critical step in understanding the results and basis of genderinequities that may otherwise be lost in datasets [2]. This is particularly true for students withnonbinary or transgender identities who are often understudied or overlooked entirely [3], [4]. In thispaper, we present an analysis of gender reporting practices in papers published in the proceedings ofthe American Society for Engineering Education Gulf-Southwest (ASEE GSW) conference to assessour community’s progress toward transparent reporting. MethodsWe downloaded papers from the ASEE PEER website (https://peer.asee.org) from the 2019, 2020,and 2021 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference collections. All papers in each yearlycollection were
Mentoring, the Award for Leadership, and a 2019 award from the College of Engineer- ing as an Outstanding Faculty Mentor of Engineering Graduate Students. In 2020 she won the Sterling Olmsted Award from the Liberal Education/Engineering and Society Division of ASEE. She is president of Purdue’s chapter of the American Association of University Professors (2020-22). She helped found, fund, and grow the PEER Collaborative, a peer mentoring group of early career and recently tenured faculty and research staff primarily evaluated based on their engineering education research productivity. She can be contacted by email at apawley@purdue.edu.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Matthew W. Ohland is
bachelor’s degrees in engineering has increased in the last decade;however, the growth has been slow, increasing from 17.8% in 2010 to 22.5% in 2019 [4].Additionally, the percentage of Blacks or African Americans earning bachelor’s degrees inengineering has remained around 4.2% since 2011. With women making up 50.8% of thepopulation and Blacks or African Americans making up 13.4% of the population [5], the severityof the underrepresentation is clear. Since it is not reasonable to expect to build demographicallydiverse teams, engineering educators must work to build capacity for diversity by cultivatinginclusive cultures and curricula [6], [7].Building inclusive classrooms is one component of building culture [8]. Efforts toward moreinclusive
-Communicate Class,” Proceedings of the 2017 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[6] K.S. Corbett, K. Evans, S. McAdams, J. Gaudin, M.A. Walker and T.S. Fontenot, “Work inProgress: Developing a Model for Student-led Peer Mentorship Programs,” Proceedings of the2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[7] Q. Tahmina, “Does Peer Mentoring Help Students be Successful in an Introductory Engi-neering Course?” Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[8] L.K. Someh, B.P. O’Connell, K.S. Grahame and J. Levi, “Friendly mentor or formerconsultant: peer-mentors in First Year Engineering Courses,” Proceedings of the 2020 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, 2020.[9] C. Kiassat and R. Elkharboutly, “Peer
. With the help of two graduate student fellows,ACE was built and launched. Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE North Central Section Conference 1 Copyright © 2022, American Society for Engineering EducationThis paper discusses the development of the STEM-focused portions of the ACE coursecurriculum, lessons learned while supporting accessible OER development in STEM disciplinesand areas for future growth of the course. First, the paper discusses models used for and strugglesin designing the course. Lessons learned include accessibility challenges inherent to STEMresources, lack of librarian competency in this area and special issues with STEM tools likeLaTeX. The paper concludes with areas for future development of
, First-Year Programs, and Design in Engineering Education Divisions. He has also been recognized by ASEE as the recipient of the 2005 Merl K. Miller Award and by the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) with the 2018 ASEE Best Card Award. Dr. Estell received the ASEE First-Year Programs Division’s Distinguished Service Award in 2019. Dr. Estell is also active within the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). He has been an ABET Expert since 2010, starting as a Program Evaluator (PEV) for both Computer Engineering and Computer Science. He served as a Computing Accreditation Commission (CAC) Commissioner from 2013 to 2021, including being on the CAC Executive Committee from 2016-19
on peer evaluation ratings in project teams. In International Journal of Business Communication, 43(1), 4-20.[12] C. Martin & K. Locke. (2022). What do peer evaluations represent?: a study of rater consensus and target personality. In Frontiers in Education, 7, 1-7.[13] The Regents Of The University Of Michigan, “Tandem,” tandem.ai.umich.edu. https://tandem.ai.umich.edu/welcome (accessed: June 23, 2022).[14] ASEE. (2019). Current status of the U.S. engineering and computing workforce, 2019.[15] J. Roy. (2019). Engineering by the Numbers. American Society for Engineering & Education, 13-52.
theproduct, whereas human-centered design considers the stakeholders more broadly than thestereotypical user” [26, p.31]. Scholars have also mentioned the closely-relatedconceptualizations of sustainable design [27] and, more explicitly, empathic design [28].In this review, we sought to explore what empirical evidence exists for cultivating empathy, andwhich learning activities or pedagogical approaches can be used for its development in STEMstudents. While we do examine how some of these other concepts related to empathy wereintegrated into educational contexts, empathy remained at the forefront of our inquiry.3 Theoretical FrameworkIn 2019, Stanford psychologist Jamil Zaki published The War For Kindness: Building Empathy InA Fractured World [29
implementation. Moreover, we leverage the USB accelerator to improve the detection speed.1 https://www.canakit.com/raspberry-pi-3-model-b-plus-starter-kit.html Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX Copyright ã 2022, American Society for Engineering EducationFinally, we extend this implementation to weapon detection through fine-tuning pretrained deeplearning models on data samples collected and annotated manually. ProjectThis project implemented object detection on Raspberry Pi. As a core task in the field of
literature,” International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), Vol. 6(3), pp. 254-265. DOI: 10.18404/ijemst.428182.19. Gee, J. P., 2001 "Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research in Education," Review of Research in Education, Vol. 25(1), pp. 99-125.20. Kendall, M. R., & Procter, L. M., & Patrick, A. D. (2019, June), Assessing Methods for Developing an Engineering Identity in the Classroom Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2—3211421. Hughes, B. E., & Schell, W. J., & Tallman, B., & Beigel, R., & Annand, E., & Kwapisz, M. (2019, June), Do I Think I’m an Engineer? Understanding the Impact of Engineering Identity on
-1304.[6] Mahmoud, M. M, Faber, J. M., Grzech, L. G, and K. H. Becker. “Factors Influencing the Interest Levels of Male Versus Female Students Going into STEM Fields.” Proceedings of 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa FL, June 15 - 19, 2019. Paper ID: 26352.[7] Nadelson, L., Mooney, D. K., Dean, N. “Why I am an Engineering Major: A Cross-Sectional Study of Undergraduate Students.” Proceedings of 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, June 15-18, 2014. Paper ID: 9097.[8] Dorie, B. L., Jones, T. R., and M. E. Cardella. “Parents as Critical Influence: Insights From Five Different Studies (Other)” Proceedings of 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
. ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=127592022&site=eds-live.JL Sliko, A. Morales, S. Agili, R.Asempapa, “Keeping women in stem majors: the penn state Harrisburg stem scholars program.” Abstracts with Programs ‐ Geological Society of America. 2018;50(6):@Abstract no. 103‐3.Kloos, E. and Furterer, S., “Designing an Undergraduate Engineering Mentoring Program to Enhance Gender Diversity through Application of Lean Six Sigma Methods and Tools.” Paper presented at 2019 ASEE AnnualLin, Y. (2014). Perspectives on Peer‐Mentoring from Taiwanese Science and Engineering Master’s Students. Education, 135(1), 79–92L.M. Frehill analysis of data from National Science Foundation, Division of
model.2. Nelson, K., & Clarke, J. (2014). The first year experience: Looking back to inform the future. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 1, 23-46.3. Mendoza Diaz, N. V., Sunny, C. E., Sotomayor, T., & Richard, J C. (2021). Time to Graduate for Latinos/Hispanics in Comparison to Other Diverse Student Groups: A Multi-Institutional/ Multilevel MIDFIELD Study. International Journal of Engineering Education (IJEE).Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 1013–1023.4. Mendoza Diaz, N. V., Yoon, S. Y., & Richard, J. C., (2019, June), Exploring Enculturation in the First-Year Engineering Program (Year III). Poster presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, USA. Proceedings
wastewater, she has strong interests in engineering education research, teacher professional development, and secondary STEM education. In 2021, Erica received the ASEE Pacific Southwest Early Career Teaching Award and two awards at UNLV for mentoring undergraduate and graduate students. She also received the Peter J. Bosscher Outstanding Faculty Advisor Award in 2019 from Engineers Without Borders and was recognized as a Nevada Woman in STEM by Senator Jackie Rosen. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 WIP: Contract grading as an alternative grading structure and assessment approach for a process-oriented, first-year
participating in teaching, scholarship and service to the department. Dr. Stiner-Jones recently won funding for the College’s first National Science Foundation (NSF) Research Experience for Undergraduates SITE program. She and her co-investigators aim to pro- vide students from traditionally underrepresented backgrounds with a 10-week research immersion and prepare them for graduate school. She is the recipient of the 2018 College of Engineering Faculty Diver- sity Excellence Award for achievements that support the College’s goal of excellence through diversity and inclusion. She and her co-author are the recipients of the 2019 Best Paper and Best Diversity Paper Awards from the American Society for Engineering Education for
West Lafayette (COE) Beth Holloway is the Assistant Dean for Diversity and Engagement and the Leah H. Jamieson Director of the Women in Engineering Program (WIEP) in the College of Engineering at Purdue University. She is the current PIC IV Chair of the ASEE Board of Directors. Holloway received B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue University.Dr. Theresa A. Maldonado P.E., University of California System Dr. Theresa A. Maldonado is currently serving as Director of the Division of Engineering Education and Centers (EEC) in the Directorate for Engineering. She began her term at NSF in January 2011. Prior to joining NSF, Dr. Maldonado served as Assoc
public perceives themovement, its demands, and its proposed policy solutions. The “movement framing” theory aidsin analyzing the tweets produced and reshared by public educational institutions.Method A content analysis of university tweets was conducted. Content analysis is a researchmethod used to make replicable and valid inferences by interpreting and coding textual, visualand audio data (Stemler, 2015). The sample institutions were chosen from the top six institutionsawarding bachelor’s degrees to African Americans (ASEE, 2019). Engineering fields typicallyhave challenges in recruiting and retaining African Americans. We found it helpful to researchinstitutions that produce the most significant number of Black engineers in 2019. The
, Y. Siow, and J. Abiade, “Execution details and assessment results of a summer bridge program for engineering freshmen,” in Proceedings of the 2019 Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, June 2019. [6] T. L. Smith-Jackson, B. S. Benedict, G. T. Stewart II, and E. Smith Vinson, “Use of front-end evaluation to design an ambassador program (ISEAmP),” in Proceedings of the 2014 Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, June 2014. [7] Carnegie Mellon University, “BiasBusters @ CMU.” http://www.cmu.edu/scs/scs4all/programs/biasbusters.html. Accessed: 2021-08-27. [8] Univeristy of California Berkeley, “Bias Busters.” http://biasbusters.berkeley.edu/. Accessed: 2021-08-27. [9] Google, “Bias Busting
: myPID.Compute()7 References[1] Artiles, M. S., Waters, R. C., Taylor, A. R., Boyd-Sinkler, K., Blackowski, S. A., Hampton, C., Nave, A. H., Lutz, B. D., & Lee, W. C. (2017). Action on Diversity: A Content Analysis of ASEE Conference Papers, 2015–2016. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH.[2] Anderson, E., Williams, K., Ponjuan, L., & Frierson, H. T. (2018). The 2018 status report on engineering education: A snapshot of diversity in degrees conferred in engineering.[3] Roy, J. (2019). Engineering by the numbers. American Society for Engineering Education.[4] Deloitte (2021). CHEMICAL ENGINEERS. DATAUSA. Retrieved from https://datausa.io/profile/soc/chemical- engineers[5] Ohio State
Computers in Education, First-Year Programs, and Design in Engineering Education Divisions. He has also been recognized by ASEE as the recipient of the 2005 Merl K. Miller Award and by the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) with the 2018 ASEE Best Card Award. Estell received the First-Year Programs Division’s Distinguished Service Award in 2019. Estell currently serves as an ABET Commissioner and as a subcommittee chair on ABET’s Accreditation Council Training Committee. He was previously a Member-At-Large on the Computing Accreditation Commission Executive Committee and a Program Evaluator for both computer engineering and computer science. Estell is well-known for his significant contributions on
. Themajor difference between GD and the other engineering tools, such as Finite Element Analysis(FEA), is that GD optimizes the shape of the design solution based on the manufacturing processselected by the design engineer. So, the design and shape solution recommended by GD for five-axismachining will be different from a solution developed for the casting process. In order to use thepower of GD to the full extent, one specific area that requires more investigation is additivemanufacturing.Additive manufacturing (AM) is a manufacturing technology that produces parts and assemblies Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX
2022 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID 35749 Coding Camp for Middle School Girls Helps Improve Awareness of Science/Engineering Careers and Pathways Pranav A. Bhounsule* Lorena Claeys, Belinda Harmon, 842 W. Taylor St. Cynthia Lima, Emily Young University of Illinois at Chicago, 1 UTSA Circle, Chicago, IL, USA 60525 The University of Texas at San Antonio pranav@uic.edu San Antonio, TX, USA 78249AbstractAlthough jobs and career opportunities in computer science continue to grow rapidly, womenconstitute only 28% of the
traditional college classrooms and learningmanagement systems are teacher-centered pedagogy in which the instructor provides the content6. Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX Copyright © 2022, American Society for Engineering Education 2Direct learning is teacher centered, interaction between students is lacking, and there are nocooperative groups. Lack of activity makes students face difficulties in understanding the learningmaterial. Therefore, it should take a learning model that stimulates students' responses andactiveness7. Linsenmeyer suggested that
/Lecturer of the McNair Scholars Program at Cornell University. He has also worked as the Associate Director of Advising and Diversity in the College of Architecture, Art, and Planning and Diversity Programs in Engineering (DPE) at Cornell University. He completed his Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction from Virginia Tech.Mandy J Wright, Fields Wright Consulting Mandy Wright has a background in the service and hospitality industry, along with 15 years’ experience teaching high school and college language arts, composition, communication. Of those 15 years, she spent 2012 to 2019 at Virginia Tech, teaching, coordinating, and assessing professional and technical commu- nication instruction within three different
integrated into contexts of all shapes and sizes in K-12, it is clear that engineeringeducators need to critically evaluate the potential impact of classroom technology integration.Engineering education can look vastly different from one school district to another. For example,some schools may have designated engineering classes while others incorporate engineeringconcepts and practices into computer science, technology education, STEM, and/or STEAM(science, technology, engineering, the arts, and mathematics) pathways. Others focus on Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright 2022, American Society for Engineering Education 1integrating engineering practices into
regarding their wellbeing. The findings on the lack of perceived support areorganized by departmental and university-level influences. The students also identify areasfor improvement that have posed barriers to their awareness and utilization of universitysupports and services and to their overall wellbeing. The method of soliciting studentperspectives has implications for institutions wanting to examine their own practices andpolicies in order to better support students’ whole selves.Keywords: wellbeing, student support, undergraduate, student experience, studentperception, thematic analysis1. BackgroundHigher education is dealing with a mental health crisis [1]. According to the 2019 ACHA-National College Health Assessment II (ACHA-NCHA II
Delivered Course”, in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017 [8]. Devanshi Shah, Elisabeth Kames, et. All, “Examining the Differences in Student Motivation for Industry Projects and Non-Industry Projects in Senior Capstone Design”, in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019 [9]. Savage, Nick, et al. “Motivation of Engineering Students in Higher Education.” Engineering Education, Vol. 6, 2011 [10]. Gero, Aharon, and Gershon Abraham. “Engineering Preparatory Programs: Students’ Academic Motivation.” In Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), Queen’s University Library, Nov. 2018. [11]. Malek Mohammadi, A., & Hajrasouliha, A., & Cleary
2022 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID 36140 was determined that Cummins employees, especially the engineers, scientists, and accounting professionals, who have a strong background in STEM fields, are well- equipped to not just instruct students in the activities, but also relate the tasks back to the appropriate Science and Engineering concepts to facilitate concept retention.As a result of implementing these changes, the average number of volunteers per week increasedfrom 3 to 4 per session in the Winter of 2019 to 13 to 14 per session in the Winter of 2020 justbefore the pandemic started. Volunteer engagement as well as concept retention by the studentsalso seemed to have
College of Engineering and Computer Science was awardedby the ASEE Diversity Recognition Program a Bronze Level designation (the highestlevel) in January 2021. 4We will describe these two exemplar initiatives in more details in the following slides 56The United States is facing two major challenges that will potentially impact oureconomic growth, technological advancements, energy capabilities, national/cybersecurity, global competitiveness, and advances in health/neurosciences in the 21stcentury. The first challenge is the growing need to produce an adequate number
2022 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID 36132 Work in Progress- STEM engagement for middle and high school young women- Implementation, Challenges and Lessons learned Rashmi Deodeshmukh* Fay Barber-Dansby Purdue University Purdue University rdeodesh@purdue.eduIntroductionWomen make up about 22% of students pursuing and completing Engineering or Technology degrees inthe STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fields. Analysis of data showed thatonly about 6% of these degrees were awarded to women of color who are about 37% (in the 18-24 yearsold range) of the total