Technology for 12 years, and then returned to UIUC in 2015, where he teaches the Programming Languages and Data Structures courses. He has recently adopted Computer Science Education as his research focus.Mr. Lucas Anderson, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Lucas Anderson is a Specialist in Education at the Center for Innovation in Teaching & Learning (CITL) at the University of Illinois. He organizes the central campus teacher training program for the more than 800 new Teaching Assistants (TAs) Illinois welcomes each year. He continues to work with TAs throughout their graduate career by observing their classes, helping them collect and interpret feedback from their students, and shepherding them through
and STEM careers as well as the development of instruments and evaluation tools to assess these constructs.Dr. Euisuk Sung, Indiana University Euisuk Sung is a postdoctoral researcher at Indiana University. He earned a Ph.D. degree in Engineering and Technology Teacher Education at Purdue University. He has computer science degree and worked as a computer software developer for three years. then he served as an engineering and technology educator in high school for 9 years in South Korea. Currently he is working in NSF Funded project, titled TRAILS. His research interests are design cognition, maker education, computer science education, and all about STEM education.Dr. Adam V. Maltese, Indiana University
Paper ID #24976unique environment of working in an urban, all-boys school further ignited Anitra’s interest in increasingstudent achievement in STEM and the number of her students pursuing college degrees in science in en-gineering. Her experience at St. Benedict’s Prep led Anitra to pursue a master’s degree in education witha concentration in science teaching, learning, and curriculum at the University of Pennsylvania. Whileattending the University of Pennsylvania, she completed her thesis on the impact of teacher expectationsand norms on student interest in science as a career. In addition, she served as a science education con-sultant for the Drexel University School of Education/Philadelphia Public School System Partnership andhelped create
experiences, career pathway, and advice.Meanwhile, back in the classroom, engineering students typically focus on learning theoreticalconcepts and working on problem sets and receiving guidance from the professor and/or teachingassistants. Both academic and industry experiences help to shape students as they becomeengineers.There has been some research on how male and female engineers and engineering students differin their experiences. Since women remain a largely untapped resource in meeting the demand fora skilled scientific workforce, it is important to understand why they remain underrepresented inboth engineering programs and industry. While considerable attention has been paid in theliterature to the issue of attracting and retaining more
easier to form.Theoretical Frameworks used to examine impacts LLCs have on FYECSTinto’s Interactionalist Theory of Student Departure is a common theoretical framework used toanalyze why students leave college [2], [3], [9], [11], [13]. Tinto believes students’ success incollege is based upon their preparation for higher education, and their environment in college[14]. Tinto’s research found that LLCs tend to create their own support groups, and spend moretime outside of class together than non-participants. This type of supportive relationship provesthat LLC participants gain more than just a deeper understanding of their course material [9].Similarly, Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) from Lent, Brown, and Hackett is used toexamine how
Paper ID #25694The 5Ws of the Third Edition of the Civil Engineering Body of KnowledgeDr. Kenneth J. Fridley, University of Alabama Kenneth J. Fridley is the Senior Associate Dean for the College of Engineering at The University of Alabama. Prior to his current appointment, Fridley served as Professor and Head of the Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering at the University of Alabama. Dr. Fridley has been recognized as a dedicated educator throughout his career and has received several awards for his teaching efforts, including the ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education) Leadership Award
American Society for Engineering Education, 2019An Advanced Teaching Methodology to Improve Student Learning Outcomes in Core Discipline Content and Soft Skills AbstractThe research paper addresses the existing gap between employers’ expectations and thecompetencies of college graduates. According to recent reports, there is an increasing need toadopt new methodologies in teaching to help students improve their career readiness.Contemporary requirements to engineering workforce, besides the core discipline skills, includeproficiency in complex open-ended problem solving, interdisciplinary collaboration, andmanagement and leadership skills.The proposed methodology is based on a role-play
from those impacting urban poor. While both groups of students must tackle financial,academic, and social barriers to achieving a STEM degree, geographic isolation impacts the ruralpoor in particular ways that can affect their academic careers. PTG seeks to better understand thesebarriers and to tailor academic and social support initiatives so that these students may thrive incollege. This section summarizes what is known about rural, low-income STEM students, howexisting retention initiatives may be adapted to support these students, and how PTG maycontribute to this knowledge base.Rural Arkansas continues to struggle economically, which has greatly limited K-12 academicofferings for its students. Urban migration has meant an eroding tax
Paper ID #26879STEM Engagement through Mentoring: Motivations of STEM MentorsDr. Jerrod A. Henderson, University of Houston (CoE & CoT) Dr. Jerrod A. Henderson (”Dr. J”) is an Instructional Assistant Professor in the Cullen College of Engi- neering at the University of Houston. He joined the University of Houston after six years as a chemical engineering faculty member at the University of Illinois. He has dedicated his career to increasing the number of students who are in the pipeline to pursue STEM careers. He believes that exposing students to STEM early will have a lasting impact upon their lives and academic
a Professor of Engineering at Calvin College, Grand Rapids, Michigan. She earned an M.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, with research in protein engineering. Her current research interests include retention, diversity, and career pathways among engineering students and professionals.Joanna Wright, University of Washington Joanna Wright is an M.Ed. student in Learning Sciences and Human Development at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her education research interests span early childhood through higher education, with a focus on the impact of pedagogical practices and contexts on learning and development.Lauren Summers, University of Washington Lauren
highly desirable, asexposure to such role models is known to increase STEM interest among girls. Several outreachevents and similar education programs are described in the literature, with most reportingincreased STEM knowledge and interest among participating girls. Interestingly, the majority ofresearch studies related to STEM outreach have middle school students as participants. However,the results of several studies show that girls should be exposed to STEM in the 10 to 13 years oldage range, when career goals are still undecided. It is this younger group of girls that receives theattention of GEE.STEM Role ModelsLee and Anderson [12] found that middle school students were about three times more likely toname a male mathematical role model
standards. Literature review showsthat academic success is linked to secondary education GPA and SAT or ACT scores.Literature review also suggests student success in engineering can be based on studentdemographics. These programs focus on students from primarily low income, under-represented ethnic backgrounds, and gender. These academic programs are somewhatremedial intended to improve student academic performance for success. Third, there arepre-engineering programs developed to improve student awareness as to the types ofengineering professions available through career exploration. These academic programs givestudents exposure to different disciplines such that they can decide what course of study isof interest. All of the information on STEM
choose between a career in professional baseball orengineering; with his father’s prompting, he chose engineering: “And so my dad maybe didn’twant to see me do that, to be working as a janitor. Which I am not saying anything, it’s a job atthe end of the day, but I had the opportunity to pursue a career so why would I not follow thatpath?” For Francisco, the decision to pursue engineering was a decision rooted in economicstability, which he referenced more than once in his interviews. The decision was also verystrongly influenced by his father, who was also an engineer; this will be explored in more detailin a later section.Two ME students, Elisa and Alfonso, also expressed career-oriented aspirations. In her account,Elisa emphasized her affinity
with whether those students eventually leaveengineering. We use this information to compare students who stayed in engineering againstthose who left using quantitative data on how certain and interested they initially were inengineering as well as qualitative responses describing why they switched disciplines or leftengineering.IntroductionAs STEM students and workers gain national attention, a growing body of research seeks toexamine why students choose to pursue STEM-based majors as demonstrated in many previousreports [1]-[4]. Supporting this growth, the National Science Board put together a reportexamining the STEM pipeline, the process of students moving from early education, throughhigh school and college, and into STEM careers [5
summer, along with activities focused on issuesin STEM pedagogy and engineering career readiness. Professional development took placethrough an orientation session, weekly Wednesday lunch talks, and Friday curriculumdevelopment sessions. Sustained academic year interactions helped to ensure translation of RETknowledge and experience to the classroom and dissemination to other teaching colleagues.The broad goal for this program was to build awareness of the utility of using engineering conceptsand skills in the teaching of math and science concepts in secondary education settings. In thisgoal the program fit with countless other programs across the country. The chief focus of thisprogram was tuned more specifically to enhance key competencies of
University Dr. Glenda D. Young Collins completed her doctoral work at Virginia Tech in the Department of Engi- neering Education. Her research interests include the role of university-industry partnerships in shaping student career expectations and pathways, the student to workforce continuum, and broadening participa- tion in engineering. Dr. Collins has worked as an Employer Relations Assistant for the VT Career and Professional Development office and has a B.S. degree in Industrial Engineering from Mississippi State University and Master of Industrial and Systems Engineering from Auburn University. She is a Gates Millennium Scholar. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
development of engineering standards (e.g., Engineering for USAll) and the growing number of public, private, and charter schools with engineering subjectsspeaks to an increasing interest in integrating engineering in the K-12 curriculum. However,because such efforts are not yet widely implemented, monitoring K-12 efforts of broadeningparticipation at the national level is unlikely. The same can also be said for informal engineeringeducation (outreach programs, museums, toys, etc.), which is also a prominent form ofparticipation in engineering at the K-12 level.After compulsory education, those wishing to pursue engineering as a career then proceed tohigher education. Here, this can entail the completion of an associate's degree, bachelor’s degree
policy describe compelling reasons why new science,technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education pathways, able to supportachievement among the nation’s nontraditional and underrepresented minority students, areneeded. Specifically, policy recommendations emphasize that increased enrollment and retentionof student veterans in STEM degree programs is critical to our nation’s capability to reachrequired levels of future STEM workers [1]. Moreover, since many SVSM are women and/orunderrepresented minorities, recruitment and retention of SVSM along STEM career pathways isvital for diversifying, as well as strengthening, the nation’s STEM workforce [2-4]. As a group,student veterans and service members (SVSM) are considered well-suited
Paper ID #26141The NSF S-STEM Program 2010-2014 at Purdue University Northwest (Ex-perience)Prof. Harvey Abramowitz EngScD, Purdue University Northwest, Hammond BS Materials Science 1972 Columbia University MS Extractive Metallurgy/Mineral Processing 1975 Columbia University EngScD Extractive Metallurgy/Mineral Processing 1983 Columbia UnviversityMr. Roy L. Hamilton, Purdue University Northwest Throughout his career Roy L. Hamilton has been an advocate for providing the leadership and resources that promote educational opportunity for those who have traditionally been excluded from the American educational mainstream
-- in part,because our existing science and engineering programs cannot handle the number of studentswho state an interest in science” [7 p. 9]. This prescriptive curriculum can make it more difficultto enter throughout their career or to repeat courses without delaying graduation [8].While quantitative studies have been completed to point to factors that decrease success inengineering curriculum, little work has been done to understand the factors that underlie theissues. The question of degree attainment is compounded by the intersection of multipleidentities a student carries- gender, ethnicity and first generation degree seeking status. Currentefforts are falling short to increase enrollment of women and marginalized groups. The currentbody
career in academia or industry, including the developmentof soft skills and increased confidence to articulate their technical ideas and knowledge. This approachcan be further extended to all STEM fields to enhance learner engagement in research-based tasks andincrease learning outcomes relating to creative and professional activities. Our results based on an IRB-approved survey indicate that 81% of the participants strongly agreed or agreed that attending the paneldiscussions increased their understanding of research topics related to the course materials. Furthermore,94% of the survey responders strongly agreed or agreed that working on a capstone report helped thembetter understand the process of creating a research paper, while 75% of the
applied Voice ofCustomer to engage students and faculty to identify the pilot program’s requirements. They usedthe lean six sigma process design tools and root cause analysis to identify the critical tosatisfaction characteristics and the factors that will positively impact success of the mentoringprogram. This is a work in progress and constitutes the first step in designing and piloting anengineering mentoring program. The program will be piloted in Fall 2019, based on the findingsfrom the Lean Six Sigma project. This program will provide mentorship to women engineersthroughout their college career as well as support them for a career in engineering in theworkplace.Key words: Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, STEM, Women
professional skills such as innovativeness, teamwork, communication, 1problem-solving and creativity [2]. Increasingly, universities and higher education institutionsare leveraging entrepreneurship education programs (EEPs) to expose undergraduate engineeringstudents to entrepreneurial environments in curricular and co-curricular settings [3].Expanding from a business school focus of venture creation [4], EEPs in engineering also placeemphasis on the development of entrepreneurial mindsets and behaviors in graduates. ManyEEPs seek to promote innovation and creativity in students pursuing both entrepreneurial andnon-entrepreneurial career paths [5]. To
curriculum development, and is passionate about giving students opportunities to make a difference throughout their academic career. As the EPICS Director of Instruction, Stephanie leads the EPICS pro- gram’s curriculum development, EPICS-Community College program, and program assessment efforts. She received her M.S.E.C.E. from Georgia Tech in 2013, and her B.S.E.E. from the University of Miami in 2012.Ms. Nicolle Sanchez, Arizona State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Adding the extra 5%: UGTAs Creating Value in the Classroom1. IntroductionThe undergraduate teaching assistant (UGTA) program at the Ira A. Fulton Schools ofEngineering at Arizona State University has
importance of family in influencing different aspects of students’academics. For example, it was found that students taking an indirect path to a four-yearinstitution are more likely to have their parents involved academically by monitoring schoolworkand influencing the student’s academic plans [13]. Additionally, students at two-year institutionswho subsequently transferred to a four-year institution had, on average, a higher socioeconomicstatus than those who did not transfer to a four-year institution [13]. Specifically related toparental influences, parental behaviors were found to be related to a student’s career decision-making self-efficacy, or how strongly the student believes that they can complete the necessarytasks to make career
websites to identify and select an engineering educationprogram that supports their diverse interests. Traditional disciplinary engineering curricula areoften perceived as limiting for some students. However, multidisciplinary engineering orinterdisciplinary engineering education programs provide opportunities for students to pursueengineering as a career that aligns with their interest, career goals, and a space to establish a senseof belonging. Prior studies have broadly examined what influences students to select engineeringas a major; however, little work has explored what influences students in their decision making totransition to an interdisciplinary engineering education program. In this work-in-progress paper,we describe our preliminary
encountered circuits.applications in their discipline often struggle to draw This natural progression first prepares students withconnections between the theoretical concepts from their necessary skills that are applicable to any engineeringintroductory courses and those specific contexts in which discipline and then with more specific tools that are relevantthey might apply those concepts in their future careers. in any ECE area of focus. Students may then later specializeAs such, these students frequently struggle with relating within their field by strategically choosing technical electiveto their courses and may become discouraged or doubt courses in the last two
. Previous research supports science self-efficacy asbeing positively associated with achieving science literacy (Bryan, Glynn, & Kittleson, 2011)and science achievement (Britner & Pajares, 2001). This study examines if exposing students toyoung model “engineering experts” would impact middle schoolers’ science self-efficacy. If so,the motivation for k-12 teachers to invite engineers into their classroom is two fold. It increasesstudents’ awareness of engineering careers as well as increases student’s achievement in science.But would such a short intervention have an impact? Students were surveyed at the beginningand end of a one day event at Washington State University, which included “engineering experts”who interacted with the students in
. David S. Greenburg, The Citadel Dr. Greenburg is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Leadership and Program Management (ELPM) in the School of Engineering (SOE) at The Citadel. He served over 20 years of active military service, achieving the rank of Lieutenant Colonel, United States Marine Corps. During his military career he served in a variety of progressively responsible command and staff and leadership positions in Infantry, Logistics, Acquisition, and Human Resources; with peacetime and combat experi- ence. Upon completion of active military service, Dr. Greenburg served in program leadership positions at Eagan McAllister Associates, and Science Applications International Corporation until
tracked for five semestersbeyond.Foundationally, this engineering major discernment study is theoretically founded in SocialCognitive Career Theory (SCCT) to consider students decisions14-15. SCCT is used to evaluate thegoals, outcomes expectations, and self-efficacy beliefs14. An engineering education based studyon engineering major discernment used SCCT by VanDeGrift and Lao reported that courseprojects, faculty advisory interactions, and other laboratory experiences were influential inengineering major selection. The current study expects to reveal that other targeted courseexperiences would likewise influence students16.Research Questions: 1. How effective is the engineering informed decision making module at meeting its intended goals