that examine the impact of developing systems of care and transforming practices on health care access and utilization, delivery and quality of care, and health outcomes. Third, she assesses the effect of social determinants of health on access to care and pa- tient outcomes. She evaluates the effectiveness of interventions designed to attenuate the effect of social determinants on patient outcomes. She has 15 years of experience leading research teams; designing and implementing research and evaluation; developing protocols for surveys, interviews, and focus groups; collecting and analyzing qualitative data, and programming advanced statistical analyses of quantitative data using Stata. She has served as principal
equitable engineering environments.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research characterizes front-end design practices across the student to practitioner continuum and studies the impact of developed front-end design tools on design success.Dr. Lisa R. Lattuca, University of Michigan Lisa Lattuca, Professor of Higher Education and member of the Core Faculty in the Engineering Education Research Program at the University of Michigan. She studies curriculum, teaching, and learning in college
teachers to apply the concepts and techniques learned in Week 1 by practicing hands-on mini-project applications to solve problems that were assigned by their lab mentors and specifically related to their research projects. Teachers were urged to discuss ideas with their mentors and with the PI and graduate students. Teachers were encouraged to make choices, i.e. to complete a mini-project that was not completely “canned,” but rather refined in collaboration with the mentors and with each other as a team. The mini project was designed to transition teachers to practice what they learned in training in Weeks 1-2 and was not the same problem as their research project. Each team of teachers (from the
promote greater retention of Black engineering students?Project GoalsOur project aims to highlight the policies and practices that contribute to increased persistenceand graduation as well as attrition for Black students in EE, CpE and ME. In the end, we hope tomake actionable recommendations for a variety of stakeholders regarding best practices forensuring retention of Black students in these majors. We employ a mixed-method approach toexplore our research questions.The quantitative dimension of our project employs the power of large population sizes availablein the Multiple-Institution Database for Investigating Engineering Longitudinal Development(MIDFIELD), which includes 10,929 Black students (8072 men and 2857 women) who haveever
perceived appropriateness? 4. What are teachers’ rationales for (a) integrating or (b) not integrating specific digital technologies? Literature ReviewEngineering, Technology, and Science: Natural Integration Opportunities for PositiveOutcomesFor decades, educational researchers have espoused integrated science instruction as a means toincrease student engagement, interest in science, and achievement (e.g., Roth, 2001). As a result,many different commercial curricula (e.g., Engineering is Elementary, Project Lead the Way,Lego Robotics) and open-source software (e.g., WISEngineering) exist to facilitate integratedinstruction. Further, design-based, project-based, and problem-based learning can
and similarly structured large-scale STEM research centers. This projectseeks to take up this challenge with a direct, conscientious effort to address this need and combatcurrent limitations facing ERC evaluation.The project aims to broadly impact practice within the engineer-formation system by providing anew approach to measuring the effectiveness of education and diversity programs within andacross ERCs. The goal of the project is to enhance evaluation for not only individual ERCs, butmake it possible to expand and compare across all ERCs. The suite of evaluation tools includes amodularized quantitative instrument, online instrument disseminate platform, set of qualitativeprotocols, updated NSF ERC Best Practices Manual document, and a
Australasian Association for Engineering Education and 9th Australasian Women in Engineering Forum (p. 358). Australasian Association for Engineering Education, 2003.[15] D. Chachra & D. Kilgore, “Exploring gender and self-confidence in engineering students: A multi-method approach,” Research Brief. Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (NJ1), 2009.[16] C. L. Colbeck, A. F. Cabrera, & P. T. Terenzini, “ Learning professional confidence: Linking teaching practices, students' self-perceptions, and gender,” The Review of Higher Education, 24(2), 173-191, 2001.[17] K. Szelényi & K. K. Inkelas, “The role of living–learning programs in women’s plans to attend graduate school in STEM
, and a MEd degree in Instructional Systems Design Technology from Sam Houston State University. He is currently the General Chemistry Laboratory Coordinator at Sam Houston State University and has an interest in online and hybrid instruction. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Integration of research-based strategies and instructional design: creating significant learning experiences in a chemistry bridge courseIntroductionBridge courses are often designed to provide undergraduate students with learning experiences toremediate pitfalls in understanding or facilitating the practice of essential skills related to specificcontent
ABET accredited engineering program within theirinstitution and are on NSF’s list of top 50 baccalaureate origin institutions who graduate the mostundergraduates who go on to receive a PhD in science or engineering.Research responses from our Phase I survey as well as from the interviews developed for PhaseII will be used to produce evidence-based insights and recommendations towards (1) increasingunderrepresented minority students’ interest in graduate STEM degrees, (2) retaining andgraduating Black students in those programs, and (3) documenting best practices for others touse in supporting student success. Furthermore, our study along with dissemination workshopswill advance current scholarship in two main ways. First, our research will add
Paper ID #33459Framing Engineering as Community Activism for Values-Driven Engineer-ing(RFE Design and Development - Year 2)Dr. Joni M. Lakin, University of Alabama Joni M. Lakin (Ph.D. , The University of Iowa) is Associate Professor of Educational Research at the University of Alabama. Her research interests include educational assessment, educational evaluation methods, and increasing diversity in STEM fields.Dr. Daniela Marghitu, Auburn University Dr. Daniela Marghitu is a faculty member in the Computer Science and Software Engineering Department at Auburn University, where she has worked since 1996. She has published
Paper ID #33005Work-focused Experiential Learning to Increase STEM Student Retentionand Graduation at Two-year Hispanic-serving InstitutionsCynthia Kay Pickering, Arizona State University Cynthia Pickering is a retired electrical engineer with 35 years industry experience and technical lead- ership in software development, artificial intelligence, information technology architecture/engineering, and collaboration systems research. In September 2015, she joined Science Foundation Arizona (SFAz) to lead the Girls in STEM initiative and translate her passion for STEM into opportunities that will attract, inspire and retain
Paper ID #34049Global Impact of Experiment-centric Pedagogy and Home-based, Hands-onLearning Workshop at a Historically Black UniversityDr. Oludare Adegbola Owolabi P.E., Morgan State University Dr. Oludare Owolabi, a professional engineer in Maryland, joined the Morgan State University fac- ulty in 2010. He is the assistant director of the Center for Advanced Transportation and Infrastructure Engineering Research (CATIER) at Morgan State University and the director of the Civil Engineering Undergraduate Laboratory. He has over eighteen years of experience in practicing, teaching and research in civil engineering. His
collaborations, impacting the quality of the studentlearning experience and research activities done virtually and/or in hybrid and multiple platforms.As faculty respond to changes in their educational philosophy based on best practices for studentslearning, questions need to be raised as to what, if any, methodologies will be continued afteruniversities return to on campus learning [1,2,3]. The educational research that was pursued previously focused on documenting andunderstanding the impact of a personal instrumentation-based pedagogy and its enablingtechnology as a treatment to improve student learning and retention [4,5,6,7]. In the present effort,a similar approach is followed. The treatment is now distance delivery and learning and
hypotheses and drove my ability to refine my customer discovery approach.” “Conducting customer interviews before reaching out to any potential investors because: interviews establish whom your potential customers are, where the fields are that your product will perform the best, and what your selling points should be for the product.”Below is the remark from a graduate male student on the program impact on selecting his PhDthesis topic. “Deciding on a topic for thesis for a Ph.D. student is a major task. I will use my experience to reshape my objectives of research and choose the topic and courses accordingly.; The interviews helped me in taking decisions on my Ph.D. topic selection. I will choose my
Paper ID #34072FOUNDATIONS – Integrating Evidence-based Teaching and Learning Prac-ticesinto the Core Engineering Curriculum: Retrospective on the Progress ofTeaching-Track Faculty ParticipantsDr. Gail P. Baxter, Stevens Institute of Technology Gail P. Baxter is the Co-Director, Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education (CIESE) at Stevens Institute of Technology. Baxter leads CIESE research and evaluation efforts and manages a program to support faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices in the core courses in the School of Engineering at Stevens. Before joining CIESE, Baxter was a Senior Survey
research and edu- cation awards including the State University of New York (SUNY) Chancellor’s Award for Excellence in Teaching (2017), the 2019 Ada Byron Award of the Galician Society of Computer Engineers (Spain) for a successful professional career path that inspires women to engineering study and careers, the Best Paper Award in the IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 2007 as coauthor of a paper entitled Particle Filtering, the IEEE Outstanding Young Engineer Award (2009), for development and application of computational methods for sequential signal processing, the IEEE Athanasios Papoulis Award (2011), for innovative educational outreach that has inspired high school students and college level women to study
teaching practices, and the use of technology and innovative pedagogies on student learn- ing and success. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students.Dr. Matthew Charles GrahamMadison E. Andrews, University of Texas at Austin Madison Andrews is a STEM Education doctoral student, Mechanical Engineering master’s student, and graduate research assistant for the Center for Engineering Education at the University of Texas at Austin. She received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Clemson University in 2017.Dr. Jenefer Husman, University of Oregon Jenefer Husman received a doctoral degree
implemented before the field trip and one is implemented after the field tripprogram. The lesson plans for school teachers to complete before and after the field trip include“educative” materials [4] to help teachers develop their capacity to introduce engineering in theirclassrooms. All activities are aligned with the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS).The primary Research Practice Partnership (RPP) [5] is between MOXI, The Wolf Museum ofExploration + Innovation (MOXI), and researchers at University of California, Santa Barbara(UCSB). See [6] for an overview of the multiple interacting programs and related research thispartnership has produced. Our work follows a design-based implementation research model [7-9], which is “a systematic but
EngineersIntroductionThis paper describes progress to date on a five-year National Science Foundation S-STEMproject entitled "Creating Retention and Engagement for Academically Talented Engineers(CREATE)" being conducted at the University of Nevada, Reno, a large western land-grantuniversity. The objectives of CREATE are: (1) To implement a scholarship program built onevidence-based curricular and co-curricular best practices that supports low-income,academically talented students with demonstrated financial need through successful programcompletion; (2) To conduct a mixed-methods research study of the effect of the implementedevidence-based practices on the self-efficacy and engineering identity of the cohorts to contributeto the existing knowledge base on
, where she is currently a Professor. Her research interests include electrical machinery design, modeling and analysis of electric drives, and control of electric drives.Dr. Varun K. Kasaraneni, Gannon University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Effect of evolving design requirements on students’ motivationAbstractIn 2008, Gannon University was awarded a National Science Foundation S-STEM grant (AwardNo. 0806735), known as Scholars of Excellence in Engineering and Computer Science (SEECS)which provided scholarship funding for academically talented students having financial need.Since then, the grant has been funded twice more in 2011 (Award No
Professor in 2013 and Full Professor in 2019 . Dr. Chrysochoou’s general research area is environmental geochemistry, with a focus on site remediation, characterization and reuse of industrial waste and construction materials. Dr. Chrysochoou’s serves as the Principal Investigator of the project ”Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation”. Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Revolutionizing Engineering Department program, this 5-year project aims at transforming educational practices and cultivate the potential of neurodivergent individuals to contribute to engineering breakthroughsDr. Arash E. Zaghi, University of Connecticut Arash E. Zaghi is an Associate Professor in the
and practice in undergraduate and graduate students; and d) scholarship and researchabout STEM Education.Since its inception, SUNY LSAMP has collaborated with many institutions, with Stony BrookUniversity as the university center. SUNY LSAMP has been very successful in its mission.Together the Alliance has researched and attempted to alleviate and mitigate ongoing problemsfor underrepresented students in STEM. The Alliance has offered innovative programs anddeveloped powerful ideas to assist in the progress of its students. Faculty and staff have becomeadvocates for best practices at local and state levels.The SUNY LSAMP Research Grant reported that the Alliance was effective through many facetsof the project including continuity and the
network modeling and analysis, as well as related experi- mentations. The system identification based framework for metabolic network analysis has been proving to be a highly effective tool to extract biological knowledge from complex, genome-scale metabolic net- work models, and has been successfully applied to understanding several industrial relevant microbes. She was the 2008 recipient of the Ralph E. Powe Junior Faculty Enhancement Awards from Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU). Her graduate student also won the inaugural AIChE CAST Director’s Presentation Award in 2011. Her research is funded by various US federal and state funding agencies including NSF, USDA, Department of Education and DOT as well as
of research andeducational collaborations not just within IEC but also between its MSI members and PWIresearch-intensive institutions. This is especially true since its member institutions serve a uniquepopulation of minority students. The IEC is developing the infrastructure and programs tofacilitate collaborations between faculty, students and staff in its member departments, based onlessons learned from the previous educational program and, more generally, on the Science ofTeam Science. It is also addressing how best to build a different type of team structure withPWIs, industry, and other external constituencies. For each type of partner, a process is beingdefined and tools are being addressed. The Inclusive Engineering Consortium (IEC
and reflec- tive practice in higher education; and redesigning how learning is recorded and recognized in traditional transcripts and academic credentials.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of
underserved by the education and social sectors. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 The Endeavour S-STEM Program: A Multi-College Collaboration to Increase Engagement & Retention in STEMIntroductionThe United States has long held its position as the global leader in technological innovation andeducation. But that standing has been in jeopardy due to the shortage of domestic studentsgraduating in STEM. This concern has led researchers to investigate why graduation numbers areso low and also to propose ways in which STEM retention and hence graduation can beincreased. The data show that there are
and academia, later receiving her Ph.D. in Civil Engineering and Sustainable Water Resources. Her work highlights a commitment to undergraduate engineering education and its improvement through best teaching practices. Her research efforts target ways to support and encourage diversity among students and how to create an inclusive learning environment.Dr. Carol Haden, Magnolia Consulting, LLC Dr. Carol Haden is Vice President of Magnolia Consulting, LLC, a woman-owned, small business special- izing in independent research and evaluation. She has served as evaluator for STEM education projects sponsored by the National Science Foundation, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the William and Flora
Paper ID #32819Leveraging Changes in Engineering and Computer Science Curricula toEngender Inclusive Professional Identities in StudentsMr. Blaine Austin Pedersen, Texas A&M University Blaine is currently a graduate student earning his Ph.D. in Educational Psychology with an emphasis in Research, Measurement, and Statistics at Texas A&M. His research is primarily focused on issues of equity in STEM education.Dr. Robin A.M. Hensel, West Virginia University Robin A. M. Hensel, Ed.D., is the Assistant Dean for Freshman Experience in the Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources at West
time to graduation and arerequired to begin in remedial mathematics. The target population struggles to integrate appliedmathematical concepts within their introductory engineering classes. As a result, the attritionrates are higher after students take statics and dynamics courses. These students with poormathematical preparation were identified as at-risk for leaving engineering and STEM pathwaysentirely once they faced difficulties in their early coursework due to applied mathematics. Thispaper highlights the best practices in implementing peer-led team learning strategies as part ofengineering recitation courses to achieve student persistence and retention.As part of the activities for the NSF Improving Undergraduate STEM Education grant
she conducted research in transportation and sustainability as part of the Infrastructure Research Group (IRG). In addition to the Ph.D. in Civil Engineering, Dr. Barrella holds a Master of City and Regional Planning (Transportation) from Georgia Institute of Technology and a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Bucknell University. Dr. Barrella has investigated best practices in engineering education since 2003 (at Bucknell University) and began collaborating on sustainable engineering design research while at Georgia Tech. Prior to joining the WFU faculty, she led the junior capstone design sequence at James Madison University, was the inaugural director of the NAE Grand Challenges Program at JMU, and developed first