research. Transdisciplinary research focuses on societalproblems. Therefore, the research process must take into account the ethical and social factors ofthe problem. Finally, the last category suggested by the developers in the framework isEffectiveness. As Legitimacy focused on the fairness and ethical aspect of the project in regardsto societal needs, Effectiveness of transdisciplinary will determine how the research will make apositive change in its context.Unlike Rubrics 1 and 2, this paper only presents a framework and a prototype rubric. The valuein the proposed Transdisciplinary Quality framework is that it can be used to determine whetheror not the selected project is meeting its research goal. While the researchers tested theframework on
in Education Conference, 252-258.[4] Matthews, M. R (2000). Time for Science Education. How Teaching the History andPhilosophy of the Pendulum can contribute to Science Literacy. New York. KluwerAcademic.[5] Davis, M (1998). Thinking like an Engineer. Studies in the Ethics of a Profession. NewYork. Oxford University Press.[6] Edels, H (1968).Technology in the sixth form. Trends in Education. No 10. London.Ministry of Education.[7] Vardy, P and Grosch, P (1994). The Puzzle of Ethics. 1st edition. London. Font/HarperCollins. p 17.[8] Yokomoto, C. F and Bostwick, W. D (1999). Modelling: the process of writingmeasureable outcomes for Ec 2000. ASEE/IEEE Proceedings Frontiers in EducationConference, 2B-1, 18-22.[9] Bloom B et al (eds) (1956
-learning 4.01 4.20 4.49 4.56 4.34 Critical thinking 4.21 4.38 4.19 4.40 4.31 Ethical judgment 3.95 4.15 3.98 3.99 4.01 Innovation/creativity 3.69 3.81 3.68 3.71 3.73 Technical writing 3.55 3.46 3.83 3.46 3.55 Technical presentations 3.29 3.01 3.39 2.94 3.11 Management skills 3.16 3.19 2.94 2.83 3.00 State Local National Local Skill/Qualification
efforts. This support of student internships is critical, as thenational trend is for increased student participation in internship or cooperative educationprograms. “In 1980, about one out of every 36 college students completed an internship prior tograduation. This increased to three out of four by the year 2000.” (Hurst 58)Prior to fall 2014, most divisional internship and co-op records were paper based. Work isunderway to streamline recordkeeping through the use of electronic databases. This has alloweddepartments to better evaluate student and employer success. The following graphs representemployer feedback for the following questions: 1. Did the internship student recognize professional, ethical and societal responsibilities
accountability for managing independent and group projects in a professional environment. I have seen these experiences pay off outside of CEDC, and I already know that the leadership skills I have acquired will continue to make a positive impact on my future. Leadership in CEDC has been a huge contributor to my development as a leader. It forced me to take ownership of a project and be a driving force within it. This sense of ownership is key to taking on more responsibilities.DiscussionUnlike typical students in the CEDC program, CEDC interns not only have an objectively higherlevel of responsibility for the ethical considerations and successful execution of projects but alsodevelop the aptitude to lead a team of
, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability). e) Ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. f) An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. h) Broad education to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context. i) A recognition of the need for, and have the ability to engage in life-long learning. k) An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.This means that a program will need more than one indicator (summative measure) for eight ofthe eleven SOs. Sample performance
. Be the faculty sponsor for the student chapter of the Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME). [Teaching/Advising Role] 4. Work with professors from the Materials Science Dept. on an NSF research project focusing on materials processing and manufacturing research (a topic of interest to all 5 of these faculty members). [Research Role] 5. Work with 2 other faculty members to develop a new Intro to Engineering freshmen course. Course to focus on interdisciplinary nature of engineering and emphasize ethics & societal values. [Teaching/Advising Role]Respondents were also provided brief biographical information about five faculty members whohave varying years of experience. All five of the bios indicate strengths
part of WPSI). The specific ABET outcomestargeted by this course are (c) “an ability to design a system, component, or process to meetdesired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political,ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability”, (f) “an understanding ofprofessional and ethical responsibility”, (h) “the broad education necessary to understand theimpact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context”, and(j) “a knowledge of contemporary issues”9.The purpose of this study is to begin to assess the effectiveness of the course and course structurein helping students learn the course topics. This first study will focus on two topics in
adopted in ET curricula spanning variousdisciplines by many institutes. 1, 2, 3 Prolific literatures discussing numerous projects successfullycarried out by students with various engineering and technological backgrounds have beenpublished with technical details. 4, 5 Since ET programs focus more on the application oftechnologies, emphasis on developing projects with industrial partners is becoming a trend andstudies have shown great success in many cases. 6, 7 Teaching methods and assessing mechanismsemphasizing different aspects that modern engineers and engineering technologists are facingsuch as time management, team work, communications, and ethics have also been developedand incorporated in these courses to resemble experiences in practical
be morechallenging. However, the two paper authors co-teach a module on Engineering CorporateSocial Responsibility. As a result of the Great Expectations Project, the learning objectivesassociated with this module have been amended so as to better emphasize the need forindividual and organizational social and ethical awareness. The assessment for this modulehas been altered to encourage graduate students to use their engineering and analytical skillsto work with non-profit heritage sites within the UK.In considering the individual and employment related drivers, one of the paper authors hasdeveloped and introduced a new graduate learning strategy which has been disseminatedacross the School of Engineering. Within this strategy, priority is
FARO Arm demonstration. No further instructions were given, otherthan some discussions occurring if there was a problem just like in the case of editing .stl files.The student faced a large time commitment over several months but acquired strong knowledgeand great amount of skills in 3D scanning, 3D data manipulation, and 3D printing, along withAFO design knowledge due to her strong work ethics and will to learn. The student’scompetency and confidence also improved. After completing this project, she took an internshipposition with a high-tech tissue simulation/phantom company and performed successfully withthe skill and knowledge gained from this project. Following ABET student outcomes are alsocovered in this independent study:(Outcome c) an
Michigan Technological University, an MBA from Keller Graduate School of Management, and his Ph.D. from Colorado State University. His research interests are in the areas of Nanotechnology, Fiber Optic Communications, Faculty Development, and Social and Ethical Implications of Technology. He is the author of many educational papers and presentations. He has authored/coauthored the following books: • Nanotechnology: Ethical and Social Implications (2012) • Technology and Society: Issues for the 21st Century and Beyond 3E, (2008) • The Telecommunications Fact Book and Illustrated Dictionary 2E (2006) • Fiber Optic Communication: An Applied Approach, Prentice Hall, N.J. (2002) • Technology and Society: A Bridge to the
proficiencies and understanding of ethical issues andprofessional responsibility2. Furthermore, adopted assessment procedures have beensuccessfully applied using Senior Exit Surveys to assess student outcomes through acomprehensive and integrated approach using both direct and indirect measures3. Understandingstudents through perception surveys is useful to improving engineering pedagogy as a means ofproviding insight into student development occurring during their engineering education4.Embedded indicators are widely accepted as an effective means of assessing student achievementas compared to adopted performance standards5. Use of course-based embedded indicators,detailed grading rubrics, and graded student performance scores compared to
. Developing an entrepreneurial mindset is an important part of our education of 1 5 3.4 undergraduate engineering students.11. Developing ethics and empathy for others is an important part of our education 2 5 3.8 of undergraduate engineering students.12. Developing an appreciation for the global context of engineering is an 2 5 3.9 important part of our education of undergraduate engineering students.13. Engineering education research and innovation is important at my
simulations, smart home technology and aging in place, and retrofitting existing homes to create net zero homes for aging in place.Mrs. Terri S. Krause, Purdue University Terri Krause is a second year PhD student in Learning Design & Technology, a Graduate Research Assis- tant in Purdue Polytechnic Institute, and is serving on the research and evaluation team for the Transdis- ciplinary Studies in Technology (TST) program. Her interests include adapting learning experiences for cross-cultural instructional and online instructional environments; with a values-based, ethical focus. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Systematically Integrating Liberal Education in a
ethically, making a genuineeffort to get to know others and build relationships, and self-sacrifice/servanthood.Summers et al. [3] identified several “soft skills” as being extremely important for engineersincluding: writing reports, team leadership, project and time management, and setting of projectdeadlines. There are many definitions of leadership and lists of skills, knowledge, and abilitiesexpected of leaders. Bowman and Farr [4] describe a leader as “someone who can influence anorganized group toward accomplishing its goals.” They emphasize that the literature supportfour key leadership traits: communication, teamwork, cultural awareness, and ethics.There are various leadership models and debates about what constitutes leadership. Similarly
University of Washington include introductory and honors courses in bioengineering, tissue and protein engineering lab courses, bioengineering ethics, leadership, and bio- engineering capstone writing and research/design courses. She is committed to enhancing diversity and inclusivity in engineering, and creating opportunities for undergraduate students to engage in K-12 educa- tional outreach. Dr. Hendricks has over a decade of experience leading educational outreach and summer camp programs at both Duke University and the University of Washington.Dr. Alyssa Catherine Taylor, University of Washington Alyssa C. Taylor is a lecturer in the Department of Bioengineering at the University of Washington. She received a B.S. in
that those feelings influence their thoughts, beliefs, and actions [17]. In engineering, weoften devalue the affective aspects of these discussions, and sometimes forget to bring up themoral/ethical aspects of our positions. This architecture develops the moral imagination ofengineering students by examining how their actions impact others.The ability to make meaning of complex, open-ended problems is critical to the success ofprofessional engineers in the workplace [18] and has been examined as a specific difficulty thatengineering students have [19]. The Four Voices architecture provides an alternative to simply"finding the best solution" to the issue being discussed. Instead, it asks participants to considerhow and why different parties
theirdiscipline knowledge.”8 Wasson also identified a need to integrate SE concepts, principles, andpractices into engineering programs. This will significantly upgrade the knowledge and skills ofnew engineering graduates to meet demands of the public and private workforce6.At the undergraduate level, the Western Kentucky University created a new SystemsEngineering (SE) Minor to upper division civil, electrical, and mechanical engineering9. Theintent is to prepare the student for their capstone design course. Their course consists of systemsengineering process, requirements, design fundamentals, subsystem fundamentals, trade studies,integration, technical reviews, and case studies and ethics. The minor in SE offers students toexpand their perspective on
assignments will follow t Bloom's taxonomy(Bloom 1956) where each new assignment moves to a higher level with each module. Forexample, Module 1 is descriptive and focuses on knowledge acquisition, Module 2 focuses oncomprehension and understanding of materials to formulate questions, Module 3 moves toapplication, while Modules 4 and 5 will focus on analysis, evaluation, and creation. With eachModule there will be a set of tasks undertaken and an assessment. The final product will be asynthesis of engineering knowledge and social, political, economic, and ethical considerations. Module 1: Introduction. New knowledge/ tasks: The social science professors and the engineering professor will discuss the role of computer technology in community
., an engineerinstilled with the entrepreneurial mindset) places product benefits before design features andleverages technology to fill unmet customer needs”. Skills associated with the entrepreneurialmindset include: effective communication (verbal, written, graphical), teamwork, ethics andethical decision-making, customer awareness, persistence, creativity, innovation, timemanagement, critical thinking, global awareness, self-directed research, life-long learning,learning through failure, tolerance for ambiguity, and estimation3. In order to prepare moreengineering students with such skills, the Kern Family Foundation has established the KernEntrepreneurial Education Network (KEEN), a network of institutions that are committed tochanging
provide opportunities for written and oral communications 4. To provide opportunities for working in teamsWhile the ABET outcomes addressed by this course are: 1. An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering: (a)- Reinforcement 2. An ability to design and conduct experiments as well as to analyze and interpret data: (b)-Emphasis 3. An ability to design a civil engineering system to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability and sustainability: (c)-Reinforcement 4. An ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams: (d)- Reinforcement 5. An ability to
; the ability to demonstrate ethical judgment andintegrity; intercultural skills; the capacity for continued learning, and general breadth of skillsand knowledge 5. Thus, having disciplinary knowledge is not enough. Today’s workplacerequires applying such knowledge towards analysis, decision-making, and problem solvingwithin a complex environment6-8. 2Formal Education and Computing Professionals’ Needs It is therefore unsurprising that, in the Computing Science Curricula 2013 final report, theJoint Task Force on Computing Curricula9 stated that The education that undergraduates in computer science receive must adequately prepare
Paper ID #20602The CASCADE Experience: An Innovative Cascaded Peer-Mentoring ProjectDr. Nael Barakat P.E., Texas A&M University, Kingsville Dr. Nael Barakat is a professor of Mechanical Engineering and Associate Dean for Research and Grad- uate Studies at Texas A&M University - Kingsville. He is a registered professional engineer in Ontario, Canada, and a fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). His areas of interest include Controls, Robotics, Automation, Systems dynamics and Integration, Mechatronics and Energy Harvesting, as well as Engineering Ethics, professionalism, and Education. Dr
combinedelectrical and mechanical engineering technology major, with several courses related torenewable energy, energy conversion, green energy manufacturing and sustainability. Our maingoal is to create a highly skilled professional workforce ready to “hit the ground running” aftergraduation and also having most of the qualities of a “global engineer”, a critical thinker and aninnovator which is in total agreement with ABET criterion c (“an ability to design a system,component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic,environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability”)[7], [8]. During the past 8 years, our ET program developed courses oriented towards energyconversion
management, Hangzhou Dianzi University 2007-2012 Associate Pro- fessor, School of management, Hangzhou Dianzi University 2005-2007 Assistant Professor, School of management, Hangzhou Dianzi UniversityMiss Yuexin Jiang, Zhejiang University Master degree candidate in School of Public Affairs in Zhejiang University. Research direction: Educa- tional Economy and Management.Dr. Xiaofeng Tang, Pennsylvania State University Xiaofeng Tang is a postdoctoral fellow in engineering ethics at Penn State University. He received his Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 University Innovation & Entrepreneurship
earned his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois in 1993 prior to joining the faculty of the University of Arkansas. Hall is very active in both the research and education communities. He has published more than 70 articles and given more than 150 presentations to various groups. His primary teaching and research interests include pavement design, materials, construction, and rehabilitation, in addition to the topics of professionalism, licensure, and ethics. On the education front, he serves as the co-Chair of the ASCE Body of Knowledge Education Fulfillment Committee (BOKEdFC), and is an active participant in the Civil Engineering Division of ASEE. In terms of technical/research efforts, he currently serves on eight
Through a Humanistic Lens” in Engineering Studies 2015 and ”A Game-Based Approach to Information Literacy and Engi- neering in Context” (with Laura Hanlan) in Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference 2015. A classroom game she developed with students and colleagues at WPI, ”Humanitarian Engineering Past and Present: Worcester’s Sewage Problem at the Turn of the Twentieth Century” was chosen by the Na- tional Academy of Engineering as an ”Exemplary Engineering Ethics Activity” that prepares students for ”ethical practice, research, or leadership in engineering.” c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Negotiating a Nineteenth-Century Solution AbstractThis
theshower chair adjustable headrest – mentioned that she wanted to provide solutions to people intheir community working at a meat-packing plant. However, she desisted from addressing thatspecific problem because she thought it would become very politicized. She understood that hercommunity had a history of struggle and subjugation and wanted to prevent any harm to them.This is a clear example of conciencia and empathy. Living in a liminal state5 provided Sofia witha different set of decision-making skills and approaches to solve problems in the community. Shewas aware that options were limited by economics, politics, and social constraints. In this way,Sofia demonstrated an understanding of the importance of ethics in engineering. Ethics
goal was to prepare graduates forengineering practice by equipping them with contextual (also sometimes called “professional”)skills. These calls for reform resulted in the EC2000 accreditation criteria, which require, amongother things, that graduates demonstrate the ability to integrate “realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability” into the design process, including the development of new products. This ability,in turn, rests on other abilities including an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams; anability to define and solve problems; an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility;an ability to communicate effectively; the