, and learning about today's students are important to the success in theclassroom.Learn To Teach ExamplesTwo very short and very different cases will be discussed below. In each case the professor had afull teaching load, each was offered the opportunity for mentorship and outside assistance; onefaculty member is successful, the other was not. As in the case of the mentor relationship,cooperation and idea exchange are key to learning to teach.Case 1. A new faculty member with industrial experience and a doctorate was assigned to teachseveral classes and the associate laboratories. The mentor made classroom visits with
design document and submit a peer evaluation. Their design projectis 50% of their final grade and their peer evaluation is 15 % of their final grade. The peerevaluation process used in ENGR 215 is described extensively in previous papers 5 , 6. The finaldesign project is donated to the client at the end of the semester.Studio Teaching of Design and the ERE Design StudioIn 1988, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute integrated technology into a cooperative learningenvironment7 through the Studio Teaching approach. This approach integrates lecture,laboratory, and recitation by exploiting computer-based materials as a tool to accelerate,integrate, and leverage interaction. Studio courses engage students in various problem solvingand active learning
, or could be used in arecitation section. Some examples include a model rocket launch, a catapult project, and aCharpy test demonstration. Details of these projects (Self and Redfield, 2001) as well asdifferent assessment techniques (Self et al, 2003) have been previously reported. During the pastyear, we added a LEGO® car competition laboratory to help students understand the fundamentalconcepts of rigid body kinetics.LEGOs® aren’t just your children’s simple playthings anymore. Educators are using advancedmechanical products to teach students about compound belt drives, gearing, and pulleys(www.lego.com). LEGO® Mindstorm includes a programmable “brick” that is being used toteach robotics (Klassner, 2003), chemical engineering concepts
Session 3513 Use of Process Simulation and McCabe-Thiele Modeling in Teaching Distillation Kevin Dahm Rowan University, Glassboro, NJAbstractThe increasing prominence of process simulation has led to new ideas on how to teach separationprocesses such as column distillation to students. Graphical techniques such as McCabe-Thielemodeling have value in that they provide a compact framework for visualizing the process andillustrating concepts and phenomena, but no longer represent the state-of-the-art in engineeringpractice. Process simulators
Ph.D. students tocomplete a Teaching Practicum course during their doctoral studies. Students work closely withfaculty mentors in teaching a course. While the focus of the class is on pedagogy, the goal is forstudents to find the experience useful regardless of whether they are going into academia,industry, a research laboratory, or other career pursuits. In addition to issues dealing withteaching engineering, sessions are organized for career planning, success in both academia andindustry, ethics, and basic counseling and mentoring skills. This paper is a study of theeffectiveness of the Teaching Practicum experience. Survey responses are analyzed from nearly100 Ph.D. alumni for the period from the summer of 1996 to the spring of 2009. The
nanotechnology has nowbrought urgent challenges to undergraduate engineering education: How to integrate theemerging nanotechnologies into classroom teaching? How to prepare our students fortomorrow’s highly competitive global job markets? And how to maintain the US’s leadershipand dominance in science and technology in an era of globalization?Funded by Department of Education, a project is carried out to integrate nanotechnology into theundergraduate science and engineering curricula through a sequential preparation approach fromintroductory freshman to the advanced senior level. The curricula are reinforced by innovativecomputer simulations and state-of-the-art nanomaterials laboratory experiments anddemonstrations. The work presented in this paper is
AC 2012-3735: A MODULAR APPROACH FOR TEACHING A FIRST UN-DERGRADUATE COURSE IN NANOELECTRONICSDr. Syed Iqbal Omar P.E., Texas A&M University, Kingsville Syed Iqbal Omar is a professor of electrical engineering and computer science at Texas A&M University, Kingsville. The areas of his current research interests are computational nanotechnology and spintronics.Prof. Reza Nekovei, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Reza Nekovei is a professor of electrical engineering and computer science at Texas A&M Univer- sity, Kingsville. He has many years of experience in developing graduate and undergraduate programs. Nekovei is currently co-PI for two NSF projects related to teaching by design research and develop
of Engineering Education, Vol. 84, p.343.9 Steif P. and Dollár, A. 2003. A New Approach to Teaching and Learning Statics. Proceedingsof the American Society for Engineering Education 2003 Annual Conference and Exposition,June 2003, Nashville TN.10 Williams, R. and Howard, W. 2007. A Versatile and Economical Apparatus for Experiments inStatics. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education 2007 Annual Conferenceand Exposition, June 2007. Honolulu, HI.11 O’Neill, R., Geiger, R. C., Csavina, K. and Ondroff, C. 2007. Making Statics Dynamic:Combining lecture and laboratory into an interdisciplinary, problem-based, active learningenvironment. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education 2007 AnnualConference and
to develop multimedia presentations. Theobvious choices for the two are the Windows-based computers (x86 or Pentium) or theMacintosh-based computers. Macintosh-based computers have several advantages overWindows-based computers. These range in ease of use to assured interoperability. The mainstrength of the Macintosh is in its maturity in graphics and animation software. However, thisadvantage is slowly diminishing as Windows-based machines continue to be built with bettermultimedia hardware components. All the software listed in the previous section will run on bothplatforms.At the University of Oklahoma, Windows-based computers are installed in the engineeringmultimedia teaching laboratory. These workstations consist of Pentium 200 MMX
, faculty mustassume the role of scholar. SCHOLARSHIP OF TEACHING AND SERVICE When hired into a tenure-track position in the Department of Engineering Technology, Ifaced a very challenging task. Like everyone else, to be awarded tenure I would have todemonstrate an ability to perform duties associated with teaching, research and service.Although I expected such a challenge when choosing my career path, I was unprepared for theexpectation that I meet the research and service expectations while teaching four courses, persemester, (and associated laboratories without graduate student assistance). The TennesseeBoard of Regents regulations assume that teaching one course should consume approximatelytwenty percent of a
provided by the corresponding 1-Dfilter applied to a speech signal. Once a systems concept has been made intuitively clear,understanding the mathematical definitions and explanations should become easier for thestudents. A set of laboratory exercises have been developed for a course in digital imageprocessing which will aid in teaching systems-related concepts such as spatial convolution,space-frequency duality, image compression, spatial and contrast enhancement, signaldegradation due to noise, and image restoration. All laboratory exercises were originallyimplemented using the C programming language on a UNIX computer system. Studentsin a digital image processing course taught by the author during the fall semester of 1996were provided with
Teaching Graduate Rotorcraft Design Based on Twenty Years of Experience Dr. Daniel P. Schrage Professor and Director Center of Excellence in Rotorcraft Technology School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332-0150IntroductionRotorcraft is a general term for rotary-wing aircraft and includes all aircraft that include anyrotary-wing device for generating lift or propulsion for a portion of the aircraft’s flight envelope.Therefore, rotorcraft includes helicopters
ondesign projects selected from various disciplines of engineering. This paper provides adescription of the topics covered in each of the three components of this course. Theinstructional approaches used to teach this course are described and the engineeringdesign projects conducted by the students are outlined.Students normally take the course in their first or second semester. The class meets forthree double periods per week for a total of 6 hours. The class is divided up into threegroups during the first meeting. For example a student may attend computer skills onMonday, graphical skills on Wednesday and Design laboratory on Friday. Three faculty
web-based virtual experiment in material science: Tensile test laboratory application."Acta Physica Polonica A 125.2 (2014): 310-312.[4] Schmidt, Jonas, Tim Huber, and Jörg Müssig. "Improving Material Property Understanding with Virtual Proceedings of the 2023 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2023, American Society for Engineering Education ETD 415Experiments: A New Approach to Teach About Mechanical Testing of Materials Using an Interactive DesktopApp." (2022): 553-560.[5] May, D. "Online laboratories for supporting international student collaboration in merging
careers as well as the plans and suggestions to overcome those problems. The course outline along with laboratory experiments will also be discussed.Keywords: Problems and Solutions for PIC MicrocontrollerIntroduction At Northwestern State University of Louisiana, Natchitoches, we inducted a one-semester course on microcontrollers, obviously, for a multiple of reasons, for our undergraduatestudents doing majors in ‘Electronic Engineering Technology (EET)’. At the very start of thisventure, we found out that we were on a head-on-collision course to a number of challenging andmulti-faced problems. This was quite disappointing. But we pursued on to develop a reasonablygood course and our consistent efforts in doing-so ultimately
Ateneo de Manila University, Philippines. He has done and published research in the areas of additive manufacturing (3D printing) for electronics and the design of smart electronic systems. His current research interests include the design of technology- mediated learning environments in teaching electrical and electronics engineering concepts, and curricular innovations for additive and advanced manufacturing programs.Dr. Nicole P. Pitterson, Virginia Tech Nicole is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Prior to joining VT, Dr. Pitterson was a postdoctoral scholar at Oregon State University. She holds a PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University and other
the standalone technical communication courses in the Departments ofChemical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and Civil and Environmental Engineering at theUniversity of Texas at Austin [3]. Finally, rather than using a standalone course to teach writing,a number of engineering departments try to interweave the teaching of writing into a sequence ofengineering courses. Such a course sequence occurs with two upper-level laboratory courses inthe Mechanical Engineering Department of Virginia Tech [4]. However, with recent increases in engineering undergraduate enrollments [5], many suchcourses are stretched. Faculty are asked to teach greater loads, often without additional resources.One such example is Pennsylvania State University
TAs fulfill the role ofsecondary instructor, supporting a course via laboratories, recitations, grading, and otherteaching activities. Whether faculty or TA, primary or secondary, instructors employ a range ofinstructional approaches to engage student learning and interact with students to develop rapport,answer questions, and further scaffold instruction. Although there remains some confusion inthe literature regarding terms, faculty support generally refers to teaching technique (bothteacher-centered and student-centered) while faculty interactions refer to more informalexchanges with students which include both curriculum and course-based interactions as well asconversations about career and other intellectual matters. In this paper, we