were taught programminglanguages (or coding skills in a graphical and text-based languages) after some classes inalgorithmic thinking or planning your code with flow diagrams or pseudo-code beforecoding. 35% Female (%) 30% Male (%) 25% Total (%) 20% 15% 10% 5% 0%Figure 3. Contribution to the skills part of the student responses to their view of theirview of the engineering foundation course’s contribution.Typical answers for the contribution of engineering foundation course to their teamworkskill development include
. Though some work remained with the projects to create a uniformlook and include text panels that matched the rest of the exhibit, the director was overall verypleased with the work done by the students.Developing service opportunities for the online students was a greater challenge, and a fairamount of time was spent determining how to incorporate service learning into an onlineenvironment. Ultimately, it was decided to take a student-led approach, where teams were givenan opportunity to develop and implement their own project ideas. As a back-up plan for thispilot, there were options for groups that were not able to come to a consensus. Of the projectgroups, two teams developed their own ideas (website for engineering students, STEM
collaboration. Each side knows the other side well, including organizational structure andpeople. The partnership is mainly managed by the two authors of this paper, but many people inboth organizations are involved. At the University, an event planned with the BGCPC needs littleexplanation; at BGCPC, the University will often be suggested as a possible collaborator.University students and student groups have a ready partner for proposed activities without ourneeding to recruit partners.This continuity has the benefit that each partner has learned how to be flexible, responsive, andfluid but also consistent. We are willing to try new ways of delivering content (STEM Day hasevolved considerably), to admit mistakes, but to always assume that we will
,the students yet remained receptive to them. Dr. Giovannelli credits this to that firstunthreatening text on day one: to Augustine’s observation of a silent reader.The Course Reader (Giovannelli, 2016) also provided a list of cultural dimensions (from GeerteHofstede, 2005), i.e., of over-arching cultural characteristics. These include, for example, how aculture deals with time or space; how a culture regards honor, power, or identity; whether themembers of a culture operate as a collective or as individuals; and to what extent the culturepractices long-term or short-term planning. Each week featured one specific cultural dimension,strategically paired with that week’s content.For example, the week on the Industrial Revolution featured the
concepts students hold at agiven time, and are commonly used as a pre-course assessment to plan instruction, and as apre/post measure to assess the effectiveness of instruction [45-48].Traditionally, concept inventories are guided by the notion of the assessment triangle, aconceptual framework that includes cognition—what students know; observation—whatevidence we seek about their knowledge; and interpretation—how we interpret the evidenceabout their knowledge. Others expanded this notion into an assessment square focused on clearlydefining the construct of interest, the means to assess the construct, the observation or evidencecollected through that means, and the interpretation of the evidence collected [49, 50]. Theassessment square therefore
coordinate data collection, interpretation and dissemination to support teaching and learning, planning and decision-making across the college. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 IntegratingTheoryandHands-OnPracticeUsingUnderwaterRoboticsinaMultidisciplinary IntroductoryEngineeringCourseAbstractThisCompleteEvidence-basedPracticepaperwillfocusonthedesign,implementation,andevaluationofamultidisciplinaryintroductoryengineeringcoursethatintegratestheoryandhands-onpracticearoundathemeofunderwaterrobotics.Thecourseisrequiredforallstudents(includingnon-engineeringmajors
theirprototype but were not always intentional in how they planned or conducted their interactions.These three perspectives point to specific gaps in student knowledge related to user interactionsthat future design pedagogy might target to help students elicit requirements and solicit designfeedback from users more effectively.1. IntroductionThose who have a relationship of use with design solutions – defined as “users” – play animportant role in engineering design projects [1]. The use of any technology is defined by thosewho use that technology [2]–[7], and user acceptance strongly influences which technologiesbecome widely adopted [7]–[10]. Designers may interact with users for a number of reasons,such as to elicit user requirements or to solicit
items being planned and created in the 2 2 drawing. Other There are elements of creation in the drawing. 8 8Figure 2. The themes identified in the K-2 Draw-A-Manufacturer test results. The inner circleindicates if the theme was found in the pre or posttest, the middle circle refers to a main theme,and the outer-most circle refers to a sub-theme. The size of each section indicates the frequencyof that theme among all drawings within this data set.Figure 3. The themes identified in the 3-8 Draw-A-Manufacturer test results. The inner circleindicates if the theme was found in the pre or posttest, the middle circle refers to a main theme,and the outer-most circle refers
inmany industries and a valuable skill for an engineer to possess.Integrating engineering learning into projects that benefit the community is rewarding on manylevels. Recipients get access to things that didn’t yet exist or they can’t afford while studentsdevelop new skills and gain valuable, resume building, experience. Further, students get realwork experience working with “clients” while wrestling with balancing function, durability,fabrication time, cost, scheduling, planning, communication, ergonomics, user experience, etc.Finally, service learning projects build and reinforce strong relationships between educators,their administration, and their communities. From our experience, ideal service projects are onesthat benefit the community or
. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Underrepresented Minority Engineering Students’ Professional Experiences with Cooperative Education: Perceived Benefits, Drawbacks, and Pathways to ParticipationAbstractThis study examines underrepresented minority students’ perceptions of cooperative educationprograms (co-ops), and how these perceptions (and other influences) are related to students’decisions about whether to participate in co-ops. This study also examines current co-opstudents’ experiences, including identified benefits and drawbacks of co-op participation. EightAfrican
practice forcore courses in the College of Engineering at CU Boulder. After they were enrolled, studentswere sent a message from the course instructor explaining why they were enrolled in the pilotEngineering Math course and the expected benefits of completing the course. The tone of themessaging was especially important for several reasons: the course was not included in anyengineering degree planning flowcharts, was not a required course for any engineering major,and required that students take Engineering Math in addition to Pre-Calculus their first semester.1 Of note, 10 years ago, CU Boulder’s engineering college did not offer a Pre-Calculus course. Studentswho were not deemed ready for Calc 1 were simply denied entrance into the college. Yet
female. Enrollment in College Physics I, which focused onmechanics was between 20 and 30 students per semester. College Physics II, which focused onwas often smaller and composed primarily of students who intended to move on to graduate studyin biology or physical therapy. These classes were smaller and had between 15 and 20students.The 200-level students who enrolled in Physics I and Physics II were most often 1st or 2nd yearengineering majors, with 10-20 per semester. There were usually between 2 and 6 students frombiology, chemistry, or biochemistry who planned to pursue professional programs in medicine,dentistry, or optometry. These students were often 3rd or 4th year students. Additionally, 1-2math or math education students may also be
region may not be rosy in the Figure 2. Accelerated impact of sea levellong term, the urgency of recurrent flooding has rise in subject study area. These impactscreated an environment in which cities and academics and modeled approaches to adaptation andstruggle to plan and to identify strategies to ameliorate mitigation will be of use to other coastalthe impacts of a changing environment. Immediately communities globally as conditions mimicapparent is that no single discipline is equipped to those experienced currently in the studyprovide guidance. Rather, the changing world area. Source: Dr. Gabriel Vecchi afterdemands that government agencies, professionals, and Oppenheimer, Princeton Universityacademic
of positive adaptations intrinsic to acommunity that has tried to overcome adversity. In ASGM communities, these have includedmercury detoxification programs [19], territorial local planning that keeps ASGM away fromwatersheds [20], the desire of groups that have been discriminated to organize to gain voice andpower [21], etc. For these type of positive adaptations to occur, communities must exhibit thefollowing characteristics: Collective self-esteem (love who you are as a community); Culturalidentity (know who you are as a community); Social humor (be able to laugh at who you are);and State honesty (transparency between local/state government and communities) [14]. Studentsin my class learned about these positive adaptations by researching
defining the steps tomake a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. By letting participants incorporate dance whenteaching algorithmic thinking, participants were able to connect a familiar activity with thealgorithmic process in a hands-on way that was fun. One student commented to the instructorthat she loves to dance and to create and to see how dancing and programming could worktogether was great. This experience supported prior research by the authors that a hands-on,project-based learning approach in a computing camp strengthens teamwork and problemsolving skills [13].Future plans including offering this approach in other computing camps for elementary girls.Having a larger sample size will enable more data collection and assessment of the
institutions represented thelandscape of ~350 engineering schools in 2014 in terms of size and other institutional characteristicsrelated to the intent of the study. A total of 7,179 students responded to the survey; of these respondents,6,187 students were classified as “juniors”, “seniors”, or “5th-year seniors”, in keeping with the study’ssampling plan. See Gilmartin, et al. for a detailed technical report that provides extensive informationabout the study objectives and research questions, sampling framework, response rates and nonresponsebias, and respondent characteristics [20]. All procedures were approved by the Institutional ReviewBoards at Stanford University and Elizabethtown College.Variables considered in the analysis Students
’ views of success included commonmeasures of academic success in engineering; they also reflected participants’ longer-term careergoals and financial plans. Findings have implications for the development of robust engineeringpathways at both 2- and 4- year institutions. Departures from the “norm”: How nontraditional undergraduates experienced success in an alternative engineering transfer programThe idea/ideal of the traditional college undergraduate as “one who earns a high school diploma,enrolls full time immediately after finishing high school, depends on parents for financial support,and either does not work during the school year or works part time” is giving way in 21st centuryAmerica [1]. As early as 2002, researchers noted
gender diversity, particularly in UPR-Ponce, we arecollaborating with “Get by STEM”, a project funded by the US Department of Education seekingto increase the number of female students in STEM. Social science has been an integral part ofthe project that has not been fully implemented yet. Accordingly, the planned curriculumincludes guest experts on the subject.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantsNo. 1832468 and 1832427 (HSI program). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors are greatly thankful to theadvisory board members
minimized [2]. The dynamics of the panopticon areexemplified in the design of Jeremy Bentham’s panopticon as illustrated in Figure 2(b) [19]. Theauthor intends to draw on Foucault’s interpretation of Bentham’s panopticon. These are not one-to-one analogies as the instructor does not offer a “performance” in the lecture hall nor is theobserving instructor invisible to the students in the computer lab as she would be in apanopticon. The analogies hold at the level of the underlying assumptions while designing thesespaces vis-à-vis what type of interactions in the space are anticipated and planned for. (a) (b
-seated beliefs about the curriculum that were the cause ofthe problem they wished to examine. In the short workshop time available, we were not able todislodge these beliefs.Recommendations for staff developers and workshop organizersBased on our reflective analysis of the workshops conducted to date we make the followingrecommendations as initial determinants:1. The participants should be required to pre-read the materials and to complete pre-workshopactivities to explore their own problems. Also, workshop leaders should communicate the entirecourse content to the participants in advance of the workshop, allowing for modifications. If wehad, the participants could have framed their problems in light of the planned discussion. Thefacilitators
75 10,275 2018-2020 Yrs 2-4 participant feedback; augment evaluation plan*Estimatedbasedontheaveragehighschoolteacherbeingresponsibleforabout137studentseachyear[4]To develop the NEET program, NEWT’s educational team hosted 15 environmental scienceteachers for a two-day brainstorming session to determine the educational needs of teachers andidentify the ERC nanotechnology topics to be incorporated into the pilot NEET program.Teachers were selected to participate in the brainstorming session based on years of teachingexperience in environmental science and teaching in a high-needs district. The session includedpresentations of NEWT research, instructional practices and strategies discussions, and a hands-on lesson
identify high risk students. The educatorcould then implement an intervention plan for that individual or group of individuals to ensuretheir success in the course. This study specifically addresses three research questions pertaining tothe motivation of students in design courses. RQ1: Does a correlation exist between motivational factors and student success in Freshman Cornerstone Design? RQ2: Does a correlation exist between motivational factors and student success in Senior Capstone Design? RQ3: Does a correlation exist between changes in motivational factors and student success in Senior Capstone Design for the same cohort of students?2. BackgroundIn this study, the authors use a modified version of
component.Field visit with EWB Project TeamOriginally, the ethnographic component of our project was envisioned as following our localchapter through an entire project cycle. We planned to travel with the EWB team, sit in oncommunity conversations, and conduct participation observation in chapter meetings, work, andplanning sessions. The chapter identified for this portion has, for a variety of reasons, not beenable to make progress on their project, but we were able to find another chapter to travel with.However, we have not been able to conduct participant observation during ongoing chapteractivities due to geographical distance. Instead, ongoing “check-ins” with chapter leadership havebeen conducted. In January of 2017, Dr. Tina Lee and a student
outcomes: Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences, 171-192.Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of vocational behavior, 45(1), 79-122.Liben, L. S., Bigler, R. S., & Krogh, H. R. (2001). Pink and blue collar jobs: Children’s judgments of job status and job aspirations in relation to sex of worker. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 346–363.Magnuson, C. S., & Starr, M. F. (2000). How early is too early to begin life career planning? The importance of the elementary school years. Journal of Career Development, 27(2), 89- 101.Miller, P
problems in STEM education and to increase the supply of qualified teachers,XXX University and YYY technical college worked in tandem to produce an EducationalInternship program funded by the NSF-Robert Noyce Scholarship and UNITE program. Thisprogram was designed to meet the demands of STEM teachers in the Savannah Chatham CountyPublic school system. Specific elements of the program include the following: 1. Launching an aggressive recruitment plan for talented math and engineering majors to pursue teaching careers in 6 -12 secondary schools; 2. Implementing a comprehensive STEM teacher training program; 3. Providing Summer Educational Internship Program (SEIP) to rising sophomores; 4. Providing Field Observation Experiences for
remotely interesting to me.The data shows that enrollment in Mechanisms and Drives should triple if renamed as a Roboticsclass.When given multiple options for a theme in a manufacturing class, clear front runners for coursecontent topics became visible. Charts 3a and 3b: Data for female and low interest responders related to the following survey question:Survey questions used to generate this data: Which of the following STEM elective classes would you like to take? a. Architecture b. Biomedical Engineering c. Inventions 101: Planning and Design d. Food Science and Technology e. DIY Manufacturing: Handmade Games
time working independently andtaking the lead on various projects such as cutting the pieces for the cabinets and askingLaura and Tara to assist her by holding the large pieces of wood. During these days,Jane demonstrated her increasing confidence by using a variety of power tools she hadpreviously not used alone (e.g., power drill and circular saw), and by making criticaldecisions vis-à-vis the plans for designing and constructing parts for the new cabinets.During the second half of the third day, Mark had to leave the team to work on a projectoutside the SIL. Mark’s absence became an opportunity for Jane to engage in the team’stasks in a different manner. For example, when the Systems Team decided to change thelocation of the air compressor
idea generation as well asconvergent implementation planning (Kurtzberg, 2005; Kolmos and Holgaard, 2010). However, alongsideincreases in creativity, diverse team membership may also generate conflict among team members; thus,creating a complex situation (van Knippenberg and Schippers, 2007; Williams and O’Reilly, 1998). Priorresearch has shown that more conflict and less cohesion may arise in groups with one or more salientdifferences between members. In team formation, cliques and exclusionary practices can illuminate lowsense of belonging among students (especially for females and underrepresented minority students), andcause disparities in learning gains. A survey of nearly 700 students from multiple higher educationinstitutions revealed
whether it was aligned to the priorities of the funding agency.Research Course Development and Implementation, Summer Research Experience ObservationsNon-intrusive site observations occurred during the research course development process. Theseobservations were conducted during select planning meetings. Informal visits were made duringthe research course and summer research experience. Detailed field notes were gathered andanalyzed to provide requisite answers for the evaluation questions.Focus Groups and InterviewsMSEN teachers, student participants, and mentors participated in either focus groups or interviewsto determine the program’s impact on the items outlined in the evaluation criteria. Semi-structuredinterview protocols were used to guide
diversity); were comfortable voicing opinions about diversity topics; hadwitnessed tensions, stereotyping, or discriminatory acts on the basis of any of these minoritycharacteristics (implying a dominant cultural capital excluding minorities); and whetherminorities felt pressured to act in any particular way inside or outside of the classroom(reflecting both social and cultural capital).1 Climate indices were derived from factor analysesof each of these sets of questions (see the Appendix for index construction). Further, self-confidence as an engineer and in terms of academic suitability to engineering were assessed;indices for these sets of questions were also developed through factor analysis (see theAppendix); as were future plans to be