State University studying Industrial and Management Systems Engineer- ing with a focus in Aerospace. She is currently engaged in engineering leadership identity research as well as a proud member of Pi Beta Phi fraternity. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Developing Students’ Engineering Leadership Identity: Development and Results of a Pilot Effort with First Year StudentsAbstractIn an era of scientific and engineering advancement, we need engineers who have a diversifiedskillset. More specifically, in order to solve many of the complex problems faced today, industryis calling for engineers who combine their technical expertise with leadership qualities
biomedical engineering and engineering edu- cation research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests include student mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Pilot Study of the Impacts of a Robotics Curriculum on Student’s Subject- related Identities and Understanding of EngineeringAbstractParticipation in educational robotics, tinkering, and making are common precursors to enrollment inengineering majors. Negative perceptions of robotics can inhibit some students from participating andlater, pursuing engineering studies. Additionally
Community and Self-Efficacy Building of Civil Engineering StudentsIntroductionThe Citadel, a regional, residential military college, is currently engaged in a multi-year NSF S-STEMproject to encourage persistence of academically-talented, low-income civil engineering students. OurExcellence in Civil Engineering Leadership (ExCEL) scholarship program builds on a prior program (ofthe same name) that included 34 scholarship recipients, of which 85% graduated with a STEM degree and65% met the academic requirements to graduate as an ExCEL scholar [1]. The current ExCEL programseeks to retain several community-building and support services that were highly valued by our formerstudents, including: (1) funding to attend the
viewers. Her primary research interest is science identity, STEM education, and participation in online communities.Mr. Matthew Bahnson, North Carolina State University Matthew Bahnson is a doctoral student at North Carolina State University in Applied Social and Com- munity Psychology. His research interests include engineering identity, diversity, bias, stereotypes, and STEM education. He works with Dr. Cheryl Cass at NCSU.Ms. Marissa A Tsugawa, University of Nevada, Reno Marissa Tsugawa is a graduate research assistant studying at the University of Nevada, Reno in the PRiDE Research Group. She is currently working towards a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. She expects to graduate May of 2019. Her research interests
author and co-author of numerous papers and served as project lead on a major study of transfer in engineering. Ms. Schiorring holds a Master’s Degree in Public Policy from Harvard University. She is a graduate of NSF’s I-Corps program for educators.Dr. Paul S Nerenberg Dr. Paul S. Nerenberg is currently an Assistant Professor of Physics and Biology at California State University, Los Angeles. He received his PhD in Physics from MIT and has a strong interest in improving the quality of introductory physics education, particularly for students who enter college with little or no previous physics coursework. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Quantitative and Qualitative
development.Preliminary results indicate that students differentiate between researcher, scientist, and engineeridentities qualitatively and quantitatively, but that these identities are separate from the salientidentity activated when completing student-type tasks. As such, items developed in this work canbe used to craft a framework for understanding graduate student experiences, but futurerefinement may be necessary to fully capture students’ transitions from undergraduate tograduate education. While the results of this study speak to graduate students holistically, furtherwork is needed to understand how the different sub-populations (e.g., underrepresentedminorities, international students) that exist within engineering graduate programs experiencegraduate
has served as PI/Co-PI on multiple educational projects sponsored by NSF programs including NSF S-STEM, NSF GK-12, and NSF TUES.Dr. Jianyu ”Jane” Dong, California State University, Los Angeles Jianyu Dong is a professor in electrical and computer engineering and currently serves as the Associate Dean for the College of Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology at Cal State LA. Her area of expertise is video compression/communication, multimedia networks, QoS, etc. With a strong passion in Engineering Education, she has been engaged in multiple funded projects and initiatives to increase the participation and success of students from undeserved, low-income communities in engineering areas.matthew jackson PhD
Foundationsince 2019. The program offers seminar-type lectures supplemented with activities designed to helpgraduate students develop critical skills for research-based careers. The program is focused on graduateengineering students but is open to graduate students from all programs. Students also choose mentorsfrom within and outside the university with the goal of increasing their sense of belonging to the field andtheir identities as research engineers. As part of this program, a pilot study is in progress, aimed atperforming a full-scale network analysis of student interactions. A web-based survey was administered tocollect information about students in and outside the College of Engineering who participate in the GRIDprogram sessions. The survey was
attitudinal profiles.This mixed methods study investigates the intersectionality of engineering students' personalidentities to understand: How do non-normative groups in engineering form an engineeringidentity and navigate a culture dominated by limited diversity?The focus of this paper is on the first phase this project, in which students' identities, motivation,psychological traits, perceived supports and barriers to engineering, and other backgroundinformation is quantitatively assessed. Pilot survey data were collected from participants enrolledin second semester, first-year engineering programs across three institutions (n = 371). We usedtopological data analysis (TDA) to create normative and non-normative attitudinal profiles ofrespondents. As
, their education, and their profession, and how experiences uniquely affectunderrepresented or marginalized students. Researchers have suggested that culture is especiallyimportant for women to persist in a field [23], [30]. A culture of “Engineering with Engineers”could result in graduates who not only are prepared technically and professionally with apractical, realistic understanding of what it is to be an engineer, but who also identify with andare committed to the engineering profession. Hence, results of the study are hoped to lead to aclearer understanding of the changes that promote engineering identities, particularly in women,and how such identities affect students’ sense of belonging in a program and their persistence inthe major.It
necessarychanges to engineering curriculum to attract a more diverse student and practitioner population. Page 25.321.6Engineering IdentityThe construction of professional or personal identity is dynamic and multiple. In other words,identity reflects membership in many groups and changes over time. Socialization into aprofession may be done via many avenues. However, it is commonly suggested that havingexamples of people like oneself may be a strong contributor. In STEM fields with low femalemembership, this may hinder the entry and retention of females into engineering38–40.STEM study and work is perceived by students as more difficult than many social
seek through our work overall isthe enhancement of both students’ and faculty’s capacities to engage issues of inclusivity, equityand social justice. Towards this end, we aspire to shift School community members’ cognitiveand affective knowledge of power and privilege. While there are quantitative assessment toolsthat measure related constructs (e.g. cultural competencies), we are not aware of any instrumentsthat measure a person’s understanding of social power and oppression, particularly how sociallyconstructed differences and identities like gender, race, and class intersect and combine to affectpeople’s lives in various settings. Our research team is in the early stages of constructing such aninstrument, and will begin piloting it soon to
requirecooperation among experts from many fields. Successful leaders must harness the diversecapabilities of teams composed of these experts and be technically skilled. Undergraduateengineering students can fill this need by learning how to be effective leaders during theirformation as engineers. Unfortunately, many engineering students graduate with littledevelopment of leadership skills; engineering educators do not currently have asufficient understanding of how engineering students develop into leaders.This NSF ECE supported project seeks to improve educators’ understanding of the interactionbetween leadership and engineering identities in the formation of undergraduate engineers. Thiswork postulates that a cohesive engineering leadership identity
Update Proposed Revisions to EAC General Criteria 3 and 5". 2016 EDI, San Francisco,CA, 2016, March. ASEE Conferences, 2016.3. Denecke, D., K. Feaster, and K. Stone. "Professional development: Shaping effectiveprograms for STEM graduate students." Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools(2017).4. Trevelyan, J. The Making of An Expert Engineer. (Taylor and Francis, 2014).5. Ahlqvist, S., London, B. & Rosenthal, L. Unstable Identity Compatibility How GenderRejection Sensitivity Undermines the Success of Women in Science, Technology, Engineering,and Mathematics Fields. Psychological Science 24, 1644-1652 (2013).6. Wieman, C., & Gilbert, S. (2014). The Teaching Practices Inventory: a new tool forcharacterizing college and university
work? 2) Over the course of their early college experiences with mathematics, science, and engineering, how do students’ global affect about mathematics, science, and engineering change? 3) How do students’ local and global affect about mathematics, science, and engineering contribute to/interact with their identities, including engineering identity?While affect has been widely studied using qualitative methods, our parallel use of qualitativeinterviews and piloting of quantitative survey instruments will contribute to the development ofquantitative measures of affect that can be employed by others in STEM education. For thepurposes of this short grant summary, we will be focusing on the second research question
, J. Robinson, J. McLean, K. Jensen, and H. Golecki, “Revolutionizing Robotics: Broadening the Definition of Engineering by Engaging Students in Soft Robotics,” The Science Teacher, vol. 90, no. 5, May 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.nsta.org/science-teacher/science-teacher-mayjune-2023/revolutionizing- robotics[16] H. M. Golecki, T. Tran, E. McNeela, and K. J. Jensen, “Pilot Study of the Impacts of a Robotics Curriculum on Student’s Subject-related Identities and Understanding of Engineering,” in Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education, Baltimore, MD, Jun. 2023.[17] S. E. Coulter, “Using the retrospective pretest to get usable, indirect evidence of student learning,” Assessment &
stream at Queen’s University. Proceedings of the Canadian EngineeringEducation Association. DOI: 10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3943Tonso, K. (2006a) Teams that work: campus culture, engineer identity, and social interactions.Journal of Engineering Education 95(1): 25-37.Tonso, K. (2006b) Student engineers and engineering identity: Campus engineer identities asfigured world. Cultural Studies of Science Education 1(2): 1-35.Valverde, K.L.C and Dariotis, W.M. (2019) Fight the Tower: Asian American Women Scholars’Resistance and Renewal in the Academy. Rutgers University Press. New Brunswick, New Jersey.Wang Y., Zhang, X., Khalkhal, F., Claussen S., and Biviano A. (2023) A quantitative analysis onteamwork behavior, disagreement, and their linkages to Students
Paper ID #38182Board 207: ACCESS in STEM: An S-STEM Project Supporting Economi-callyDisadvantaged STEM-Interested Students in Their First Two YearsErica ClineMenaka AbrahamSarah AlaeiDr. Heather Dillon, University of Washington, Tacoma Dr. Heather Dillon is Professor and Chair of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Washington Tacoma. Her research team is working on energy efficiency, renewable energy, fundamental heat transfer, and engineering education. Before joining academia, she worked for the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) as a senior research engineer working on both energy efficiency and renewable
Formation (PFE: RIEF) program under Award#2024960. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] Patrick, Anita D., and A. N. Prybutok. "Predicting persistence in engineering through anengineering identity scale." International journal of engineering education 34, no. 2a (2018).[2] Marra, Rose M., and Barbara Bogue. "Women engineering students' self efficacy--alongitudinal multi-institution study." Women in Engineering ProActive Network (2006). Surveyavailable at http://aweonline.org/efficacy.html[3] Bilgin, Betul, James W. Pellegrino, and Vikas Berry. "Work-in-Progress: The Design of Up-to-Date
under preparation for a detailed discussionof these results.7 Summary of Findings to Date and Future WorkIn summary, PLP is an open project that adapts to the needs of computer engineering educationand is designed to actively engage students in the learning process. PLP was created to connectcore concepts learned in various computer engineering courses, and is aimed at improving thelearning experience for students. It is grounded in the theories of social constructionism andsituated cognition. Results from the pilot studies show that PLP is highly effective in engagingstudents and in helping them gain valuable skills. One clear advantage we are beginning to see isthat students, instructors, and teaching assistants all found it very convenient
avoidance, and masculinity. A semi-structured interview is beingconducted in order to understand how engineering students define their disciplinary engineeringculture using Hofstede’s dimensions as the guide.An initial interview protocol was developed based on the answers that students provided in thequantitative study, the information collected on the systematic review of the literature, and alsoinformed by theory proposed by Bradbeer [51] and Nulty and Barrett [52]. The initial protocolwas piloted with 2 graduate students. Revisions were made and a pilot study was conducted were5 undergraduate electrical and computer engineering students were interviewed for one hour. Thepreliminary results were analyzed using the qualitative data analysis
servedas a consulting engineer on several freeway projects statewide. She was awarded a Masters in PublicAdministration from Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government as a result of her passion forpublic policy and technical background. Ms. Reyes is the author and contributing writer of more than20 academic publications with an emphasis on the social and cultural pedagogies of minorities in STEMenvironments. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work-focused Experiential Learning to Increase STEM Student Retention and Graduation at Two-year Hispanic-serving InstitutionsAbstractWith support from the National Science Foundation’s Division of Undergraduate Education
concerned with sci- ence, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning and participation among historically marginalized students of color. Her research focuses on the role of racialized experiences and biases in STEM educational and career attainment, problematizing traditional notions of academic achievement and what is mean to be successful yet marginalized, and STEM identity and identity development in high-achieving students of color. She is currently the PI on two studies funded by NSF, the first of which investigates the causes behind why African Americans remain one of the most underrepresented racial groups in engineering faculty positions. The second study is working toward the design of a holistic
in the context of problem solving, and researcher identity.Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She earned her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering from Ohio State and earned her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her research interests focus on the intersection between motivation and identity of undergraduate and graduate students, first-year engineering programs, mixed methods research, and innovative approaches to teaching.Dr. Marian S. Kennedy, Clemson University Marian Kennedy is an Associate Professor within the Department of Materials Science &
University, Justin’s dissertation research focuses on the study of Intersectionality Theory and the intersectionality of socioeconomic inequality in engineering education, use of critical quantitative methodology and narrative inquiry to understand the complex stories of engineering students from traditionally minoritized backgrounds, and the pursuit of a socioeconomically just engineering education.Mr. Matthew Scheidt, Purdue University at West Lafayette Matthew Scheidt is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He graduated from Purdue University with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University with a M.S. in Me- chanical Engineering with a focus in Ultrasonic Additive
department at Seattle University to study how the department culture changes can foster students’ engineering identity with the long-term goal of increasing the representation of women and minority in the field of engineering.Dr. Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington Dr. Jennifer Turns is a full professor in the Human Centered Design & Engineering Department in the College of Engineering at the University of Washington. Engineering education is her primary area of scholarship, and has been throughout her career. In her work, she currently focuses on the role of reflection in engineering student learning and the relationship of research and practice in engineering education. In recent years, she has been the co
identifying and understanding factors that contribute toengineering students' motivation to learn and succeed, and compare these for different studenttypes (by demographics and choice of major). A quantitative study was conducted in which theMotivation and Attitudes in Engineering (MAE) survey was developed using achievement valueas the theoretical framework. Three constructs were identified through factor analysis:Expectancy, Present Perceptions (students' perceptions of their present tasks in engineeringstudies), and Future Perceptions (students' perceptions of their future tasks as engineers). Surveyresponses over the course of the first year in engineering for a single cohort of students (n=959)were collected and tested for internal reliability
of Doctoral Studies, 8(2103), 151-172. http://ijds.org/Volume8/IJDSv8p151-172Lundy- Wagner0381.pdfMayat, N., & Amosun, S. L. (2011). Perceptions of academic staff towards accommodating students with disabilities in a civil engineering undergraduate program in a university in South Africa. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24(1), 53-59.McCall, C., Shew, A., Simmons, D. R., Paretti, M. C., & McNair, L. D. (2020b). Exploring student disability and professional identity: Navigating sociocultural expectations in U.S. undergraduate civil engineering programs. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2020.1720434McLoughlin, L. A. (2005
. In developing the intervention activities, the investigative team consideredbest practices from a large body of literature on improving the retention and graduation rates ofunderrepresented minority students in STEM to address the following research question:Research Question. Does peer-led team learning through recitation labs in engineering coursesincrease students’ mathematics confidence, mathematics efficacy, engineering identity, andpersistence in engineering pathways?The team constructed the activities based on studies that highlighted the need for active andcollaborative learning environments to engage underrepresented minorities, specifically femalestudents, in engineering fields. These activities had high indicators for support to
general and first-generation SVEs in particular. Forexample, because many of these students overcame initial obstacles in higher education, theycould be a potential pool of effective mentors, both to other student veterans and to first-generation students.Women Student VeteransA paper on women student veterans will be presented in the Military and Veterans Division forthe ASEE 2018 Annual Conference.15 A graduate student at Clemson University is leading thiseffort.Preliminary Interview Findings on Women Student VeteransFrom: R. C. Atkinson, C., Mobley, C. E. Brawner, S. M. Lord, J. B. Main, and M. M. Camacho,“I Never Played the “Girl Card”: Experiences and Identity Intersections of Women StudentVeterans in Engineering,” Proceedings of the 2018