ends meet. He details having “mov[ed] from oneplace to another” and “never really [having their] own house…even now”. He says that seeinghow other people in his part of town live compared to the upper class is astounding. James statesthat being financially sound and stable is difficult and feels as if the “odds are stacked” againsthim which he feels can hinder the start of his academic career. Additionally, he says that he feelsthe need to work harder to be successful. He attributes this struggle to a lack of resources.While applying to college James considered a few different career paths but ultimately landed onengineering. He discussed how culturally important it is to his family that he considers becominga medical doctor as Nigerians have
moreinformed global citizen. Fig. 4 compiles a summary of responses the students had both pre-travel and how those same responseschanged post-travel after their 10 weeks abroad. A summary of the student’s perspectives of their global awareness regarding research within their fields for both pre-traveland post-travel is shown in Fig. 5. After their travel abroad, the IRES students felt that they had a better overall understanding of the global aspects of scientificresearch and how their topics are issues being worked out across the world. The students also felt more confident to conduct,work with, and present their research in an international setting.C. Professional Competency - Development and Career Impact The IRES students were asked both in
case studies that highlight a set of promising exemplary practices effective in designingand implementing STEM bridge programs to serve middle, high school, and college indigenousstudents. A historical review of related STEM program partnerships between the NationalAeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and some Tribal Colleges and Universities ispresented to highlight past approaches and to support some of the presented recommendations.This review may be particularly relevant to government agencies and business groups who wishto collaborate with universities to support the development of career pathway preparationprograms for underrepresented students in STEM.IntroductionA systematic review is similar to a literature review, but can, in
motivations and hindrances questions as well as qualitativeanalysis on students’ experiences and attitudes exhibit four main trends.Outreach Trend 1: Students enjoy attending outreach and find it helpful to themselves andto societyAll 19 (100%) respondents reported that improving teaching or communication skills had animpact on their volunteerism (Figure 1). An engineering student said, “It is important tounderstand how to present your [research] field to many diverse groups.” 17/19 (89%) ofparticipants reported “Fun or Enjoyment” having an impact on why they volunteer for thesebroader impact outreach events. 16/19 (84%) students believe that participating in outreach willhelp them in their future careers. For example, one student said, “By
Christi’s Ridges to Reefs program (R2R). The firstoffered an introduction to research in collaboration with universities in the Yucatan while thesecond considered ecology of river and coral reef systems in Belize with programming offeredon land and at the Mesoamerican Coral Reef. Pre- and post-participation surveys regarding priorexperience, research skills, a variety of potential impacts, graduate school, and learning wereconducted with participants. Comparison of the pre- and post-participation submissions indicatedparticipants found the offerings valuable for learning about concepts related to their major andspecific topics in the sciences, learning about research, themselves, history and culture, refiningeducation and career plans, developing
-college)-level with a goal of pursuing an engineering major never make it to that200-level. In contrast to the 200-level experience, students earlier in their academic path aremore diffuse in 100-level math, physics, and chemistry courses that also serve other STEMmajors and include no direct instruction on how course content is relevant to their career goals.Opportunities to build community around engineering are up to individual students to seek out inextra-curricular opportunities such as student clubs. This challenge is amplified for most WCCengineering students who must complete 10-20 credits of prerequisite math and physicscoursework before credits apply toward their eventual Bachelor of Science degree.Table 1 illustrates the differential
universities. They have traits to acknowledge and make themost of, for example, their “native digital” nature. Generation Z college students also view college as away to lead a career with purpose; therefore more likely to be motivated by the change they can make inthe world. They also have specific challenges which are important to consider, the primary example beingthe stresses and losses derived from learning within a pandemic [2]. Generation Z students are also themost diverse generation in modern American history. In honoring a commitment to support studentsuccess, it is important to consider these strengths and challenges. In addition, the weed-out culture ofengineering should be replaced with a culture that supports the success of a wider
wastewater, she has strong interests in engineering education research, teacher professional development, and secondary STEM education. In 2021, Erica received the ASEE Pacific Southwest Early Career Teaching Award and two awards at UNLV for mentoring undergraduate and graduate students. She also received the Peter J. Bosscher Outstanding Faculty Advisor Award in 2019 from Engineers Without Borders and was recognized as a Nevada Woman in STEM by Senator Jackie Rosen. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 WIP: Contract grading as an alternative grading structure and assessment approach for a process-oriented, first-year
CoE Equity Action Plan, year-one theme of Mentorship and CommunityBuilding. The event structure was as follows: a keynote address by Wilbur C, Milhouse III, CEOof Milhouse Engineering & Construction, Inc., a first round of concurrent sessions by guestspeakers on the topics of Women in Leadership and Disabilities in STEM, lunch discussions witha short Wellness Bingo, and a second round of concurrent sessions by Penn State speakers on thetopics of Maintaining Authenticity while Pursuing Mentorship in Academia and Developing anEffective Networking Strategy. The summit concluded with a professional panel on Mentorshipand Career, and closing remarks. Feedback on key takeaways and actionable steps was collectedfrom attendees.The second Equity
. degree in Engineering Mechanics from the United States Military Academy in 1982. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana in 1990 and 1999, respectively. He taught at The United States Military Academy during his 25 year military career. After retiring form the military he has taught at the University of Texas at Tyler and The Citadel, where he was the Dean of Engineering for 10 years. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Active Duty and Veteran Pathways to Engineering Higher EducationAbstractThe number of veteran enrollments in American colleges and universities is
-funded Athena Institute for Artificial Intelligence (AI). Her career in higher education began at Howard University as the first Black female fac- ulty member in the Department of Computer Science. Her professional experience also includes Winthrop University, The Aerospace Corporation, and IBM. She is a graduate of Johnson C. Smith University (B.S., ’00) and North Carolina State University (M.S., ’02; Ph.D., ’05), becoming the first Black woman to earn a Ph.D. in computer science at the university and 2019 Computer Science Hall of Fame Inductee.Prof. Shaundra Bryant Daily, Duke University Shaundra B. Daily is a professor of practice in Electrical and Computer Engineering & Computer Sci- ence at Duke University
less prevalent instudents in first year RedShirt programs that enroll women, ethnic minorities, students from lowsocioeconomic status families, and students who would be the first generation in their family to attendcollege (Ennis et al., 2011). To the extent that they are constructed as counterspaces, RedShirt programscan help with the development of engineering identity through forming a strong cohort amongparticipants, helping integrate an engineering and cultural identity and facilitating discussions aboutengineering as a career that includes diversity, equity and inclusion practices (Knight et al., 2021).From a research perspective, less is known about what happens to RedShirt students as they transitioninto their major during the middle
research careers in bioinformatics and at providing authenticresearch experiences that led to publications or presentations”. Although the evaluation of theprogram was mostly positive, there were some key areas for improvement identified.Specifically, the main area for improvement was related to the pre-training activities primarilycentered around building the proper technical coding skills. The IRES students stated that theywould like to have additional experience with coding, exercises tailored to their specific projects,and perhaps more time to learn some of the background of their projects.Efforts to Improve Student PreparednessIn the lead-up to the first year of this IRES program, the PI created a custom course in DataCamp(https
implemented new lessons. The teachers participated in 2 regional teacher conferences, 8 winners at competitions including at state-level, and 2 NSF-ECC grantee conferences. One teacher was appointed as key trainer and technical supervisor for manufacturing section at the new Career and Technical Education center in Bryan, Texas. ▪ Industry supports: Gene Haas Foundation provided funding for additional teachers; AutoDesk provides professional training and complimentary software to participating schools. Unist donated equipment to selected schools. ▪ Nine educational /technical articles were presented /published from this RET program.III.3. Issues and recommendationsIn addition to program interruption by the
department at Seattle University to study how the department culture changes can foster students’ engineering identity with the long-term goal of increasing the representation of women and minority in the field of engineering.Dr. Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington Dr. Jennifer Turns is a full professor in the Human Centered Design & Engineering Department in the College of Engineering at the University of Washington. Engineering education is her primary area of scholarship, and has been throughout her career. In her work, she currently focuses on the role of reflection in engineering student learning and the relationship of research and practice in engineering education. In recent years, she has been the co
, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities 2023,” National Science Foundation, Alexandria, VA, Special Report NSF 23-315, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/wmpd.[3] J. C. Weidman and L. DeAngelo, Socialization in Higher Education and the Early Career: Theory, Research and Application. 2020. Accessed: Sep. 03, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33350-8[4] A. Holbrook, K. Shaw, J. Scevak, S. Bourke, R. Cantwell, and J. Budd, “PhD Candidate Expectations: Exploring Mismatch with Experience,” IJDS, vol. 9, pp. 329–346, 2014, doi: 10.28945/2078.[5] N. Bouhrira and J. M. Cruz, “System Factors Affecting Underrepresented Minorities in Doctoral Programs in Engineering: A Literature Review
Department of Civil Engineer- ing, Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland. Pelumi got his BSc and MSc degree in Physics from Obafemi Awolowo University, where he also served as a research assistant at the Environmental Pollu- tion Research unit, in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. As part of his contribution to science and engineering, Pelumi has taught as a teaching assistant both at Morgan State University and Obafemi Awolowo University. With a passion to communicate research findings gleaned from experts in the field as he advances his career, Olaitan has attended several in-person and virtual conferences and workshops, and at some of them, made presentations on findings on air pollution, wastewater reuse, and heavy metal
non-native population were impressed by the labcapabilities. “We were gladly surprised of the amount of equipment and manufacturing tools and the friendliness that they offer.” -RU Faculty member, professor of biomedical engineeringAdditionally, new relationships were made with people who have different perspectives. Thishelped all participants ruminate on new possibilities for their future careers and professionalgrowth. Finally, they were inspired by the collaboration from this customized 3D printed project. “I've never done a project like this before, but I feel like I learned a lot and I got to make new relationships and meet new people with different perspectives.” - RU student engineer, design team member
competency in STEMclassrooms germinated from the best ambitions but proved hollow [5]. These intentions oftenlacked the depth of multicultural sensitivity as the efforts and outlooks suffer from simplicity [5]. Previous research literature germane to students of Colors’ university experiences inSTEM stipples vexatious challenges that impede full participation and a sense of belonging [6].These include but are not limited to; a negative campus climate shaped by microaggressiveoccurrences [7]; dominant culture reinforcement in STEM classrooms that serve to excludestudents of Color [2], deficient social networking for career advancement opportunities [1],absence in the perception of the community [6], and racists stereotypes, tokenism
personally invite them to courses prepared their children for the job program events. Although families were not always the market (internships) or graduate school able to make it, they appreciated the invitations. (e.g., research opportunities).Families’ stories derived from their participation in this program challenge dominant narrativesthat leave unquestioned deficit assumptions about low-income and of color families’ perceivedlack of support for their children’s college. Accordingly, this program helps to build asset drivencounterstories about the community cultural wealth that these students’ families leverage tosupport their academic and career success.Because students within and across the two program cohorts
the United States, primarily pressurized water reactor systems and boiling water reactorsystems. The overall fraction of electric power production by nuclear power in the United Stateswas identified at 20%. Four sectors in the nuclear power industry were identified: nuclear wastefacilities, nuclear power plants, nuclear fuel facilities, and nuclear-decommissioning activities.The workforce needs for each sector were identified and discussed.MethodsTo train, encourage and motivate students to pursue nuclear science and technology careers andjobs in our communities, our HBCU team has been assigned Task 4.2: Strategic Outreach forNuclear Workforce Pipeline Development and Maintenance. The objectives include thefollowing:1. Increase the number of
on two broad areas: achievement/retention in STEM and comprehension of illus- trated scientific textDr. Karin Jensen, University of Michigan Karin Jensen, Ph.D. (she/her) is an assistant professor in biomedical engineering and engineering edu- cation research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests include student mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research.Dale RobbennoltAnne Hart, University of Tennessee, Memphis ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Exploring the Landscape of Stressors Experienced by Doctoral Engineering
practices, STEAM, and S-L and further refined throughcomparison to student feedback on various activities.This framework has implications for both researchers studying S-L and STEAM education andalso practitioners seeking to set up their programs for success. While elementary teachers areoverworked and over-asked, developing S-L relationships with local university programs can beone solution to addressing STEAM workforce development at both K-12 and university levels.IntroductionIn a most recent effort to strengthen Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics(STEM) education nationwide, the goal of the Raise the Bar: STEM Excellence for All Studentsinitiative is to ensure their 21st-century career readiness and global competitiveness for all
(5) year contracts with option to renew. Conditions forrenewal are included in the agreement.2.2. The ImplementationThe implementation of the HPAT model requires a combined effort of both partners at all stagesof a student’s career. This requires an early and active participation of the 4-year partner from thetime of admission, until the student completes the bachelor’s or master’s degree. Additionally, itimplies a continuous participation of the 2-year partner through mentoring, and longitudinalprogram assessment for continuous improvement. Various curricular, co-curricular, andextracurricular activities are encouraged to be developed in each of the partner institutions withsome overlap whenever possible. This will support student
highereducation institutions focusing on sustainability often ground the curricula for those topics incommunity work using three pillars of engagement: social, environmental, and economic [8].Community engagement, as a form of service-based learning, has proven to be a viablemethod for grounding sustainability factors in technical education, so that such concepts arenot so easily dismissed by students driven by pragmatic, purely technical conceptions ofengineering.There are still knowledge gaps in how engineers could apply higher levels of sustainabilityexpertise in their careers [9]. This could perpetuate a notion that sustainability programsproduce effete engineers unable to apply their conceptual understanding of sustainability inpractice [9]. A
Education Organization and Leadership from the University of Illinois. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 The Early Research Scholars ProgramBackgroundResearch experiences for undergraduates has shown to increase retention in scientific fields [1],and the NSF Summer REU program provides great support for such experiences. Most REUs aredesigned for advanced students with strong foundations in Computer Science. The EarlyResearch Scholars Program (ERSP) was designed to provide a structured research experience forstudents early in their CS career (pre-data structures when they apply). The goal is to increaseretention of women and under-represented
at Purdue University. She was co-PI of Purdue’s ADVANCE program from 2008-2014, focusing on the underrepresentation of women in STEM faculty positions. She runs the Feminist Research in Engineering Education Group, whose diverse projects and group members are described at pawleyresearch.org. She was a National Academy of Engineering CASEE Fellow in 2007, received a CAREER award in 2010 and a PECASE award in 2012 for her project researching the stories of undergraduate engineering women and men of color and white women, and received the Denice Denton Emerging Leader award from the Anita Borg Institute in 2013. She has been author or co-author on papers receiving ASEE-ERM’s best paper award, the AAEE Best Paper
. ‘Non-persisting’ students are those leaving engineering because of the academic climate, grades, self-efficacy, high school preparation, career goals, and gender or race [20]. Moreover, students leave STEM because of a lack of belonging [3], [24], “chilly” climate [25], microaggressions [26], conflicting identities [26]–[28], and not identifying with the field [29]–[31]. This literature on student perceptions highlights how their decisions are influenced by how they see themselves as being capable. This suggests how students’ perceptions affect their decisions which can be influenced by several cognitive and non-cognitive factors. Therefore, students’ observations in school inform the actions they take, and what they see as
. is an Associate Professor of engineering in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of En- gineering at Arizona State University. He teaches context-centered electrical engineering and embedded systems design courses, and studies the use of context and storytelling in both K-12 and undergraduate engineering design education. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Education (2010) and M.S./B.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Purdue University. Dr. Jordan is PI on several NSF-funded projects related to design, including an NSF Early CAREER Award entitled ”CAREER: Engineering De- sign Across Navajo Culture, Community, and Society” and ”Might Young Makers be the Engineers of the Future?,” and is a Co-PI on the NSF
experiential learning opportunities to both undergraduate and graduate students locally, regionally and internationally with a focus on Hispanic and female students. She is currently Co-PI of UTEP’s NSF-AGEP program focusing on fostering Hispanic doctoral students for academic careers; the Department of Education’s (DoE) STEMGROW Program and DoE’s Program YES SHE CAN. With support from the Center for Faculty Leadership and Development, she leads a Learning Community for Diversity and Inclusion for Innovation at UTEP. She is also a member of two advisory committees to UTEP’s President: The Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion committee and is chair of the Women’s Advisory Council. She is a member at large of the UTEP Council of