Rapid Manufacturing.Dr. Bonita Barger, Tennessee Technological University Currently, Dr. Barger is a Professor Emeritus of Management at Tennessee Technological University. She has diverse domestic and international operations experience in both for-profit and non-profit organiza- tions. Demonstrated ability to conceptualize and implement effective strategic human resource manage- ment plans that further broaden corporate objectives. Strong personal initiative, effective leadership skills, ability to influence others, proven collaborative style, and adaptability to various situations. Her research interests include creating global leaders and developing organizational talent. c American
rubric marking was conducted by raters whose training addressed the specificcontext and content of course assignments. Raters were undergraduate students and graduatestudents, with faculty called on for subject area expertise when necessary. The raters wereengaged longitudinally through the study and where possible markers used across disciplines toprovide consistency of ratings. This stresses the importance of having a well-planned, well-supported process to rate artefacts using the VALUE rubrics and an environment whichfacilitates rater discussion and interaction.Participants and ResultsParticipants consented to participate in standardized tests and to have samples of their coursework scored by trained graders using VALUE rubrics. The
as a resource for inquiry anddesign, rather than as a challenge 20, 21. The three authors of this paper were the co-facilitators ofthe CBE Institute.The institute included the following phases: • Learn - Week 1 (Three 2.5-hour sessions): During the learn “Learn” phase participating volunteers were engaged in learning through exploration of the engineering design process. They designed and tested prototype solutions to two engineering design problems posed by the institute instructors. • Plan - Week 2 (Three 1- hour sessions): During the “Plan” phase the participants worked in pairs to plan an engineering module for elementary students. The problems had been previously
(summary of the Water, Earth, and Biota initiative as a 2000highlight for Geosciences), Geotimes, 46(7), 25-26.4. Hooper, R., and E. Foufoula-Georgiou (2008), Advancing the Theory and Practice of Hydrologic Science, EosTrans. AGU, 89(39), doi:10.1029/2008EO390005.5. CUAHSI (2010). Water in a Dynamic Planet: A Five-year Strategic Plan for Water Science(http://dx.doi.org/10.4211/sciplan.200711).6. Shaw, S. B., and M. T. Walter (2012), Using comparative analysis to teach about the nature of nonstationarityin future flood predictions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16(5), 1269–1279, doi:10.5194/hess-16-1269-2012.7. Meselhe, E., McCorquodale, J.A., Shelden, J., Dortch, M., Brown, T.S., Elkan, P., Rodrigue, M.D., Schindler,J.K
problem solving,management of resources, and process planning. Manufacturing is important and has greatimpact on economic development. Thus, it is imperative to provide pathways for students topursue careers in the manufacturing field.This paper discusses the development and implementation of articulated college credit forholders of "Louisiana’s Fast Start Program C4M Certification for Manufacturing”. Thiscertification was developed by Louisiana Economic Development – Fast Start Program and isoffered by different technical and community colleges in the state. It requires the completion ofone year of training on manufacturing oriented topics to include: Introduction to Manufacturing,Tools and Equipment Used in Manufacturing, and Introduction to
practice. K-12 science teachers are increasingly pressured to include engineeringdesign in their curriculum; however, there are relatively few engineering-focused professionaldevelopment programs in comparison to those for traditional science and mathematics. [3] [4] Professional development can improve teacher practice,[5] [6] especially if the programsare content specific,[7] inquiry-based, and learner-centered. [8] [9] Successful professionaldevelopment provides teachers with content, pedagogical knowledge, and training; training thatincludes guidance, support, feedback, and time for reflection and planning.[10] [11] In addition,effective professional development approaches include peer support, teacher-developed researchexperiences, and
students on the path toskill development, it is critical to assess whether or not they intend to change their behaviorsbased on the feedback with which they have been provided. The theory of planned behavior16postulates that behavioral intentions are the most proximal construct to behavioral change, asthey represent one’s attitude towards that behavior. This then captures the effort they are willingto expend in order to engage in that behavior and their motivation to engage in that behavior andimprove upon it. However, the role of intentions in future behavior is qualified by individuals’volitional control over the behavior in question, which is the control the individual has over theirability to engage in that behavior16. Volitional control can
. Figure 1: Original Pole-Mounted Transformers Figure 2: Original 480V Breaker PanelThe senior design team was tasked with designing a completely new electrical system whichincluded two pad-mounted transformers: one 2300V/480V transformer for the foam breakerpower and another 480V/120V transformer for lighting and maintenance equipment. The teamwas responsible for providing one-line drawings, elementary drawings, panel schedules, a bill ofmaterials, a cable schedule, a conduit plan, a lighting plan and a construction package. The teamwas also responsible for assembling two electrical panels and shipping them to the mill. 4. ImplementationIn the process of completing this project for Verso, the team gained a great
academically when they regulate their learning19–22. SRL has beenoperationalized to measure aspects of students’ metacognition, motivation, and behaviors relatedto their academic self-regulation, such as the Self-Regulated Learning Interview Scale (SRLIS)developed by Zimmerman and Martinez-Pons19. SRLIS, a semi-structured interview protocolfocused on “hypothetical learning contexts”23 based on research with K-12 students comprises 14themes19,20, including self-evaluation, organizing and transforming, goal-setting and planning,seeking information, keeping records and monitoring, environmental structuring, self-consequences, rehearsing and memorizing, seeking social assistance (peers, teachers, adults),and reviewing records (notes, books, tests).Prior
andimplementation of practices and initiatives for increasing diversity of the student and faculty inthe mechanical engineering discipline must be a focus. Additionally, we believe that having awelcoming, inclusive environment is a precursor to improving diversity and thus should be animportant consideration in mechanical engineering education. We propose that introducing a fewcarefully designed practices that require very few resources and cause minimum disruption couldresult in a more welcoming and inclusive environment.Bringing about change for a more inclusive environment can be challenging, namely in that itcan be disruptive and require resources, but careful planning and strategic use of resources canhelp alleviate these challenges. A more inclusive
piece • 1 yard of tape: free • 1 yard of string: free • 1 marshmallow: free Figure 1 – Text of Engineering Design Challenge TaskParticipants in the session were first introduced to the EDP, reviewing the different phasesincluding identifying the problem and constraints, developing possible solution paths, selecting apath and building a prototype, evaluating the process and making improvements. Attendeesbegan by working in pairs (one engineering undergraduate student and one mathematicseducation masters student) to design their towers and plan how to spend resources for theirtowers (see Image 1). Image 1 – Planning the TowerAfter this initial designing period, pairs then transitioned to
contribute to support the named abilities/skills? • What is the impact of the PELARS’ technology seen from the final users: students and teachers? • Will the new technology change the accreditation procedures?The schedule for trials in PELARS is shown in figure 1.Creating a comprehensive plan for each of the trials include also ethics considerations. Allactivities are and will be carried out taking into account FP7 guidelines as well as nationalguidelines on ethic issues, guaranteed by the Ethics Committee under EU. Participation of users isin line with agreed European and National ethical procedures for user participation andremuneration of test subjects, and subject to sign off by the Ethics and Research committees
the classroom. Further, there are no five or fewer silver bullets. Systemic change requireschange across numerous elements in the system. Recommendations presented in two ASEEreports7,8 addressed who and what needs to change, and now it is critical that the engineeringeducation research community conduct research to support change agents as they developeffective plans to make these changes. The purpose of our work-in-progress paper is to offersample research questions to illustrate potentially productive research directions for improvingadaptation of evidence-based teaching approaches to improve student learning, which could beaddressed by the engineering education community. Based on results of a Delphi study, we offera framework for
. 2. Feedback on questions 6 through 11 Spring 2016 Mid‐Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 8‐9, 2016 GWU Figures 3 and 4 show the results of two additional questions regarding their future academicplans and career choices. Fig. 3 Student responses regarding their plans to pursue graduate studies Fig. 4. Student responses regarding recommending the internship program to others Spring 2016 Mid‐Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 8‐9, 2016 GWU The following paragraphs summarize student responses to the following open-ended question:Question: How could the internship experience be improved for future
address a particular course learning outcomethat in turn is linked to a program learning outcome. This practice is often used toevaluate the effectiveness of a course as well as to identify any need for coursemodifications and improvements. When assessment is in the form of a test, then theadministration, collection and the final aggregate report generation becomes a timesconsuming task that often introduces delays in planning. In this paper we present a web-based software tool that is primarily designed and developed for automating the courseassessment process. It automates the test creation, grading and the final reportgeneration that can help save time, reduce errors and produce variety of reportsummaries for better decision making.1
, and starting a design challenge for high school students to address the needs of the less fortunate.Dylan Bargar, Clemson UniversityDr. Penelope Walters Brunner, Clemson University DR. PENELOPE BRUNNER is the Director of Assessment and Planning for Clemson’s College of En- gineering. In this role, she works with academic departments and administrative offices on assessment reporting and strategic planning alignments. Prior to joining Clemson, Dr. Brunner was an Associate Vice President at the College of Charleston. As an associate professor within the University of North Carolina system, she taught courses in Management and Management Information Systems. Her national and international consultancies involve working
competition are to deliver a market-driven technology application, create aninnovative business plan, and develop a deployment strategy. Two faculty advisers, a mechanicalengineering assistant professor from the college of engineering and an entrepreneurship assistantprofessor from the college of business designed and delivered content to help student memberseffectively collaborate and innovate across their disciplines and form a cohesive and highfunctioning team. In addition to being members of the cross-disciplinary team, half the studentswere concurrently enrolled in a business management course with an emphasis in socialentrepreneurship and market analysis while another half were enrolled in a senior capstoneengineering course. Activities in the
, resolve, remediate’ approach to recovery from cyber-attacks would be ineffective. According to the FBI press release given December 19, 2014, notonly was a large amount of sensitive data stolen from SPE but, “The attacks also renderedthousands of SPE’s computers inoperable, forced SPE to take its entire computer networkoffline, and significantly disrupted the company’s business operations.” 5Attackers have proven that they have the capability to perform large-scale operations againsthigh-profile targets. With these capabilities it is not feasible to assume that a plan to quarantinecompromised systems in wake of a cyber-attack while maintaining service availability will be apossible recovery method in the future. We must find ways to maximize
inUSMA’s Civil Engineering Department. It is a mandatory course for Civil Engineering majorsand civil engineering trackers, and taken as an elective by students majoring in Management.Civil engineering trackers are non-engineering majors fulfilling the Academy requirements totake a three course sequence in engineering, and civil engineering with CE450 as the culminatingcourse is an option. As an introductory construction management course, the scope is as variedas the background of the students who take it, as articulated in the course description: This course provides an in-depth study of special topics in construction planning and management. The course covers life-cycle facility management to include planning, programming, design, bid
on Lifelong STEM Learning Julie is the Associate Director of the the Oregon State University Center for Research on Lifelong STEM Learning. In this role she focuses on investigating and enhancing the quality of research impacts, working to redefine undergraduate success, and working across campus to support transformation of undergraduate STEM education practices. Julie brings experience working with research organizations at OSU including Oregon Sea Grant and the Institute for Natural Resources. Prior to her work as research administrator Julie spent many years working for non-profit organizations and as a U.S. Peace Corps Volunteer on marine conservation issues including state and regional research planning and
Paper ID #16895Developing a Questionnaire and Evaluation Methods for a High School RocketProgramMr. Ibrahim Halil Yeter, Texas Tech University Ibrahim H. Yeter is currently a PhD candidate in the Curriculum and Instruction program at the College of Education, and at the same time, he is pursuing his Master’s degree in Petroleum Engineering at Texas Tech University. He is highly interested in conducting research within the Engineering Education frame- work. Mr. Yeter plans to graduate in December 2016 with both degrees and is looking forward to securing a teaching position within a research university and continuing his
the strategies involved in the game. Henceforth it wasbeneficial to include a break for game playing at times when students appeared to be tired or loseinterest.The games primarily involved two players competing against one another in various challengesthat included subtracting numbers to reach zero, eliminating virtual matchsticks to clear theboard, filling Sudoku type squares, and connecting dots to create network patterns. All of thegames involved a need to observe patterns and then plan ahead in strategic ways. Severalelements of classical problem solving were required to participate in these games. Many of thegames are in the NIM category such as that illustrated on the Archimedes’ Lab website.13Students began by competing against the
featuredyear-long capstone projects for outside clients since 1988. The program had remained essentiallythe same over that time until 2011. A course instructor was responsible for all of the groups’work and each team was assigned a faculty member as coach. The projects have always been realprojects for clients with real needs.Early in capstone projects, the groups’ work often required the expertise of a faculty member tomentor field and lab work even though that faculty member was not the team coach or courseinstructor. The field and lab work can be of lesser quality because the teams failed to adequatelyuse the faculty expert to plan their work. Later, during project design, the sub-discipline designrequired on each project was not always mentored by
instructional component as it relates to the situativeframework; provide an explanation of how AR technology supports the instruction ofengineering concepts; and provide a more tangible view of instructional design using a fourthgrade lesson plan for teaching circuitry.Guidelines to Situating ARTable 1 summarizes the guidelines for integrating an AR application for teaching and learningelectrical engineering concepts. We propose that following this guide, engineering educators canwork with elementary teachers to incorporate AR into lesson plans to provide a more tangibleand engaging environment for the students. First, we will review the three principles thatsummarize situative learning theory and will form the basis for the guide as suggested
(Katerina) Bagiati, Ph.D.: After graduating with a Diploma in Electrical and Computers Engi- neering and a Masters degree in Advanced Digital Communication Systems from Aristotle University in Thessaloniki, Greece, Katerina Bagiati was in 2008 one of the first graduate students to join the pioneer School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. In 2011 she acquired her Doctorate in Engineering Education, followed by a post-doctoral associate appointment within the MIT-SUTD Collaboration at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), and she is currently a research scientist working at the MIT Scheller Teacher Education Program in the Department of Urban Studies and Planning and the MIT Of- fice of Digital
has a single Electrical Engineering Instructor whoadvises all groups and oversees all projects. Lectures are once per week and serve the purpose ofreinforcing the design process by introducing techniques for project management, research,design process management, prototype planning, and effective presentations and writing skills.The Computer Engineering capstone course consisted of 8 projects. Three were sponsored byindustry and a fourth was a collaborative effort between the CE capstone class and the UCSBDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology. Other projects were student defined.One of the industry sponsored projects was the CE contribution to the SpaceX Hyperloop Podcompetition described above. The technical focus of this team
the Georgetown EnergyCompetition, which aims at reducing electrical and natural gas use within the city over the nexttwo years. A Department of Energy (DOE) grant was also recently awarded to facilitate theinstallation of the first MW of solar photovoltaics in the community. In 2017, the DistrictHeating Plant in downtown will be converted from an inefficient steam system to hot water.Along with these efforts by the city, the local sanitary district is making great strides towardbecoming more sustainable through the installation of biogas digesters, with future plans for acombined heat and power system on site.The University has also been heavily involved in the sustainability movement and has beenactively pursuing sustainability goals for
has evaluated and debated the merits of international service learning from theperspective of the student, but little research exists to assess the success and sustainability of anengineered infrastructure system over an extended period of time from a developingcommunity’s perspective. The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) hasimplemented a new course that will exist for ten years and will bring together the College ofEngineering, along with departments of Kinesiology and Community Health, Anthropology,Global Studies and Regional and Urban Planning, to collaboratively teach an undergraduateresearch-focused course elective targeted at evaluating baseline conditions precedingimplementation of a new irrigation system for the
standards rich incontent and practice that are coherent across disciplines.3 The NGSS (2013) indicates thatengineering must be a fundamental part of the new framework since students are required todevelop the capability to carry and transfer knowledge across science disciplines throughmodeling, planning, conducting investigations, analyzing and interpreting data, andconstructing explanations to demonstrate understanding of core science ideas. Students “mustbe able to apply scientific ideas to solve a design problem, taking into account possibleunanticipated effects”.3Our approach to broadening participation is based on what we know works to engage girls inengineering. We know that precollege and college design classes have a much higherpercentage
, is a one-credit, semester-long course. This course is a graduation requirement across all undergraduate degree plans at theuniversity and its primary aim is to assist new students during their initial academic and socialtransitions to the university. Students enrolled in the course receive information about campusand academic resources, and highly encourages participation in and out of the classroom. Thecourse is taught by full-time staff who represent most of the student service areas on campus,(non-engineering) faculty, and upper administration. The course is coordinated by the AssociateDirector of Transfer and Transition Programs in the office of First Year Experience, adepartment that reports to the Vice President of Student