work in curriculum, Dr. Linder has multiple national publications relating to early childhood and elementary mathematics motivation and achievement, preservice and inservice teacher quality and professional development, cross-curricular and technology integration in mathematics, and teacher beliefs related to mathematics pedagogy.Dr. Cindy M. Lee, Clemson University Cindy M. Lee serves as the department chair of Clemson University’s Engineering and Science Education Department, a graduate-only department that offers a graduate certificate program in STEM education pedagogy and introduction to education research methods as well as a PhD program in STEM education research. Cindy’s research and teaching has focused on
heavily integrated into the classroom piece whichwould be not be replicable in our project as we had no classroom piece to use to grade such. “Inengineering, there are many examples of service-learning programs ranging from freshmanintroductory courses to senior capstone courses. Despite their successes, an area that theengineering education community has yet to fully develop is the reflection component of service-learning.”3 We have made a conscious choice to keep the project housed outside the bounds of a forcredit course due to student feedback which will be specifically discussed in the results section.RESULTS The exhibits that have been created over the years have varied greatly in design and have grown in depthand complexity over that
Paper ID #27426Connecting to the Physical Space through Funds of Knowledge: LessonsLearned from a STEM Summer Enrichment Program (Fundamental, Diver-sity)Dr. Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of San Diego Dr. Joel Alejandro (Alex) Mejia is an assistant professor of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. His current research investigates how the integration of the historically and culturally accumulated wealth of knowledge, skills, and practices - also known as funds of knowledge - and engineering design can serve as a pathway to and through engineering. Dr. Mejia is particularly interested in how Latinx
Effectiveness, she worked as the Education Project Manager for the NSF-funded JTFD Engineering faculty development program, as a high school math and science teacher, and as an Assistant Principal and Instructional & Curriculum Coach.Lydia Ross, Arizona State University Lydia Ross is a doctoral candidate and graduate research assistant at Arizona State University. Her re- search interests focus on higher education equity and access, particularly within STEM.Prof. Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause is professor in the Materials Science Program in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and
reported adding realistic projects or case studies that are morehands-on or industry related into the course design [34]–[39]. Other studies talked about addingrealistic components to a curriculum as a whole rather than just in project work in a particularclass [24], [27]. Other studies took this step further into actually interfacing with industrythrough the use of industry mentors [23] or work-integrated learning where students worked inthe field [30]. However it was done, there was a clear emphasis on real-world experiences thatseemed prevalent to high-achieving and honors populations.Bridging topics and disciplines: One interesting finding was the emphasis on learning that wasinterdisciplinary or that bridged multiple topics together. For
process of integrating an international, intercultural or globaldimension into the purpose, functions and delivery of post-secondary education, in order toenhance the quality of education and research for all students and staff, and to make ameaningful contribution to society.” Both the notion of “meaningful contribution” and of“society” are of course open to widely different interpretations but is in not uncommonlyconnected to strivings to meet the UN's Sustainable Development Goals, including the idea ofcultivating a sense of “global citizenship” as an important part of quality education. These arethemes that look well beyond both the EU project and the business side of higher education, andindeed also far beyond the university.The European
academic year with a huge success [2]. Our two courses wereoffered as technical elective courses. The two courses are the only two project-based courses oncutting-edge computer technologies in our curriculum. These courses provided students with theopportunities to learn and practice real-world software engineering, and gain experiences insolving multidisciplinary practical problems. Furthermore, these courses help students to attainseveral ABET student outcomes that are difficult to accomplish via traditional lecture-based andlab-based courses, such as (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility, (i) arecognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning, and (j) a knowledge ofcontemporary issues.These
practices(Brophy et al., 2008; NRC, 2012; NGSS Lead States, 2013; Roth, 1996).Methods Context and Participants. This study took place at a medium-sized land grant universityin the eastern United States. Students from two separate undergraduate programs, MechanicalEngineering (ENG) and Early Childhood Education (ECE) participated in the study. Participantswere enrolled in one of three courses; namely, ENG students were enrolled in a 200-level designcourse that covered 3D drafting and modeling, while ECE students were enrolled in either a 400-level course on inclusive curriculum and assessment for infants and toddlers, or a 400-levelcourse on integrated early childhood teaching that emphasized science curriculum, instructionand assessment for
Paper ID #34742Transforming Introductory Engineering Courses to Match GenZ LearningStylesDr. Sean Michael Quallen, University of Idaho Dr. Sean M. Quallen teaches dynamics, fluid mechanics, and heat transfer. His interests include improving the representation of young women in engineering fields and the integration of gaming and entertainment into modern pedagogy.Dr. John Crepeau P.E., University of Idaho Professor John Crepeau received his BS degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Califor- nia, Berkeley, and his MS and PhD degrees from the University of Utah. After serving as an NSF-NATO
and feminist education frameworks established by Paulo Freire [12]and bell hooks [33], Donna Riley introduced the concept of liberative pedagogy to engineeringeducation through her thermodynamics course at Smith College [14]. Liberative pedagogy takesa student-centered approach that empowers students to question authority and challengeoppression, which is critical to “prepare effective [engineering] professionalswho have an added critical awareness of the systems in which they work, as well as theability and desire to act to change those systems” [14, p. 143]. To reform her traditionalthermodynamics course, Riley related students’ lived experiences to the curriculum, madestudents authorities in the classroom by giving them teaching roles
paperdescribes an effort using short readings, which require minimal effort on the part of the studentsor instructor, in class topics that require some effort, and research papers that requireconsiderable effort to complete and grade. The goals of these readings and topics are diverse andinclude building character, encouraging creativity and compassion, and gaining a betterunderstanding of the modern business environment. Appropriate topics can also encouragestudent interest in the subject.References 1. Hartman, J. C., “Engineering Economy: Suggestions to Update a Stagnant Course Curriculum,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 1998. 2. Evans, E., Nachtman, H., Needy, K.L., “A look into the Engineering Economy Literature”, ASEE Annual
ProjectsAbstractThis evidence-based practice paper provides engineering educators teaching first-yearintroductory courses, who are new or looking to update their courses, inspiration with diverseproject ideas. The active learning via project-based, activity-based, and service-based courseswithin the first-year engineering curriculum has proven effective for students not only to becomemore engaged and motivated but also to experience increased learning and retention. Generally,first-year engineering courses are meant to create student experiences that are meaningful, open-ended, and hands-on in addition to being an introduction to working and communicatingeffectively within teams. Whether one is an experienced educator or not, looking for projectideas to adapt
Paper ID #22678(Fundamental) Fregados Pero no Jodidos: A Case Study of Latinx RasquachismoDr. Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of San Diego Dr. Joel Alejandro (Alex) Mejia is an assistant professor of General Engineering at the University of San Diego. His current research investigates the funds of knowledge of Latinx adolescents, and how they use these funds of knowledge to solve engineering problems in their communities. Dr. Mejia is particularly interested in how Latinx adolescents bring forth unique ways of knowing, doing, and being that provide them with particular ways of framing, approaching, and solving engineering
increasedtransportation systems in the Hampton roads area, and the intentional development of AfricanAmerican engineers through an experimental-centric curriculum (Hampton University School ofEngineering, n.d.). Additionally, Hampton’s College of Engineering and Technology has been inthe spotlight for partnerships and technical competitions. Hampton engineering students won anaviation human factors competition where they could utilize creative insight and technicalskillsets to design aviation solutions that connect to the broader issues of traveling in Virginia.Similarly, Hampton engineering and technology departments recently partnered with Amazon toexpose Black students and the broader community to critical engagements with augmentedreality in support of
to improve our lessons and add to them, with the goal of providing a morecomplete set of materials that can be shared with high school teachers, which would includewrite-ups and assessments as well as teaching manuals. We are also planning to explore optionsto integrate these lessons in remote summer camps or after-school programs. While the currentpandemic-induced remote education situation will not endure indefinitely, we believe that theseeducational materials and approach may be useful for remote instruction during “snow days” andwill also provide an ongoing opportunity to offer EE-centric STEM outreach to high schoolstudents in remote and rural areas who are often left out of university-based STEM outreachevents and the many STEM events
minor from Ohio Northern University. He was a Choose Ohio First scholar inducted during the 2012-2013 school year as a promising teacher candidate in STEM. David was the recipient of the Remsburg Creativity Award for 2013 and the DeBow Freed Award for outstanding leadership as an undergraduate student (sophomore) in 2014. He is also a member of the mathematics, education, and engineering honor societies: Kappa Mu Epsilon, Kappa Delta Pi, and Tau Beta Pi respectively. He has extensive experience in curriculum development in K-12 and creates material for the Technology Student Association’s annual TEAMS competition. David has co-authored two texts related to engineering, Principles of Applied Engineering for Pearson
Paper ID #38763Impacting engineering students’ academic trajectories through a learningoutcomes enhancement cycleMrs. Javiera Espinoza, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso Javiera Espinoza von Bischhoffshausen is a lecturer and curriculum design specialist in the Department of Industrial Engineering at the Pontifical Catholic University of Valparaiso (PUCV). She has an M.A. in Higher Education from the University of Michigan (2020). In addition, she has a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from PUCV, Chile (2012). Her research interests include engineering education, particularly curricular design, quality
other AP science teacher mentioned that a recent restructuring of the AP Physics coursecontent and sequencing led him to change from implementing IC as a required in-class program,which he did in previous years, to a voluntary after-school program, which was the case for the2015-2016 school year. He indicated that after the restructuring of the course, he did not have thetime or flexibility in the curriculum that he felt is needed in order to implement IC as a required,in-class program.Further, the elementary school teachers also discussed how they appreciate the opportunities theprogram offers, such as providing an integrated STEM experience and allowing students andteachers to move beyond the confines of their regular classroom and curriculum
Paper ID #21914Successes and Difficulties Experienced by Engineering Transfer Students ata Large Public UniversityDr. Susan P. Gentry, University of California, Davis Dr. Susan P. Gentry is a Lecturer with Potential Security of Employment in the Materials Science and Engineering department at the University of California, Davis. In her current position at UC Davis, she is integrating computational modules into the undergraduate and graduate materials curriculum. She is specifically interested in students’ computational literacy and life-long learning of computational materi- als science tools.Dr. Colleen Elizabeth Bronner
rapidly develops), the endeavor of empathic growth anddevelopment need not be abandoned within post-secondary education. Rather, it indicates thatwe lack an understanding of the ideal means for empathic development later in one’s life.Given the growing emphasis on the necessity of empathy to thrive as an engineer, engineeringeducators need to understand the constellation of existing tools and pedagogical techniques tofoster empathy within the engineering curriculum. This synthesis piece highlights a variety ofeducational contexts and pedagogical techniques, each of which we posit are equally salient andmutually supportive for the development of engineering students’ empathic skills, abilities, ordispositions. We draw from literature from a wide
. Insummary, a critical contribution of the Socially Transformative Engineering Pedagogy is engaginglearners in different modes of reasoning so they can achieve their full potential for conscientiousdecision-making.Pedagogical Translation of the Socially Transformative Engineering FrameworkIntegrating a new framework with an emphasis on engineering reasoning fluency while integratingsocial and ethical perspectives can be daunting. Therefore, we present an illustrative lessoninspired by a curriculum developed by Sung and colleagues [29]. In this lesson, engineering is notthe central focus, but engineers are situated as part of a legal case. As part of the legal case, twoengineers are the expert witnesses, one representing the defendant and the other
) share some of the best practicesadopted by the instructors to ensure rigor and consistency of the coursework at the regionalcampus.The curriculum for the two courses covers the fundamental concepts and provides an opportunityfor students to explore the applications of circuits in the real world. In a normal learningenvironment, these courses tend to be difficult due to higher expectations for problem-solving,math, and scientific concepts, and adding external factors such as the pandemic adds morecomplications. The focus of this research work is to study the first- and second-year engineeringcourses and present the challenges associated with the delivery of the course content, teachingengineering concepts and applications and laboratory
inter- est is in 3D modeling and applications, CAD/CAM/CAE, manufacturing system design and planning, and computer simulation and OR. He renovated the industrial and manufacturing engineering curriculum with introduction of CAD/CAM/CAE and 3D modeling applications to manufacturing systems, and has taught Boeing engineers on the subjects for about 20 years. He was a recipient of NSF grants on developing a supply-chain manufacturing system and on developing an integrated design-aid tool for flexible manufac- turing systems, and of AHA (American Heart Association) grant on volumetric assessment of epicardial adipose tissue using echocardiography . He authored a book on CAD on Unigraphics: Engineering De- sign in
shown by comparison in Table 1.Table 1: Engineering degree recipients for U.S. citizens or permanent residents. UNM, B.S. (21-22) UNM, Ph.D. (21-22) National, Ph.D. (2019)All recipients 266 23 4725U.S., females 79 0 1312Latinas 36 0 91Engineering and research identity has been used as an analytical lens for describing andunderstanding the achievements and persistence of students in engineering curriculums [10]–[16]. These studies have also proposed interventions that might increase student interest andconnection to their engineering field of study [17]–[19]. Further these studies
-semester project course,(3) approaches of ET students in handling cutting-edge technology, (4) the competition rules andscoring, and (5) student feedback and discussion. This paper will serve as a teaching aid for theinstructors currently teaching or planning to teach senior design courses in the near future. Mostspecifically, the paper will help the new junior faculty members in planning the course andadapting grading and reporting procedures. In the next section, a brief overview of the coursestructure, objectives, outcomes with project requirements and team selection are presented.2. Course Structure, Objectives, and Learning OutcomesIn order to offer an interdisciplinary project experience to ET students at OSU, EET and METprogram integrated
Cybersecurity program and serves as Academic Coordinator of the M.S. in Software Engineering Program at West Virginia University. She has served on program and organizing committees of many international conferences and workshops.Dr. Erin Carll, University of Washington Erin Carll is a research scientist at the University of Washington Center for Evaluation and Research for STEM Equity. She earned a PhD and MA in Sociology as well as a certificate in demographic methods and a concentration in social statistics from UW. She also earned an MA in Russian, East European, and Eurasian Studies from Columbia University, a BA in Political Science and Russian Studies from Central Connecticut State University, and an AA in Liberal
structuredthe methodology as follows: a. Narrative Collection: Each co-author, representing a distinct national background, shares their personal narrative. These narratives encompass their experiences, challenges, and successes in navigating U.S. academia as an international faculty. This process includes documenting instances of cultural adjustment, professional development and encounters with institutional barriers [16]. We presented each narrative based on themes like transitional experiences, our experiences as graduate students, then transitioning into our first professional roles (postdoc, junior faculty etc), and then finally moving towards post- tenure experiences. b. Integration of Insights: Finally, the
virtual lab experiences havemuch more possibilities without being limited to lab courses. The project team and faculty in EEsuccessfully integrated laboratory experiences into purely theoretical courses via Hardware-in-Homework (HiH) concept [13, 14]. The Analog Discovery kit is a good example of HiH, whichcan play an important role for students who learn EE materials in an online setting. The uniquemeasurement features of the Analog Discovery kit can be appropriately applied to lower to upper-level courses [14]. Due to its readily available and portable nature, it will be beneficial forstudents who learn well with hands-on activities. With a growing need of an integration of online labs in engineering curriculum, it isimperative that we
Louisiana State University a gift from an alumnus made possible the establishment of auniversity-wide program to improve undergraduate students’ communication skills. As weinitially described in a 2006 paper, the Communication across the Curriculum (CxC) programwas established in 2004 with an initial emphasis on engineering students.¹ A key element of theCxC program was the inception of Communication-Intensive (C-I) courses. C-I courses areintended to be integrated into existing discipline-specific courses, with additional requirementsfor emphasis on two of the four modes of communication: written, spoken, visual, andtechnological. In a 2007 survey designed to solicit student perceptions of the value of C-Icourses in the engineering curricula, our
Science and to streamline transfer from community colleges to 4-year institutions.Dr. Ruzica Todorovic, City Colleges of Chicago-Wilbur Wright College Ruzica Todorovic, PhD has been an Engineering and Chemistry faculty member at Wilbur Wright College since 2012. She also acts as a coordinator for Wright’s Engineering Program and the NSF: HSI ”Building Bridges into Engineering and Computer Science” grant since its inception. She is committed to cultivating an inclusive educational environment which respects the diversity of students, while providing attentive student support. Prior to joining Wright College, Ruzica obtained her PhD in Chemical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Chicago, and conducted