Education Journal, 2(3), 2011, 106-112.11. N. Provotas and K. Elder, Phase-Field Methods in Materials Science and Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, 2011.12. S.B. Biner, Programming Phase-Field Modeling, Springer, 2017.13. M. Foss and Y.-C. Liu, “Creating solutions through project-based and experimental learning: A case study of the Concept Center”, International Journal of Engineering Education, 37(6), 2021, 1630-1642.14. M. Foss, Y.-C. Liu, and S. Yarahmadian, “Project-based learning in a virtual setting: A case study on materials and manufacturing process and applied statistics’, International Journal of Engineering Education, 39(5A), 2022, 1377-1388.15. M. Foss and Y.-C. Liu, “Promoting sustainable development goals through
by its inclusion in the 2017-2018 biennial report of the NSF’s Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering(13) presented to the U.S. Congress, which states that: “[s]upported by NSF’s Division ofEngineering Education and Centers, this REU site is directed by NSF Faculty Early CareerDevelopment Program awardee […] to provide undergraduate students with Attention DeficitHyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) with interdisciplinary research experience in the cyber andphysical security aspects of critical infrastructure resilience. […] This effort is changing theeducation paradigm from deficit–based to strength–based and make engineering education moreinclusive of diverse learning and thinking styles.”The impact of the program on the
. Dorneich, W. Rogers, S. D. Whitlow, and R. DeMers, “Human performance risks andbenefits of adaptive systems on the flight deck,” International Journal of Aviation Psychology,vol. 26, pp. 15-35, 2016[2] B. Seijo-Pardo, I. Porto-Díaz, V. Bolón-Canedo, and A. Alonso-Betanzos, “Ensemble featureselection: Homogeneous and heterogeneous approaches,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 118,pp. 124–139, 2017[3] X. Li, J. Zhang, and J. Han, “Trajectory planning of load transportation with multi-quadrotors based on reinforcement learning algorithm,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol.116, 2021[4] L. Zhang, B. Whiteley, D. K. Sharma, I. Dabipi, W. L. Brown, W. Zhu, and X. Tan, “On theexploration of game-based learning in STEM education with the development and
://engineeringunleashed.com. [Accessed 23 February 2023].[2] J. B. Hylton, D. Mikesell, J-D. Yoder and H. Leblanc, "Working to Instill the Entrepreneurial Mindset Across the Curriculum," Entrepreneruship Educ. and Pedagogy, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 86-106, 2019.[3] C. Kim, R. A. Cheville, E. & Jablonski, M. J. Prince, K. E. K. Nottis, N. P. & Siegel, M. A. Vigeant and J. Tranquillo, "Instilling an Entrepreneurial Mindset through IDEAS Studio Courses," in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, June 2016.[4] S. Ardakanai, "Implementing Entrepreneurial Mindset Learning (EML) in a Timber Design Course," in Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, Virtual On line, 2020.[5] C. Wang, "Teaching
. 7Song, Wichin, Sung Jieun, and Chang Youngbae. (2011). A proposal to fuse science/technology with humanities/social sciences to solve social problems. Science and Technology Policy Institute, pp. 1-164.Star, S. L., and J. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional ecology, 'Translations', and Bound ary objects: Amateurs and professionals on Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology. Social Studies of Science 19: 387-420.Whitehead, N. Alfred. (1929). The Aims of Higher Education. 8
, R1institution. All three sections had different instructors and a class size of around 50 students. One of thethree sections implemented a technology that allowed students to connect to a teammate’s computer andshare control of keyboard/mouse, enabling real-time collaborative programming in a normallyindividual programming environment. The other two sections were control sections with no specificimplementation differences. A survey instrument grounded in Burch et al.’s conceptual framework wasdeveloped and distributed at strategic times to measure students’ engagement with their team and in-class programming tasks. Results presented include a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) that supportsthe factor structure of the student engagement survey and an
and clarify the required functions. In order to do so, functions must be identified, classified, and organized. Then, resources are allocated to functions and functions are prioritized for value improvement. 4. Creativity: Generate ideas on all the possible ways to accomplish the required functions. All ideas associated with each function are recorded for further review. Brainstorming techniques are utilized at this stage. 5. Evaluation: The large number of ideas generated in the previous stage are synthesized. Those have promise are selected for development into specific value improvements. Each feasible idea/improvement is discussed with the team. 6. Development: Here, ‘best’ alternative(s) for
coupled with online classes) or completely virtual campus. Similarly, student supportprograms had to adjust quickly.In academic and professional environments, mentors often take the role(s) of advocates, counselors,advisors, and/or friends 6,4 . Ensher et al. 2 enumerated three major support avenues provided bymentors: (1) vocational or instrumental, (2) psychological, and (3) role models. Vocational orinstrumental support is provided when a mentee’s career is enhanced by opportunities such assponsorship, visibility, or providing challenging tasks through the mentoring relationship 2 .Psychological support could be provided through a mentor-mentee friendship, counseling, ormentor’s encouragement 2 . Finally, mentors could also serve as role
. JRC120911). Adopted at the 3617th European Union Councilmeeting. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CONSIL:ST_9009_2018_INIT&from=ENJackson, D. (2014). Factors influencing job attainment in recent Bachelor graduates:Evidence from Australia. Higher Education, 68(1), 135–153.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9696-7Kolmos, A., & Holgaard, J. E. (2019). Employability in engineering education: Areengineering students ready for work? In S. H. Christensen, B. Delahousse, C. Didier, M.Meganck, & M. Murphy (Eds.), The Engineering-Business Nexus (Vol. 32, pp. 499–520).Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99636-3_22Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral
• Should you use =, is, or == to calculate the answer? • This predicate is only meant to be used in situations where you know the first two pa- rameters. Do not call it with variables as either of the first two parameters in the call. • You will likely need to write more than one rule named add. • You may need to test the type of one of the parameters to know whether to use a rule with + or a rule with string concat. • Do not worry about calls to add like add(3, 3.14) or add(3, “hi”) for this assignment. Autograder test cases test case fail response(s) add(3, 4, 7) Doh! Your results were: results. add(3.2, 4.6, 7.8) Doh! Your results were: results
Paper ID #38510First-year Engineering Students’ Sense of Belonging: Impact of COVID-19and Efficacy as a Predictor of GraduationBreanna Graven, University of Louisville PhD candidate in curriculum and instruction with focus on informal science education. Graduate research assistant for the First-Year Engineering department studying ways to improve student retention.Dr. Patricia A. Ralston, University of Louisville Dr. Patricia A. S. Ralston is Professor and Chair of the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville. She received her B.S., MEng, and PhD degrees in chemical engineering from the
, Russian Academy of Sciences, Chernogolovka, Russia, and later at the Department of Semiconductor Physics, University of Ulm, Germany. Currently, he is Associate Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department of Virginia Commonwealth Univer- sity. His research interests encompass growth, characterization and device applications of semiconductor, nanophotonic, and plasmonic materials. He is a member of the American Physical Society, the Materials Research Society, and IEEE. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 New Course Development for Internet of ThingsAbstractIoT is a fast growing technology sector that is estimated to be valued at 100’s of billions
. “Learning by Doing” is a common training process which is a well-known theory ofeducation popularized by philosopher John Dewy in the 1930’s [5].Conclusions and RecommendationsIt is important to understand that these projects are missions that for engineer leaders are vehiclesfor training in preparation for any possible deployment. Engineer leaders and craftsmen on theground focus on skills critical to successful project planning and management. LearningObjectives 8 through 12 are consistently a focus during training events. Is the military missing anopportunity to better incorporate sustainable design (LO 13), data collection long term impactanalysis (LO 6), and stakeholder history and cultural education to develop military engineers intoglobal
design, test fixtures, and dataanalysis. The existing AM standards are covering only a few of these aspects. Students will havean opportunity to develop new SOP and standards. Upon completion of this module, studentsshould be able to (a) develop SOP of specimen and fixture design and data analysis, if there is nospecific standard available; (b) identify ASTM and/or ISO standard(s) which can be referencedto the developed procedure; (c) document the developed SOP and prepare for further evaluationand improvement for evolving it to be a standard. The pilot course is MFGE 5334/5334GAdditive Manufacturing of Lightweight Structures. It will be then introduced to other graduatelevel AM courses.The new graduate-level course:A new graduate level course
still exist betweenmale and female students, especially in STEM. Given these findings, we intend to extend thisstudy by investigating why LCDLMs fostered similar forms of engagement for males andfemales. LCDLMs are inexpensive miniature prototypes of industrial equipment; participantsinteract with the LCDLMs without fear of damaging the equipment. Researchers [17]hypothesize that men are more likely to take risks than women. Although preliminary, we predictthat the female participants in our study were as comfortable using the LCDLMs as the maleparticipants because the modules are inexpensive. Future studies will carefully examine thishypothesis.References[1] E. S. Pietri et al., “Addressing Unintended Consequences of Gender Diversity
. Kazemersky and D. Alp, "An alternate learning approach for the engineering management program at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga," in 2000 Annual Conference Proceedings, 2000.[4] S. Motavalli, H. Zong, F. Ganjeizadeh and D. Bowen, "Development of a new masters degree program in engineering management," in 2005 Annual Conference Proceedings, 2005.[5] R. Dusseau, "History of the online master of engineering management program at Rowan University," in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 2014.[6] N. Cherbaka and J. Lavelle, "Proposing an Engineering Management program at North Carolina State University," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2009.[7] L. Stauffer, "A model for the graduation
teaching these IPRO courses.References[1] C. Carrillo, M.A. Flores, COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices, European Journal of Teacher Education. 43 (2020) 466–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184.[2] M.F. Wyne, S. Akhtar, M.A. Rahman, Impact of COVID-19 on Faculty Teaching and Student Learning, in: ASEE Conferences, Virtual Conference, 2021. https://peer.asee.org/37278.[3] B. Karimi, M. Yazdanpour, P. Lewis, COVID-19 Effects on Higher Education: A Case Study, in: ASEE Conferences, Virtual Conference, 2021. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--36857.[4] R. Sengupta, A.E. Sparkling, Incorporating Virtual Reality in Construction Management Education, in: ASEE Conferences
least recalibrating) thisalignment should provide students and professionals a clearer roadmap of not only how to train(or re-train as needed) for a career in this field, but also ensure that a robust and vibrantmechatronics industry persists for the foreseeable future. References[1] Liagkou, V., Stylios, C., Pappa, L., & Petunin, A. (2021). Challenges and opportunities in industry 4.0 for mechatronics, artificial intelligence, and cybernetics. Electronics, 10(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10162001[2] Hegde, G. S. (2010). Mechatronics; Jones and Bartlett Publishers: Burlington, VT, USA.[3] Stobierski, T. (2020, July 15). What is Mechatronics? Northeastern University Blog
, “Reclaiming Engineering Management’s Position among EngineeringDisciplines,” 2022 International Conference, American Society for Engineering Education, Minneapolis, MN, June2022.[4] R. L. Morgan, E. S. Hunt, J. M. Carpenter, “Classification of Instructional Programs, 1990 edition.” [Online].Available: nces.ed.gov/pubs91/91396.pdf. [Accessed January 15, 2023].[5] Morgan, R.L., and E.S. Hunt, “Classification of Instructional Programs – 2000; Public Comment Draft,”communication from AskaLibrarian, AskaLibrarian@ed.gov, October 20, 2022.[6] National Center for Education Statistics, “CIP: The Classification of Instructional Programs.” [Online].Available: https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/cipcode/cipdetail.aspx?y=55&cip=15.1501. [Accessed January 15, 2023].[7
, backup and restore operations, and disaster recovery tasks. • Troubleshooting: Troubleshoot capacity, automation, connectivity, and security issues related to cloud implementations.Certification and Course Integration Methodologies:With the set of certifications decided, we set out to identify the course(s) that are best to integratethe certification skill set in. In this paper, we present our methodologies as they apply to theNetwork+, which we used as the pilot project. We will report and disseminate results for othercertifications as they are completed.Course Material RevampingWith most of the faculty in the new Cyber Security Program coming from Computer Sciencebackground, it was imperative that we revamp the current course
faculty mentors, and develop more effective techniques for faculty mentoring.References1. M. Klawe, “Why We Need More STEM Students to Study Abroad,” Forbes, Mar 6, 2019. [Online]. https://www.forbes.com. [Accessed February 21, 2023].2. R. Jones and B. Oberst, International Experience for Engineering Students through Distance Learning Techniques. ASEE 2000 Annual Conference Session 2360. 2000.3. ABET Criterion. https://www.abet.org/accrediation. [Accessed February 15, 2023].4. S. Gerras et al. Strategic Leadership Primer. Army War College, Carlisle Barracks PA, 2010.5. J. Schreiner and G. Dixon. The Engineering Management Handbook 3rd Edition, Chapter 1 The Engineering Management Profession. The American Society for Engineering Management
early1990’s. It was understood that a FEM theory was not necessary to learn the usage of FEAsimulation. FEA simulation was included as a part of solid modeling in an engineering designgraphics course [11]. Ural et. al. [12] have developed a project for first year course incorporatingFEA simulation. In that project, the behavior of a SMARTBEAM® was examined usingexperimental measurement and FEA simulation and the results were compared. For all these firstyear courses FEA was used only as a simulation tool and the philosophy was that the underlyingFEA theory or the knowledge of mechanics was not necessary.Papadopoulos et al. [13] proposed a different pedagogy on integration of FEA practicethroughout the undergraduate CE/ME curriculum. They
. C. J. Gray, G. D. Grabovetz, K. A. Gabrielsen, S. R. Lecin, and P.R. Stupak, “Green Energy Tent Light with GPS Locator: A Real Product for a Real Customer”, 2017 Mid- Atlantic Section Fall Conference, University of Pennsylvania, Berks, October 2017. 2. H. Tawfik, Y. Ryu, and R. Kowalski, “Education through Applied Learning and Hands- on Practical Experience with Flex Fuel Vehicles”, Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. June 2017, https://peer.asee.org/27417 3. P.R. Stupak, M. Romero, J. Sitarz, T. Skibik, E. Smith, N. Vuolde, J. Jannone, M. Zgorzynski, D. McManus (2017, April), “Illuminated Umbrella: An Engineering/Visual Arts Interdisciplinary Product Development
. Isa and A. M. Amirruddin, “Survey on the Effectiveness of Exit Ticket Method inImproving Student’s Focus and Understanding in Teaching and Learning for Course DFC2073Programming Fundamental in Politeknik Muadzam Shah,” Proceedings: InIIC Conference 2019,pp. 184-189, 2019.8. M. Akhtar and M. Saeed, “Assessing the Effect of Agree/Disagree Circles, Exit Ticket, andThink-Pair-Share on Students’ Academic Achievement at Undergraduate Level,” Bulletin ofEducation and Research, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 81-96, August 2020.9. R. S. Kirzner, T. Alter, and C. A. Hughes, “Online Quiz as Exit Ticket: Using Technology toReinforce Learning in Face to Face Classes,” Journal of Teaching in Social Work, Vol. 41, No.2, pp. 151-171, 2021.10. B. Stein, A. Haynes, M
. Nature 483, 29 (2012).[6] Gui, Q., Lawson, T., Shan, S., Yan, L. & Liu, Y. The Application of Whole Cell-Based Biosensors for Use in Environmental Analysis and in Medical Diagnostics. Sensors 2017, Vol. 17, Page 1623 17, 1623 (2017).[7] Thouand, G. Handbook of Cell Biosensors. Handb. Cell Biosens. (2020). doi:10.1007/978- 3319-47405-2
. [Accessed: 21-Apr- 2020].the door. In addition, the 3D printed enclosure would be adjusted [2] S. Davidoff, M. K. Lee, C. Yiu, J. Zimmerman, and A. K. Dey,as needed to provide a more streamlined design and decrease the “Principles of Smart Home Control,” Lecture Notes in Computeroverall cost of printing the enclosure. Some considerations Science UbiComp 2006: Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 19–34, 2006.around malicious use was explored, specifically around usingthe product on the outside of the door facing inward with amodified lens. Research into this led us to some issues that
Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain; David McKay Company: New York, NY, USA, 1965. 7. Airasian, P.; Cruikshank, K.A.; Mayer, R.E.; Pintrich, P.; Raths, J.; Wittrock, M.C. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives; Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Eds.; Allyn and Bacon: Boston, MA, USA, 2001; ISBN 978-0-8013-1903-7.8. Hadzigeorgiou, Y.; Garganourakis, V. Using Nikola Tesla’s story and his experiments as presented in the film “The Prestige” to promote scientific inquiry: A report of an action research project. Interchange 2010, 41, 363–378.9. Hadzigeorgiou, Y.; Klassen, S.; Froese-Klassen, C. Encouraging a
. References[1] Tan, L., Main, J., Darolia, R. (2021). Using random forest analysis to identify studentdemographic and high school-level factors that predict college engineering major choice. Journalof Engineering Education, 110 (3), 572-593. [Accessed: March 28, 2022].[2] Sarma, S. Grasp. New York: Doubleday, 2020.[3] Astra Nova. Astra Nova, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://astranova.org. [Accessed: March28, 2022].[4] Dahn, J. “Interview.” Email interview, (March 28, 2022).[5] Dahn, J. “Interview.” Email interview, (March 28, 2022).[6] Frank, C. “Interview.” Email interview, (March 27, 2022).[7] Frank, C. “Interview.” Email interview, (March 27, 2022).[8] Young Engineers. Young Engineers, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://youngengineers.com
About Leaving,” Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1997.[7] P. A. Daempfle, “Analysis of the high attrition rates among first year college science, math, and engineering majors,” U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, 2002.[8] K. Reid, and D. Reeping. "A classification scheme for “introduction to engineering” courses: defining first-year courses based on descriptions, outcomes, and assessment." 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 24-24. 2014.[9] J. Sticklen, D. Briedis, C.E. Vergara, M. Urban-Lurain, R. S. DeGraaf, L. Paquette, R. Heckman, N. Buch, and T. F. Wolff. "Engaging Early Engineering Students (EEES): A Fourth Year Report from an NSF STEP Project." 2013 ASEE Annual
that as instructors, we are also still adjusting to a newnormal. Our hope is to continue to adapt to the students’ needs while helping them understandwhat is required to be a good sophomore engineering student.References[1] Park, J. J., Park, M., Jackson, K., & Vanhoy, G. (2020). Remote Engineering Education under COVID-19 Pandemic Environment. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Higher Education, 5(1), 160-166.[2] Grodotzki, J., Upadhya, S., & Tekkaya, A. E. (2021). Engineering education amid a global pandemic. Advances in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 3, 100058.[3] A. Hamad, A. P. Rehmat, G. Panther and H. A. Diefes-Dux, "Challenges and Successes of Engineering Instructors