of skills namely, ‘Engineering skills’,‘Communication Skills’, ‘Computer Skills’, ‘Resource Utilization skills’, ‘Management Skills’,and ‘Connection and linkage to other courses’. A S S ES S M EN T R ES U L T S 5 4 .0 8 4 .1 2 4 .3 2 4 .1 2 4 .0 3 3 .7 4 4 3 2 1 EN G G . S K IL L S CO M M. S K IL L S CO M P. S K IL L S RES O U RCE MG MT. S K IL L S CO NNECTIO N UTIL S N. S K IL L S TO O THER
displayed on the chart below. Page 5.265.5 5 M a le F e m a le 4 .5 C a u c a s ia n M in o ritie s 4
explosive growth of theInternet and World-Wide-Web, the effects of these technologies are increasingly presentin routine settings. Consequently, the exposure to “quantized” and “compressed”information is very high whereas exposure to the theoretical underpinnings and a firmunderstanding of the associated tradeoffs is very low. We begin here with a briefintroduction to the theory surrounding both the mechanics of speech production and themathematical modelling of vocalization, including basic quantization and prediction.The dryness of the mathematical development is then nicely contrasted with thereal-time demonstrations of speech coding which rely on a participant’s vocalizations. II. H U M A N S PEECH AND L INEAR P R E D I C
is for novice programmersAbstractIn this work-in-progress paper, the emphasis is to understand the perceptions about whichlanguage should be the first programming language. Computer programming is a fundamentalskill for novice engineers. However, over time, multiple programming languages have emergedand are being used as the first language for students. While in modern times, many schoolsaround the globe, particularly in the USA, consider Python’s syntax simplicity and versatility asa way to go, other places and traditional computer scientists consider C++’s efficiency as theirchoice. Similarly, many engineering schools introduce MATLAB as the first programminglanguage. While these decisions are made at the
assistant professor in the Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at Florida International University. Dr. Dickersonˆa C™s research agenda contains two interconnected strands: 1) systematic investigatiDr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University Matthew W. Ohland is the Dale and Suzi Gallagher Professor and Associate Head of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students and forming and managing teams has been supported by the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received for the best paper published in the Journal of
improveretention, researchers have applied asset-based perspectives to studying retention of marginalizedstudents. This approach often emphasizes the role of social capital [1], [11] and socializers [12]–[14] as primary drivers of motivation to pursue STEM education and careers. This present paperbegins to unpack the unique relationship between socializers and the decision students atminority serving institutions (MSIs) make to pursue STEM. We report on the experiences ofstudents gathered using qualitative methods and examined through the lens of expectancy valuetheoretical framework.Theoretical Framework: Expectancy-ValueMotivation to pursue a career in STEM can be modeled through Eccles et al.'s Expectancy-Valuetheory (EV) [15]. EV establishes a direct
of the coupler during the animation. The linkage presentedhere is a crank-rocker mechanism, which can be assembled in a colinear configuration. Thislinkage was selected because of the interesting nature of the coupler link space centrodeand the motion of the output, link. The position solution for the linkage is obtained with a.Newton-Ra.phson method and the use of kinematic coefficients. The details of this approachare presented as is the specific MATLAB code required to produce the position solutionand the animation. IntroductionOne of the main impediments to learning dynamics of mechanisms is the visualization ofthe mechanism motion. Several commercially available software p a c k a g e s such as
Figure 3: A plot showing the z-plane annotated for discussing bandpass sampling.dents that allows them to evaluate Equation (1) in a way that promotes exploration and “what if” thinking.A simple m-file that provides this capability is shown in Listing 1, with an example output given in Figure 4for the bandpass signal parameters from Figure 2(a). Listing 1: M ATLAB program to evaluate valid sampling frequencies for bandpass sampling.f u n c t i o n vFs = bp samp ( fu , B )% vFs=bp samp ( f u , B )%% C r e a t e a s e t o f min and max v a l i d s a m p l e f r e q u e n c i e s% f o r bandpass sampling .% For Q= f u / B ,% 2B (Q / n ) <= Fs <= 2B ( ( Q− 1 ) / n −1))% where n i s an i n t e g e r s u c h t h a t 0> bp_samp
always proven to be verysuccessful. Even today, a large percentage of the deaf community has reading comprehensionand writing deficits and this has not changed much over the past 30 years.3When deaf or hard of hearing students arrive at college, they have high expectations ofthemselves for completing bachelor‟s and graduate degrees.4 The research led by Cuculick andKelly has shown through statistical analysis that only about 17% of incoming deaf students atNTID, 2001 and 2002 had the requisite reading and language skills to enter a baccalaureateprogram in their first year. Also, with the same data, it indicated that at NTID it takes longer forthe deaf students to complete Associate of Occupational Studies (AOS), Associated of AppliedScience (AAS
system mass determined in Lab 1, and system gain from the user's manual, they form adouble-integrator plant model. The hardware is configured in 1 DOF mode with no spring ordamper. The theoretical transfer function model is G(s) = 1/ms2. The students are then able todirectly select the P I and D gains to match closed-loop requirements. Students are encouraged tophysically feel the control forces due to P, D, and I control. They should then be able to betterquantify the effects of each type of feedback. Interested students are encouraged to try Ziegler-Nichols tuning of P and PID gains for extra credit.Lab 4. In this laboratory, the students construct a Root Locus plot from experimental systemresponse data. The double integrator plant of Lab 3 is
repeated stress fatigue cycle in which the maximum stress and the minimumstress are not equal. For this type of stress cycle the maximum and minimum stresses can be bothtension, both compression or one tension and one compression. These types of stress cycles arepresent in rotating shafts with overloads(s).1 Page 10.1404.2 Figure 2: An illustration of a repeated stress fatigue cycle1 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationFigure 3 illustrates an irregular or random stress cycle
://www.acteonline.org/wp- content/uploads/2018/03/Career_Readiness_Paper_COLOR.pdf.[2] J. Defazio, "Why is Career Readiness Important?," Education Advanced, 7 April 2023. [Online]. Available: https://educationadvanced.com/resources/blog/why-is-career- readiness-important/. [Accessed 27 October 2023].[3] N. A. o. C. a. E. (NACE), "WHAT IS CAREER READINESS?," National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE), [Online]. Available: https://www.naceweb.org/career- readiness/competencies/career-readiness-defined. [Accessed 30 October 2023].[4] G. F. P. C. C. L. Bonesso S., "Students' entrepreneurial intentions: The role of prior learning experiences and emotional, social, and cognitive competencies.," Journal of Small Business Management
Education During the Pandemic: Responses to Coronavirus Disease 2019 From Spain," Frontiers in Psychology, Original Research vol. 12, 2021.[2] A. Bashir, S. Bashir, K. Rana, P. Lambert, and A. Vernallis, "Post-COVID-19 Adaptations; the Shifts Towards Online Learning, Hybrid Course Delivery and the Implications for Biosciences Courses in the Higher Education Setting," Frontiers in Education, Original Research vol. 6, 2021.[3] S. R. Jayasekaran, S. Anwar, K. Cho, and S. F. Ali, "Relationship of students' engagement with learning management system and their performance-An undergraduate programming course perspective," 2022.[4] I. A.-O. DeCoito and M. A.-O. Estaiteyeh, "Transitioning to Online Teaching
interventions in their classroomsand examine best practices to utilize such interventions to promote entrepreneurially mindedlearning within engineering classrooms.AcknowledgmentThis work was developed, in part, as a result of the author’s (or authors’) participation in theAmerican Society of Engineering Education Archival Publication Authors Workshop forEngineering Educators (ASEE APA-ENG) program.References[1] S. Shane and S. Venkataraman, "The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research," Academy of Management Review, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 217-226, 2000, doi: 10.5465/amr.2000.2791611.[2] L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, Teaching the Entrepreneurial Mindset to Engineers. Springer Cham, 2018, p. 142.[3] N. Suprapto et al
and Mathematics (STEM)outreach is well documented. The methods by which this is accomplished vary and depend onthe specific needs of the student or STEM stakeholder being supported. Further the outreachprovider can vary in size from single high school students doing experiments with youngerstudents, to scientists and engineers (S&E’s) visiting classrooms, and to fortune 500 companiesdonating vast sums of money to build STEM infrastructure.1 Each of these has the potential toinfluence students and impact STEM careers. This paper looks to document what the authorsconsider a large STEM organization. The STEM outreach provider being described is one of theU. S. Army’s research centers, the Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center
. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Future Career Pathway Perceptions of Lower-Income Computing Students Through the Lens of Capital Exchange1. BackgroundWhile significant broadening participation efforts in computing higher education have focusedon gender and race [1]-[3], the experiences of lower-income students in undergraduatecomputing education are as yet underexplored. One major effort focused on lower-incomestudents is the National Science Foundation (NSF) Scholarships in Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (S-STEM) program, a funding program designed to supportlower-income students to persist and succeed in STEM fields. The
shiftsbetween the 1970’s and 2010’s.using paradigms to understand AI’s evolutionPractitioners in diverse fields define the term “paradigm” in different ways depending on theirdomains, with slight variations corresponding to norms in their respective fields. We takeKuhn’s[12] view which holds that a paradigm provides an open-ended resource that presents aframework of concepts, results and procedures within which subsequent work is structured. Acharacteristic of paradigms is that they can “shift” with new knowledge or evidence. An exampleusing human flight experience can be represented as shown in Table 2 below. The inspirationmay have originated from nature, through birds’ ability to swiftly move in air. Legends andmythology from early Greek times
operator, applied in postfix notation. To obtain the transferfunction of this system, one assumes that the initial conditions of the input and output signals arezero and applies the Laplace transform to both sides of this differential equation to giveU(s)a(s) = Y (s)b(s), where U(s) and Y (s) are the Laplace transforms of u(t) and y(t),respectively, and s is a complex variable. This yields the transfer function Y (s)/U(s) = a(s)/b(s),which may be multiplied by a particular transformed input U(s) to find the correspondingtransformed output Y (s).Transfer functions are appealing in that they model dynamic systems as rational functions that canbe added, multiplied, and inverted to reduce networks of interconnected subsystems. However,the educational
agreed to incorporate the nanotechnology-based design project intotheir sections. This project required students to develop a Graphical User Interface (GUI) usingMATLAB to teach their peers about nanotechnology for a real project partner (nanoHUB.org).17The student teams received a memo from the project partner that described the details of theassignment (Appendix A). The project was driven by five criteria: 1. Clearly helps peers understand the Size & Scale of nanotechnology (big idea #1), 2. Clearly assists peers in connecting Size & Scale to at least one other nanoscience big idea 3. Clearly engages peers in how criteria 1 and 2 apply to one or more engineering disciplines via model(s) or simulation(s) 4. Is highly
/experiences for some of the competencies but few, if any,would specify all the courses/experiences that every scholar must complete for each of the fivecompetencies. Thus, even within an institution, how each Grand Challenges Scholar achieveseach competency often varies. For example, some scholars may complete course(s) while othersmay engage in experience(s) in order to achieve each competency. The types of courses andexperiences students are involved in also vary, depending on the students’ Grand Challengefocus area and/or their specific interests within that competency area. For example, therequirements to achieve each GCSP competency at ASU, shown below in Table 1, are written interms of number of courses and experiences, but the student can
increasingly used as a safety management tool in the nuclear power industry through the 1980’s and 90’s. This capability is of central importance in the domestic nuclear power industry in the new century. PRA provides answers to four important questions: (i) What can go wrong? (ii) How likely is it? (iii) What are the consequences? and (iv) How do uncertainties impact the above answers? There are three levels of PRA analysis in the commercial nuclear power industry: Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3. Level 1 consists of an analysis of plant design and operation focused on the accident sequences that could lead to a core damaging event, their basic causes and their frequencies. Key figure of merit is the Core Damage
Statistics [8], first-generation college students were characterizedas students’ whose parents did not have postsecondary educational experience. Another studystated, “first-generation college students include students whose parents may have some college,postsecondary certificate(s), or associate’s degree, but not a bachelor’s degree” and this definitionclosely aligns with the definition set forth by the Federal TRiO program (i.e., outreach and studentservice programs created to serve students from disadvantaged backgrounds) [9, p. 8]. There areinconsistencies and numerous ways in defining first-generation college students, so much so thatWhitley et al. [10] found at least six different definitions. However, regardless of how first-generation
through undergraduate education. This frame is visually represented inFigure 2. Figure 2 Visual Representation of Relationships between Local Standards, National Directives, Higher Education Outcomes and Literature Synthesized for Engineering Epistemic Frame The epistemic frame elements are skills(S), knowledge(K), identity(I), values(V), andepistemology(E), and have been coded as such for analysis. Each parent code (S,K,I,V,E) has aset of sub-codes that allow for macro and micro analysis. The nomenclature for each code isparentcode.subcode, for example k.localknowledge represents the sub-code localknowledgeunder the parent code K. (but indicated in lowercase). Figure 2 shows how sub-codes
Paper ID #16983Challenges for Integrating Engineering into the K-12 Curriculum: Indicatorsof K-12 Teachers’ Propensity to Adopt InnovationDr. Louis Nadelson, Utah State University Louis S. Nadelson is an associate professor and director for the Center for the School of the Future in the Emma Eccles Jones College of Education at Utah State University. He has a BS from Colorado State University, a BA from the Evergreen State College, a MEd from Western Washington University, and a PhD in educational psychology from UNLV. His scholarly interests include all areas of STEM teaching and learning, inservice and preservice teacher
Techniques,” AK Peters, Ltd.[8] Nistér, D., Naroditsky, O. & Bergen, J., 2006, “Visual Odometry for Ground Vehicle Applications,” Journal of Field Robotics, 23(1) 3-20.[9] DeSouza, G. N. & Kak, A. C., 2002, “Vision for mobile robot navigation: A survey,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24(2) 237-267.[10] Zhang, M., Zhang, Z., Esche, S. K. & Chassapis, C., 2013, “Universal Range Data Acquisition for Educational Laboratories Using Microsoft Kinect,” Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, June 23-26.[11] Zhang, M., Zhang, Z., Aziz, E.-S., Esche, S. K. & Chassapis, C., 2013, “Kinect-Based Universal Range Sensor for Laboratory
-serving community college hasestablished a scholarship program for financially vulnerable community college students whowish to move to a four-year university to obtain a bachelor's degree in a STEM field. Developedthrough a S-STEM grant NSF Scholarship, the program included cooperation between STEMteachers, college employees, administrators, student organizations and industry partners, four-year colleges, local high schools and professional organizations. In addition to providingfinancial support, student access to academic capital was enhanced by an intensive math reviewprogram, tutoring, study groups, additional training, and internship opportunities for research.Access to cultural and social capital was increased by providing scholars with
Ca Un ty o SLO ro ive f K lin rs an a it s A & y o as
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Interdisciplinary Teams through Two Companion Courses on InfrastructureAbstractOne of the program outcome criteria for ABET accreditation is that students demonstrate “anability to function on multidisciplinary teams” (Criterion 3(d)). * An innovative way to meet thiscriterion was piloted at the University of Wisconsin—Platteville in the 2011 Fall Semester by theauthors. During that semester, we taught two infrastructure-related courses. The first course,called “Introduction to Infrastructure Engineering” (I2I), was taken by civil and environmentalengineering students. The second course, “Infrastructure and Society” (I&S), was
pressure, velocity, orelevation at one of the points, provided that the correct unit conversions are applied.Bernoulli Example. Given cold water flowing through an arbitrary shape where z1 = 100 ft, z2 =50 ft, p1 = 30 lbf/in2, V1 = 25 ft/s, V2 = 1ft/s, and = 62.4 lbf/ft3. Since water is essentiallyincompressible in this range, then the unknown pressure p2 can be determined by rewritingBernoulli’s equation using algebra as follows: V 2 V22 p2 p1 ( z1 z2 ) 1 2g Note that each term has basic dimensions of force per area (length2) and the rules