. Wigfield, “MOTIVATIONAL BELIEFS,VALUES, AND GOALS,” 2002.[12] J. S. Eccles, A. Wigfield, and U. Schiefele, “Motivation to succeed,” in Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development., Vol. 3, 5th ed., N. Eisenberg, Ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1998, pp. 1017–1095.[13] Jacquelynne S. Eccles, “GENDER ROLES AND WOMEN’S ACH IEVEMENT- RELATED DECISIONS,” Psychol. ofWmn Q., vol. 11, pp. 135–172, 1987.[14] G. Hofstede, Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. 1991.[15] R. L. Kajfez, M. J. Mohammadi-Aragh, A. Clark, S. Sassi, and J. Petrie, “Board 29: Initial Qualitative Exploration into First-Year Engineering Community and Identity,” in 2019 ASEE Annual
learning goal/outcome. There were two versions of interviewquestions, faculty version and student version, trying to explore the same topics. The interviewquestions only varied slightly, asking both the faculty and the student to reflect on the expectedstudent experience. Each interview lasted approximately fifty minutes. And an emergingthematic analysis will inform other prongs of the research. Example interview questions arelisted below in Tables 1 and 2.Table 1: Example interview questions in Area 1: Classroom Experience Q: Can you tell me your perceptions about students’ expected learning experiences through the curriculum? Walk me through the classes students take? (faculty) (probe) What knowledge and skills are they
ideas to fit what ATE will supportDay 0 Evening Assignment: Each college should appoint a spokesperson and prepare aone minute introduction of your team and your project for tomorrow morning.Day 1Monday, July 15, 20196:30-8:00AM Breakfast at hotel8:15 -8:30AM Bus pickup at hotel9:00 – 9:10AM Welcome9:10 – 9:30AM Introduction of Colleges9:30-10:00 Session 1: ATE Basics (brief session 30 minutes including Q&A) Components of ATE proposal Head’s up about submission process, Fastlane, grants.gov, research.gov What PIs and grants offices will have to do between now and submission day10:00-10:45AM Session 2: Rationale (45 minutes) Brief presentation on importance of rationale (10
ch id pr po lr rc gu al h u nd of ar g ta n ea c q hy
thank Don Fowley of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. for supportingthe project.References[1] K. VanLehn, "The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems," Educat. Psychologist, vol. 46, pp. 197-221, 2011.[2] C. D. Whitlatch, Q. Wang, and B. J. Skromme, "Automated problem and solution generation software for computer-aided instruction in elementary linear circuit analysis,” in Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Washington, D.C.: Amer. Soc. Engrg. Educat., 2012, pp. Paper 4437.[3] B. J. Skromme, C. D. Whitlatch, Q. Wang, P. M. Rayes, A. Barrus, J. M. Quick, R. K. Atkinson, and T. Frank
reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References:[1] Q. Zhu and B. K. Jesiek,“A pragmatic approach to ethical decision-making in engineering practice: Characteristics, evaluation criteria, and implications for instruction and assessment,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 663-679, 2017.[2] D. Bairaktarova and A. Woodcock,“Engineering ethics education: Aligning practice and outcomes,” IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 18-22, 2015.[3] D. Bairaktarova and A. Woodcock, "Engineering Student’s Ethical Awareness and Behavior: A New Motivational Model," Science and Engineering Ethics, pp. 1-29, 2016.[4] B. E. Barry and M. W. Ohland, "Applied ethics in the engineering, health, business
-explored in engineering and the characterization of the formercan contribute to an understanding of the latter. A brief overview of the study is provided tocontextualize the research and its implications for workforce development.Postsecondary Student Engagement Survey (PosSES)The first phase of the study was the development and distribution of a survey on students’ out-of-class activities and outcomes. The instrument, termed the Postsecondary StudentEngagement Survey (PosSES), was generated through a process involving a literature review,Q-study with focus groups, panel of experts, and think aloud sessions. The survey was designedto understand the activities in which students participate, the barriers to participating, theincentive for
engineering.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1920421. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] National Science Board, "NSB-2018-2, Science and Engineering Indicators 2018," National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/indicators[2] D. E. Chubin, G. S. May, and E. L. Babco, "Diversifying the engineering workforce," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 73-86, 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00830.x.[3] Q. Clark
,”Adult Educ. Q., vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 267–285, Aug. 2015.[2] J. M. Ross-Gordon, “Adult Learners in the Classroom,” New Dir. Stud. Serv., vol. 2003,no. 102, pp. 43–52, Jun. 2003.[3] W. Naudé, A. Szirmai, “The importance of manufacturing in economic development:Past, present and future perspectives,” United Nations University, 2012.[4] “Advanced Technologies Initiative: Manufacturing and Innovation.” Deloitte andCouncil on Competitiveness, 2015. Available: https://www.compete.org/reports/all/3122-advanced-technologies-initiative-manufacturing-a-innovation[5] K. Bourzac, “Advanced Manufacturing and New Materials,” MIT Technology Review,2011. Available: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/424631/advanced-manufacturing-and-new-materials/.[6
]. Available: ACM Digital Library, https://dl.acm.org/. [Accessed Jan. 3, 2020].[14] C. S. Dweck, C. Y. Chiu, and Y. Y. Hong, “Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives,” Psychological Inquiry, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 267-285, 1995.[15] B. Dorn and A. E. Tew, “Empirical validation and application of the computing attitudes survey,” Computer Science Education, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1-36, Feb. 2015.[16] N. S. Fabert, Growth Mindset Training to Increase Women’s Self-Efficacy in Science and Engineering: A Randomized-Controlled Trial. PhD [Dissertation]. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://repository.asu.edu/.[17] J. Q. Dawson, M
].[3] “Sustainable Engineering Education Key Resources Repository (SEEKRR).” [Online]. Available: http://www.aimehq.org/resources/seekrr. [Accessed: 02-Mar-2020].[4] J. Crittenden, C. Hendrickson, and B. Wallace, ICSI 2014. American Society of Civil Engineers, 2014.[5] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications, 2014.
Foundation.References1. S. Laursen, A. Hunter, E. Seymour, H. Thiry, and G. Melton. “What is Known About the Student Outcomes of Undergraduate Research?” in Undergraduate Research in the Sciences: Engaging Students in Real Science, San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2010.2. J.E. Brownell and L. E. Swaner, “High-Impact Practices: Applying the Learning Outcomes Literature to the Development of Successful Campus Programs,” PEER Rev. 11(2), 26-30, 2009.3. G.D. Kuh, “High-Impact Educational Practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter,” Assoc. Am. Coll. Univ. p. 85-99, 2008.4. T.J. Wenzel, “What is undergraduate research?,” Counc. Undergrad. Res. Q., 17(163),1997.5. R. Kajfez, A. McAlister, C.J. Faber, K. M. Ehlert
January 2020).[33] https://www.bumc.bu.edu/facdev-medicine/files/2009/12/Developmental_Network- AssessmentKramandHiggins.pdf (accessed January 2020).[34] M. Q. Patton, Utilization-focused evaluation. Sage publications, 2008.[35] M. Hendricks, M. C. Plantz, and K. J. Pritchard, "Measuring outcomes of United Way– funded programs: Expectations and reality," New Directions for Evaluation, vol. 2008, no. 119, pp. 13-35, 2008.[36] K. MacQueen and E. Namey, "Applied Thematic Analysis," ed: London: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2012.[37] J. W. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications, 2013.[38] J. W. Creswell and V. L. P. Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
evaluator).# Debriefing. Onboarding. Campus tours. (WEEK) RESEARCH PROJECT EXPERIENCE (VIP TEAMS) PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT (COE USRG)* May Define project objectives, methodology, timeline Welcome breakfast. Orientation. General lab (Week-1) & outcomes. Ethics training courses. safety training. Welcome Bar-B-Q. Ethics. Jun. Research plan due! Overview of metrology/ GRE workshop: What to expect. Seminar: TAMU (Week-2) inspection principles & labs. Safety courses. early admissions program. Jun. Research questions & tasks. Training & practice GRE workshop: Maximize your study time. (Week-3) on relevant laboratory equipment. Seminar: Applying to graduate school
financial aid, mentoring, diversityand inclusion and Q&A sessions. The PTG interview weekend was free of cost to the student andfamilies and sponsored by the HC. Finalists’ interviews were held with interview panels thatconsisted of a PTG team member, an industry representative, and a student representative. Onceaward notifications were made, follow up communications were conducted by phone and emailsto answer any questions the students and their families may have had before committing to theprogram.Addressing PTG Students’ Social Engagement Through Peer Mentoring and Living LearningCommunities.Transitioning from high school to a university setting is a challenge for most students, no mattertheir socio-economic or demographic background. For
middle levelthermodynamics course of the industrial engineering curriculum. After the completion of thismodule, students should be able to (i) use Fourier’s Law of heat conduction to determine rate ofheat flow (Q/t) and heat rate constant (K) when given other parameters such as dimensions of thematerials and temperature at both ends of materials, (ii) determine the thermal conductivity ofdifferent materials (such as steel, brass, copper and aluminum) and (iii) determine which materialis suitable to be selected for other applications considering the thermal conductivity of thematerials. Following are the questions that have been developed to demonstrate students’mastery of the concepts that ECP will be used improve students learning outcomes in
and limited each student’s engagement,consisting of two hours of short PowerPoint presentations with limited time for Q&A. At ourpre-REU mentor meeting in 2018, we agreed to a “gallery”-style check-in format that used low-tech posters (printed sheets taped to a wall or poster board), to which mentors, graduate students,and other faculty in the department and across campus were invited. The new format was verywell received both by the mentors and the REU students the past two summers, primarily due tothe increased interaction each REU student had with a larger number of researchers. Attendanceat the check-in meetings also increased since graduate students, post-docs, and faculty who werenot REU mentors came to talk to the students. The