; n=32 freshmen, 19 sophomores, 33 juniors, 9 s eniors, 27 senior leaders Figure 4. Confidence in Engineering Survey Results (Earlier Study)Students said that they learned a great deal from the EEP (Figure 5). About 30% had taken thecourse more than once. One student had taken it all seven semesters it has been offered. Most ofthe students said that they had learned a lot from the project experience. As would be expected,seniors all seem to have learned a lot because they had more to put into the program. I learned a great deal from my work on this project Percent of each class giving response 100
number ofyears. The end goal was to create an e-course curriculum with a set of multiple electronic coursesthat can offer online or in-class to help address the scheduling and learning needs of the student.References1. Brooks, D. W. “Web-Teaching A guide to Designing Interactive Teaching for the World Wide Web”, Plenum Press, New York, 19972. Regan, M. and S. D. Sheppard, "Interactive Multimedia Courseware and Hands-on Learning Experience: An Assessment Study," ASEE Journal of Eng. Education, 1996 85 (2), p 123-130.3. Gramoll, K.C., R.F. Abbanat, and K. Slater, "Interactive Multimedia for Engineering Dynamics," ASEE 1996 Conf. Proc., Washington, D.C., June 1996.4. Gramoll, K.C., R. Abbanat and K. Slater, Multimedia
ORI 101 Survival Skills (1) ENG101 Communication Skills I (3) MTH 125 Calculus I (4) CHE 101/101L Gen Chemistry I (4) FAS/HED/NHM 101/103 Health S. (2) ENG 101 Eng. Drawing & Graph (3) 2nd Semester ENG 102 Communication Skills II (3) MTH126 Calculus II (4) PHY 105 Physics I (4) EGC 104 Computer Programming (3) ME 101/101L Intro to Mech Eng. (2) Sophomore 1st Semester MTH 227 Calculus III (4) PHY 106 Physics II (4) HIS 101 Wold History I
predicted and measured results would be of concern at an aircraft manufacturingplant, it was to be expected in this project given the students’ lack of manufacturing and testingexperience. Nonetheless, in an attempt to identify the source(s) of discrepancy, studentssearched for possible clues in their analysis procedure and underlying theory as well as thepossible anomalies with the fabrication process and the imperfections with the experimentalsetting.The availability of multiple samples for each design concept provided an excellent opportunity tofurther elaborate on the statistical nature of such experiments involving multiple randomvariables. In this case the random variables included the specimen dimensions, supportcondition, loading
. This is particularly true ofsmaller industries in nonmetropolitan areas with no Ph.D.’s (and often no Master degreerecipients) on their staff and sometimes few Bachelor-level college graduates at all, even amongthe “engineering” staff. The staff might feel threatened by bringing in someone “superior” tothem in technical ability. They might also feel a new/young engineering professor is still only a“kid.”The above perceptions can be addressed only by a ongoing, sensitive, and low key nurturing ofrelationships with key industrial personnel and letting them know in a nonthreatening manner ofone’s interest and capability in helping with their problems. It may take some time but generallythey will come around, often when a “crisis” suddenly occurs
requirecoaching to guide us in our studies. Self-learning is not given to everybody with the sameeasiness. Maybe it is to soon in our training to ask us so much. » L-D. H.« I am a person who needs someone to summarize the subject, I need someone who explains mein detail, who gives me examples. It is difficult for a person like me to learn by myself. » T. S.5.2 – Metacognitive strategiesAmong the metacognitive strategies listed in table 2, those most often cited by students are : beaware of one’s progress and results, evaluate the quality and the efficiency of one’s cognitiveactivities. As a preliminary analysis, we ascribe that result to the fact that students have an examonce every two weeks (or each week if we consider the formative exam) instead of
constrained wewere able to omit and insert topics that allow for a logical, integrated presentation of thermalsciences. The assessment process will determine which of these decisions were appropriate.After two or three annual cycles, this course will be an excellent model of an introductorythermal science course for mechanical engineering majors at USMA and elsewhere.References 1. Office of the Dean, 1998, “Educating Army Leaders for the 21 st Century,” United States Military Academy, West Point, New York, p. 5. 2. Office of the Dean, 2000, “Academic Program AY 2000-2001: Field Tables and Course Descriptions,” United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. 3. Albert, B., Klawunder, S., Arnas, Ö., 2002, “Energy
thefuture, laboratory experiences, and past experience. During the interviews, we specifically notedthe students' strengths (and weaknesses) in relation to oral and interpersonal communicationskills. We made offers to the highest ranked candidate(s) based on our final assessments. Table 2 - Scoring Rubric for Assessing Student Applications Scoring Scoring (0 to 3 points ) and Qualifying Characteristics Category 0 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt Grade Point < 2.50 2.50 to 2.99 3.0 to 3.49 3.50 to 4.0 Average (GPA) Worked up to one
theUniversity of North Carolina, July/August 2003[13]- The Future of Higher Education: An Interview with Parker Rossman by James L. Morrison and ParkerRossman The Technology Source Archives at the University of North Carolina, January/February 2003[14]- Integrating Laboratories into Online Distance Education Courses by Deborah O'Bannon, Jill Scott, MargaretGunderson, and James S. Noble, The Technology Source Archives at the University of North Carolina,January/February 2000[15]- The Nature and Purpose of Distance Education, by Diana G. Oblinger, The Technology Source Archives at theUniversity of North Carolina, March/April 2000[16]- Quality Assurance for Online Courses: Implementing Policy at RMIT by Carmel McNaught, The TechnologySource Archives at
State University, Ames, IA, US √ Many electives None Page 22.916.7 Johns Hopkins University, 13 Baltimore, MD, US √ Concentration: Ecology and Sustainability (no details on the E/S Loyola Marymount University, Los Courses)14 Angeles, CA, US √ Massachusetts Institute of Course: Leadership
, or g(x) = f(x-c), which will shift theoriginal graph of f(x) to the right by c units. These transformations do not change the shape ofthe graph. However, there are also transformations that changes the shape of the graph, such asg(x) = 2f(x), or g(x) = f(3x).Quadratic Functions Another mathematical concept used in the demonstrations is quadratic functions.Students first learn that the height of an object in free fall follows this quadratic function:Where, is the height of the object (in meters) at any given time t (seconds), is the initialvelocity (meters per second), is the initial height, t is time, and is the gravity constant, 2which is 9.8 m/s .The time it takes the object reach its maximum height is given
Page 22.1104.12Society, S. Jasanoff, et al., eds. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1994.4. Wisnioski, Matthew. "'Liberal education has failed': Reading like an engineer in 1960s America." Technology andCulture 50 (4), 2009, pp. 753-782.5, Azarin, Samira, Nicola Ferrier, Stephen M. Kennedy, Daniel Klingenberg, Kristyn Masters, Katherine D.McMahon, Jeffrey Russell and Susan C. Hagness. "Work in Progress: A First-Year introduction-to-engineeringcourse on society's engineering grand challenges." 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008,Saratoga Springs, NY.6. Aronowitz, Scott. "Duke and NC State Launch Joint Program to Stimulate K-12 STEM interest" CampusTechnology. March 55, 2010. Available at: http://campustechnology.com
. Page 22.1121.21 10. Myers, I. and M. McCaulley (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the 19Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Consulting Psychologists Press Palo Alto, CA.11. Felder, R. and R. Brent (2005). "Understanding student differences." Journal ofEngineering Education. 94(1): 57-72.12. Felder, R. (2004). "Changing times and paradigms." Chemical Engineering Education.38(1): 32-33.13. Smith, K. and A. Waller (1997). "New Paradigms for Engineering Education." InCampbell, W.E. & Smith, K.A. (Eds.). New paradigms for college teaching. Edina, MN:Interaction.14. Smith, K., S. Sheppard, et al. (2005). "Pedagogies of engagement: classroom-basedpractices." Journal of Engineering
Modernisation Project Vignette § Singapore Water Management Vignette § FAA Advanced Automation System (AAS) Vignette § Standard Korean Light Transit System Vignette References:1. Pyster, A., D. Olwell, J. Anthony, S. Enck, N. Hutchison, and A. Squires, eds.; Ferris, T. lead author (2011, December 15). Graduate reference curriculum for systems engineering (GRCSE) version
Learning Sciences, 235-76. 4. Prince, M.J. 2004. “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research,” Journal of Engineering Education, 1-9. 5. Harsha, P., M. Green. 2010. Computer Science Majors Significantly Increase for the Second Year in a Row: Growth Reverses the Steep Decline in Enrollment of the 2000’s. Retrieved from http://www.cra.org/uploads/documents/resources/taulbee/CRA-Taulbee-PR-2010-Final.pdf. 6. Dahlstrom, E., T. de Boor, P. Grunwald, M. Vockley. 2011. The ECAR National Survey of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, Educause Center for Applied Research. Page
., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom- Based Practices. Jnl. Eng. Ed. 94, 87–101 (2005).3. Kilpatrick, D. J., Linville, M. & Stout, D. E. Procedural justice and the development and use of peer evaluations in business and accounting classes. Journal of Accounting Education 19, 225–246 (2001).4. Byrd, J. S. & Hudgins, J. L. Teaming in the Design Laboratory. Jnl. Eng. Ed. 84, 335–341 (1995).5. Eschenbach, E. A. & Mesmer, M. A. Web Based Forms for Design Team Peer Evaluations. Proceedings of the 1998 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (1998).at 6. Wang, J. & Imbrie, P. K. Assessing Team Effectiveness: Comparing Peer-Evaluations to a Team Effectiveness
: Linking Engineering and Society. National Academy of Engineering. 36(2):38-446. Paterson, K., C. O’Holleran, and C. Leslie (2010). Faculty Impressions of Service Learning in Engineering Education. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. Louisville, KY. AC2010-2033, 8 pp.7. Silliman, S., R.Mohtar, K.G. Paterson, and W. Ball (2010). Engineering Academic Programs for Hydrophilanthropy: Commonalities and Challenges. Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education. 145:5-29. (I)8. Bielefeldt, A.R., K.G. Paterson, and C.W. Swan (2010). Measuring the Value Added from Service Learning in Project-Based Engineering Education. International Journal of Engineering Education. In Special Issue on
-intercept, caused by physical and electronic offsets between the active elements of thetransducers and the measured displacement between the bases of the holders, can be ignored.)The speed of sound found for a 10-point fit is typically within 1% of the textbook speed of soundin air of 343 m/s at 20° C.Because the Machine Science pulsers cannot be adjusted in frequency or amplitude, theextensions that we have used at NU to measure the (lack of) dependence of the speed of soundon frequency or intensity were not possible at NECC. Using the Voltage Cursor feature theNECC students were able to measure the decrease in intensity of the signal as the distancebetween the transducers in increased. This can be displayed as a scatter plot in Excel, and
class room or laboratory.For an engineer in industry, a project is a sequence of tasks required to reach an objective.Typically, the objective is to design a device or process that has value to a customer (user). Theproject begins by defining a performance problem associated with an application and ends with adesign solution. The problem drives the learning required to complete the project. Managing theproject requires the engineer to demonstrate effective teamwork, clear communication and theability to balance the social, economic and environmental impacts of the project. Project-basedlearning (PBL) is based on the practice of solving problems. The concept of problem-basedlearning was first developed in the medical field in the mid-1950’s. It
EPICSEPICS is an engineering-centered, multidisciplinary, service-learning program at PurdueUniversity that has received national recognition. Students enrolled in the EPICS courses learndesign while they develop projects for local or global community partners. In the 2011-2012academic year, over 500 students from more than 70 majors within the College of Engineeringand across the university have participated in EPICS. This program is structured with student-leddivisions, each with 8-20 students, a faculty or industry mentor, and a graduate teaching assistant(TA). Each division has one or more not-for-profit agency/ies (such as a museum, governmentservice, charity, etc.) as a community partner(s). The students work with their communitypartner(s) to
preparation for her and created a challenging objective for the group. The resultsshowed the students in her group their weaknesses in a format different from the in-class testsand verified that they did indeed need to study and that attendance in the study group isworthwhile.Study Group LogisticsAs described elsewhere8, students arrive at study groups to find that the mentor has organized theseating in the room to be in a U-shape with all chairs and desks facing the white board. Thementor takes a seat as if s/he is a part of the group. The mentor facilitates collaborative groupwork by opening communication and asking about problem areas from the lecture or homework.In the case of a group with students from several different course sections studying
. Page 25.202.1514 Baillie, C. (2011) ‘Threshold capabilities: an emerging methodology to locate curricula threshold’, in proceedings of the Research in Engineering Education Symposium, 4-7 October, Madrid.15 Male, S. and Baillie, C. (2011) ‘Engineering Threshold Concepts’, SEFI Annual Conference, European Society for Engineering Education, Lisbon.16 Smith, M., Hargroves, K., and Desha, C. (2010) Cents and Sustainability: Securing Our Common Future by Decoupling Economic Growth from Environmental Pressures, Earthscan, London.17 Von Weizsäcker, E., Hargroves, K., Smith, M., Desha, C., and Stasinopoulos, P. (2009) Factor Five: Transforming the Global Economy through 80% Improvements in Resource Productivity, Earthscan
educational objectives, Complete ed. New York: Longman. [7] Feltovich, P.J., Prietula, M.J. & Ericsson, K.A., (2006). Studies of expertise from psychological perspectives. In Ericsson, K.A. ed. The cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, xv, 901 p.[8] Chi, M.T.H., (2006). Two approaches to the study of experts’ characteristics. In Ericsson, K.A. ed. The cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, xv, 901 p.[9] Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I. & Vermetten, Y., (2005). Information problem solving by experts and novices
future is... beyond modular. The Technology Teacher, 56(7), 28-29.11 Virtual Machine Shop. (n.d.). Retrieved August 2011, from http://www.kanabco.com/vms/index.html12 Smith, R. (2007). Virtual machine shop. Retrieved August 8, 2007, from www.jjjtrain.com/vms/index.html13 Bugeja, M. (2007, September 14). Second thoughts about Second Life. Retrieved June 21, 2008, from http://chronicle.com/jobs/news/2007/09/2007091401c.htm14 Volk, K. S. (1993, Spring). Enrollment trends in industrial arts/technology teacher education from 1970-1990.15 Rogers, G. (1998). Concerns about technology education laboratories. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 35(3), 97-10016 Rogers, G. E. (1996). The untapped resource. Journal of
that the passing rate in the secondcourse in thermodynamics is higher for those students who completed the first course with theinstructors who were tough graders, that is those who issued lower GPAs in the prerequisitethermodynamics class5. Page 25.233.5 Table 1. Cumulative Grade distribution for sections of Thermodynamics-I taught by each instructor. Inst- GPA N S %A %B %C %D %F %W % DFW Type
. Page 25.235.5 Independent variable Dependent Variable Student Background Information Teaching Content of Department of Gender Architecture Extension Education Age Previous Education System Description Architecture Teaching (12 items) Previous Major Studied Analysis, Current Education System Independent S
Desktopdeployment options, learningmanagement system applications, andcontent development tools. DOE LMS Page 25.1284.6 Figure 4: Overview of the standards and technology selection process Learning Content Portability StandardsQuestion: Which learning content portability standard(s) would fit our needs?Objectives: (1) ability to move content between various delivery platforms, (2