Paper ID #44044Work in Progress: Investing in Engineering Futures Through Summer ResearchFundingJessica Baldis, University of California, San Diego Jessica Baldis serves as the Strategic Initiatives and Assessment Senior Analyst at the University of California, San Diego’s IDEA Engineering Student Center. She holds a Masters degree in Engineering from the University of Washington and is currently pursuing a doctorate in Education at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Jessica spent several years managing and directing software engineering and content development teams primarily in the military and law enforcement
, gender and sexuality studies(WGSS) or ethnic studies empowers minoritized engineering students to develop criticalconsciousness relative to the culture of engineering. Our work investigates the influence of twosuch courses on student attitudes and motivation by gathering both qualitative and quantitativedata from students in two STEM-themed courses in WGSS and ethnic studies, “Gender andSTEM” and “Race and Technology.” We argue that in these courses students acquire skills thatenable them to critically reflect on both the socially constructed nature of STEM and on thehistorical patterns within engineering culture that exacerbate existing inequities and injusticedespite claims of “neutral” objectivity. In preliminary data, students report that
the student-led boards of UC SanDiego’s NSBE, SHPE, and SWE student chapters. In 2016, the IDEA Center helped launch astudent chapter of Out in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (oSTEM), anational society for LGBTQA communities in STEM fields. Additional student chapters ofdiversity organizations now served by the IDEA Center include Women in Computing and, mostrecently, the Society of Asian Scientists and Engineers.Academic Achievement Program: The Academic Achievement Program is a two-fold initiativethat includes both a study skills course and a process for early academic intervention that isembedded into participating engineering courses. The “ENG 15: Engineer Your Success” courseuses Raymond Landis’s Studying Engineering
writing,” Coll. English, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 610–617, 1979.[20] J. Colwell, J. Whittington, and C. F. Jenks, “Writing Challenges for Graduate Students in Engineering and Technology,” 2011, doi: 10.18260/1-2--18722.[21] A. Selzer King, K. R. Moore, S. Frankel, and A. Hardage Edlin, “Drawing Strategies for Communication Planning: A Rationale and Exemplar of the Geometric Page Form (GPF) Approach,” ACM'S Spec. Inte. Group on the Des. of Info., 2017.[22] A. S. King and A. H. Edlin, “Structured drawing tasks support research ideation : A mentor-mentee report on iteration, invention, and collaboration,” ACM'S Spec. Inte
engineering withmarginalized identities navigate their workplace cultures, specifically looking at howthey can authentically be themselves. The data shown within this presentation werecollected as part of a larger NSF-funded study qualitatively assessing themanifestation of racism within the technology industry.From literature, we know that Black engineers leave their workplaces at a higher ratethan White engineers. This is largely due to the toxic workplace environments definedby White men that are unwelcoming for minoritized people [1], [2]. With this work,we intend to understand their experiences and combat racism in tech. The narrativesshared by the participants will provide a depiction of what is occurring in tech. Theintention of this is to
; she has served as a Co-PI on three research projects, including one on transfer students and another on student veterans in engineering.Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is President of Research Triangle Educational Consultants. She received her Ph.D.in Educational Research and Policy Analysis from NC State University in 1996. She also has an MBA from Indiana University (Bloomington) and a bachelor’s degree from Duke University. She specializes in eval- uation and research in engineering education, computer science education, and technology education. Dr. Brawner is a founding member and former treasurer of Research Triangle Park Evaluators, an Ameri- can
questionnaire." British Journal of Educational Technology 46, no. 4 (2014): 848-63. doi:10.1111/bjet.12181.12. Mann, Karen, Jill Gordon, and Anna MacLeod. "Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review." Advances in Health Sciences Education 14, no. 4 (2007): 595-621. doi:10.1007/s10459-007-9090-2.13. Prince, Michael. "Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research." Journal of Engineering Education 93, no. 3 (July 2004): 223-31. doi:10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2004.tb00809.x.14. Thomas, Lauren D., Mania Orand, Kathryn Elizabeth Shroyer, Jennifer A. Turns, and Cynthia J. Atman. "Tips & Tricks for Successful Implementation of Reflection Activities in Engineering Education." Paper presented
Engineering (ILead). She completed her PhD at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) studying product development decision-making during complex industry projects. Dr. Olechowski completed her BSc (Engineering) at Queen’s Uni- versity and her MS at MIT, both in Mechanical Engineering. Dr. Olechowski studies the processes and tools that teams of engineers use in industry as they design innovative new products. She has studied engineering products and projects in the automotive, electronics, aerospace, medical device and oil & gas industries.Ms. Madeleine Santia c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Examining the Engineering Leadership Literature: Community of
Director of One Page Solutions, a consulting firm that uses the OGSP R process to help technology and branded product clients develop better strategic plans. Mark is a member of The Band of Angels, Silicon Valley’s oldest organization dedicated exclusively to funding seed stage start-ups. In addition, he serves on the board of several technology start-up companies.Sophia Lerner Pink, Stanford University Sophia Pink is a sophomore studying engineering at Stanford University. She began conducting research in Dr. Sheri Sheppard’s Designing Education Lab in June 2016. Sophia’s academic interests include mechanical engineering, human-centered design and social science research.Kayla Powers, Stanford UniversityMr. Adrian Piedra
technology that did notpreviously exist in the curriculum. He reported that local industry has found the course valuable and hebelieves the new course is uniquely preparing his students for careers in that branch of engineering.Greg had a career in manufacturing and brings advanced manufacturing techniques into the department,allowing students to build systems that were not previously possible and collaborating with researchers inthe department.Capstone and introductory courses seem to be particularly well-suited for teaching faculty. Capstone is aparticularly good fit for participants like Alan and Greg who had engineering management experience andso could model the type of design processes and skills that are necessary in a product development
students formulate as they come toidentify with various social, academic, personal, and professional groups. Simply speaking,identity is not as singular as how an individual perceives themselves in isolation from otheraspects of their personality. Often individuals project different parts of their identity asdependent on the environment and context. In doing so individuals are continuously doing andundoing their identities to suit their needs in the moment.In Science and Math Science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) disciplines have turned to identitytheories as a way to identify talented individuals in efforts to fuel recruitment and retention. Tothis end, many have sought to define what it means to have a science 24; 27; 44 or
Kitchener’s model exhibited such openness.36 Engineering education scholars can begindeveloping empathy for effective collaboration among themselves, with their students, andamong their students by some combination of conflict resolution techniques, communicationtraining programs, and team-skills training.Lastly, given the growth of online education and the technological manifestations that allowinteraction by virtual media, some scholars have focused on how empathy functions betweencollaborators interacting online. For example, Nguyen and Canny72 found that empathymanifests differently in two types of video interactions. When they compared between “head-only” and “upper-body” framing, they found that the latter produced a significantly higher
includestudents from Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) majors.These articles were published in 1 conference proceeding and 6 journals: ASEE conferenceproceeding (9), Journal of Engineering Education (6), European Journal of EngineeringEducation (1), International Journal of Engineering Education (1), International Journal forService Learning in Engineering (1), Journal of Women and Minorities in Science andEngineering (1), The Journal of Higher Education (1), Research in Higher Education (3).Table 1Summary of Research on Engineering Student Out of Class InvolvementAuthor/Year Article Source Research Types of Participants Methods
, but as Tang and Nieusma’s articlepoints out, their society was not immediately supportive of the whistleblowers’ plight. Rather, ittook the advocacy of two, short-lived, dissident committees—the Committee for SocialResponsibility in Engineering (CSRE) and the Committee on Social Implications of Technology(CSIT)—with membership overlap in IEEE to codify ethical principles in 1977. The archivalresearch conducted for these two articles demonstrates that the inclusion of ethical principles inat least two professional codes was a fairly recent addition driven by the need to protectengineers and their professional societies from damaging public relations events. Given theirorigins, it is important that engineering ethics educators view professional
Institute at UGA is an innovative approach that fuses high quality engineering education research with systematic educational innovation to transform the educational practices and cultures of engineering. Dr. Walther’s research group, the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), is a dynamic in- terdisciplinary team that brings together professors, graduate, and undergraduate students from engineer- ing, art, educational psychology, and social work in the context of fundamental educational research. Dr. Walther’s research program spans interpretive research methodologies in engineering education, the pro- fessional formation of engineers, the role of empathy
still be practicing engineeringtoday. Similar to Louise, Hewlett et al. [2] found that most women who left SET careers(science, engineering, and technology) sought re-entry paths. Findings such as these suggest ifmore employers would provide flexible work options and create pathways for returningengineers, more women would remain in or return to the engineering profession, therebyincreasing the representation of women in the engineering workplace.KeywordsWomen in engineering, underrepresentation, career pathways, unfolding model of turnover,narrative inquiry.IntroductionWomen remain underrepresented in the engineering profession, leaving engineering careers at arate double that of men. To address this inequity, we must increase our
Chemists and Chemical Engineers (NOBCChE) and Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. She holds degrees in chemistry from Wofford College (B.S.), North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (M.S.), and Louisiana State University (Ph.D.).Ellen Wang Althaus, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Ellen Wang Althaus, PhD (she/her) is a collaborative and innovative leader forging new initiatives and building alliances to foster diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. In her current role as Assistant Dean for Strategic Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Initiatives in the Grainger College of Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana
21st Century,” J. Exp. Educ., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 91–98, 1999.[2] J. Cantor, “Experiential Learning in Higher Education: Linking Classroom and Community,” 1995.[3] R. Graham, “The Global State of the Art in Engineering Education,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2018. Accessed: Oct. 04, 2018. [Online]. Available: file://engin-storage.m.storage.umich.edu/engin- storage/jcallew/windat.v2/Documents/Conferences/ASEE/2019/MIT_NEET_GlobalStateE ngineeringEducation2018.pdf[4] L. Harrisberger, “Experiential Learning in Engineering Education,” ERIC Clearinghouse, 1976.[5] D. R. Fisher, A. Bag, and S. Sarma, “Developing Professional Skills in Undergraduate Engineering Students Through Cocurricular
/Academic Variables Related to Engineering PersistenceThe importance of mathematical achievement and preparation to engineering persistence hasbeen well documented. Seymour and Hewitt [6] posited over two decades ago that if students areproficient in mathematics and science at an early age, then this proficiency encourages them tochoose science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate majors alongwith employment in STEM fields such as engineering [1]. Veenstra and colleagues [7]highlighted key differences regarding factors that predict retention and academic successbetween engineering majors and other majors. They found that high school academicachievement in mathematics and sciences are weighted heavily for engineering majors
found positive associations between internships and career-relevant variables. Theoretical and empirical studies indicated that internships have positive effects on engineering education. Engineering and technology students learn to gain much experience from different approaches [12]. Our findings show that internships also have a crucial effect on subsequent academic outcomes. These effects influence prior academic achievement, and they hold for both the advantaged and disadvantaged [13]. The analysis from a national dataset of 2004 seniors suggests that students who spent more time in a cooperative education program are better at ensuring that a process or product meets a variety of
. Saez-Martinez, "Gender diversity with R&D team: its impact on radicalness of innovation," Innovation: Management, Policy, and Practice, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 149–160, 2013.[4] American Society for Engineering Education, "Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers 2019," American Society for Engineering Education, [Online]. Available: http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges/16091.aspx. [Accessed 7 October 2021].[5] U. C. Bureau, "Quick Facts.," [Online]. Available: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045219. [Accessed 7 October 2021].[6] R. A. Atadero, C. H. Paguyo, K. E. Rambo-Hernandez and H. L. Henderson, "Building inclusive engineering identities: implications for changing engineering
100ConclusionsThe Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) has amended their GeneralCriteria to now include DEI principles with the aim of ensuring students have the “ability tofunction effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborativeand inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks and meet objectives. Further, the facultycriteria now states that “program faculty must demonstrate awareness and abilities appropriate toproviding an equitable and inclusive environment for its students and knowledge of appropriateinstitutional policies on diversity, equity and inclusion [25]. There is an urgent need forengineering education to morph both teaching content and practices to graduate studentsequipped to
Paper ID #32704Engineering Students Coping With COVID-19: Yoga, Meditation, and Men-talHealthDr. Kacey Beddoes, San Jose State University Kacey Beddoes is a Project Director in the College of Engineering Dean’s Office at San Jose State University. She holds a Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech, along with graduate certificates in Women’s and Gender Studies, and Engineering Education. Dr. Beddoes serves as Associate Editor for the Australasian Journal of Engineering Education and Managing Edi- tor for Engineering Studies. She is also the past Chair of the Working Group on Gender and Diversity
/ www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/papers/22458541 datasheets.scbt.com/sc-52666.pdfDr. Celeste Chavis P.E., Morgan State University Celeste Chavis is an Associate Professor in the Department of Transportation & Urban Infrastructure Studies in the School of Engineering at Morgan State University in Baltimore, MD. Dr. Chavis is a reg- istered professional engineer in the State of Maryland. Her research focuses on transportation operations, safety, and performance metrics for multimodal transportation systems through an equity lens. Dr. Chavis specialized in instructional technology, STEM education, and ABET accreditation. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020
roots of entrepreneurial spirit. Today he works at CELONIS. As a business development manager he brings innovative technology to businesses around the globe.Eric Reynolds Brubaker, Stanford University Eric is a PhD student in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford interested in engineering design, manufactur- ing, entrepreneurship, and engineering education. From 2011 to 2016, Eric worked at MIT D-Lab where he co-developed and taught two courses and was a lab instructor in Mechanical Engineering. Addition- ally, he managed the MIT D-Lab Scale-Ups hardware venture accelerator supporting full-time social en- trepreneurs primarily in Sub-Saharan Africa and India. Eric has worked extensively in less-industrialized
STEM program to prepare pre-service teachers to become K-12 technology and engineering educators. His research involves engaging college students in human centered design and improving creativity. He also develops nanotechnology based lessons that integrate the STEM disciplines. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Design through empathy: how low vision simulators can be used to engage students in better design solutions (Academic Practice/Design Interventions) INTRODUCTION: One of the objectives of a first-‐year engineering design course is to engage students in a real engineering design project. The team project typically
demographics and engineering identity.References[1] ASEE. (n.d.) “Going the distance: Best practices and strategies for retaining engineering, engineering technology and computing students”. Washington DC: ASEE.[2] LSU BIOS, www.lsu.edu/science/bios/. Accessed 5 Feb. 2018.[3] Gillock, K. L., and Reyes, O. (1999). “Stress, support, and academic performance of urban, low income, Mexican–American adolescents”. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 28(2): 259–282[4] Murtaugh, P. A., Burns, L. D., and Schuster, J. (1999). “Predicting the retention of university students.” Research in Higher Education 40(3): 355–371.[5] Perrine, R. M. (1999). “Stress and college persistence as a function of attachment style.” Journal of the First Year Experience
Research Triangle Educational Consultants. She received her Ph.D.in Educational Research and Policy Analysis from NC State University in 1996. She also has an MBA from Indiana University (Bloomington) and a bachelor’s degree from Duke University. She specializes in evaluation and research in engineering education, computer science education, teacher education, and technology education. Dr. Brawner is a founding member and former treasurer of Research Triangle Park Evaluators, an American Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the Amer- ican Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Extension Services Consultant for the
were a large number of remedial English students amongthe incoming freshmen in both Fall 2012 and 2013, with an increase in both the number ofstudents and the number of remedial English students in 2013. The percent and numbers ofremedial English students vary by discipline from none in Biomedical and Materials Engineeringto 60% of the incoming Industrial Technology freshmen. There were differences in ethnicity aswell (see Table 2). The largest ethnicities among the remedial English engineering freshmenwere African-American, Asian, and Latino/a. At SJSU, African-American and Latino/a studentshave lower retention and graduation rates.Table 1. Incoming Fall 2012 Freshmen remedial in English by Major Fall
Paper ID #11547Design of an extended engineering curriculum to increase retention and eq-uityProf. Diane Grayson, University of Pretoria Diane Grayson is Extraordinary Professor of Physics at the University of Pretoria and Director: Institu- tional Audits at the Council on Higher Education, which is responsible for quality assurance in higher education in South Africa. She designed the ENGAGE program when she was academic development manager in the Faculty of Engineering, Built Environment and Information Technology at the University of Pretoria. ¨Dr. Erika Muller, University of Pretoria, RSA Dr Erika M¨uller