Paper ID #26654The Impact of Integrating Making Activities to Cornerstone Design Courseson Students’ Implicit Theories of Making AbilityMr. Mohamed Galaleldin, University of Ottawa Mohamed Galaleldin is a Professional Engineer and a PhD candidate - at the University of Ottawa, On- tario, CA. He is interested in investigating the impact of integrating a maker curriculum to engineering design education.Dr. Hanan Anis, University of Ottawa Hanan Anis holds an NSERC Chair in Entrepreneurial Engineering Design and is a professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Ottawa. Prior to Joining the
Systems Group in Poughkeepsie, NY in z Systems Firmware Development. Her current interests include recruitment and retention of women and under-represented students in STEM, integrative training for graduate teaching assistants, and curriculum innovation for introductory programming courses.Hyun Hannah Choi, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Hannah Choi is an assistant director of assessment and curriculum design at the Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learning. She collaborates with faculty to conduct research, program evaluations, and learning outcomes assessments pertinent to innovative curriculum designs and educational technologies. She is responsible for fostering continuous improvement in teaching
Undergraduate Professor Award, ASEE Chemical Engineering Division Raymond W. Fahien Award, and the 2013 and 2017 ASEE Joseph J. Martin Awards for Best Conference Paper. Dr. Cooper’s research interests include effective teaching, conceptual and inductive learning, and integrating writing and speaking into the curriculum and professional ethics.Dr. Lisa G. Bullard, North Carolina State University Dr. Lisa Bullard is an Alumni Distinguished Undergraduate Professor and Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at North Carolina State University. She received her BS in Chemical Engineering from NC State and her Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University. She
Paper ID #27409Identifying Phenomena and Developing Sustainable Engineering EducationalModules that Integrate STEM Education Best Practices and Next GenerationScience Standards for Middle School Science TeachersMr. Michael Lorenzo Greene, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Michael Greene is a PhD Student at Arizona State University. He is pursuing his degree in the Engineering Education Systems and Design program, concurrently while pursuing a Master’s degree in Engineering. Michael graduated with his B.S. in Mechanical engineering from University of Pittsburgh in April of 2018. His research interest lies in diversity
GIFTS: Fostering Racial Identity Development, Self-Efficacy, andInstitutional Integration to Promote the Success of African American Male First Year Students Karl W. Reid, Ed.D.IntroductionAfrican American males attending four-year colleges and universities graduate at lower ratesthan most other demographic [1]. However, Black males and other students who perceive highlevels of institutional integration (i.e., faculty contact, peer cohesion and congruence with themainstream of campus life) are more likely to graduate [2], [3], [4].In-college perceptions and experiences [6] may interact with perceived self-efficacy [7] andracial identity attitudes [8] to idiosyncratically moderate
curriculum will be the basis to understand the system level approachof specifying, breakdown, hardware/software development, and integration of an embeddedsystems course. In such a course students typically explore microprocessor architecture,instruction sets, interfacing, and real-time programming techniques in assembly language.Laboratory exercises usually consist of system level development in serial and parallel datatransfer, data acquisition, and analog input and output signal processing. The most commonchips used in microprocessor courses are the Motorola HC11/12 or the Intel 8051. Figure 1Figure 1 shows how a four year EET curriculum would map out introducing the integratedAnalog and Digital
, she developed a passion for undergraduate education. This passion led her to pursue a career as a lecturer, where she could focus on training undergraduate chemical engineering students. She has been teaching at UK since 2015 and has taught Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Computational Tools and the Unit Operations Laboratory. She is especially interested in teaching scientific communication and integration of process safety into the chemical engineering curriculum.Prof. Samira Azarin Samira Azarin is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at the University of Minnesota. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technol- ogy in 2006 and went
integrating selected ST and SE topics in a sophomore-level design course [14-17], thispaper outlined a possible approach to translate that effort to other stages within an undergraduatemechanical engineering program, specifically at the freshman-level.The baseline STSS results reported here highlight the potential of the proposed intervention tosignificantly improve students’ abilities in ST and SE. For example, average post-testperformance on technical questions was only 53%, indicating plenty of room for learning andimprovement. In addition, the difference in results between the two sections of the STSS –namely, significant change in students’ self-efficacy (perception) vs. no significant change instudents’ performance (direct measure) – emphasizes
that are appropriate to the course.Conclusions and Future EffortsThis paper describes the development, implementation, and initial assessment process effortsundertaken by a multi-disciplinary team responsible for the US Air Force Academy’sApplications of Engineering Methods outcome. Ultimately, the team succeeded in developing anoverarching objective and eight (8) proficiencies for an engineering outcome, aligning corecourses to the proficiencies, and integrating an explicit cross-discipline problem solving process.As USAFA moves forward with its revised outcomes, the AEM team will continue to look atmeasures and methods to better assess the core engineering curriculum to produce more capablegraduates. In particular, additional data will be
at the University of New Haven where she is currently teaching in the Tagliatela College of Engineering and coordinating a college-wide initiative, the Project to Integrate Technical Communication Habits (PITCH).Jenna Pack Sheffield, University of New Haven Jenna Sheffield holds a PhD in Rhetoric, Composition, and the Teaching of English from the University of Arizona. Sheffield is currently an Assistant Professor of English at the University of New Haven where she also directs the Writing Across the Curriculum program. Her research in composition pedagogy and theory and writing program administration has appeared in publications such as Computers and Com- position International, Computers and Composition Online
adapt to enable the best intellectual development and character building. While CharlesBabbage designed the first mechanical computer as early as 1822 [1], the digital computersare relatively new and have been with us since the 1930s [2]. In recent years, computerprogramming has shifted from being a skill for an elect few computer scientists to enteringthe main stream of education [3]. At the United States Coast Guard Academy (USCGA), learning computer programminghas been an integral part of the Electrical Engineering curriculum for decades. While initiallyfocused on hardware-friendly languages like C and C++, this was later expanded to includeMATLAB and C#. In keeping with the principle of continuous improvement and providing ourstudents
students to embrace more elaborate, discipline-specific, critical thinking requiredof them in future courses. At sophomore, junior, and senior levels, courses were selected forcritical thinking, and professional ethics emphasizes. The students were encouraged to use criticalthinking skills to analyze requirements and constraints which would apply for advanced real-worldproblems. Significant improvement in critical thinking skills of students have been achievedthrough this sequence. An integrated thinking approach is adopted by Katz [3] to bridge the educational gapbetween analytical and design thinking for mechanical engineering students. The suggestedapproach is implemented by reforming science engineering courses by stressing the
systemsprogramming. The low minimum value indicates that a few are still not sure, even after passing thatproject and the embedded systems course. Question 5 tries to make students be comfortable in thinking about microcontrollers and theircapstone project along with the fact that they have taken embedded systems course with itschallenging final (car) project. A low value of 2 indicates that the student group thinks their projecteither does not include an embedded controller or does not require programming them explicitly (suchas using a PLC or a similar device). However, all the projects done by the surveyed students had amicrocontroller either integrated into (such as the SCADA safety panel) or used as a discretecomponent requiring it be programmed
ethics module in Ethics Seminar course by assessing theimpact of the integrated e-learning module on: 1. knowledge of code(s) of ethics 2. using code(s) of ethics for ethical reasoning 3. conducting ethical reasoning 4. FE exam ethics section preparedness 5. ethical behavioral growthOnline Ethics ModuleThe University of New Haven developed a series of 18 online learning modules as part of their effort todevelop the entrepreneurial mindset of their engineering and computer science students [18]. Theuniversity’s plan is to integrate the modules into core engineering, and applied science courses and doesnot plan to use the modules outside off core classes. Content experts developed the modules with an onlineeducation
Antonio, Texas, 2012.[7] H. S. Saad, “Implementation and Assessment of New Techniques in Technical Writing.” ASEE Conferences, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.[8] F. Zhong and G. Hou, “An Integrated Curriculum for Technical Writing in Higher Education in China.” ASEE Conferences, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[9] T. Bridgeford and K. S. Amant, Academy-Industry Relationships and Partnerships, Taylor & Francis, 2017.[10] American Society of Civil Engineers, “Achieving the Vision for Civil Engineering in 2025,” ASCE, Reston, VA, August 2009.[11] American Society of Mechanical Engineers, “Vision 2030: Creating the Future of Mechanical Engineering Education,” ASME, New York, NY, September 2012.[12] ABET, retrieved from https://www.abet.org.[13
Paper ID #25863Participation in Small Group Engineering Design Activities at the MiddleSchool Level: An Investigation of Gender DifferencesJeanna R. Wieselmann, University of Minnesota Jeanna R. Wieselmann is a Ph.D. Candidate in Curriculum and Instruction and National Science Foun- dation Graduate Research Fellow at the University of Minnesota. Her research focuses on gender equity in STEM and maintaining elementary girls’ interest in STEM through both in-school and out-of-school experiences. She is interested in integrated STEM curriculum development and teacher professional de- velopment to support gender-equitable
with a variety of audiences. 2. To expose students to a diverse set of future career opportunities available to STEM PhD holders.With an immersive training experience in mind, the SciComm program integrated a variety ofknowledge-based learning activities about communication, practice with communicating, andpractical experience communicating with various audiences. Program participants also engagedwith peers, practitioners, and professionals throughout the program. The program curriculum included three primary components: a) bi-weekly seminarmeetings, b) communication challenges, and c) mentorship by University alumnus/a. The threecomponents were designed to integrate hands-on learning and practical application to helpstudents
State University course “provides an overview of the salient math topics mostheavily used in the core sophomore-level engineering courses.”4 “The course will also provide anintroduction to the engineering analysis software Matlab, which is used throughout theengineering curriculum. While time constraints will preclude a formal treatment of Matlabduring lecture, application of the software will be integrated with each laboratory assignment.”4Having taught the WSU course, the author wasconcerned the new model might resemble the WSUcourse too closely. Since both courses have a goal ofincreasing student
essential for sustaining successfulinterdisciplinary groups: 1) leadership and management, 2) effective communication, 3) personalrewards, training, and development, 4) appropriate resources and procedures, 5) appropriate skillmix, 6) positive and enabling environment, 7) individual characteristics, 8) clarity of a sharedvision, 9) quality and outcomes, and 10) respecting and understanding roles. An interdisciplinarygroup lacking in any of these ten characteristics is often what causes many higher educationinterdisciplinary collaborations to fail [3].Sustaining a longitudinal interdisciplinary research group. While the term interdisciplinarygenerally refers to the process of integrating two or more disciplines, it can also describe theissues that
dimensioning and tolerancing (b) Use of computer aided drafting and design software (c) Selection, set-up, and calibration of measurement tools/instrumentation (d) Preparation of laboratory reports and systems documentation associated with development, installation, or maintenance of mechanical components and systems (e) Basic familiarity and use of industry codes, specifications, and standards (f) Use of basic engineering mechanics (g) An integrating or capstone experience utilizing skills acquired in the programMET Baccalaureate DegreeAccording to ABET-ETAC requirements, the following student outcomes and curricular topicsare required in a baccalaureate degree:Student Outcomes (a) an ability to
experiences during the first several months areshown in blue font to highlight the adaptive nature of the AGEP-NC model, an important featureof “robust project design” in the Kezar and Eckel model of change. • Summer year 1: o Collect baseline data, refine evaluation plan and logic model o Recruit and select Fellows, develop Fellow curriculum, select readings and speakers o Announce project to participating departments and administrators and develop website o Meet with External Advisory Board for input and feedback on plans, baseline data, and evaluation plan o Select Student Leadership Council members • Fall year 1: o Fellows’ reading group
in the field of engineering. PBL has long been shown to be an effectivemethod for student learning and understanding, particularly if thoughtfully integrated throughoutthe curriculum [1] and if instructors include key features, such as meaningful inquiries,scaffolded assignments, and consistent feedback [2]. Other studies have shown that PBL is moreeffective in deeper retention of material, satisfaction of both students and professors, anddevelopment of professional skills than traditional lecture methods [3]. However, the overalleffectiveness of PBL, and experiential learning in general, may vary widely depending on thenature and structure of the teamwork [4].This study was conducted at the branch campus of Texas A&M University
productsrecently switched from systems engineering. of this effort included a comprehensive design report to Past designs have relied heavily on the work of previous include drawings, a model of the bridge, and a briefing toyears, which has led to stagnant performance at the client. The integrated design experience was augmentedcompetitions. Our hypothesis is that by entering different by formal classroom instruction in civil engineeringperspectives into the group at an early stage, a systems design and advanced topics in civil engineeringrevolutionary approach will ensue and overall performance component design. This 3.0 credit hour course meets a totalwill increase. The team did not
Engineering, UCL, in 2000, becoming a Senior Lecturer in 2006 and full Pro- fessor of Communications Systems Engineering in 2015. He received an MA in Teaching and Learning in Higher and Professional Education in 2016. From April 2012 to April 2016, he was on secondment to the UCL Engineering Faculty as the Director of the Integrated Engineering Programme, a cross-faculty curriculum review and revision of the undergraduate programmes. He is currently Vice-Dean (Eduction) in the UCL Faculty of Engineering Sciences and co-director of the Centre for Engineering Education, a joint central between UCL Engineering and the UCL Institute of Education. Professor Mitchell is a Char- tered Engineer, fellow of the Institution of
materials--students learn simple models that require many assumptions to use. Asstudents advance in their studies and specialize, the models become more complex as fewerassumptions are made.Engineering science courses are typically taught with a lecture-based pedagogy and assignstudents sets of homework problems to engage them in practicing the course material outside ofclass time. Problem sets usually comprise problems from the course textbook or are written bythe professor. Although the number and length of problem sets varies by instructor, a problem settypically takes several hours of work (and in the U.S., a 3-credit-hour 12-week undergraduatecourse assumes 6 hours per week of out-of-class work). In an undergraduate curriculum, studentsare
of locating, discovering, and studying local, state, and federal regulations/codes. The curriculum is integrated with laboratory exercises that emphasize blueprint reading, quantity takeoff and learning software packages used in cost estimating and project scheduling and controls.”Table 1 summarizes major course parameters that may affect student engagement and learningfor falls 2017 and 2018. Except not using poll (2017) and using poll (2018), both semesters weresimilar for most of the parameters. The course content consisted of three parts: (i) projectmanagement concepts and cost estimating; (ii) project financial evaluation; and (iii) projectscheduling and controls. As the summative assessments of these three parts, three
, beliefs, self-regulation, and achievement.Min Tang, College of Education, Learning and Cognition Program,Florida State University The research interests of mine are: 1) to understand teachers’ pedagogical practices and the potential effects of those practices on students’ critical thinking and epistemic beliefs in engineering domain, 2) to quantify epistemically-related emotions that occur during the epistemic activity, 3) to explore the best pedagogical practices to improve the efficiency integrating classroom project-based learning and students’ real-world problem-solving practice. I have MS degree from Florida State University in Curriculum and Instruction and BA degree from China Nanchang University in English
4 N/A N/A 3.69 8 3.69 8 Evaluate the integrated circuit 2 N/A N/A 2 8 2 8 Identify mitigation options for ambient light 1 N/A N/A 1 8 1 8C. Surveys and Other Assessment MechanismsFormal surveys directly related to the use of AD2 units in these scripted laboratories were notoffered to students, but students did complete pre/post-project surveys affiliated with the follow-on wearable ECG design. These surveys, described in detail in an ASEE 2018 paper [23], askedstudents to rate their understanding of each of a number of topics according to a five-point Likertscale, where a “1” indicated no understanding and a “5” indicated full understanding
Paper ID #25362Intercultural Competency Differences between U.S. and Central Asian stu-dents in an Engineering Across Cultures and Nations Graduate CourseDr. Dena Lang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Lang is the Associate Director of the Engineering Leadership Research Program at Penn State Uni- versity. She holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering from West Virginia University, an MBA from Johns Hopkins University, and a PhD in Kinesiology with a focus on Biomechanics from Penn State University. Dr. Lang’s previous professional experiences and research interests range from mechanical engineering
Native Hawaiian and Pacific Island serving institutionAbstractThere is a need for public policy to be integrated in science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) education as it brings policy and social relevance into STEM classes withthe potential to increase engagement and success of students with STEM content. From theperspective of developing future engineers and scientists, an early emphasis on linkages to publicpolicy and societal issues can promote student buy-in, and prepare for future policy andadvocacy work that are, increasingly, a component of scientific and engineering careers. Fromthe perspective of the science and engineering community, early exposure to the responsivenessand integration of policy into STEM will increase