training Page 24.58.9includes mainly technical issues, uninfluenced by ethical, aesthetic, political and epistemologicalconsiderations. Working with them demanded continuous monitoring in the face of resistance toreflections about education and the role of the teacher in contemporary engineering. It is fair tosay, though, that their own training does not help them to conduct group work, or encouragethem to invest in the collective creation of knowledge.5. Discussion and future worksThe issues raised by this study suggest that it will be necessary to review the objective ofengineering generally and mechatronics specifically, as well as continually
economics and ethics, and graduate finite elements, numerical methods, thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, plasma fundamentals and gas dynamics.Bradley S. Davidson, University of Denver Bradley Davidson is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering and director of the Human Dy- namics Laboratory at the University of Denver. He holds a BS in civil engineering from Tennessee Tech, an MS in engineering mechanics from Virginia Tech, and a PhD in biomedical engineering from the Vir- ginia Tech–Wake Forest School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences. His research in musculoskeletal biomechanics emphasizes measurement of human movement and motor control, with applications in the lumbar spine stability, total knee
discussed during the presentation of final class projects projects,, so that green solutionsfrom the beginning of the project can be aachieved in the AEC industry. Also, guest lectures onsustainability, BIM technology, ethics, and green markets potential are delivered.Figure 2.. Schematic diagram for the proposed framework3Students in the proposed course are expected to gain (1) uunderstanding of green resources suchas building materials, building forms, and building systems, (2) hands hands-on on experience with BIM,especially 3D geometric models
6 Engineering Ethics 7 10 5 Graduate Studies Civil Engineering Community Engagement in Engineering Education 8 8 4 Multidisciplinary Engineering Two Year College Computers in Education 9 6 3 New Engineering Educators Environmental Engineering Mechanics Aerospace Mechanical Engineering 10 Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
directlymeasured. The aim for this unit of study is to raise awareness of the moral, ethical, social,economic, and environmental implications of using science and technology. Learning ObjectivesTo be able to fully answer the essential question and the address the project aim each student willneed to meet the three learning objectives listed below. 1. Describe the role of the data center in the functioning of the web 2. Identify inherent concerns in data center thermal management 3. Describe current and possible future strategies to address data center thermal management concerns. Foundational Learning ModulesThe Foundational Learning Modules drive the introduction of core content to meet the objectivesas well as promoting the
• Organization & Industry • Metacognition • Professional • Reflection and self-‐assessment • Ethical • Information and media literacy • Legal • Professional development • Security 10. INNOVATION / CREATIVE THINKING • Social • New and novel solutions to problems 5. PROBLEM SOLVING AND CRITICAL • Risk
constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability.This activity provides numerous constraints including component size, product rating, limitedproduct development time, limited manufacturing time, and fixed and variable costs associatedwith labor and materials. Assessment of this outcome can be based on whether or not teamswere able to make a profit on their design. (d) An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams.Multidisciplinary teams are formed out of the cohort of engineering physics and opticalengineering students in our class. Success in practice is only achieved through teamwork; byassigning a fixed cost per student for labor and keeping the
) (b.3) Analyze & interpret data from experiments (c) Design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs (e) Solve biomedical engineering problems (d) Function on multidisciplinary team (f) Ethical responsibility: Cite regulations and standards and credit work (g) Communicate effectively: written and
Paper ID #10226An inclusive process for developing a taxonomy of keywords for engineeringeducation researchDr. Cynthia Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Director of the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching Engineering and research associate professor in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan. She actively pursues research in engineering education and assists other faculty at U-M in their scholarly endeavors. Her current research interests include studying faculty motivation to change classroom practices, evalu- ating methods to improve teaching, and exploring ethical decision
. F., and Austin, S. “Adding Sustainability to the Engineer’s Toolbox: A Challenge for Educators.” Environmental Science and Technology, 2007: 4847-4850.4. Huntzinger, D. N., Hutchins, M. J., Gierke, J. S., and Sutherland, J. W. “Enabling Sustainable Thinking in Undergraduate Engineering Education.” International Journal of Engineering Education, 23(2) 2007: 218-230.5. Chau, K. W. “Incorporation of Sustainability Concepts into a Civil Engineering Curriculum.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, ASCE, 2007: 188-191.6. El-Zein, A., Airey, D., Bowden, P., and Clarkeburn, H. “Development of a Course on Environmental Sustainability, Ethical Decision-making and Communication Skills in Engineering
Paper ID #9841Assessment of Students’ Changed Spatial Ability Using Two Different Cur-riculum Approaches; Technical Drawing Compared to Innovative ProductDesignDr. Mark E Snyder, Illinois Institute of Technology Architectural Engineering Faculty at IIT. Creating and testing innovative classroom pedagogy for the last 10 years. Evaluating the link between visualization and improved abstraction skills to specific classroom activities. Investigating the connection between ethical judgement and academic motivation to improve the learning environment.Prof. Matthew Spenko, Illinois Institute of Technology
grade has a lower impact on their future, and have more confidence in their choice ofmajor than females in low representation majors. Compared to top enrollment majors, BIOE’sfeel they are struggling more with their courses and have less faculty support. BIOE females feelthey have a greater understanding and ethical responsibility, and confidence in their choice ofmajor compared to top enrollment females. Due to the consistency of these results a predictivemodel of choice of long-term engineering goal was created. Students who score highly onknowing an engineer as a reason for selecting a major, wanting a good potential salary, designingand building things, and their perceptions of the present were likely to be traditional engineers.Students
aspects of the project as compared to the first and second generationprojects and other typical capstone projects. Page 24.287.5Senior Design ProjectsNearly all of the latest ABET accreditation student outcomes (Criterion 3) for engineeringprograms are related to senior design projects.28 These include: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical
OutcomesUpon the completion of this project, students certainly gained some knowledge related to circuitdesign and collaborated with each other working toward a common goal. In addition, it can beclaimed that the project activity supports the following students outcomes set by ABET: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering; (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data; (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability; (d) an ability to function on
, including environmental, ethical, cultural, social, political, and economical aspects”;(b) seeks simplicity (as opposed to what Langdon Winner terms manifest and latent complexity); (c) chooses decentralization over authoritarian centralization; (d) employs labor intensive as opposed to capital intensive strategies; and (e) addresses itself to the unique characteristics of the surrounding community. Working with the marginalized and the poor does not imply charity. Rather, a true partnership with the community that is being served must be forged through a model where the community is involved in decision-making and management of projects. We understand this to be true for our
consider first-hand experiences with students.Identify desired attributes of graduates (such as Survey industry partners and department faculty.critical thinker, ethical) and desiredknowledge/skills of graduates (such as finiteelement analysis and communication).Identify objectives and constraints. CRC compiles.Benchmark other curricula. Review literature, explore university web sites, and invite seminar speakers.Generate concepts for new curriculum. CRC and department faculty and staff brainstorm.Select concepts for new curriculum. Departmental faculty and staff provide
with the opportunity to demonstrate the knowledge that they have gained in previousprojects. Students learned about various aspects of renewable energy including problemidentification, technical, social and environmental constraints, multidisciplinary teammanagement, communications and documentation skills. These projects also provided thestudents with an opportunity to view their designs from an ethical and sustainability awarenessperspective, thus realizing a lifelong learning opportunity. Through practice, the students realizedthat the key success to a design project is team work, industry interaction, and collaborations.Two renewable energy-related courses were developed and are being offered in the department.One of the courses is a
(Outcome E). A bigportion of the project deliverables was four to five presentations made both to the client and otherpeers at the program, and the writing of several technical reports. After each presentation, the teamreceived feedback from the faculty and peers on the content and delivery of the presentation andtheir technical writing skills. Each section of the final technical report was reviewed and gradedby the team mentor (Outcome G). One of the deliverables was the contextualization documentthat reports what significance the final design might have on the environment, health and safetyconcerns, economics, ethics, etc. (Outcome H). Based on the technical evidence and submitteddocuments, these outcomes were evaluated, and the faculty mentor
building, testing, operating andmaintaining laser and electro-optical devices and systems.2. Demonstrate critical thinking skills in applying basic photonics technology principles to solve Page 24.385.4technical problems.3. Exhibit effective oral and written communication skills, team work, and ethical andprofessional behavior in the workplace.4. Continue professional training and adapt to changes in the workplace through additionalformal and informal education.”Achievement of the PEO’s is supported by the Program Outcomes (PO) which capture whatstudents should know and be able to do at the time of graduation. Both PEO’s and PO’s werediscussed with
by a team of 4-6 students.Seven credit hours incorporate fundamental, practical and computational principles ofnanotechnology into the curriculum. This will allow the TLC to build the following professionalattributes: • Ability to work productively in a collaborative setting. • Knowledge of successful careers in the nanotechnology area to fill the future needs of industry. Students pursuing this track are equipped with key elements needed in industry, including computer modeling and simulation, laboratory experience, and design methodologies. • Ability to do scientific research and engage in discovery and scholarship. • Develop strong professional attributes, including ethical behavior in the workplace
although not free of frustrations. Faculty also observed the pedagogicalvalue of collaborative projects but there was no consensus as to if or how much extra work isrequired to administer them.1- IntroductionCapstone design projects, being the culminating experience of a typical four year engineeringcurriculum, present an opportunity to reinforce a number of critical soft skills that are deemedimportant in professional engineering practice. Such soft skills are outlined by the EngineeringCriteria of ABET1 relating to communications, teamwork, ethical responsibilities, contextualunderstanding, among others. A more extensive list of student outcomes, presented by the KernEntrepreneurship Education Network (KEEN), is aimed at fostering an
Paper ID #10188Investigation of High School Pathways into Engineering (work in progress)Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests include human-centered design learning and assessment, service-learning, ethical reasoning development and assessment, leadership, and
grouped into eleven subcategories see Table 1. below: Sorted Reported concept learned responses percent Cultural differences 33 52% German manufacturing methods 30 47% Technology and innovation 20 31% Living and working - Transportation 18 28% Time management - work ethic 14 22% Relationships and communication 14 22% Table 1. Sorted responses to open-ended question on concepts
31% to a B+ (89%). In the mid-semester evaluations for the Spring 2014course, 98% of students noted that working in a group has contributed to their understanding ofthe course material. Engineers in the workforce are constantly working with others on variousprojects. Another student explains that working in a group motivates students to stay on top oftheir work load as well as encourages them to produce higher quality work. This student states,“Working in a group allows me to work harder to guarantee that I do not let my partners down.”This accountability not only improves the students’ work ethic but also improves the way theyinteract with their peers. By exposing teamwork early in student engineering development theygain a sense of
) can include both written rulesand unwritten norms that govern interaction. These are necessary to mediate social orderand help regulate larger questions of justice, ethics, and morality. Division of laboracknowledges that subjects require the assistance of others to realize their goals and thatpower relations among subjects are often unequal.Identifying and Negotiating Contradictions While CHAT can be helpful in describing the component forces influencinghuman activity, it may be most useful in highlighting situations where these forces act incontradiction to each other [24]. The concept of contradiction in CHAT highlights pointsof tension, potentially creating transformative changes in activity patterns[12]. Engestromhighlighted
of our efforts toenhance graduates’ skills in communication, multidisciplinary teamwork, lifelong learning, andawareness of social and ethical considerations in addition to a firm grasp of science,mathematics, and engineering fundamentals. Page 24.873.7Future directions may include comparison of student performance in Senior Capstoneexperiences with or without participating in this model of long-distance collaboration.Figure 3: Student outcome assessment results. Percentage of students rating their perception of their ability for each outcome for one year without collaboration (2012) and one year with collaboration (2013). Each graph is
evaluated at the program level (during thecapstone project), or through performance in co-ops and based on surveys and feedback from theindustry (indirect measures). An example of the latter includes creative thinking and problemsolving skills, communication skills (both verbal and written), and ethical behavior. In someclasses, pre- and post-learning assessments were conducted, to identify the type and amount ofknowledge students started with, and compared to the amount they ended the class with, with theassumption that the difference represents what they have learned in this particular class. Thesepre- and post-learning tests served as a confirmation on the sufficiency and quality of the“supply” of knowledge students learned and retained from
thenecessity of methodologies for a wide range of processes to determine the best parameters forproduction of multiscale composites. Thorough understanding and further verification of thesemultiscale materials were attained through the application of statistical modeling of processesand property variations.CurriculumThe REU site guided students through a combination of seminars and lab experiences. Theseminars provided fundamental knowledge to assist in their research and included topics inResearch Methods and Ethics, Health and Safety, Statistical Analysis, Engineering DataAnalysis, Experimental Design, and the use of statistical software packages. Seminars onTechnology Entrepreneurship and Commercialization (TEC) were used to enhance
Page 24.953.3to situate each and all the unit processes on the site.The program outcomes mapped to this course include: • An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs • An ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams • An ability to communicate effectively • An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility • Knowledge of contemporary issues • A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in, life-long learningDescription of online modules and assessment of student’s mastery of materialAfter careful discussion between the prerequisite course instructor and the design instructor,specific topics were chosen that covered technical content required for the
, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability, and sustainability;(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams; and(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems.(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility;(g) an ability to communicate effectively;(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global,economic, environmental, and societal context;(i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning;(j) a knowledge of contemporary issues;(k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary forengineering practice.Additionally, Criterion 5-Curriculum states that: Students must be prepared for