Paper ID #47640The Power of Movement: Exploring Gestures as Tools for Engineering StudentsConceptualizing StatisticsMr. Junior Anthony Bennett, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Junior Anthony Bennett is a Graduate Research Assistant and Lynn Fellow at Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA. He is pursuing an Interdisciplinary Ph.D. program in Engineering Education majoring in Ecological Sciences and Engineering (ESE). His research focus is the ’Impact of Extended Reality (XR) Technologies on Learning’. He worked for over a decade in higher education and held multiple positions of responsibilities
Paper ID #45494Study Historical Cases, Learn Today’s Tools, and Prepare for the FutureDr. Jason Yao, East Carolina University Dr. Jianchu (Jason) Yao is a Professor with the Department of Engineering at East Carolina University (ECU), Greenville, North Carolina, USA. He is currently the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs of the College of Engineering and Technology. He received his Ph. D. degree in electrical engineering from Kansas State University in 2005, after which he joined ECU as a founding faculty member. His educational research interests are laboratory/project-driven learning and integration of research into
Paper ID #48786The Design and Successful Implementation of Anonymous, Informal, Mid-SemesterFeedback for Improving Undergraduate Engineering EducationDr. Lucas Buccafusca, Johns Hopkins University My name is Lucas Buccafusca. I am currently a teaching faculty at Johns Hopkins University in Electrical and Computer Engineering. I received my Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, earned my Masters in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2017 and my Bachelor’s degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering in 2013 from
Paper ID #48415Toward a Critical Framework for AI Tool Selection and Adoption in AcademicResearch Contexts: Reflections from the Brown University Critical AI LearningCommunityMr. Jason Cerrato MA, MSLIS, PhD Student, Brown University Jason Cerrato (he/his) is an Instructional Librarian at Brown University (Providence, RI) and a STEM generalist supporting students and researchers across a range of disciplines. In addition, he also concurrently serves as the university library liaison to the Chemistry Department and School of Engineering. Prior to employment at Brown, Jason worked as the coordinator of Online Learning and
and entrepreneurially- [28] Vertically-Integrated Learning: minded engineers through a vertically-integrated spine ofDeveloping Whole-Person and interactive courses in the first, second, third and fourth yearsEntrepreneurially-Minded … we discuss our approach to early engagement andEngineers vertically-integrated teaching and learning in the School…”Examination of Environmental “…The purpose of this study is to examine the current state [29]Engineering Topics Taught in of environmental engineering topics taught at all elevenUnited States Federal Service Federal Service Academies and Senior Military Colleges…”Academies and Senior MilitaryCollegesFramework for Defining
with the Servingness Framework in mind, weemployed framework analysis [2], [3], [4] to identify which, if any, elements of the servingnessframework were represented in engineering education graduate program recruitment slides aspart of the multi-institutional graduate program showcase.BackgroundThis section provides an overview of the concept of servingness and how it has been appliedwithin the literature. We also give additional background on the multi-institutional graduateprogram showcase including its intended goals and an overview of the instructions provided tograduate programs about how to prepare their respective presentations that are the subject ofanalysis for this study.ServingnessThe concept of servingness was developed by Garcia
Paper ID #47053BOARD # 410: NSF RED: Engineering Pathways for Access, Community,and Transfer (EPACT)Anne FlesherDr. Ann-Marie Vollstedt, University of Nevada, Reno Ann-Marie Vollstedt is a teaching associate professor for the College of Engineering at the University of Nevada, Reno (UNR). Dr. Vollstedt completed her dissertation at UNR, which focused on exploring the use of statistical process control methods to assess course changes in order to increase student learning in engineering. Dr. Vollstedt teaches courses in engineering design as well as statics and runs the Engineering Freshmen Intensive Training Program. She is
Paper ID #46246Integrating Theory and Practice in Signals and Systems Education: A Lab-CenteredCurriculumDr. Mahdi Yazdanpour, Northern Kentucky University Dr. Mahdi Yazdanpour (Senior Member of IEEE, ABET PEV) is an Assistant Professor and the Program Coordinator of Mechatronics Engineering Technology as well as the Coordinator of the Institute for Student Research and Creative Activity at Northern Kentucky University. His research interests include Intelligent Mechatronic Systems, Human Robot Interaction, Brain Computer Interfaces, Mind-Controlled Systems, Medical Robotics, and Computer/Machine Vision. He has received
entrepreneurial identity development. Additionally, we enrich vocationalidentity theory by illustrating how engineering students navigate a dual identity that mergestechnical expertise with entrepreneurial ambitions [21]. With the growing emphasis oninnovation and entrepreneurship in engineering practice [22], engineers who -also identify asentrepreneurs might better focus on innovation and development, [23] and better positioned toevaluate ideas not only on technical merit but also from organizational and strategicperspectives[24]References[1] J. Wheadon and N. Duval-Couetil, “Elements of Entrepreneurially Minded Learning: KEEN White Paper,” The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 17–25, 2016.[2] R. Korte, “Identifying
senior capstone design course leaned more solidly towards“agree” than mean values from the sustainable civil engineering course. This slight trend showspositive support for our approach of including touchpoints of Envision coverage that buildknowledge into applying the system more fully in senior capstone design.Additionally, the assignment in senior capstone design (Figure 3) was utilized for departmentalcontinuous improvement and assessment of student outcomes. For the student outcome to“analyze the sustainable performance of civil engineering projects from a systems perspective,”this assignment scored 83% passing rate in AY 2022-23 and 100% passing rate in AY 2023-24.ConclusionTo support students in designing with sustainability in mind from
Paper ID #48907NSF EEC: Establishing UTRGV’s Center for Broadening Participation inEngineering: Engage, Educate, EnrichDr. Ala Qubbaj, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Ala Qubbaj, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Engineering & Computer Scienceˆa C¯ The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley aˆ C¯ Dr. Ala Qubbaj is the Dean for the College of Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (UTRGVLaura Benitez, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Dr. Laura Benitez serves as Associate Dean for Outreach and Student Engagement in the College of Engineering and Computer Science (CECS
students can approach these types ofapplications or having conversations with them afterwards to help them realize they have moreoptions than they think. We may not be able to guarantee that all students get to study their first-choice engineering major, but we should be better prepared to give them advice before and afterthey navigate these types of applications so they can align their preparation to their career goalsand have known alternative options in mind while making this tough decision.References[1] A. Van den Beemt et al., “Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 508–555, 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20347.[2] P. J. Palazolo, S. Ivey, and C. V
the basis of the creative nature ofengineering [4], [5]. Key aspects of engineering thinking include identifying contradictions(logical, technical, or physical) and applying imagination. This leads to the transformation ofideas into tangible technologies, balancing technological, ethical, and aesthetic considerations toachieve desired outcomes. In contrast, critical thinking allows engineers to re-approach oldproblems with creativity, flexibility, and a desire to improve the world around them. Engineeringthinking, on the other hand, is done with the activity of design or production in mind. Thinking isan active process for engineers which is quite different from philosophical thinking, whichrequires a contemplative posture of removing oneself
principles for equity-centered engineering education are therefore instructional infocus and address the development of equitable classroom environments, including equitableassessment strategies, and the need for assessment of equity content. To date, most publications on equity-centered engineering course implementationsdescribe efforts in engineering design or ethics courses and modules. This may suggest that anequity lens is only or most relevant in those courses; however, if the goal is to promote students’capacity for equity-minded engineering practice, educators must center equity in a variety ofimpactful courses across students’ academic paths [17]. Indeed, Leydens and Lucena [18] arguethat engineering science courses are perhaps the
/VR/MR) helped students to have a clear understanding ofthe engineering concepts that they had in mind. Also, students used this demonstration to receivespecific feedback from subject matter experts about their team projects. Finally, XRdemonstrations were used for the final presentation of the project to the instructor, classmates,and industrial guests.1-1. A geodesic dome for Mars habitation: The project was focused on determining how tocreate a habitable geodesic dome on the surface of Mars to advance the exploration andunderstanding of the planet. Adequately designing a habitat suitable for life on Mars would allowfor prolonged manned missions and further research. This can be beneficial to the future survivalof humanity, as Earth's
supported broadly into specific features related to learning. The findings provideempirical grounding for ways to build belonging-minded engineering environments.A unique finding related to belonging in this study was the way students defined competence inengineering as an aspect of belonging. Studies have shown relationships between students’ senseof belonging and feelings of self-efficacy and competence [6], and with academic performance inengineering [3], but this study shows how engineering students directly interpret the meaning ofbelonging. Many participants related belonging to some expectation of performance. Forexample, were they performing well enough, able to contribute, deserving of their status as anengineering student? Their responses
individualized to the student participants and each university-affiliated program.Low-resource design is another important skill expected of well-rounded engineers, though it toois often excluded in undergraduate curriculums. Low-resource engineering emphasizes creativityand user-centered design, which are transferable skills to many other career paths as well. Thepractice of designing technologies with low-resource communities in mind has been shown toincrease the equity, accessibility, and use of developed technologies worldwide [5]. Low-resource engineering design projects have benefited communities facing challenges such aspoverty, natural disasters, and inaccessibility to quality healthcare [6]. Future engineeringtechnologies have the potential to
Undergraduate Robotics EducationAbstractThe growing popularity of robotics education in undergraduate engineering programs gives rise toa demand for robotic technologies to facilitate learning in the classroom. Robotics undergraduatecurricula require platforms and tools that grow with the students, remaining accessible to earlyundergraduate levels while supporting the implementation of advanced algorithms. In this paper,we describe a software framework for educational mobile robotic platforms designed withundergraduate robotics education in mind. The MBot custom robot platform is capable ofexecuting a vast range of robotic and machine learning algorithms using a variety of sensors. Oursuite of open-source tools is designed
leadership role in a couple different areas on campus. Seeing her do what she does in her roles really motivated me.For other students, they craved building community away from engineering: I already spend my school work time doing all that engineering stuff, going to office hours, and even helping friends or people who ask me when I'm at these office hours. Getting away from that engineering community is like a good break because I don't want to always just be around engineers. You want to feel connected to them and you want to understand them. And myself being Asian American, I met so many kind of like-minded people, like second-generation immigrants you know in this organization. And I felt
taxonomy for teaching, learning, and assessment, 2001. [4] Center for Socially Engaged Design. Socially engaged design process model. https://csed.engin.umich.edu/socially-engaged-design-process-model, 2020. [5] J Johnson. Designing with the mind in mind: simple guide to understanding user interface design guidelines. Morgan Kaufmann, 2020. [6] C Wickens, Lee J, Liu Y, and Becker G. An Introduction to Human Factors Engineering, Second Edition. Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004. [7] MR Endsley. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human factors, 37(1):32–64, 1995. [8] SG Hart. Development of nasa-tlx (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Human mental workload/Elsevier, 1988. [9] M Glinz
education is no longer traditional. We must engage in civic dialogues to understandwhat keeps students awake at night and provide hands-on experiences that set us apartfrom other institutions. It is not just about the degree they will earn; prospective studentsneed to see the value we offer. As Stephen Covey suggests in Habit 2, we must help them'Begin With the End in Mind' [2] and be there with them to help achieve successes alongthe way. Education is no longer linear; students need to feel a sense of belonging.Index Terms – Engineering technology, technology, gender, women, mentorship,connectedness, innovativeness, belonging, career preparation, recruitment, students,universities.I. INTRODUCTIONPurdue Polytechnic Columbus is more than just an
Paper ID #48024Student Teamwork Experience in a Hands-on Robotics CourseDr. Xiaoxiao Du, University of Michigan Xiaoxiao Du is a Lecturer and Adjunct Assistant Research Scientist at the University of Michigan. She teaches robotics courses and supervises multidisciplinary teams and design experiences. She is interested in promoting student learning and team collaboration through innovative curricular design and data-informed evaluation.Dr. Robin Fowler, University of Michigan Robin Fowler is a Technical Communication lecturer and a Engineering Education researcher at the University of Michigan. Her teaching is primarily
Paper ID #45458Metaphors Matters: the implicit epistemology of how we talk about learningengineeringProf. Katherine Goodman, University of Colorado Denver Katherine Goodman is an associate teaching professor at the University of Colorado Denver in the College of Engineering, Design, and Computing. She also serves as the University’s Director of the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning. Her research focuses on transformative experiences in engineering education. She has served as program chair and division chair of the Technological and Engineering Literacy - Philosophy of Engineering (TELPhE) Division
engineeringdesign for disability research papers to refer to individuals with disabilities, as well as torecommend which words to continue to use in practice. Designing with the disabled communityin mind, such as through universal design or designing assistive devices, is a wide field ofinquiry. As we teach our students about designing for disability, language is crucial. In asystematic review of engineering education papers, we identified those examining the outcomesof course-based engineering design projects related to disability and extracted all references todisabled folks. To determine acceptable use of these terms, we conducted a survey of the phrasesused more than once alongside a random sample of single-occurrence terms. Participants (n=53),with a
Paper ID #46355”Nothing About Us, Without Us”: Co-Designing an Accessible EngineeringEducation Tool with the Blind and Low Vision (BLV) CommunityAya Mouallem, Stanford University Aya Mouallem (she/her) is a PhD candidate in Electrical Engineering at Stanford University. She received a BEng in Computer and Communications Engineering from the American University of Beirut. Aya is a graduate research assistant with the Designing Education Lab at Stanford, led by Professor Sheri Sheppard, and her research explores the accessibility of introductory electrical engineering education to learners with disabilities. She is
Paper ID #48722BOARD # 35: Work-in-progress: Approaching Bioimaging Challenge Projectsthrough Scaffolding and Improved Time ManagementDr. Travis Carrell, Texas A&M University Dr. Travis Carrell joined the Biomedical Engineering faculty at Texas A&M University as an Instructional Assistant Professor in Fall of 2022. He had the privilege of participating in the curriculum redesign process, which enabled him to co-develop two of the common courses. The integration of engineering education projects within these courses has been a source of evaluation and improvement for the courses, as he and the other faculty within the
+𝑮+𝑩𝐼 = Sample intensity, 𝐼 = blank intensity, R = red value, G = green value, B = blue value,𝐴 = absorbance, 𝐶 = concentration, 𝑙 = pathlength, 𝜀 = molar absorptivityThis module was made with fourth year undergraduate students in mind, either to supplementlearning in an engineering course like reaction kinetics or biochemical engineering or it may beused as an introductory experiment for a wet lab like that associated with a unit operations or ananalytic chemistry course. The experiment features a common spectroscopy test for determiningblood glucose concentrations in biomedical blood analysis labs with two reactions in sequence,the first and rate determining step (13) being a reaction between glucose, oxygen, and theenzyme glucose
Engineering ForK 12 Students,” in 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Chicago, Illinois: ASEEConferences, Jun. 2006, p. 11.828.1-11.828.15.[4] N. Holstermann, D. Grube, and S. Bogeholz, “Hands-On Activities and Their Influenceon Students’ Interest,” Research in Science Education, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 743–757, Nov. 2010.[5] A. Cloutier, J. Dwyer, and S. Sherrod, “Exploration of Hands-On/Minds-On Learning inan Active STEM Outreach Program,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & ExpositionProceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2016, p. 26839.[6] S. Kanapathy and A. M. Azhari, “Exploration of the Experience of Hands-On Learningand Its Impacts on STEM Learning,” PED, vol. 155, no. 3, pp. 104–125, Nov. 2024.
teachings frame love as an active practice grounded in non-harming,interdependence, and mindful awareness—principles that resonate with ecological thinking andrelational ethics in design. They provide students with a lens to view engineering not merely astechnical work, but as an opportunity to cultivate compassion, relational awareness, and systemsthinking that support both environmental harmony and more-than-human flourishing.This interplay between emotion and action also aligns with findings in evolutionary biology andthe psychology of social behavior [90]. While natural selection has favored competition, it hasequally supported cooperation, generosity, and prosocial tendencies [91]. In How the MindWorks, Steven Pinker frames this balance as a
mentors. This larger scale adds a layerof complexity to the program's logistics, requiring more coordination to ensure meaningfulinteractions and effective mentorship for all participants.Program logistics involve several tasks that the course faculty and Program Coordinator mustcomplete to ensure a successful experience for the students. These tasks include the following: 1. Identifying and Recruiting Ideal Mentors With the goals of the mentoring initiative in mind, we leveraged existing professional networks to recruit engineers who embody key characteristics essential for successful mentorship. Ideal mentors are: • Local practicing engineers, • Professionals with technical expertise aligned with the students