College in Escanaba, MI. He has successfully received over $2 million in grants throughout his career, which have been used to transform the technical education his institution provides. Most recently, Mark successfully authored an OER Degree Initiative grant through Achieving the Dream to develop a complete degree pathway using nothing but open educational resources. Mark also served on the development committee for the Voluntary Framework of Accountability, an initiative of the American Association of Community Colleges. Mark has a passion for rural education and completed his dissertation on the roles of rural educators and rural community colleges, and believes this is an underrepresented segment of our national
income distribution are ten timesas likely to become inventors as those from below-median income families [5, 6]. By 8th grade,half of students will have given up on STEM as a career [7]. Only 69.7% of high school graduatesattend college [8], and more than half of college students who declare in a STEM field will changemajors or drop out of school entirely, meaning 11% of HS graduates become qualified STEMprofessionals, and the deficit would not be met if 100% of STEM students graduated. Table 1: PISA Results for U.S. Students compared to the International Median since 2000.There are significant socio-economic barriers to growing and diversifying the STEM workforce,and outcomes highly correlate to income, educational access, race, and gender
particularlyinterested in conducting an intersectional analysis of the survey data to determine which funds ofknowledge are most relevant to first-generation college students based on demographiccharacteristics, such as race/ethnicity, socioeconomic class, and gender, and other descriptors, i.e.,transfer student status, language spoken at home, and career expectations to name a few.Understanding the funds of knowledge of first-generation college students in engineering has thepotential to benefit both these students and their continuing generation peers. First, these can serveas inspiration for culturally-relevant pedagogy that would enhance first gen student learning andinterest in engineering. We echo the sentiments of Wilson-Lopez et al.’s [2] ethnographic
engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Equity in Collaboration: My Ideas Matter, Too! K-12 Students’ Negotiation of Social Status in Collaborative Engineering Team (Fundamental Research)AbstractWithin pre-college (K-12) engineering education, the curriculum design integrates studentsworking with partners or teams on projects as standard practice in the curriculum design.However, with a need to increase participation in engineering and other STEM career pathways,introducing engineering in pre-college settings has become a central avenue for access to STEMcareer pathways for many students. Pre-college learning experiences are opportunities to developstudents’ interests further and
goal is to advance thefield of renewable energy by supporting renewable energy programs. Madison College serves asthe lead institution for CREATE, and has developed and delivered various types of facultyprofessional development programs in solar energy for over a decade [18].The need to build a renewable energy educational pipelineA major challenge to educating future renewable energy professionals, is the need to build aneducational pipeline. Since this is an emerging field, many potential young students havelimited knowledge of renewable energy career opportunities, and they lack professional rolemodels. Young adults with an interest in STEM have at least some awareness of what scientists,engineers, and health care professionals do, and many
Describe the highlights involved in undergraduate place and what an ARCE’s career path can of your University organizations related to look like. experience so far. ARCE. Summarize the topical areas ARCEs work Describe which ARCE Describe your favorite in, providing some details on each of the student organizations are classes. sub-areas of ARCE
]. Understanding moreabout how undergraduate engineering students develop identities as engineers will helpengineering educators better prepare students for engineering careers and support those studentsduring their postsecondary experiences. Much of the current research on engineering identity takes engineering as a monolithicdiscipline. In other words, it is taken as a given that different engineering disciplines function inthe same way with respect to engineering identity development. However, previous research hasshown that the culture of engineering disciplines do, in fact, differ from each other—forexample, some disciplines, such as biomedical engineering, civil engineering, and chemicalengineering, are more inclusive of gender diversity than
curriculum included (a) STEM hands-on activities focused on mathematicsand engineering (including mathematical visualization, engineering design process throughtowers and chain reaction machines, explorations with arduinos and circuits, and mathematicalthinking through folding), and (b) World of Work activities that centered on self- and career-exploration experiences (including career cards, games, virtual reality experiences, conversationswith and presentations from STEM professionals). The first week of the summer program thestudents focused on introductory STEM activities and explorations and alignment of their currentinterests and abilities to career pathways leading to STEM. In the second week, these activitieslaid the foundation for students
Course on Undergraduate Students (RTP)AbstractExposure to pre-college Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) activitiesand undergraduate service learning have been linked to increased interest and participation inSTEM careers. However, few studies have linked these two activities to increased interest andparticipation in teaching careers related to STEM. Due to changing national standards anddemographics, the next generation of K-12 teachers will be required to integrate STEM into theirclassrooms while dealing with students of diverse backgrounds that may differ significantly fromtheir own. Of concern are the elementary or K-6 teachers who will be expected to include STEMin their lessons but do not
minorities, and the shortage of highlyqualified teachers. The goal of Grad Student STEM Share is to connect graduate students inSTEM with diverse K-12 students and provide these students with role models while excitingthem about new developments in science and engineering. While not all graduate students gointo teaching careers, it is important that they learn how to communicate effectively and havemeaningful experiences with diverse students. Grad Student STEM Share allows graduatestudents to have introductory classroom experiences in a guided manner. Graduate students need to be confident that they can help improve STEM education byvolunteering in schools and mentoring students, even if they do not pursue academic careers. Inaddition
students where the focus has beenon self-reporting confidence without a link to actual student performance. Self-efficacy is how aperson’s belief in their capabilities impacts their ability to achieve a goal.1 In 2015, mathematicalself-concept was studied with respect to how it differs between genders and how it affects pre-college and post-K-12 career choice decisions. Self-concept studies investigate howpsychological processes relate to academic achievement and career choice.2 In particular, thislongitudinal study looked at how different factors including the person, their environment, andmath self-concept impact a student’s decision to pursue a STEM (Science, Technology,Engineering and Mathematics) career. Data from surveys were analyzed to
postdoctoral fellow at Stanford’s Clayman Institute for Gender Research. She earned her Ph.D. in Sociology from the University of California, San Diego and B.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering and Sociology from Montana State University. Cech’s research seeks to uncover cultural mechanisms of inequality reproduction–particularly gender, sexual identity and racial/ethnic inequality within science and engineering professions. Her current research projects focus on the recruitment and retention of women, racial/ethnic minority and LGBTQ individuals and the role of professional cultures in inequality in STEM.Rocio C Chavela Guerra, American Society for Engineering Education Rocio Chavela is Director of Education and Career
awareness of contractual risk distribution. Also a more in-depth structure was given as to how to build and/or restructure an organizationso it operates at optimum efficiency. Strategies and approaches were also addressed as to how to address internal as well as external issues that arise within an organization. By having various counter methods of dealing with the various conflicts the most advantageous solutions to all parties could be obtained. I believe the MCM course has provided me with the essential tools to further advance my professional career both mentally and physically by providing a more in- depth understanding of the construction industry as a whole.”Even with students’ high praises regarding their professional
economy and job market. Undergraduate students who are transitioning fromcollege to the workplace must have adequate oral communication skills to complement thetechnical knowledge they have acquired in their collegiate experience. Students must be able toorally present and communicate ideas, knowledge, and research to many different audiences inthe arenas of interviews, conferences, and interoffice presentations. Although helpful in avariety of careers, improvements to communication skills at the undergraduate level canspecifically increase the success and effectiveness of those moving into the field of engineeringmanagement. These communication skills can increase the engineering manager’s performancein areas such as leadership, motivation
curriculum is its broad applicability to avariety of professions. Thus, a student majoring in mechanical engineering may end up going tomedical school, or earn an MBA. Another such alternative path which is gaining more traction isattending law school or directly applying for a job as a patent examiner where a JD is notrequired. We strive to provide our students with information to make better career decisionswhile still working on their undergraduate degrees. We have thus collaborated with ouruniversity’s law school to allow roughly five engineering juniors each year to enroll in one oftheir courses taken by second and third year law school students. To date, students have taken acourse entitled ‘Introduction to Intellectual Property.’ This year, a
student motivation to pursuecomputing careers and an increase in software engineering knowledge1, 26. In fact, involvementin HFOSS is increasingly being utilized as a way to educate software engineering students and Page 26.1379.3there are a growing number of faculty members who are involving students in HFOSS projects(foss2serve.org).This paper expands on an earlier effort1 to report on a multi-institutional study on the impact ofstudent participation in HFOSS.2. The InstitutionsTable 1 below outlines the four institutions involved in the study. These institutions are a mix ofpublic and private institutions and are small to medium in size. The
supportive of white males16 .Informed by these findings the research team came up with the following broad interventionstrategy the goal of which was to ensure that students are provided with academic support,pedagogies are adopted that promote active and collaborative learning, empower students to takecharge of their learning and develop a sense of community or belonging in their professionaldisciplines and socially: 1. Improve instruction by establishing an active learning in STEM education faculty community and redesign introductory courses. 2. Provide early and motivating field-of-study and career explorations. 3. Foster meaningful engagement experiences into the professional community. 4. Support student academic learning through
to them (mechanical advantage).What surprised the author when first introducing the can crusher activity in 2012 was that thestudents were truly troubled with how to represent the force from the can onto the can crusher.The vast majority of students would draw the force in the wrong direction. Steif et al.5 state“Certainly, the initial stage of surveying a physical system, the true modeling stage, can be themost difficult.” The author has found this to be true, and it relates to the students reluctance touse mathematical models later in their coursework or in their careers. If the student cannot makethe first connection between the real system and the mathematical model, all the mathematicalanalysis tools they’ve learned become useless.The
Paper ID #14744An Exploration into the Impacts of the National Society of Black Engineers(NSBE) on Student PersistenceMrs. Monique S. Ross, Purdue University, West Lafayette Monique Ross is a doctoral candidate in the Engineering Education department at Purdue University. Her research focuses are race, gender, and identity in the engineering workplace, specifically the experiences of Black women in engineering industry. She also has interest in preparing women and minorities for career advancement through engagement in strategies for navigating the workplace. She has a Bachelors degree in Computer Engineering from
hazards. Her research has been funded by the National Science Foundation, National Park Service through FAU Environmental Sciences Everglades Fellowship Initiative, USGS, and The Na- ture Conservancy.Mrs. Summer Scarlatelli, Museum of Discovery and Science Summer Scarlatelli, STEM Center for Education and Career Development Manager , creates and con- ducts programs for school groups, grants, community outreach and camp-ins that introduce basic science concepts and enhance the STEM content of the exhibit experience. She coordinates with Broward Schools to ensure museum activities support Common Core standards. She is currently working with United Way c American Society for Engineering Education
her faculty job and came to Connecticut for family reunion. Throughout her academic career in Australia and Singapore, she had developed a very strong interest in learning psychology and educational measurement. She then opted for a second Ph.D. in educational psychology, specialized in measurement, evaluation and assessment at University of Connecticut. She earned her second Ph.D. in 2010. Li has a unique cross-disciplinary ed- ucational and research background in mechatronics engineering, specialized in control and robotics, and educational psychology, specialized in statistical analysis and program evaluation.Dr. Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven Ron Harichandran has served as the Dean of the
-CRE survey that gauged students’ sense ofbelonging, community, and identity; and, if students were in the College of Engineering, theirperceptions of engineering and perceptions of diversity in the engineering career. Students alsoreported demographic information. One week later, engineering students received The ImmortalLife of Henrietta Lacks to be read over the summer as part of the Common Reading Experience(CRE). Upon arriving on campus, engineering students were assigned a discussion session toparticipate in during the first month of school. Over 99% of those students completed theprogram by participating in a discussion session. After the discussion sessions were completed,both engineering and non-engineering students received a post
solutions that generate and strengthen career plans of students, as well as improve retention, graduation rates, and speed to graduation. He is recognized within education circles as standing at the vanguard of the progressive technological movement. He has taught students, trained corporate salespeople and career coaches, and advised entrepreneurs. His energy, passion, positivity, and attention to detail have served him well in bringing out the best in others.Dr. Kishore Pochiraju, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science) Kishore Pochiraju is the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Education and a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering department at Stevens Institute of Technology. He recently
conducted in a single junior-level course for environmentalengineering students. The innovation self-efficacy of participants was measured using a surveythat included items from the Very Brief Innovation Self-Efficacy scale (ISE.6), the InnovationInterests scale (INI), and the Career Goals: Innovative Work scale (IW). The drawings wereanalyzed for Artistic Effort (AE) and Creative Work (CW) by engineering and art evaluators,respectively. The ISE survey results were compared with the AE and CW scores and thecorrelations with travel, gender, and multilingualism on creativity attributes were explored. Astrong correlation between CW scores and AE scores was observed. A negative correlationbetween CW and ISE.6 was found. The CW scores were significantly
scienceconcepts in both didactic and experiential settings. Students appreciate the need to successfullycommunicate with data and be effective data storytellers but will often feel frustrated that datastorytelling skills are not “real data science.” An analysis of LinkedIn profiles indicates that over60% of graduated learners secured new employment in data careers since starting the program.To build on this success, further curriculum development should more explicitly connectfundamental data science concepts and broader concepts such as creative problem-solving anddata storytelling.KeywordsGraduate education, data analytics, distance learning, life-long learning, adult learning1. IntroductionWe are living in an era where the Volume, Velocity, Veracity
andopportunities faced by graduate students and higher education institutions in navigatinginterdisciplinary research and teaching landscapes. Key themes include but are not limited to: thecultivation of a community-oriented team culture to enhance scientific team cohesion andproductivity e.g., [5]; the importance of academic motivation and teamwork diversity ininterdisciplinary context [6]; the mechanisms that facilitate team science e.g., [7], and theperspectives of graduate students and early career academics on interdisciplinary research e.g.,[8]. These studies collectively underscore the complexity of interdisciplinary endeavors, andhighlight the need for supportive institutional structures, the development of interdisciplinarycommunication and
a scale we designed to quantify the successful developmentof target EML skills, had no consistent pattern based on race, but that female students reported asignificantly lower score compared to male students. We additionally developed a panel ofquestions gauging the extent to which certain groups of students were motivated by theirdemographics (e.g., gender, race, etc.) and individual economic benefits of BMEG (e.g., high-paying jobs, career preparation, etc.). Female students were also more likely to report that theywere motivated by their demographics and had significantly lower self-efficacy scores comparedto male students. While race had no impact on the final EML score, HRM groups were moremotivated by their demographics and were
many challenges. For instance, arocket project involves the collaboration of aerospace, mechanical, chemical, electrical, andcomputer engineering disciplines. As a result, students from diverse backgrounds and withdistinct career aspirations must collaborate to overcome the obstacles. This diversity fosters ateam-based and interdisciplinary learning approach that provides students with invaluable insightand skills beyond those learned in a typical classroom setting [7].Program PhilosophyAt Make to Innovate, we advocate for a practical learning experience emphasizing a hands-onapproach. Our students are motivated to tackle problems head-on and create innovative solutionsthat can be tested in real-world scenarios. Clear objectives are set for
critical challenges society faces. In the ever-advancing engineeringindustry, how would our Materials Engineering education system adequately prepare ourstudents with the essential knowledge and skills necessary to adapt and excel in their career?What are the learning outcomes that are required to support such excellence?To design these learning outcomes in our curriculum, gathering and analysing relevantstakeholders’ input is crucial. This paper presents our endeavour in partnering thestakeholders (students, educators/faculty, alumni and employers) to understand the gaps andneeds of Materials Engineering education. Consultations with the stakeholders were designedto rally around three main focus areas namely (i) to evaluate the existing
society 2. The ease or difficulty of being an ethical aerospace engineer 3. Technical determinism and aerospace career pathways 4. Macroethics discussions within aerospace coursework 5. The ability of faculty to facilitate conversations on the macroethics of aerospaceThese five factors provide a new basis upon which we will generate additional survey items inthe future. Through this process, we will develop a survey that can effectively measure students’beliefs and experiences in regards to the macroethical implications of the field of aerospaceengineering.IntroductionThe impact of aerospace systems on society is regularly featured as part of the global news cycle.Recent topics have included protests against aerospace companies