- Conference Session
- Track 3 - Session I - Faculty Development
- Collection
- 2013 ASEE International Forum
- Authors
-
Ralph Dreher PhD P.E., International Society for Engineering Education (G
- Tagged Topics
-
Invited - Faculty Development
to understand how fruitful this way of learning is andthat it is a great chance to develop competences during their own process of learning: TEACHER`S LEARNING BIOGRAPHY = HIS STYLE OF ENGINEERING EDUCATIONFollowing this simple awareness, the Education Staff for Engineering Education must betrained with the same (competence-oriented) methods as it is fruitful for the students. Thatmeans in fact: Looking to the idea of HAVIGHURST about principle of task-oriented learning[4], the curricula of Enginnering Education for the training staff must be dominated by PBE-oriented Development-tasks a core elements (Modules) of the curriculum-structure..Short Explanation: From PBL to PBEPBE as a further development of PBLProject Based Learning (PBL
- Conference Session
- Track 3 - Session I - Faculty Development
- Collection
- 2013 ASEE International Forum
- Authors
-
Thomas Lachlan Goldfinch, University of Wollongong
- Tagged Topics
-
Invited - Faculty Development
. Page 21.39.77. Ang, S. and L. Van Dyne, Handbook of Cultural Intelligence: Theory, measurement and applications. 2008, Sharpe, M.E.: Armonk, NY. p. 391.8. Deardorff, D.K., Assessing Intercultural Competence. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2011. 149.9. Spitzberg, B.H. and G. Changnon, Conceptualizing Intercultural Competence, in The SAGE Handbook of Intercultural Competence, D.K. Deardorff, Editor. 2010, SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA.10. Hofstede, G., Culture's Consequences (2nd edn.). 2001: Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.11. Matsumoto, D., Reflections on culture and competence, in Culture and competence: contexts of life success, R.J. Sterberg and E.L. Grigorenko, Editors. 2004, American Psychological
- Conference Session
- Track 3 - Session I - Faculty Development
- Collection
- 2013 ASEE International Forum
- Authors
-
Dirk Schaefer P.E., Georgia Institute of Technology
- Tagged Topics
-
Invited - Faculty Development
may be nationwide, international, or locally controlled. How is the professional development program implemented at the local level? – Internal or external personnel may coordinate, deliver, and document professional development activities. Mentors may or may not be used or required. How is the professional development program included in accreditation? – Accreditation may require teaching certification for all or some faculty, documentation of professional development activities, or other teaching related items. Is participation compulsory or voluntarily? – Participation requirements vary widely. Who is/are the target group(s)? – While some countries focus on professional development for
- Conference Session
- Track 3 - Session I - Faculty Development
- Collection
- 2013 ASEE International Forum
- Authors
-
Reginald Vachon P.E., American Society of Mechanical Engineers; Robert O. Warrington Jr., Michigan Technological University; Robert D. Kersten, University of Central Florida
- Tagged Topics
-
Invited - Faculty Development
the UN. Dr. Vachon has authored over 150 papers, numerous technical reports and presented pa- pers internationally. He is a member of the Pan American Academy of Engineering and the International Nuclear Energy Academy. He served on the Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Advisory Committee for seven years. He has served as the advisor to the President of the World Federa- tion of Engineering Organizations. Recently he was on the AIAA Structures Committee of Standards that developed Standard, S –1110-2005 Space Systems-Structures, Structural Components , and Structural As- semblies. He is an original patentee for digital image correlation and co-holds a number of other patents encompassing the